publicdata/j40-cejst-2
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/DOI-DO/j40-cejst-2.git synced 2025-02-23 10:04:18 -08:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
j40-cejst-2/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/decision-record.md
Nat Hillard da76d6b180 Update issue templates 
Updating reviewer list
2021-05-24 10:51:28 -04:00

2 KiB
Raw Blame History

name about title labels assignees
Architectural Decision Record Propose an architectural decision ADR: [decision here] esfoobar-usds, NatHillardUSDS, switzersc-usds, TomNUSDS

[short title of solved problem and solution]

Context and Problem Statement

[Describe the context and problem statement, e.g., in free form using two to three sentences. You may want to articulate the problem in form of a question.]

Decision Drivers

  • [driver 1, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
  • [driver 2, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
  • …

Considered Options

  • [option 1]
  • [option 2]
  • [option 3]
  • …

Decision Outcome

Chosen option: "[option 1]", because [justification. e.g., only option, which meets k.o. criterion decision driver | which resolves force force | … | comes out best (see below)].

Positive Consequences

  • [e.g., improvement of quality attribute satisfaction, follow-up decisions required, …]
  • …

Negative Consequences

  • [e.g., compromising quality attribute, follow-up decisions required, …]
  • …

Pros and Cons of the Options

[option 1]

[example | description | pointer to more information | …]

  • Good, because [argument a]
  • Good, because [argument b]
  • Bad, because [argument c]
  • …

[option 2]

[example | description | pointer to more information | …]

  • Good, because [argument a]
  • Good, because [argument b]
  • Bad, because [argument c]
  • …

[option 3]

[example | description | pointer to more information | …]

  • Good, because [argument a]
  • Good, because [argument b]
  • Bad, because [argument c]
  • …

Links

  • [Link type](link to adr)
  • …