ssa-gov/www.ssa.gov/legislation/testimony_072414a.html

263 lines
No EOL
30 KiB
HTML

<!doctype html>
<html class="no-js" lang="en">
<head>
<!-- REQUIRED META INFORMATION -->
<meta charset="UTF-8" />
<meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=Edge,chrome=1" />
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width" />
<!-- DOCUMENT TITLE -->
<title>Stephen C. Goss, Chief Actuary, Social Security Administration</title>
<!-- OCOMM META INFORMATION -->
<meta name="dc.creator" content="OLCA" />
<meta name="lead_content_manager" content="Sallie Whitney" />
<meta name="coder" content="Gary Davis" />
<!-- OCOMM STYLES & SCRIPTS -->
<link href="/framework/css/phoenix.css" rel="stylesheet" media="all" />
<!-- SSA INTERNET HEAD SCRIPTS -->
<script src="/framework/js/ssa.internet.head.js"></script>
<!-- LEGISLATION STYLES -->
<link href="css/legislation.css" rel="stylesheet" media="all" />
<script>(window.BOOMR_mq=window.BOOMR_mq||[]).push(["addVar",{"rua.upush":"false","rua.cpush":"false","rua.upre":"false","rua.cpre":"false","rua.uprl":"false","rua.cprl":"false","rua.cprf":"false","rua.trans":"","rua.cook":"false","rua.ims":"false","rua.ufprl":"false","rua.cfprl":"false","rua.isuxp":"false","rua.texp":"norulematch","rua.ceh":"false","rua.ueh":"false","rua.ieh.st":"0"}]);</script>
<script>!function(e){var n="https://s.go-mpulse.net/boomerang/";if("False"=="True")e.BOOMR_config=e.BOOMR_config||{},e.BOOMR_config.PageParams=e.BOOMR_config.PageParams||{},e.BOOMR_config.PageParams.pci=!0,n="https://s2.go-mpulse.net/boomerang/";if(window.BOOMR_API_key="LERZW-HECFS-R8H4E-23UQ7-ERMQB",function(){function e(){if(!o){var e=document.createElement("script");e.id="boomr-scr-as",e.src=window.BOOMR.url,e.async=!0,i.parentNode.appendChild(e),o=!0}}function t(e){o=!0;var n,t,a,r,d=document,O=window;if(window.BOOMR.snippetMethod=e?"if":"i",t=function(e,n){var t=d.createElement("script");t.id=n||"boomr-if-as",t.src=window.BOOMR.url,BOOMR_lstart=(new Date).getTime(),e=e||d.body,e.appendChild(t)},!window.addEventListener&&window.attachEvent&&navigator.userAgent.match(/MSIE [67]\./))return window.BOOMR.snippetMethod="s",void t(i.parentNode,"boomr-async");a=document.createElement("IFRAME"),a.src="about:blank",a.title="",a.role="presentation",a.loading="eager",r=(a.frameElement||a).style,r.width=0,r.height=0,r.border=0,r.display="none",i.parentNode.appendChild(a);try{O=a.contentWindow,d=O.document.open()}catch(_){n=document.domain,a.src="javascript:var d=document.open();d.domain='"+n+"';void(0);",O=a.contentWindow,d=O.document.open()}if(n)d._boomrl=function(){this.domain=n,t()},d.write("<bo"+"dy onload='document._boomrl();'>");else if(O._boomrl=function(){t()},O.addEventListener)O.addEventListener("load",O._boomrl,!1);else if(O.attachEvent)O.attachEvent("onload",O._boomrl);d.close()}function a(e){window.BOOMR_onload=e&&e.timeStamp||(new Date).getTime()}if(!window.BOOMR||!window.BOOMR.version&&!window.BOOMR.snippetExecuted){window.BOOMR=window.BOOMR||{},window.BOOMR.snippetStart=(new Date).getTime(),window.BOOMR.snippetExecuted=!0,window.BOOMR.snippetVersion=12,window.BOOMR.url=n+"LERZW-HECFS-R8H4E-23UQ7-ERMQB";var i=document.currentScript||document.getElementsByTagName("script")[0],o=!1,r=document.createElement("link");if(r.relList&&"function"==typeof r.relList.supports&&r.relList.supports("preload")&&"as"in r)window.BOOMR.snippetMethod="p",r.href=window.BOOMR.url,r.rel="preload",r.as="script",r.addEventListener("load",e),r.addEventListener("error",function(){t(!0)}),setTimeout(function(){if(!o)t(!0)},3e3),BOOMR_lstart=(new Date).getTime(),i.parentNode.appendChild(r);else t(!1);if(window.addEventListener)window.addEventListener("load",a,!1);else if(window.attachEvent)window.attachEvent("onload",a)}}(),"".length>0)if(e&&"performance"in e&&e.performance&&"function"==typeof e.performance.setResourceTimingBufferSize)e.performance.setResourceTimingBufferSize();!function(){if(BOOMR=e.BOOMR||{},BOOMR.plugins=BOOMR.plugins||{},!BOOMR.plugins.AK){var n=""=="true"?1:0,t="",a="vht6pfix22vgcz6wgasq-f-01d262e5f-clientnsv4-s.akamaihd.net",i="false"=="true"?2:1,o={"ak.v":"39","ak.cp":"1204614","ak.ai":parseInt("728289",10),"ak.ol":"0","ak.cr":3,"ak.ipv":4,"ak.proto":"http/1.1","ak.rid":"f14fb","ak.r":35636,"ak.a2":n,"ak.m":"dsca","ak.n":"essl","ak.bpcip":"169.231.231.0","ak.cport":47872,"ak.gh":"23.214.170.93","ak.quicv":"","ak.tlsv":"tls1.3","ak.0rtt":"","ak.0rtt.ed":"","ak.csrc":"-","ak.acc":"bbr","ak.t":"1742090277","ak.ak":"hOBiQwZUYzCg5VSAfCLimQ==xvvw8YWptvcAESk+CFr4NZ2B7ytdCO2Ptv/8Xemc5hlpfV0iDVU9erF8zgH37HOGzjB/fsEiSruiaavByCbfdo6nGJx/BouBPY7awX3080zublvWtk6agy27NrR20dpsl0os5+tH9+3uEwrD3fwJo0oJD/a8pd4qiLXSEQPwTeAyblvFEh8Ly9xt2swzTk2XzkGRDRburvdlPvm5fSO+dlZ2kTGP3shUl1v9VXqJSZ59Wt+rpPYNETkvPkZrW7Od5YctoHi/0PXcddwma5lLMoWGKZQQuD5Ph9AxWqdm8F2+4dnmtSokQU2VHgeGyHFqGMVmcjbhGEbtFd53E9hEfTvllI4CTemKN+27RLz447t6LzZpNQXqy1zFzgDTWUtEwK5bkKSCVFtIedsk0jUL9dh7z9Uq8hr0Bf0lFxRkk0I=","ak.pv":"98","ak.dpoabenc":"","ak.tf":i};if(""!==t)o["ak.ruds"]=t;var r={i:!1,av:function(n){var t="http.initiator";if(n&&(!n[t]||"spa_hard"===n[t]))o["ak.feo"]=void 0!==e.aFeoApplied?1:0,BOOMR.addVar(o)},rv:function(){var e=["ak.bpcip","ak.cport","ak.cr","ak.csrc","ak.gh","ak.ipv","ak.m","ak.n","ak.ol","ak.proto","ak.quicv","ak.tlsv","ak.0rtt","ak.0rtt.ed","ak.r","ak.acc","ak.t","ak.tf"];BOOMR.removeVar(e)}};BOOMR.plugins.AK={akVars:o,akDNSPreFetchDomain:a,init:function(){if(!r.i){var e=BOOMR.subscribe;e("before_beacon",r.av,null,null),e("onbeacon",r.rv,null,null),r.i=!0}return this},is_complete:function(){return!0}}}}()}(window);</script></head>
<body>
<!-- PAGE CONTAINER -->
<div id="page">
<!-- PAGE HEADER -->
<div class="bg-dark-gray accessibility" id="accessibility"><a id="skip-navigation" href="#content">Skip to main content</a></div><ssa-header class="print-hide"><noscript><header class="banner-neo" id="banner" role="banner" style="background-color: #0b4778;"><div class="banner-wrapper"><h1 class="banner-logo"><a class="banner-logo__link" href="/">Social Security</a></h1><nav class="banner-nav" id="banner-nav"><a class="banner-nav__link banner-search" href="https://search.ssa.gov/search?affiliate=ssa" title="Search" target="_blank"><svg class="banner-nav__icon" focusable="false" width="24" height="24" viewbox="0 0 24 24"><path d="M 10 23 C 11.219 23 12.384 22.762 13.496 22.285 C 14.608 21.808 15.565 21.169 16.367 20.367 C 17.169 19.565 17.808 18.608 18.285 17.496 C 18.762 16.384 19 15.219 19 14 C 19 12.953 18.829 11.951 18.488 10.992 C 18.147 10.033 17.661 9.164 17.031 8.383 L 22.711 2.711 C 22.904 2.518 23 2.281 23 2 C 23 1.713 22.905 1.475 22.715 1.285 C 22.525 1.095 22.287 1 22 1 C 21.719 1 21.482 1.096 21.289 1.289 L 15.617 6.969 C 14.836 6.339 13.966 5.853 13.008 5.512 C 12.05 5.171 11.047 5 10 5 C 8.781 5 7.616 5.238 6.504 5.715 C 5.392 6.192 4.435 6.831 3.633 7.633 C 2.831 8.435 2.192 9.392 1.715 10.504 C 1.238 11.616 1 12.781 1 14 C 1 15.219 1.238 16.384 1.715 17.496 C 2.192 18.608 2.831 19.565 3.633 20.367 C 4.435 21.169 5.392 21.808 6.504 22.285 C 7.616 22.762 8.781 23 10 23 Z M 10 21 C 9.052 21 8.146 20.815 7.281 20.445 C 6.416 20.075 5.672 19.578 5.047 18.953 C 4.422 18.328 3.925 17.584 3.555 16.719 C 3.185 15.854 3 14.948 3 14 C 3 13.052 3.185 12.146 3.555 11.281 C 3.925 10.416 4.422 9.672 5.047 9.047 C 5.672 8.422 6.416 7.925 7.281 7.555 C 8.146 7.185 9.052 7 10 7 C 10.948 7 11.854 7.185 12.719 7.555 C 13.584 7.925 14.328 8.422 14.953 9.047 C 15.578 9.672 16.075 10.416 16.445 11.281 C 16.815 12.146 17 13.052 17 14 C 17 14.948 16.815 15.854 16.445 16.719 C 16.075 17.584 15.578 18.328 14.953 18.953 C 14.328 19.578 13.584 20.075 12.719 20.445 C 11.854 20.815 10.948 21 10 21 Z" transform="matrix(-1, 0, 0, -1, 24.000001, 24.000001)" vector-effect="non-scaling-stroke"></path></svg> <span>Search</span> </a><a class="banner-nav__link banner-menu" href="/menu" id="ssa-menu" title="Menu"><svg class="banner-nav__icon" focusable="false" width="24" height="24" viewbox="0 0 24 24"><path d="M3 5h18q.414 0 .707.293T22 6t-.293.707T21 7H3q-.414 0-.707-.293T2 6t.293-.707T3 5zm0 12h18q.414 0 .707.293T22 18t-.293.707T21 19H3q-.414 0-.707-.293T2 18t.293-.707T3 17zm0-6h18q.414 0 .707.293T22 12t-.293.707T21 13H3q-.414 0-.707-.293T2 12t.293-.707T3 11z" vector-effect="non-scaling-stroke"></path></svg> <span>Menu</span> </a><a class="banner-nav__link banner-languages" href="/es" id="ssa-languages" title="Español" hreflang="es"><svg class="banner-nav__icon" focusable="false" width="24" height="24" viewbox="0 0 24 24"><path d="M12 0C5.373 0 0 5.373 0 12s5.373 12 12 12c.812 0 1.604-.08 2.37-.235-.31-.147-.343-1.255-.037-1.887.34-.703 1.406-2.485.35-3.08-1.053-.6-.76-.868-1.405-1.56-.644-.692-.38-.796-.422-.974-.14-.61.62-1.523.656-1.616.035-.094.035-.446.023-.55-.012-.107-.48-.387-.597-.4-.117-.01-.176.188-.34.2-.164.012-.88-.433-1.03-.55-.154-.117-.224-.398-.435-.61-.21-.212-.235-.047-.562-.175-.327-.13-1.382-.516-2.19-.844-.81-.33-.88-.79-.892-1.114-.012-.325-.492-.797-.718-1.137-.225-.342-.267-.81-.348-.705-.082.106.422 1.336.34 1.37-.083.037-.26-.338-.493-.643-.235-.304.245-.14-.505-1.617-.75-1.476.235-2.23.282-3 .048-.77.633.28.328-.21-.304-.493.023-1.524-.21-1.9-.235-.374-1.57.423-1.57.423.034-.363 1.17-.985 1.99-1.56.82-.573 1.322-.128 1.982.083.66.21.703.142.48-.07-.222-.21.094-.316.61-.235.516.082.656.704 1.442.645.784-.06.08.152.186.35.105.2-.117.177-.633.53-.516.35.012.35.926 1.02.913.667.632-.447.538-.94-.094-.49.668-.105.668-.105.563.375.46.02.87.15.408.13 1.52 1.07 1.52 1.07-1.395.762-.516.844-.282 1.02.235.175-.48.515-.48.515-.294-.293-.34.012-.528.117-.187.105-.012.375-.012.375-.97.153-.75 1.173-.738 1.418.012.247-.62.622-.786.973-.164.35.423 1.113.117 1.16-.305.048-.61-1.148-2.25-.703-.495.134-1.593.703-1.008 1.863.585 1.16 1.558-.328 1.886-.164.33.163-.093.902-.023.913.07.012.927.033.974 1.032.048 1 1.3.914 1.57.938.27.023 1.173-.74 1.3-.774.13-.035.646-.47 1.77.175 1.126.644 1.7.55 2.086.82.387.27.117.81.48.985.365.176 1.818-.058 2.18.54.364.597-1.5 3.597-2.085 3.925-.586.328-.856 1.078-1.442 1.558-.69.563-1.418 1.076-2.18 1.535-.684.407-.807 1.137-1.112 1.367C19.984 22.52 24 17.73 24 12c0-6.627-5.373-12-12-12zm2.813 11.262c-.165.047-.504.352-1.336-.14-.832-.494-1.406-.4-1.477-.48 0 0-.07-.2.293-.236.747-.072 1.688.692 1.9.704.21.012.315-.21.69-.09.375.12.094.195-.07.242zM10.887 1.196c-.082-.06.068-.128.157-.246.05-.07.013-.182.078-.246.175-.177 1.043-.423.874.058-.17.48-.98.527-1.11.434zm2.098 1.523c-.293-.013-.983-.086-.856-.212.494-.492-.188-.633-.61-.668-.423-.036-.598-.27-.388-.294.21-.024 1.055.013 1.196.13.14.117.902.422.95.644.047.223 0 .41-.293.4zm2.542-.083c-.234.188-1.413-.673-1.64-.867-.985-.844-1.513-.563-1.72-.703-.206-.142-.132-.33.184-.61.318-.282 1.21.094 1.724.152.516.058 1.113.457 1.125.93.01.474.562.91.327 1.097z" vector-effect="non-scaling-stroke"></path></svg> <span>Español</span> </a><a class="banner-nav__link banner-signin" href="https://secure.ssa.gov/RIL/SiView.action" id="ssa-signin" title="Sign in" target="_blank"><svg class="banner-nav__icon" focusable="false" width="24" height="24" viewbox="0 0 24 24"><path d="M12 17.016q-.797 0-1.406-.61t-.61-1.405.61-1.405 1.406-.61 1.406.61.61 1.406-.61 1.407-1.406.61zm6 3V9.986H6v10.03h12zm-6-17.11q-1.266 0-2.18.914T8.906 6H9v2.016h6.094V6q0-1.266-.914-2.18T12 2.906zm6 5.11q.797 0 1.406.586t.61 1.383v10.03q0 .798-.61 1.384T18 21.984H6q-.797 0-1.406-.586t-.61-1.384V9.986q0-.798.61-1.384T6 8.016h.984V6q0-2.063 1.477-3.54T12 .985t3.54 1.477T17.015 6v2.016H18z" vector-effect="non-scaling-stroke"></path></svg> <span>Sign in</span></a></nav></div></header></noscript></ssa-header><script src="https://www.ssa.gov/legacy/components/dist/ssa-header.js"></script>
<!-- PAGE NAVIGATION -->
<a class="btn-top-menu show-phone" id="btn-top-menu" href="#nav-top-menu">OLCA MENU</a>
<nav class="nav-top-menu hide-print" id="nav-top-menu" role="navigation">
<ul>
<li><a href="/legislation/index.html">OLCA Home</a></li>
<li><a href="/legislation/118th.html">118th Congress</a></li>
<li><a href="/legislation/priorcongress.html">Prior Sessions of Congress</a></li>
<li><a href="/legislation/resources.html">Program Resources</a></li>
<li><a href="/legislation/other.html">Other Materials for Congress</a></li>
</ul>
</nav>
<!-- PAGE TITLE -->
<div id="title-bar">
<h2>Social Security Testimony Before Congress</h2></div>
<!-- PAGE CONTENT -->
<div id="content" role="main">
<!-- GRID SYSTEM -->
<div class="grid">
<div class="row-12">
<!-- NEWS - PAGE 1 -->
<div class="column-12 topic">
<div align="center">
<p><strong>Testimony of Stephen C. Goss, Chief Actuary, </strong><strong><br>
Social Security Administration<br>
“The Foreseen Trend in the Cost of Disability Insurance Benefits”<br>
Before The Senate Finance Committee<br>
</strong></p>
<p><strong>July 24, 2014</strong></p>
</div>
<p>Chairman Wyden, Ranking Member Hatch, and members of the committee, thank you very
much for the invitation to speak to you today on this very important subject. We are all focused
on the actuarial status of the Social Security Disability Insurance program, because the reserves
are projected to become depleted late in 2016. Without legislative action, benefits scheduled in
the law will not be payable in full on a timely basis once these reserves are depleted. Therefore,
I will present to you today the reasons, which we have long anticipated and understood, for the
recent rise in DI cost and the shortfall we face. </p>
<p><strong><u>Background</u></strong></p>
<p> Many analysts have raised questions about the “sustainability” of the recent period of rapid
growth in the numbers of DI beneficiaries and the cost of their benefits. I am glad to report that
this period of rapid growth: (1) was foreseen, (2) can be explained, and (3) is now at its predicted
end.</p>
<p> The figure below shows that the cost of DI benefits declined from just under 0.6 percent of GDP
in 1980 to just over 0.4 percent of GDP in 1990, and then increased to nearly 0.9 percent of GDP
by 2010. These changes are almost entirely explained by changes in the population and the
economy.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="testimony_072414a.jpg" width="715" height="445" alt="DI Cost and Income as Percent of GDP 1975-2090 Chart"></p>
<p>Between 1970 and 1990, there was a dramatic change in the age distribution of the working-age
population, as the baby boomers (born 1946-1965) entered young adulthood. This caused
employment and GDP to rise much more than DI cost, as the baby boomers were still under age
45 by 1990. However, from 1990 to 2010 the baby boomers moved from young adults under age
45 to older working ages 45-64. Because they were replaced at younger adult ages by low-birthrate
generations born after 1965, the share of working-age adults who were in disability-prone
ages (45-64) grew rapidly from 1990 to 2010. The great recession of 2008 resulted in lower
GDP, making DI cost relative to GDP rise even more by 2010. After our economy fully recovers,
we project DI cost will stabilize at just under 0.8 percent of GDP.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="testimony_072414aa.jpg" width="689" height="415" alt="Age Distribution of the Population Age 25+, 1940 to 2100 (2012TR) Chart"></p>
<p>Over the next 20 years, through about 2035, the share of the working age population that is aged
45-64 (disability-prone ages) will shrink rapidly, putting a halt to the rise in DI cost. This
population shift has also been foreseen for decades. </p>
<p>The rise in DI cost as percent of GDP between 1990 and 2010, due to the aging of the baby
boomers and the lower birth rates following them, is a prelude to the increase in retirement cost
our society faces over the next 20 years. The drop in birth rates after 1965 makes the rising
retirement cost as a percent of GDP just as predictable as the rise in disability cost. What is most
important to note about these changes in the population is that they are permanent shifts in the
age distribution that are now complete for DI and will be complete in 20 years for OASI.</p>
<p> In the 1995 Trustees Report, we projected that the cost of DI benefits would rise from 0.6
percent of GDP in 1995 to 0.9 percent by 2025. Since 1995, historical GDP has been revised
upward (by 5 percent for 1994 for example). Adjusting for this change in estimated GDP since
1995 through the levels estimated for 2013, we see the 1995 Trustees Report projected DI cost
represents 0.85 percent of GDP by 2025. Except for the effects of the unanticipated recession that started in 2008 (with full recovery expected by about 2020), actual DI cost as a percent of GDP has been and is now projected to be lower than expected in 1995.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="testimony_072414ab.jpg" width="651" height="415" alt="Actual and Projected Cost of DI as Percent of GDP Chart"></p>
<p>The implications of past economic cycles and various changes in the law on DI cost can be seen
by their effects on disabled worker “incidence rates,” which are the percent of insured workers
who become newly disabled in a year. The figure below compares the incidence rate (adjusted
for changes in the age distribution of the population) to the civilian unemployment rate.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p align="center"><img src="testimony_072414ac.jpg" width="610" height="415" alt="Economic cycles and policy changes fluctuate Chart"></p>
<p>During recessions, applications for DI benefits rise, but the percent of applications that are
approved for benefits generally declines because the standard for qualifying for DI benefits is
based on the ability to do work that exists in the economy, whether or not job openings are
plentiful at the time. The figure below shows how initial allowance rates by the state Disability
Determination Services (DDS), and total allowance rates, including those allowed at appeal,
respond to increases and decreases in disability applications (claims) as unemployment rises and
falls. Allowance rates change counter to the civilian unemployment rate with about a 2-year lag,
as many applicants do not apply immediately following job loss while they are seeking
employment or receiving unemployment compensation.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="testimony_072414ad.jpg" width="730" height="495" alt="Ultimate Allowance Rate for Disabled-Worker DDS Claims Chart"></p>
<p>The effect of the recent recession is particularly noteworthy because it illustrates that the change
in DI cost as percent of GDP in an economic downturn is affected far more by a drop in GDP
than by a rise in DI cost. Compared to our projections in the 2008 Trustees Report where no
recession was anticipated, DI cost turned out to be less than 3 percent above the level expected,
but GDP turned out to be more than 10 percent lower than expected.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="testimony_072414ae.jpg" width="692" height="425" alt="Change in DI Benefit Cost and in GDP Chart"></p>
<p>The difference between the unanticipated reduction in employment and the increase in DI
beneficiaries is even more dramatic. For 2010, the number of workers with earnings in covered
employment was more than 10 million lower than projected in the 2008 Trustees Report. On the
other hand, the increase in the number of disabled worker beneficiaries was only about 0.3
million more than projected.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="testimony_072414af.jpg" width="707" height="435" alt="Changes in Disabled Worker Beneficiaries Chart"></p>
<p>Over longer periods, however, the unanticipated effects of specific economic cycles tend to
offset one another. In 1995, the Trustees projected that the DI Trust Fund reserves would deplete
in 2016. The figure below shows that this projection was quite accurate, even though the
Trustees anticipated neither the period of extraordinary and unsustainable economic growth and
the positive trust fund buildup experienced between 1995 and 2005, nor the recession of 2008,
which essentially offset the positive effects between 1995 and 2005.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="testimony_072414ag.jpg" width="717" height="437" alt="DI Trust Fund Ratio in 1995, 2008, 2013 Trustees Reports Chart"></p>
<p><strong><u>Why Did the Number of Disabled Worker Beneficiaries Increase from 1980 to 2010?</u></strong></p>
<p> The change in DI cost is closely related to changes in the numbers of disabled worker
beneficiaries. This makes sense because average benefit levels are designed to roughly keep
pace with the average wage level, but have actually fallen short of that. Between 1980 and 2010,
the total annual DI benefit cost per disabled worker rose from $5,445 to $15,139, an increase of
roughly 3.5 percent per year on average. During the same period, the national average wage
index (AWI) grew substantially faster at an average rate of 4.1 percent per year. </p>
<p>Between 1980 and 2010, the number of disabled worker beneficiaries nearly tripled from 2.9
million to 8.2 million worker beneficiaries. This 187 percent increase is explainable largely by
the overall growth in the working age population (disabled worker benefits are payable only until
the normal retirement age, now 66), the change in the age distribution of this population, changes
in employment, insured status and disability incidence rates for women, and the recent severe
recession.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="testimony_072414ah.jpg" width="716" height="465" alt="DI Disabled Worker Beneficiaries : from 2010 to 1980 Chart"></p>
<p>The increase in the percent of working age women who have worked consistently enough to be
disability insured is remarkable, nearly doubling since 1970.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="testimony_072414ai.jpg" width="720" height="454" alt="Percent of Population that is Insured for Disability Chart"></p>
<p>In addition, disability incidence rates increased for women, as their likelihood of being insured
increased. Incidence rates are now close to the level experienced for men.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="testimony_072414aj.jpg" width="664" height="350" alt="New Disabled Workers per 1,000 Exposed (Incidence) Chart"></p>
<p>Considerable attention has been focused on disability adjudication standards. Many have raised
questions about the distribution of newly entitled disabled workers by impairment diagnosis.
This is a particularly important question for women who have experienced such large increases
in the likelihood of being insured and the likelihood of becoming disabled. We have looked at
the historical trend in this distribution by age group.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="testimony_072414ak.jpg" width="679" height="409" alt="Distribution of Female New Disabled Worker Entitlements at Ages 30-39 by Impairment Chart"></p>
<p>For younger women, the distribution has stayed remarkably consistent over the past three
decades. The distribution is similar for men.</p>
<p>For older women and men becoming newly entitled for disabled worker benefits, the distribution
has also remained consistent over time with two exceptions. We show the trend for males below
because the effects of the exceptions are more apparent than for women. The share of new
beneficiaries with musculoskeletal impairments has increased substantially, while the share with
circulatory impairments has declined. However, the combined share for these two diagnosis
groups has remained about the same.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="testimony_072414al.jpg" width="679" height="409" alt="Distribution of Male New Disabled Worker Entitlements at Ages 50-59 by Impairment Chart"></p>
<p><strong><u>Disabled Worker Beneficiary Prevalence Rates</u></strong></p>
<p> There are many ways of looking at the growth in the number of disabled worker beneficiaries.
Care should be exercised in selecting which years and which concepts are most helpful in
explaining change over time. In addition to changes in numbers of beneficiaries, we can look at
changes in “prevalence rates.” Prevalence rates tell us the percent of the insured population that
is receiving benefits currently. Care must be taken with prevalence rates as changes in the age
distribution of the insured population can have a profound effect on the overall “gross”
prevalence rate. This is particularly the case for gross prevalence rates between 1990 and 2010,
when the working age population was getting older with the aging of the baby boomers.</p>
<p>Disabled worker prevalence rates can also be considered more narrowly by viewing these rates
separately by gender and age groups. Of course, this approach omits from consideration the
effects of increased population size, changes in the age distribution of the population, and
changes in the percent of the population that is insured. Even in this specific analysis, care is
required to avoid any misunderstanding of changes over time.</p>
<p>The figure below shows that male disabled worker prevalence rates at ages 35-39 and 50-54
increased significantly after 2007 as the recession began to reduce employment and cause some
additional numbers of individuals to apply for benefits.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="testimony_072414am.jpg" width="712" height="359" alt="Disabled Worker Beneficiaries as Percent of Insured - MALE Chart"></p>
<p>However, the prevalence rates increased not only because more workers applied and started to
receive benefits, but also because the number of individuals who maintained disability-insured
status was reduced by the recession. As seen below, the reduced employment rates in the recent
recession reduced the percent of the population that has had sufficient recent earnings to
maintain insured status for disability. This reduction in the number of insured individuals
directly increases the prevalence rate. Therefore, increases in prevalence rates in hard economic
times result not only from more individuals applying for benefits, but also from fewer workers
maintaining their insured status.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="testimony_072414an.jpg" width="716" height="369" alt="Disability Insured as Percent of Population - MALE Chart"></p>
<p><strong><u>Adjustments to Financing or Cost Needed Soon</u></strong></p>
<p> Because the DI Trust Fund reserves are now projected to become depleted late in 2016, with
continuing tax income sufficient to cover only 80 percent of the scheduled benefits at that time,
change is needed soon. Numerous possibilities are available for adjusting revenue or benefit
levels for the DI program, and for the Social Security OASDI program as a whole.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="testimony_072414ao.jpg" width="698" height="477" alt="SS Trust Funds Ratio Chart"></p>
<p>The projected shortfall requires that either scheduled revenues be increased by 25 percent, or
cost be reduced by 20 percent, or some combination of these approaches. Because the trust finds
cannot by law borrow, adjustments before reserve depletion are essential if abrupt cuts in
benefits are to be avoided.</p>
<p>Given the immediacy of the need, one option to avoid sudden cuts in DI benefits is to enact a
temporary tax-rate reallocation between the OASI and DI Trust Funds. Such reallocations have
been enacted numerous times in the past, most recently in 1994 when the DI Trust Fund was just
8 months away from reserve depletion. The following figure illustrates just one possible tax rate
reallocation that the Congress may consider. This approach would cause a temporary
reallocation of a part of the OASI tax rate to the DI program, sufficient to equalize the expected
reserve depletion dates for the two Trust Funds.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="testimony_072414ap.jpg" width="728" height="464" alt="Projected DI and OASI Trust Fund Ratios (TFR) Chart"></p>
<p>Conclusion<br>
The increased cost of the DI program has been foreseen for decades, as it is largely the product
of demographic changes that have been well known and understood. The 1995 Trustees Report
provided ample warning that the tax rate reallocation of 1994 was only a temporary extension of
the year of reserve depletion for the DI Trust Fund. We are now in need of adjustments once
again to either permanently increase revenue or decrease cost for the DI program to assure
scheduled benefits will be fully payable on a timely basis in the future. Due to the relatively
strong status of the OASI Trust Fund, a tax rate reallocation can be enacted at relatively small
cost to the OASI reserves and projected date of reserve depletion. However, even with this
possibility, the overall Social Security program would still face a shortfall with reserve depletion
for the combined trust funds projected for 2033. Adjustments will be needed before that time to
avert sudden reductions in the amounts of benefits that are payable under the law.</p>
<p>The Office of the Chief Actuary at the Social Security Administration stands ready to assist in
any way in developing the proposal that will eventually be enacted by the Congress to maintain
the actuarial status of these funds. We have developed estimates for many proposals that would
improve the actuarial status of the trust funds. Our estimates for both comprehensive proposals
and individual provisions developed by members of Congress and other policy makers are
available at <a href="http://www.socialsecurity.gov/OACT/" target="_blank">http://www.socialsecurity.gov/OACT/</a>.</p>
<p> Again, thank you very much for the opportunity to share this information with you. I am happy
to answer any questions you may have.</p>
<div>
<div id="ftn1"></div>
</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>
</div><!-- end .row-12 -->
</div><!-- end grid -->
</div><!-- end #content -->
<!-- PAGE FOOTER -->
<ssa-footer class="print-hide"><noscript><footer class="footer" id="footer" role="contentinfo"><a href="/menu#footer">Footer menu</a></footer></noscript></ssa-footer><script src="https://www.ssa.gov/legacy/components/dist/ssa-footer.js"></script>
</div><!-- end #page -->
<!-- OCOMM BODY CONTENT -->
<!-- SSA INTERNET BODY SCRIPTS -->
<script src="/framework/js/ssa.internet.body.js"></script>
</body>
</html>