318 lines
235 KiB
Text
318 lines
235 KiB
Text
<!DOCTYPE html>
|
|
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" class="no-js no-jr">
|
|
<head>
|
|
<!-- For pinger, set start time and add meta elements. -->
|
|
<script type="text/javascript">var ncbi_startTime = new Date();</script>
|
|
|
|
<!-- Logger begin -->
|
|
<meta name="ncbi_db" content="books">
|
|
<meta name="ncbi_pdid" content="book-toc">
|
|
<meta name="ncbi_acc" content="NBK612379">
|
|
<meta name="ncbi_domain" content="ukghrcthf1385">
|
|
<meta name="ncbi_report" content="reader">
|
|
<meta name="ncbi_type" content="fulltext">
|
|
<meta name="ncbi_objectid" content="">
|
|
<meta name="ncbi_pcid" content="/NBK612379/?report=reader">
|
|
<meta name="ncbi_pagename" content="Development and application of a rapid research prioritisation process for identifying health research priorities in low- and middle-income countries: the RAPID-RP stakeholder analysis - NCBI Bookshelf">
|
|
<meta name="ncbi_bookparttype" content="toc">
|
|
<meta name="ncbi_app" content="bookshelf">
|
|
<!-- Logger end -->
|
|
|
|
<!--component id="Page" label="meta"/-->
|
|
<script type="text/javascript" src="/corehtml/pmc/jatsreader/ptpmc_3.22/js/jr.boots.min.js"> </script><title>Development and application of a rapid research prioritisation process for identifying health research priorities in low- and middle-income countries: the RAPID-RP stakeholder analysis - NCBI Bookshelf</title>
|
|
<meta charset="utf-8">
|
|
<meta name="apple-mobile-web-app-capable" content="no">
|
|
<meta name="viewport" content="initial-scale=1,minimum-scale=1,maximum-scale=1,user-scalable=no">
|
|
<meta name="jr-col-layout" content="1">
|
|
<meta name="robots" content="INDEX,FOLLOW,NOARCHIVE,NOIMAGEINDEX">
|
|
<meta name="author" content="Andrew P Dickens, Nicola Gale, Peymane Adab, KK Cheng, Chunhua Chi, Jaime Correia de Sousa, Alexandra Enocson, Amanda Farley, Kate Jolly, Sue Jowett, Mariam Maglakelidze, Tamaz Maghlakelidze, Sonia Martins, Zihan Pan, Alice Sitch, Katrina Stavrikj, Alice Turner, Siân Williams, Rachel E Jordan">
|
|
<meta name="citation_title" content="Development and application of a rapid research prioritisation process for identifying health research priorities in low- and middle-income countries: the RAPID-RP stakeholder analysis">
|
|
<meta name="citation_publisher" content="National Institute for Health and Care Research">
|
|
<meta name="citation_date" content="2024/09/25">
|
|
<meta name="citation_author" content="Andrew P Dickens">
|
|
<meta name="citation_author" content="Nicola Gale">
|
|
<meta name="citation_author" content="Peymane Adab">
|
|
<meta name="citation_author" content="KK Cheng">
|
|
<meta name="citation_author" content="Chunhua Chi">
|
|
<meta name="citation_author" content="Jaime Correia de Sousa">
|
|
<meta name="citation_author" content="Alexandra Enocson">
|
|
<meta name="citation_author" content="Amanda Farley">
|
|
<meta name="citation_author" content="Kate Jolly">
|
|
<meta name="citation_author" content="Sue Jowett">
|
|
<meta name="citation_author" content="Mariam Maglakelidze">
|
|
<meta name="citation_author" content="Tamaz Maghlakelidze">
|
|
<meta name="citation_author" content="Sonia Martins">
|
|
<meta name="citation_author" content="Zihan Pan">
|
|
<meta name="citation_author" content="Alice Sitch">
|
|
<meta name="citation_author" content="Katrina Stavrikj">
|
|
<meta name="citation_author" content="Alice Turner">
|
|
<meta name="citation_author" content="Siân Williams">
|
|
<meta name="citation_author" content="Rachel E Jordan">
|
|
<meta name="citation_pmid" content="40014739">
|
|
<meta name="citation_doi" content="10.3310/CTHF1385">
|
|
<meta name="citation_fulltext_html_url" content="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK612379/">
|
|
<meta name="citation_keywords" content="RAPID RESEARCH PRIORITISATIONS">
|
|
<meta name="citation_keywords" content="LOW- AND MIDDLE-INCOME COUNTRIES">
|
|
<meta name="citation_keywords" content="STAKEHOLDERS">
|
|
<meta name="citation_keywords" content="COPD">
|
|
<link rel="schema.DC" href="http://purl.org/DC/elements/1.0/">
|
|
<meta name="DC.Title" content="Development and application of a rapid research prioritisation process for identifying health research priorities in low- and middle-income countries: the RAPID-RP stakeholder analysis">
|
|
<meta name="DC.Type" content="Text">
|
|
<meta name="DC.Publisher" content="National Institute for Health and Care Research">
|
|
<meta name="DC.Contributor" content="Andrew P Dickens">
|
|
<meta name="DC.Contributor" content="Nicola Gale">
|
|
<meta name="DC.Contributor" content="Peymane Adab">
|
|
<meta name="DC.Contributor" content="KK Cheng">
|
|
<meta name="DC.Contributor" content="Chunhua Chi">
|
|
<meta name="DC.Contributor" content="Jaime Correia de Sousa">
|
|
<meta name="DC.Contributor" content="Alexandra Enocson">
|
|
<meta name="DC.Contributor" content="Amanda Farley">
|
|
<meta name="DC.Contributor" content="Kate Jolly">
|
|
<meta name="DC.Contributor" content="Sue Jowett">
|
|
<meta name="DC.Contributor" content="Mariam Maglakelidze">
|
|
<meta name="DC.Contributor" content="Tamaz Maghlakelidze">
|
|
<meta name="DC.Contributor" content="Sonia Martins">
|
|
<meta name="DC.Contributor" content="Zihan Pan">
|
|
<meta name="DC.Contributor" content="Alice Sitch">
|
|
<meta name="DC.Contributor" content="Katrina Stavrikj">
|
|
<meta name="DC.Contributor" content="Alice Turner">
|
|
<meta name="DC.Contributor" content="Siân Williams">
|
|
<meta name="DC.Contributor" content="Rachel E Jordan">
|
|
<meta name="DC.Date" content="2024/09/25">
|
|
<meta name="DC.Identifier" content="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK612379/">
|
|
<meta name="description" content="Health research should be locally prioritised by key stakeholders to ensure the best use of available resources, maximum likelihood of research leading to uptake into policy and practice and relevance to the needs of the potential beneficiaries. Established approaches are complex and time-consuming, therefore not feasible in settings where prioritisation is uncommon and time is limited.">
|
|
<meta name="og:title" content="Development and application of a rapid research prioritisation process for identifying health research priorities in low- and middle-income countries: the RAPID-RP stakeholder analysis">
|
|
<meta name="og:type" content="book">
|
|
<meta name="og:description" content="Health research should be locally prioritised by key stakeholders to ensure the best use of available resources, maximum likelihood of research leading to uptake into policy and practice and relevance to the needs of the potential beneficiaries. Established approaches are complex and time-consuming, therefore not feasible in settings where prioritisation is uncommon and time is limited.">
|
|
<meta name="og:url" content="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK612379/">
|
|
<meta name="og:site_name" content="NCBI Bookshelf">
|
|
<meta name="og:image" content="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/corehtml/pmc/pmcgifs/bookshelf/thumbs/th-ukghrcthf1385-lrg.png">
|
|
<meta name="twitter:card" content="summary">
|
|
<meta name="twitter:site" content="@ncbibooks">
|
|
<meta name="bk-non-canon-loc" content="/books/n/ukghrcthf1385/toc/?report=reader">
|
|
<link rel="canonical" href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK612379/">
|
|
<link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Archivo+Narrow:400,700,400italic,700italic&subset=latin" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">
|
|
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/corehtml/pmc/jatsreader/ptpmc_3.22/css/libs.min.css">
|
|
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/corehtml/pmc/jatsreader/ptpmc_3.22/css/jr.min.css">
|
|
<meta name="format-detection" content="telephone=no">
|
|
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/corehtml/pmc/css/bookshelf/2.26/css/books.min.css" type="text/css">
|
|
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/corehtml/pmc/css/bookshelf/2.26/css//books_print.min.css" type="text/css" media="print">
|
|
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/corehtml/pmc/css/bookshelf/2.26/css/books_reader.min.css" type="text/css">
|
|
<style type="text/css">p a.figpopup{display:inline !important} .bk_tt {font-family: monospace} .first-line-outdent .bk_ref {display: inline} .body-content h2, .body-content .h2 {border-bottom: 1px solid #97B0C8} .body-content h2.inline {border-bottom: none} a.page-toc-label , .jig-ncbismoothscroll a {text-decoration:none;border:0 !important} .temp-labeled-list .graphic {display:inline-block !important} .temp-labeled-list img{width:100%}</style>
|
|
|
|
<link rel="shortcut icon" href="//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/favicon.ico">
|
|
<meta name="ncbi_phid" content="CE8CAA9B7C8CDD110000000000C200A5.m_5">
|
|
<meta name='referrer' content='origin-when-cross-origin'/><link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" href="//static.pubmed.gov/portal/portal3rc.fcgi/4216699/css/3852956/3849091.css"></head>
|
|
<body>
|
|
<!-- Book content! -->
|
|
|
|
|
|
<div id="jr" data-jr-path="/corehtml/pmc/jatsreader/ptpmc_3.22/"><div class="jr-unsupported"><table class="modal"><tr><td><span class="attn inline-block"></span><br />Your browser does not support the NLM PubReader view.<br />Go to <a href="/pmc/about/pr-browsers/">this page</a> to see a list of supported browsers<br />or return to the <br /><a href="/books/NBK612379/?report=classic">regular view</a>.</td></tr></table></div><div id="jr-ui" class="hidden"><nav id="jr-head"><div class="flexh tb"><div id="jr-tb1"><a id="jr-links-sw" class="hidden" title="Links"><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" version="1.1" x="0px" y="0px" viewBox="0 0 70.6 85.3" style="enable-background:new 0 0 70.6 85.3;vertical-align:middle" xml:space="preserve" width="24" height="24">
|
|
<style type="text/css">.st0{fill:#939598;}</style>
|
|
<g>
|
|
<path class="st0" d="M36,0C12.8,2.2-22.4,14.6,19.6,32.5C40.7,41.4-30.6,14,35.9,9.8"></path>
|
|
<path class="st0" d="M34.5,85.3c23.2-2.2,58.4-14.6,16.4-32.5c-21.1-8.9,50.2,18.5-16.3,22.7"></path>
|
|
<path class="st0" d="M34.7,37.1c66.5-4.2-4.8-31.6,16.3-22.7c42.1,17.9,6.9,30.3-16.4,32.5h1.7c-66.2,4.4,4.8,31.6-16.3,22.7 c-42.1-17.9-6.9-30.3,16.4-32.5"></path>
|
|
</g>
|
|
</svg> Books</a></div><div class="jr-rhead f1 flexh"></div><div id="jr-tb2"><a id="jr-bkhelp-sw" class="btn wsprkl hidden" title="Help with NLM PubReader">?</a><a id="jr-help-sw" class="btn wsprkl hidden" title="Settings and typography in NLM PubReader"><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 512 512" preserveAspectRatio="none"><path d="M462,283.742v-55.485l-29.981-10.662c-11.431-4.065-20.628-12.794-25.274-24.001 c-0.002-0.004-0.004-0.009-0.006-0.013c-4.659-11.235-4.333-23.918,0.889-34.903l13.653-28.724l-39.234-39.234l-28.72,13.652 c-10.979,5.219-23.68,5.546-34.908,0.889c-0.005-0.002-0.01-0.003-0.014-0.005c-11.215-4.65-19.933-13.834-24-25.273L283.741,50 h-55.484l-10.662,29.981c-4.065,11.431-12.794,20.627-24.001,25.274c-0.005,0.002-0.009,0.004-0.014,0.005 c-11.235,4.66-23.919,4.333-34.905-0.889l-28.723-13.653l-39.234,39.234l13.653,28.721c5.219,10.979,5.545,23.681,0.889,34.91 c-0.002,0.004-0.004,0.009-0.006,0.013c-4.649,11.214-13.834,19.931-25.271,23.998L50,228.257v55.485l29.98,10.661 c11.431,4.065,20.627,12.794,25.274,24c0.002,0.005,0.003,0.01,0.005,0.014c4.66,11.236,4.334,23.921-0.888,34.906l-13.654,28.723 l39.234,39.234l28.721-13.652c10.979-5.219,23.681-5.546,34.909-0.889c0.005,0.002,0.01,0.004,0.014,0.006 c11.214,4.649,19.93,13.833,23.998,25.271L228.257,462h55.484l10.595-29.79c4.103-11.538,12.908-20.824,24.216-25.525 c0.005-0.002,0.009-0.004,0.014-0.006c11.127-4.628,23.694-4.311,34.578,0.863l28.902,13.738l39.234-39.234l-13.66-28.737 c-5.214-10.969-5.539-23.659-0.886-34.877c0.002-0.005,0.004-0.009,0.006-0.014c4.654-11.225,13.848-19.949,25.297-24.021 L462,283.742z M256,331.546c-41.724,0-75.548-33.823-75.548-75.546s33.824-75.547,75.548-75.547 c41.723,0,75.546,33.824,75.546,75.547S297.723,331.546,256,331.546z"></path></svg></a><a id="jr-fip-sw" class="btn wsprkl hidden" title="Find"><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 550 600" preserveAspectRatio="none"><path fill="none" stroke="#000" stroke-width="36" stroke-linecap="round" style="fill:#FFF" d="m320,350a153,153 0 1,0-2,2l170,170m-91-117 110,110-26,26-110-110"></path></svg></a><a id="jr-cmap-sw" class="btn wsprkl hidden" title="Table of Contents"><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 100 100" preserveAspectRatio="none"><path d="M20,20h10v8H20V20zM36,20h44v8H36V20zM20,37.33h10v8H20V37.33zM36,37.33h44v8H36V37.33zM20,54.66h10v8H20V54.66zM36,54.66h44v8H36V54.66zM20,72h10v8 H20V72zM36,72h44v8H36V72z"></path></svg></a></div></div></nav><nav id="jr-dash" class="noselect"><nav id="jr-dash" class="noselect"><div id="jr-pi" class="hidden"><a id="jr-pi-prev" class="hidden" title="Previous page"><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 100 100" preserveAspectRatio="none"><path d="M75,30 c-80,60 -80,0 0,60 c-30,-60 -30,0 0,-60"></path><text x="20" y="28" textLength="60" style="font-size:25px">Prev</text></svg></a><div class="pginfo">Page <i class="jr-pg-pn">0</i> of <i class="jr-pg-lp">0</i></div><a id="jr-pi-next" class="hidden" title="Next page"><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 100 100" preserveAspectRatio="none"><path d="M25,30c80,60 80,0 0,60 c30,-60 30,0 0,-60"></path><text x="20" y="28" textLength="60" style="font-size:25px">Next</text></svg></a></div><div id="jr-is-tb"><a id="jr-is-sw" class="btn wsprkl hidden" title="Switch between Figures/Tables strip and Progress bar"><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 100 100" preserveAspectRatio="none"><rect x="10" y="40" width="20" height="20"></rect><rect x="40" y="40" width="20" height="20"></rect><rect x="70" y="40" width="20" height="20"></rect></svg></a></div><nav id="jr-istrip" class="istrip hidden"><a id="jr-is-prev" href="#" class="hidden" title="Previous"><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 100 100" preserveAspectRatio="none"><path d="M80,40 60,65 80,90 70,90 50,65 70,40z M50,40 30,65 50,90 40,90 20,65 40,40z"></path><text x="35" y="25" textLength="60" style="font-size:25px">Prev</text></svg></a><a id="jr-is-next" href="#" class="hidden" title="Next"><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 100 100" preserveAspectRatio="none"><path d="M20,40 40,65 20,90 30,90 50,65 30,40z M50,40 70,65 50,90 60,90 80,65 60,40z"></path><text x="15" y="25" textLength="60" style="font-size:25px">Next</text></svg></a></nav><nav id="jr-progress"></nav></nav></nav><aside id="jr-links-p" class="hidden flexv"><div class="tb sk-htbar flexh"><div><a class="jr-p-close btn wsprkl">Done</a></div><div class="title-text f1">NCBI Bookshelf</div></div><div class="cnt lol f1"><a href="/books/">Home</a><a href="/books/browse/">Browse All Titles</a><a class="btn share" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK612379/"><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 33 33" style="vertical-align:middle" width="24" height="24" preserveAspectRatio="none"><g><path d="M 17.996,32L 12,32 L 12,16 l-4,0 l0-5.514 l 4-0.002l-0.006-3.248C 11.993,2.737, 13.213,0, 18.512,0l 4.412,0 l0,5.515 l-2.757,0 c-2.063,0-2.163,0.77-2.163,2.209l-0.008,2.76l 4.959,0 l-0.585,5.514L 18,16L 17.996,32z"></path></g></svg> Share on Facebook</a><a class="btn share" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK612379/&text=Development%20and%20application%20of%20a%20rapid%20research%20prioritisation%20process%20for%20identifying%20health%20research%20priorit..."><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 33 33" style="vertical-align:middle" width="24" height="24"><g><path d="M 32,6.076c-1.177,0.522-2.443,0.875-3.771,1.034c 1.355-0.813, 2.396-2.099, 2.887-3.632 c-1.269,0.752-2.674,1.299-4.169,1.593c-1.198-1.276-2.904-2.073-4.792-2.073c-3.626,0-6.565,2.939-6.565,6.565 c0,0.515, 0.058,1.016, 0.17,1.496c-5.456-0.274-10.294-2.888-13.532-6.86c-0.565,0.97-0.889,2.097-0.889,3.301 c0,2.278, 1.159,4.287, 2.921,5.465c-1.076-0.034-2.088-0.329-2.974-0.821c-0.001,0.027-0.001,0.055-0.001,0.083 c0,3.181, 2.263,5.834, 5.266,6.438c-0.551,0.15-1.131,0.23-1.73,0.23c-0.423,0-0.834-0.041-1.235-0.118 c 0.836,2.608, 3.26,4.506, 6.133,4.559c-2.247,1.761-5.078,2.81-8.154,2.81c-0.53,0-1.052-0.031-1.566-0.092 c 2.905,1.863, 6.356,2.95, 10.064,2.95c 12.076,0, 18.679-10.004, 18.679-18.68c0-0.285-0.006-0.568-0.019-0.849 C 30.007,8.548, 31.12,7.392, 32,6.076z"></path></g></svg> Share on Twitter</a></div></aside><aside id="jr-cmap-p" class="hidden flexv"><div class="tb sk-htbar flexh"><div><a class="jr-p-close btn wsprkl">Done</a></div><div class="title-text f1">In Page Navigation</div></div><div class="cnt lol f1"><a href="/books/n/ukghrcollect/?report=reader">Global Health Research</a><a class="current">Title Information</a></div></aside><aside id="jr-help-p" class="hidden flexv"><div class="tb sk-htbar flexh"><div><a class="jr-p-close btn wsprkl">Done</a></div><div class="title-text f1">Settings</div></div><div class="cnt f1"><div id="jr-typo-p" class="typo"><div><a class="sf btn wsprkl">A-</a><a class="lf btn wsprkl">A+</a></div><div><a class="bcol-auto btn wsprkl"><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 200 100" preserveAspectRatio="none"><text x="10" y="70" style="font-size:60px;font-family: Trebuchet MS, ArialMT, Arial, sans-serif" textLength="180">AUTO</text></svg></a><a class="bcol-1 btn wsprkl"><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 100 100" preserveAspectRatio="none"><path d="M15,25 85,25zM15,40 85,40zM15,55 85,55zM15,70 85,70z"></path></svg></a><a class="bcol-2 btn wsprkl"><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 100 100" preserveAspectRatio="none"><path d="M5,25 45,25z M55,25 95,25zM5,40 45,40z M55,40 95,40zM5,55 45,55z M55,55 95,55zM5,70 45,70z M55,70 95,70z"></path></svg></a></div></div><div class="lol"><a class="" href="/books/NBK612379/?report=classic">Switch to classic view</a><a href="/books/n/ukghrcthf1385/pdf/">PDF (1.4M)</a><a href="/books/n/ukghrcthf1385/toc/?report=printable">Print View</a></div></div></aside><aside id="jr-bkhelp-p" class="hidden flexv"><div class="tb sk-htbar flexh"><div><a class="jr-p-close btn wsprkl">Done</a></div><div class="title-text f1">Help</div></div><div class="cnt f1 lol"><a id="jr-helpobj-sw" data-path="/corehtml/pmc/jatsreader/ptpmc_3.22/" data-href="/corehtml/pmc/jatsreader/ptpmc_3.22/img/bookshelf/help.xml" href="">Help</a><a href="mailto:info@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov?subject=PubReader%20feedback%20%2F%20NBK612379%20%2F%20sid%3ACE8B5AF87C7FFCB1_0191SID%20%2F%20phid%3ACE8CAA9B7C8CDD110000000000C200A5.4">Send us feedback</a><a id="jr-about-sw" data-path="/corehtml/pmc/jatsreader/ptpmc_3.22/" data-href="/corehtml/pmc/jatsreader/ptpmc_3.22/img/bookshelf/about.xml" href="">About PubReader</a></div></aside><aside id="jr-objectbox" class="thidden hidden"><div class="jr-objectbox-close wsprkl">✘</div><div class="jr-objectbox-inner cnt"><div class="jr-objectbox-drawer"></div></div></aside><nav id="jr-pm-left" class="hidden"><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 40 800" preserveAspectRatio="none"><text font-stretch="ultra-condensed" x="800" y="-15" text-anchor="end" transform="rotate(90)" font-size="18" letter-spacing=".1em">Previous Page</text></svg></nav><nav id="jr-pm-right" class="hidden"><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 40 800" preserveAspectRatio="none"><text font-stretch="ultra-condensed" x="800" y="-15" text-anchor="end" transform="rotate(90)" font-size="18" letter-spacing=".1em">Next Page</text></svg></nav><nav id="jr-fip" class="hidden"><nav id="jr-fip-term-p"><input type="search" placeholder="search this page" id="jr-fip-term" autocorrect="off" autocomplete="off" /><a id="jr-fip-mg" class="wsprkl btn" title="Find"><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 550 600" preserveAspectRatio="none"><path fill="none" stroke="#000" stroke-width="36" stroke-linecap="round" style="fill:#FFF" d="m320,350a153,153 0 1,0-2,2l170,170m-91-117 110,110-26,26-110-110"></path></svg></a><a id="jr-fip-done" class="wsprkl btn" title="Dismiss find">✘</a></nav><nav id="jr-fip-info-p"><a id="jr-fip-prev" class="wsprkl btn" title="Jump to previuos match">◀</a><button id="jr-fip-matches">no matches yet</button><a id="jr-fip-next" class="wsprkl btn" title="Jump to next match">▶</a></nav></nav></div><div id="jr-epub-interstitial" class="hidden"></div><div id="jr-content"><article data-type="main"><div class="main-content lit-style"><div class="fm-sec bkr_bottom_sep"><div class="bkr_thumb"><a href="https://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/ghr/" title="National Institute for Health and Care Research" class="img_link icnblk_img" ref="pagearea=logo&targetsite=external&targetcat=link&targettype=publisher"><img class="source-thumb" src="/corehtml/pmc/pmcgifs/bookshelf/thumbs/th-ukghrcthf1385-lrg.png" alt="Cover of Development and application of a rapid research prioritisation process for identifying health research priorities in low- and middle-income countries: the RAPID-RP stakeholder analysis" /></a></div><div class="bkr_bib"><h1 id="_NBK612379_"><span itemprop="name">Development and application of a rapid research prioritisation process for identifying health research priorities in low- and middle-income countries: the RAPID-RP stakeholder analysis</span></h1><p><i>Global Health Research</i></p><p class="contrib-group"><h4>Authors</h4><span itemprop="author">Andrew P Dickens</span>,<sup>1,2</sup><sup>,<a href="#fn001">†</a></sup> <span itemprop="author">Nicola Gale</span>,<sup>3</sup><sup>,<a href="#fn001">†</a></sup> <span itemprop="author">Peymane Adab</span>,<sup>1</sup><sup>,*</sup> <span itemprop="author">KK Cheng</span>,<sup>1</sup> <span itemprop="author">Chunhua Chi</span>,<sup>4</sup> <span itemprop="author">Jaime Correia de Sousa</span>,<sup>5,6</sup> <span itemprop="author">Alexandra Enocson</span>,<sup>1</sup> <span itemprop="author">Amanda Farley</span>,<sup>1</sup> <span itemprop="author">Kate Jolly</span>,<sup>1</sup> <span itemprop="author">Sue Jowett</span>,<sup>1</sup> <span itemprop="author">Mariam Maglakelidze</span>,<sup>7,8</sup> <span itemprop="author">Tamaz Maghlakelidze</span>,<sup>7,9</sup> <span itemprop="author">Sonia Martins</span>,<sup>10</sup> <span itemprop="author">Zihan Pan</span>,<sup>4</sup> <span itemprop="author">Alice Sitch</span>,<sup>1,11</sup> <span itemprop="author">Katrina Stavrikj</span>,<sup>12</sup> <span itemprop="author">Alice Turner</span>,<sup>1</sup> <span itemprop="author">Siân Williams</span>,<sup>6</sup> and <span itemprop="author">Rachel E Jordan</span><sup>1</sup>.</p><h4>Affiliations</h4><div class="affiliation"><sup>1</sup> Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK</div><div class="affiliation"><sup>2</sup> Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Midview City, Singapore</div><div class="affiliation"><sup>3</sup> Health Services Management Centre, School of Social Policy, College of Social Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK</div><div class="affiliation"><sup>4</sup> Department of General Practice, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China</div><div class="affiliation"><sup>5</sup> International Primary Care Respiratory Group, Edinburgh, Scotland</div><div class="affiliation"><sup>6</sup> Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal; ICVS/3B’s, PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal</div><div class="affiliation"><sup>7</sup> Georgian Respiratory Association, Tbilisi, Georgia</div><div class="affiliation"><sup>8</sup> PetreShotadze Tbilisi Medical Academy, Tbilisi, Georgia</div><div class="affiliation"><sup>9</sup> Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia</div><div class="affiliation"><sup>10</sup> Family Medicine, ABC Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil</div><div class="affiliation"><sup>11</sup> NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK</div><div class="affiliation"><sup>12</sup> Center for Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Skopje, North Macedonia</div><div class="affiliation"><sup>*</sup> Corresponding author<span class="before-email-separator">; </span><span class="email-label">Email: </span><a href="mailto:dev@null" data-email="ku.ca.mahb@bada.p" class="oemail">ku.ca.mahb@bada.p</a></div><div class="half_rhythm">Southampton (UK): <a href="https://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/ghr/" ref="pagearea=meta&targetsite=external&targetcat=link&targettype=publisher"><span itemprop="publisher">National Institute for Health and Care Research</span></a>; <span itemprop="datePublished">2024 Sep 25</span>.</div><div><a href="/books/about/copyright/">Copyright</a> © 2024 Dickens <i>et al</i>.</div></div><div class="bkr_clear"></div></div><div class="bkr_bottom_sep bkr_bottom_margin body-content whole_rhythm"><div itemprop="description"><h2>Abstract</h2><div id="abs1-1"><h4 class="inline">Background:</h4><p>Health research should be locally prioritised by key stakeholders to ensure the best use of available resources, maximum likelihood of research leading to uptake into policy and practice and relevance to the needs of the potential beneficiaries. Established approaches are complex and time-consuming, therefore not feasible in settings where prioritisation is uncommon and time is limited.</p></div><div id="abs1-2"><h4 class="inline">Objectives:</h4><p>We developed and applied a simple, rapid research prioritisation approach to elicit the views of stakeholders.</p></div><div id="abs1-3"><h4 class="inline">Setting and participants:</h4><p>This was a collaboration between a multidisciplinary group of United Kingdom academics, the International Primary Care Respiratory Group and primary care respiratory researchers from four low- and middle-income countries: Brazil, China, Georgia and North Macedonia. We identified 10 topics for research prioritisation through workshops involving 26 topic, methods and local context experts, and considering the programme remit, to develop, adapt and evaluate culturally appropriate community and behavioural approaches for the prevention, early identification and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care.</p></div><div id="abs1-4"><h4 class="inline">Design and methods:</h4><p>In each setting, local research teams convened stakeholder groups of patients, clinicians, managers/policymakers and researchers. Each group briefly discussed the 10 potential research study topics. Discussions were facilitated using short vignettes for each topic, and participants were encouraged to consider importance, feasibility and equity. Individual participants rated each study on a three-point traffic light scale, then ranked them following a facilitated discussion on what drove the ratings. The research team rated then ranked each study considering three further criteria (international novelty, potential for future funding and capacity building on a five-point scale). Within each group, ranks were summed to create a final rank order which guided our research programme and provided insight for future projects.</p></div><div id="abs1-5"><h4 class="inline">Results:</h4><p>In each country, four to eight members attended each stakeholder group. The engagement process was completed in less than 4 hours and feedback was very positive, especially from patients who valued the opportunity to contribute to research decision-making about their own condition. Ranking varied to some extent between groups and settings, but there was consistency around topics that were prioritised among the top five in all groups (identifying efficient chronic obstructive pulmonary disease screening test strategies, evaluations of lung age to aid smoking cessation, feasibility of locally adapted pulmonary rehabilitation, clinical education for primary care staff) and study topics that consistently ranked low (use of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation, weight management to improve chronic obstructive pulmonary disease symptoms and handwashing to reduce infections).</p></div><div id="abs1-6"><h4 class="inline">Limitations:</h4><p>Despite attempts to maximise inclusivity and diversity, stakeholders were mainly limited geographically to the centres where researchers were based, potentially limiting generalisability of views across the countries. Facilitator styles varied and may have influenced some of the discussions and potentially the ranking.</p></div><div id="abs1-7"><h4 class="inline">Conclusions:</h4><p>Despite some limitations, we demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of the rapid research prioritisation approach stakeholder analysis for identifying locally relevant research priorities in low- and middle-income country settings.</p></div><div id="abs1-8"><h4 class="inline">Future work:</h4><p>Further validation is needed for aspects of the process. We have identified some useful lessons from our evaluation of the process, to facilitate future use of this approach.</p></div><div id="abs1-9"><h4 class="inline">Funding:</h4><p>This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Global Health Research programme as award number 16/137/95.</p></div></div><div itemprop="description"><h2>Plain language summary</h2><div id="abs2-1"><h4 class="inline">Background:</h4><p>Many topics need research, but within limited resources, we need to focus on the most important. There are lots of established approaches for deciding what topics are more important than others to be studied. However, they are time-consuming and complicated. We developed a simpler rapid approach by combining aspects of the previous methods.</p></div><div id="abs2-2"><h4 class="inline">Methods:</h4><p>Our team included 26 researchers in respiratory health and primary care in the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, Georgia and North Macedonia. Using our collective expertise, we identified 10 topics that need more research to help prevent, better detect or treat people with chronic lung disease. We invited groups of patients with lung conditions, clinical staff, managers and those involved in health policy, as well as researchers to attend separate discussion groups in each country. Each group talked through the potential study topics and scored them independently, considering importance, practicality and fairness. The group then discussed the combined scores and explored why each topic had a higher or lower score. Then each member ranked the topics in order of importance, considering their reflections on the discussions.</p></div><div id="abs2-3"><h4 class="inline">Results:</h4><p>Four to eight people attended each group and sessions lasted under four hours. We combined final importance scores from different groups to finalise the research priorities. Although there were some differences between groups and countries, the top and bottom scoring topics were consistent. Generally groups thought it was important to (1) find the best ways to identify people with lung disease earlier, (2) test whether telling smokers their lung age would help them quit, (3) adapt lung rehabilitation programmes for low income countries, and (4) improve education for staff working in primary care. All groups gave low scores to topics around the use of e-cigarettes for quitting smoking, encouraging handwashing to reduce chest infections and helping patients with weight management to improve their lung symptoms.</p></div><div id="abs2-4"><h4 class="inline">Conclusions:</h4><p>Although some aspects can be improved, we showed that this adapted approach can help identify research priorities quickly and relatively simply. We highlight some lessons learnt and further work to enable more groups to use this approach.</p></div></div></div><div id="s1"><h2 id="_s1_">Introduction</h2><p>There is increasing recognition and expectation that health research should be locally prioritised to ensure best use of available resources, maximise the likelihood of research leading to action (policy and practice) and enhance relevance to the needs of the potential beneficiaries.<a class="bibr" href="#ref1-bib1" rid="ref1-bib1"><sup>1</sup></a> Prioritisation with locally relevant stakeholders should therefore be the first step in the research cycle, although it is often neglected. Identifying research priorities is nevertheless difficult, due to differing stakeholder perspectives,<a class="bibr" href="#ref1-bib2" rid="ref1-bib2"><sup>2</sup></a><sup>,</sup><a class="bibr" href="#ref1-bib3" rid="ref1-bib3"><sup>3</sup></a> competing potential research topics, multiple outcomes and uncertainties in predicting and measuring impact.<a class="bibr" href="#ref1-bib4" rid="ref1-bib4"><sup>4</sup></a> Good practice recommends a comprehensive and structured approach,<a class="bibr" href="#ref1-bib5" rid="ref1-bib5"><sup>5</sup></a> with clear criteria and methods for prioritisation, and recruitment of stakeholder participants to ensure inclusiveness of expertise, gender, ethnicity, religion, educational level and region. In health research, this commonly involves inclusion of patients, the public, health providers, managers and policymakers.</p><p>There are several established approaches for prioritising health research.<a class="bibr" href="#ref1-bib6" rid="ref1-bib6"><sup>6</sup></a><sup>–</sup><a class="bibr" href="#ref1-bib9" rid="ref1-bib9"><sup>9</sup></a> In a recent literature review, approximately one-quarter of recently published health research prioritisation exercises used either the metrics-based Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) method<a class="bibr" href="#ref1-bib6" rid="ref1-bib6"><sup>6</sup></a> or the consensus building Delphi method,<a class="bibr" href="#ref1-bib7" rid="ref1-bib7"><sup>7</sup></a> while one-fifth reported using a combination of expert panel interview and focus group discussion.<a class="bibr" href="#ref1-bib4" rid="ref1-bib4"><sup>4</sup></a> Other common tools include the James Lind Alliance method,<a class="bibr" href="#ref1-bib8" rid="ref1-bib8"><sup>8</sup></a> the Combined Approach Matrix (CAM),<a class="bibr" href="#ref1-bib9" rid="ref1-bib9"><sup>9</sup></a> combinations of literature reviewing and questionnaires, and use of online surveys. The CHNRI, James Lind Alliance and CAM methods have clear criteria and scoring processes, offering more transparency and replicability than the Delphi and other approaches, but are complex and time-consuming,<a class="bibr" href="#ref1-bib10" rid="ref1-bib10"><sup>10</sup></a> especially for non-researchers. The whole process can last many months and can require several activities/meetings, making it less accessible for many participants and therefore less representative. Some prioritisation exercises may be carried out independently, with little discussion, relying on written descriptions and the understanding of participants. A simpler approach which adapts and combines the strengths of several methods could be useful,<a class="bibr" href="#ref1-bib4" rid="ref1-bib4"><sup>4</sup></a> especially in settings where research prioritisation is not commonplace, researchers and participants are unfamiliar with such processes and time is limited.</p><p>Research prioritisation in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) is uncommon,<a class="bibr" href="#ref1-bib10" rid="ref1-bib10"><sup>10</sup></a> and the potential beneficiaries of health research infrequently consulted.<a class="bibr" href="#ref1-bib11" rid="ref1-bib11"><sup>11</sup></a> There is growing recognition of the need to implement better consultation of local stakeholders in LMIC research planning, especially when funding arises from high-income countries.<a class="bibr" href="#ref1-bib12" rid="ref1-bib12"><sup>12</sup></a> In this paper, we report the development and application of a simple, rapid research prioritisation approach (RAPID-RP) which was specifically designed to elicit the views of relevant patients, clinicians, managers and policy-makers in prioritising the most important research questions within a global health research programme on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in primary care. The approach used and the lessons learnt will have application in other similar settings and are transferable across research areas.</p></div><div id="s2"><h2 id="_s2_">Aim</h2><p>To develop and implement a novel rapid approach to prioritise research questions within a multi-country global health research programme conducted in LMICs.</p></div><div id="s3"><h2 id="_s3_">Prioritisation methods</h2><div id="s3-1"><h3>Setting: the Breathe Well programme</h3><p>The Breathe Well programme (NIHR Global Health Research Group on Global COPD in Primary Care, University of Birmingham) was funded by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) in 2017 to build research capacity in four LMICs on the prevention, diagnosis and management of COPD in the primary care setting. We developed a collaboration between UK researchers at the University of Birmingham with expertise in respiratory health, the Chief Executive and Chair of the International Primary Care Respiratory Group (IPCRG) and primary care clinical researchers in Brazil, China, Georgia and North Macedonia (LMIC partner countries) to form the core co-investigator team. Together, we provided training and mentoring to research teams in our partner LMIC countries, supporting them to design and deliver research studies in primary care relevant to the needs of their local populations. The programme had the following aims:</p><ul><li class="half_rhythm"><div>strengthen local research capacity in the partner countries in community-based COPD research and generic population research methods</div></li><li class="half_rhythm"><div>develop and test community-based and culturally appropriate approaches for identifying undiagnosed COPD in low-resource countries</div></li><li class="half_rhythm"><div>adapt evidence-based behavioural approaches for management of COPD according to cultural needs and the local healthcare infrastructure, and assess the feasibility of their implementation</div></li><li class="half_rhythm"><div>build a robust platform for future collaborative research within the partner countries and other similar settings.</div></li></ul><p>An important part of the programme was to identify local research needs, involving key stakeholders to prioritise research questions for evaluation within the programme and beyond.</p></div><div id="s3-2"><h3>Stakeholder prioritisation process</h3><p>Our approach (<i><a class="figpopup" href="/books/NBK612379/figure/fig1/?report=objectonly" target="object" rid-figpopup="figfig1" rid-ob="figobfig1">Figure 1</a></i>) was designed pragmatically during several informal discussions between lead research investigators, largely adapted from the CHNRI method<a class="bibr" href="#ref1-bib6" rid="ref1-bib6"><sup>6</sup></a> but also drawing from other approaches. We created a simple process where the main stakeholder consultation could be conducted in 3 to 4 hours, particularly when stakeholders are unfamiliar with research prioritisation.</p><div class="iconblock whole_rhythm clearfix ten_col fig" id="figfig1" co-legend-rid="figlgndfig1"><a href="/books/NBK612379/figure/fig1/?report=objectonly" target="object" title="FIGURE 1" class="img_link icnblk_img figpopup" rid-figpopup="figfig1" rid-ob="figobfig1"><img class="small-thumb" src="/books/NBK612379/bin/NIHR135810_fig1.gif" src-large="/books/NBK612379/bin/NIHR135810_fig1.jpg" alt="FIGURE 1. Research prioritisation model." /></a><div class="icnblk_cntnt" id="figlgndfig1"><h4 id="fig1"><a href="/books/NBK612379/figure/fig1/?report=objectonly" target="object" rid-ob="figobfig1">FIGURE 1</a></h4><p class="float-caption no_bottom_margin">Research prioritisation model. </p></div></div><div id="s3-2-1"><h4>Defining the context and identifying potential research topics</h4><p>We held an initial scoping workshop with 26 participants, including a multidisciplinary group of UK academics with expertise in respiratory health research (epidemiologists, primary and secondary care physicians, physiologist, sociologist, health economist, biostatistician), respiratory-focused primary care clinical researchers from Brazil, China, Georgia and the Republic of North Macedonia, as well as the Chief Executive of the International Primary Care Respiratory Group (IPCRG). The workshop was used to identify important topic areas within the four LMICs. The group members were selected to include experts form a wide range of disciplines, research managers and leading researchers with local country knowledge, including those with experience of working with more disadvantaged populations. Results from the workshop were consolidated to identify common themes, which were then aligned with the remit of the funded programme, resulting in a shortlist of 10 potential research study topics (<i><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/table1/?report=objectonly" target="object" rid-ob="figobtable1">Table 1</a></i>). A short evidence-based lay summary vignette was prepared for each topic (see <i><a href="#app1">Appendix 1</a></i>), then refined in discussion with other members of the research team. Each vignette was a paragraph providing a brief background, what the knowledge gap was and how the findings from a study on the topic could be used. The selected topics were initially phrased as questions but rephrased as study titles to improve clarity for participants in response to feedback on the first prioritisation event.</p><div class="iconblock whole_rhythm clearfix ten_col table-wrap" id="figtable1"><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/table1/?report=objectonly" target="object" title="TABLE 1" class="img_link icnblk_img" rid-ob="figobtable1"><img class="small-thumb" src="/corehtml/pmc/css/bookshelf/2.26/img/table-icon.gif" alt="Table Icon" /></a><div class="icnblk_cntnt"><h4 id="table1"><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/table1/?report=objectonly" target="object" rid-ob="figobtable1">TABLE 1</a></h4><p class="float-caption no_bottom_margin">Final list of research topics used for prioritisation </p></div></div></div><div id="s3-2-2"><h4>Identification and recruitment of participants</h4><p>Research teams from each of the four countries identified and invited 6–10 relevant participants with a range of characteristics from each of three stakeholder groups (to ensure 4–6 attended): patients (range of severity of disease, gender, age and social group), clinicians (primary, secondary and tertiary care) and policy-makers/managers (local, national, non-government organisations). Research teams chose whether to hold a combined meeting or to arrange them separately, according to local context.</p></div><div id="s3-2-3"><h4>Prioritisation meetings</h4><p>Meetings were conducted in each country between October and December 2017. Each group session lasted for 3 to 4 hours, with refreshment breaks as appropriate. Venues were chosen for each meeting to ensure accessibility and including separate rooms for group sessions. Meeting material, including the 10 research study topics and the accompanying evidence vignette for each, was translated and sent to participants 1 week before the meeting in case they wished to read it in advance. Locally appropriate compensation was provided, for example small gifts and refreshments.</p><p>These meetings were to guide research activity and therefore considered stakeholder consultations. As such, no ethics approval was sought for them. Nevertheless, as meeting discussions were audio-recorded and analysed, all participants were informed about this in advance and asked to sign consent forms on arrival, agreeing to the discussion being recorded and analysed, and for the data to be used in publications. There was also a short explanation of the purpose of the meeting and reassurance that all expressed views would be valued and respected. Participants were then divided into stakeholder groups with two facilitators from the local research team allocated to each. The lead facilitator explained the process and guided the discussion and prioritisation, and the second supported through timekeeping and note-taking. All facilitators were trained by the lead research team to ensure a standardised approach across all countries. Discussions were conducted in the local language. Data from the group discussion were transcribed in the local language and the transcript translated to English by a professional translator. Data from the transcripts were used to explore the rapid prioritisation process and provide learning for its future application. To do this, the transcripts were primarily analysed to provide contextual information to explain the final list of priorities. In addition, the data were analysed to explore the group process and identify aspects which worked well or could be improved.</p></div><div id="s3-2-4"><h4>Rating and ranking research topics</h4><p>The prioritisation process involved two main stages: rating each topic individually, before finally ranking their importance relative to each other. Minor revisions were made to the model following piloting with our patient advisory group and comments from our independent scientific advisory committee, for example incorporating a traffic light system for rating importance.</p><p>The facilitator summarised the first study and evidence vignette, before asking open questions to seek participants’ views on the research study and to explore their understanding of the relevant health problem. The facilitator then guided discussion so that participants considered the study in relation to three domains: local <i>importance</i> (burden, priority, likely impact), <i>feasibility</i> (deliverability, affordability, acceptability) and the extent to which the study addressed <i>equity</i> issues (accessibility, reach, impact on reducing inequalities).</p><p>After considering these issues, participants were asked to independently rate the study overall as either ‘very important’, ‘unsure’ or ‘not important’ using a traffic light system (see <i><a href="#app2">Appendix 2</a></i>). They were then encouraged to discuss reasons for their ratings, to explore factors influencing the decision. This process was repeated for each research study topic, with participants rating each one before moving on to the next. There were approximately 15–20 minutes of discussion per study.</p><p>After all of the 10 research study topics were individually rated and discussed, there was a short break where facilitators summarised the ratings across the group. The summary scores were then presented to participants, who were asked to reflect on these through discussion, and then independently rank the 10 study topics in order of priority: 1 = highest priority, 10 = lowest priority (see <i><a href="#app3">Appendix 3</a></i>). There was further discussion to gain insight into the decision-making process, and facilitators also encouraged suggestions for additional topic areas that had not been covered or had emerged during the group discussion.</p></div></div><div id="s3-3"><h3>Prioritisation by research team</h3><p>In addition to the stakeholder prioritisation process, LMIC research team members (directly after the meeting) independently scored the 10 topics in relation to six domains: importance, feasibility, equity, international novelty, potential for future funding, and capacity building. Each domain was scored on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 5 (very much) (see <i><a href="#app4">Appendix 4</a></i>). Research teams then independently ranked the 10 topics in order of priority (see <i><a href="#app5">Appendix 5</a></i>).</p></div><div id="s3-4"><h3>Analyses</h3><div id="s3-4-1"><h4>Summarising topic ratings</h4><p>In each country setting, the ratings for groups of patients, clinicians and policy-makers/managers were summarised using bar charts, presenting the percentage of stakeholders rating each topic as ‘important’, ‘unimportant’ or ‘unsure’. Ratings from research team members were presented as star diagrams, using the average score for each domain. Wider star shapes represented research study topics with higher average scores, while stars clustered towards the centre had lower ratings (see <i><a class="figpopup" href="/books/NBK612379/figure/fig2/?report=objectonly" target="object" rid-figpopup="figfig2" rid-ob="figobfig2">Figure 2</a></i>).</p><div class="iconblock whole_rhythm clearfix ten_col fig" id="figfig2" co-legend-rid="figlgndfig2"><a href="/books/NBK612379/figure/fig2/?report=objectonly" target="object" title="FIGURE 2" class="img_link icnblk_img figpopup" rid-figpopup="figfig2" rid-ob="figobfig2"><img class="small-thumb" src="/books/NBK612379/bin/NIHR135810_fig2.gif" src-large="/books/NBK612379/bin/NIHR135810_fig2.jpg" alt="FIGURE 2. Star diagram (by LMIC country) summarising research team ratings for each of 10 research topics across 6 domains." /></a><div class="icnblk_cntnt" id="figlgndfig2"><h4 id="fig2"><a href="/books/NBK612379/figure/fig2/?report=objectonly" target="object" rid-ob="figobfig2">FIGURE 2</a></h4><p class="float-caption no_bottom_margin">Star diagram (by LMIC country) summarising research team ratings for each of 10 research topics across 6 domains. Research study key: 1 = E-cigarettes; 2 = Lung age; 3 = Screening tests; 4 = Early treatment; 5 = Quality management; 6 = PR feasibility; <a href="/books/NBK612379/figure/fig2/?report=objectonly" target="object" rid-ob="figobfig2">(more...)</a></p></div></div></div><div id="s3-4-2"><h4>Summarising topic rankings</h4><p>The sum of the rankings for each topic was calculated for each stakeholder group (patients, clinicians, policy-makers/managers and researchers) and then a rank order presented for each group, and overall.</p></div><div id="s3-4-3"><h4>Qualitative analysis</h4><p>Meeting transcripts were analysed using the Framework method for the analysis of qualitative data.<a class="bibr" href="#ref1-bib13" rid="ref1-bib13"><sup>13</sup></a> The analysis was undertaken by Dickens with the help of a research student, supervised by Gale. Emerging themes were arranged in an analytical framework, allowing comparison of how the meetings were conducted in different stakeholder groups and different countries. The framework covered facilitation, engagement and interaction (to allow exploration of the prioritisation process and what aspects worked well or needed to be modified), research topics and research literacy, culture and society, and reasoning (for/against a topic), to provide insights into why topics were prioritised (<i><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/table2/?report=objectonly" target="object" rid-ob="figobtable2">Table 2</a></i>). All meeting transcripts were anonymised prior to being analysed. However, extra steps were taken to anonymise team member identities when discussing facilitation styles, to avoid the risk of identifying specific individuals.</p><div class="iconblock whole_rhythm clearfix ten_col table-wrap" id="figtable2"><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/table2/?report=objectonly" target="object" title="TABLE 2" class="img_link icnblk_img" rid-ob="figobtable2"><img class="small-thumb" src="/corehtml/pmc/css/bookshelf/2.26/img/table-icon.gif" alt="Table Icon" /></a><div class="icnblk_cntnt"><h4 id="table2"><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/table2/?report=objectonly" target="object" rid-ob="figobtable2">TABLE 2</a></h4><p class="float-caption no_bottom_margin">Analytical framework for qualitative analysis </p></div></div><p>Finally, we asked the research teams to write a short reflective report on their experience of conducting the prioritisation meetings. These were also analysed thematically to identify learning for how to optimise the process.</p></div></div></div><div id="s4"><h2 id="_s4_">Results</h2><div id="s4-1"><h3>Patient, practitioner and policy/manager participants</h3><p>Meetings were attended by four to eight members of each external stakeholder group in each of the countries, representing a range of demographic characteristics (with the exception of China, where all patients were male and clinicians were all general practitioners) (<i><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/table3/?report=objectonly" target="object" rid-ob="figobtable3">Table 3</a></i>). Research team ratings were completed by four to six researchers per country.</p><div class="iconblock whole_rhythm clearfix ten_col table-wrap" id="figtable3"><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/table3/?report=objectonly" target="object" title="TABLE 3" class="img_link icnblk_img" rid-ob="figobtable3"><img class="small-thumb" src="/corehtml/pmc/css/bookshelf/2.26/img/table-icon.gif" alt="Table Icon" /></a><div class="icnblk_cntnt"><h4 id="table3"><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/table3/?report=objectonly" target="object" rid-ob="figobtable3">TABLE 3</a></h4><p class="float-caption no_bottom_margin">Description of patient, clinician and policy-maker/manager participants </p></div></div><div id="s4-1-1"><h4>Ratings</h4><p>Research topics that were rated highly across all countries, by the majority of stakeholder participant groups, included <i>testing of lung age to aid smoking cessation, evaluating adapted pulmonary rehabilitation programmes, exploring how to improve clinical education for primary care staff and identifying efficient COPD screening test strategies</i> (see <i><a class="figpopup" href="/books/NBK612379/figure/fig4/?report=objectonly" target="object" rid-figpopup="figfig4" rid-ob="figobfig4">Figure 4</a></i>, <i><a href="#app6">Appendix 6</a></i>). The majority of the remaining topics had less consistent ratings. In Brazil and Georgia, <i>evaluation of handwashing to reduce exacerbations</i> was rated highly by patients whereas policy-makers gave it low importance, and in North Macedonia, the <i>impact of weight management on dyspnoea and quality of life</i> was rated highly by patients and policy-makers, but most clinicians rated it as having low importance. <i>Evaluation of the use of e-cigarettes for quitting smoking</i> had low overall ratings across most countries.</p><p>Variability in ratings between stakeholders was lowest in Brazil, with the majority of research topics being considered as very important by all stakeholders. China stakeholders demonstrated relatively consistent ratings for most topics, with the most variability seen for the handwashing and weight management topics, where clinicians rated these lower. Greater variation between stakeholder groups was observed in Georgia and North Macedonia, where less than half of the topics had reasonable agreement. In Georgia, patients were most likely to rate topics as very important and the policy-maker group more likely to rate topics as not important. In general, most stakeholders across all four countries rated research on e-cigarettes as not important or were unsure, although clinicians in Georgia and Brazil rated it more highly.</p><p>Research team participant scores were similar to the external stakeholders in terms of topics rating highest and lowest. Across the settings, the topics with the highest ratings (widest stars) included <i>improving clinical COPD education for primary care staff, communication of lung age for smoking cessation, feasibility of an adapted pulmonary rehabilitation programme</i> and <i>efficiency of COPD screening strategies</i> (<i><a class="figpopup" href="/books/NBK612379/figure/fig2/?report=objectonly" target="object" rid-figpopup="figfig2" rid-ob="figobfig2">Figure 2</a></i>). The topics concerning e-cigarettes and handwashing received low ratings from the research teams in all four countries. Overall, the larger number of domains used in the research teams’ ratings did not identify substantial differences, with topics tending to have similar ratings across all six domains. The study regarding the use of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation was an exception to this pattern, being rated as novel but relatively unimportant. In Brazil, across all research topics, the likelihood of attracting future funding was rated lower than the other five domains.</p></div><div id="s4-1-2"><h4>Rankings</h4><p>Overall, in three out of four countries, the top ranked topic was <i>identifying efficient COPD screening test strategies</i> (<i><a class="figpopup" href="/books/NBK612379/figure/fig3/?report=objectonly" target="object" rid-figpopup="figfig3" rid-ob="figobfig3">Figure 3</a></i>), and it was ranked second in the fourth country (North Macedonia). <i>Clinical education for primary care staff</i> was second ranked in China and Brazil and third ranked in Georgia. <i>Evaluations of lung age to aid smoking cessation</i> was highest ranked in North Macedonia, and research on the <i>feasibility of locally adapted pulmonary rehabilitation</i> was second ranked in Georgia, and third in Brazil and North Macedonia. Topics concerning e-cigarettes, weight management and handwashing were ranked lowest across all countries. Differences between stakeholder groups were observable, both within and between countries. Among patients, <i>exploring how to improve clinical education for primary care staff</i> was ranked as most important in China, but relatively low in Georgia and North Macedonia. <i>Evaluation of lung age to aid smoking cessation</i> was ranked highly by patients in China, but not by those in Brazil. In contrast, clinicians and policy-makers in Brazil ranked this highly. The study with the most discrepant rankings across countries concerned <i>barriers and enablers to good-quality COPD management</i>. With the exception of Georgia, there was between a five- and seven-point difference in rankings between stakeholder groups for this particular study, with no consistent pattern by stakeholder group. Among the researcher group, patterns were similar to the overall summary, although the <i>study exploring views on the barriers and enablers to good-quality COPD management</i> was more prominent.</p><div class="iconblock whole_rhythm clearfix ten_col fig" id="figfig3" co-legend-rid="figlgndfig3"><a href="/books/NBK612379/figure/fig3/?report=objectonly" target="object" title="FIGURE 3" class="img_link icnblk_img figpopup" rid-figpopup="figfig3" rid-ob="figobfig3"><img class="small-thumb" src="/books/NBK612379/bin/NIHR135810_fig3.gif" src-large="/books/NBK612379/bin/NIHR135810_fig3.jpg" alt="FIGURE 3. Stakeholder and research team rankings of the 10 research topics, by country." /></a><div class="icnblk_cntnt" id="figlgndfig3"><h4 id="fig3"><a href="/books/NBK612379/figure/fig3/?report=objectonly" target="object" rid-ob="figobfig3">FIGURE 3</a></h4><p class="float-caption no_bottom_margin">Stakeholder and research team rankings of the 10 research topics, by country. 1 = E-cigarettes; 2 = Lung age; 3 = Screening tests; 4 = Early treatment; 5 = Quality management; 6 = PR feasibility; 7 = PR outcomes; 8 = Weight management; 9 = Handwashing; <a href="/books/NBK612379/figure/fig3/?report=objectonly" target="object" rid-ob="figobfig3">(more...)</a></p></div></div></div></div><div id="s4-2"><h3>Qualitative analysis from transcripts to explain and learn from RAPID-RP</h3><div id="s4-2-1"><h4>Participant engagement</h4><p>Levels and nature of the engagement with each of the projects varied across the different countries and types of stakeholders. This was in part related to the experiences and research literacy of the stakeholder participant and in part a reflection on the experience and background of the facilitator.</p><p>Although evidence vignettes were provided to accompany each research study, participants usually needed further clarification about the meaning of specific research topics. Redirection by the facilitators was also required if participants were focused on general or unrelated topic areas rather than the study-specific topic (e.g. smoking cessation rather than e-cigarettes), or they were unnecessarily concerned about possible difficulties in methodologies. These concerns sometimes dominated other aspects and could have adversely influenced ratings/rankings.</p><p>While discussing research topics, stakeholders often reflected on their own experiences to support their perspective. Patients, for example, talked extensively about their experiences of smoking cessation and e-cigarette use, citing family pressure to quit smoking and discussing the cost of e-cigarettes. Some clinicians commented that, in their experience, multicomponent smoking cessation interventions appeared more successful than simple interventions such as e-cigarettes, while some secondary care clinicians discussed their view of the importance of improving clinical education to avoid inappropriate referrals and misdiagnoses.</p><p><i><a href="/books/NBK612379/box/box1/?report=objectonly" target="object" rid-ob="figobbox1">Box 1</a></i> provides recommendations for engagement drawn from our learning.</p><div class="iconblock whole_rhythm clearfix ten_col boxed-text" id="figbox1"><a href="/books/NBK612379/box/box1/?report=objectonly" target="object" title="Box 1" class="img_link icnblk_img" rid-ob="figobbox1"><img class="small-thumb" src="/corehtml/pmc/css/bookshelf/2.26/img/box-icon.gif" alt="Box Icon" /></a><div class="icnblk_cntnt"><h4 id="box1"><a href="/books/NBK612379/box/box1/?report=objectonly" target="object" rid-ob="figobbox1">Box 1</a></h4><p class="float-caption no_bottom_margin">Recommendations based on ‘what worked’ </p></div></div></div><div id="s4-2-2"><h4>Additional research questions</h4><p>Participants made few suggestions for additional research topics beyond the 10 proposals, although those which arose naturally evolved from the discussions. The relatively fixed structure of meetings may be responsible for this, with facilitators focusing mainly on the prescribed content.</p></div><div id="s4-2-3"><h4>Facilitator style</h4><p>The structured nature of the discussions, ordered around the 10 proposals and the ranking/rating process, meant that overall the process was facilitator-led. However, within that broad structure, a range of facilitative styles were noted, with some facilitators being more effective at engaging all participants (see <i><a href="/books/NBK612379/box/box2/?report=objectonly" target="object" rid-ob="figobbox2">Box 2</a></i> for examples of prompts used) and generating debate and discussion, while others were more directive. In all cases, participants were able to share their views on the possible research projects to some extent.</p><div class="iconblock whole_rhythm clearfix ten_col boxed-text" id="figbox2"><a href="/books/NBK612379/box/box2/?report=objectonly" target="object" title="Box 2" class="img_link icnblk_img" rid-ob="figobbox2"><img class="small-thumb" src="/corehtml/pmc/css/bookshelf/2.26/img/box-icon.gif" alt="Box Icon" /></a><div class="icnblk_cntnt"><h4 id="box2"><a href="/books/NBK612379/box/box2/?report=objectonly" target="object" rid-ob="figobbox2">Box 2</a></h4><p class="float-caption no_bottom_margin">Examples of useful prompts used by facilitators </p></div></div><p>Facilitation style seemed to be more closely related to the facilitators themselves than to the stakeholder group, for example open facilitators adopted the same approach whether it was healthcare professionals, policy-makers or patients in the group. We did not observe differences by stakeholder group in terms of engagement or interaction.</p><p>Key challenges for facilitators included managing participant misunderstanding about the process, and difficulties in encouraging non-contributors to participate, or disagreements to be voiced in the group. There was little evidence of participant disagreement across all stakeholder groups, and therefore a key suggestion is to ensure more in-depth facilitator training before conducting the prioritisation exercise.</p></div><div id="s4-2-4"><h4>Participant views on prioritisation process</h4><p>Overall, participants were supportive of the prioritisation process, acknowledging the importance of identifying topics that could have an impact on health in different countries. It appeared that some clinicians and policy-makers had previously participated in similar processes, with varied opinions about their success. However, such involvement was a novelty for patients in all countries, who were very enthusiastic about these meetings and the potential to inform future research.</p></div><div id="s4-2-5"><h4>Contextual issues affecting decision-making</h4><p>The rationale for decisions about ratings and rankings for the topics varied across the different stakeholder groups and countries. However, it was clear from discussions that decisions were shaped (as intended) by demographic, organisational, socio-cultural, economic and other contextual issues, allowing the team to gain insight into differences across settings. For example, some participants considered that informing smokers of their lung age would likely encourage smoking cessation while others thought that information alone would be insufficient, and the respective ratings/rankings reflected these differing opinions. Overall, the perceived acceptance, feasibility and impact of interventions, were they to be implemented in real life, seemed to be the strongest factor influencing ranking/ratings. Within this, themes arising from the discussions that influenced decisions are summarised below and illustrated by selected translated quotes (<i><a href="/books/NBK612379/box/box3/?report=objectonly" target="object" rid-ob="figobbox3">Box 3</a></i>).</p><div class="iconblock whole_rhythm clearfix ten_col boxed-text" id="figbox3"><a href="/books/NBK612379/box/box3/?report=objectonly" target="object" title="Box 3" class="img_link icnblk_img" rid-ob="figobbox3"><img class="small-thumb" src="/corehtml/pmc/css/bookshelf/2.26/img/box-icon.gif" alt="Box Icon" /></a><div class="icnblk_cntnt"><h4 id="box3"><a href="/books/NBK612379/box/box3/?report=objectonly" target="object" rid-ob="figobbox3">Box 3</a></h4><p class="float-caption no_bottom_margin">Contextual issues influencing decisions </p></div></div><div id="s4-2-5-1"><h5>Practical barriers</h5><p>Participants did not prioritise topics that they deemed to have little chance of being accepted or adhered to long term. For example, non-availability of clean water in some rural areas was considered a barrier to interventions to promote handwashing in Georgia and Brazil. Exploration of views on e-cigarettes for smoking cessation was opposed in Brazil, China and Georgia as participants discussed that they were either not available or were too expensive. Some participants acknowledged practical barriers to other topics, such as lack of provision of pulmonary rehabilitation in small hospitals/cities.</p></div><div id="s4-2-5-2"><h5>Regional factors</h5><p>Others alluded to attitudinal and socio-cultural factors influencing implementation and acceptability in different regions of their countries. Participants discussed research needs being heterogeneous, with some topics being more relevant or important in some subgroups of the population or in certain geographical areas. For example, urban populations were perceived as more accepting of new initiatives, while smoking cessation interventions were considered unlikely to succeed in rural areas as smoking was ingrained in the culture. Patients in more deprived or rural areas were considered to have lower health awareness and worse health education, leading to poor self-management of their COPD and delayed consultations with clinicians.</p></div><div id="s4-2-5-3"><h5>Organisational factors</h5><p>Healthcare organisational issues were considered in participants’ decision-making. For example, research on <i>clinical education of primary care staff</i> was anticipated to facilitate expansion of access to medical treatment by giving patients confidence to visit doctors in rural locations rather than relying on hospital doctors. Conversely, the poor reputation of primary care clinicians’ ability and knowledge in several of the countries caused patients to have a clear preference to consult secondary care doctors or those in major hospitals, rather than those in primary care or smaller hospitals. The divide between primary and secondary care was also apparent in clinician group discussions, with secondary care doctors in North Macedonia citing misdiagnoses and inappropriate referrals from primary care counterparts. Although ranked highly, interventions such as <i>lung age for smoking cessation</i> and <i>screening for undiagnosed COPD</i> were thought by some to potentially impact negatively on patient consultations due to the perceived increased time required, and interventions to promote <i>handwashing</i> could harm doctor patient relationships by causing offence.</p></div><div id="s4-2-5-4"><h5>Socio-cultural factors</h5><p>Cultural issues informed some decisions, such as the pervasiveness of tobacco use in some communities like Macedonia and China, making smoking cessation interventions more challenging to accept.</p></div><div id="s4-2-5-5"><h5>Economic factors</h5><p>Economic factors influenced discussion around various research topics, particularly among clinicians and policy-makers, with the <i>test accuracy</i> study prioritised due to the perceived need to identify cost-effective strategies for identifying undiagnosed COPD in resource-limited settings. Cost implications were discussed in relation to the future implementation of interventions, with clinicians and policy-makers in several countries citing costs as a barrier for purchasing required equipment, and there was an acknowledgement that patients in more deprived areas would not be able to afford some interventions. While affordability was a key reason for the e-cigarette study receiving poor ratings, legal and regulatory issues were also cited, due to licensing and regulation not being in place in most countries.</p></div></div></div><div id="s4-3"><h3>Reflections of research teams</h3><p>The prioritisation activity was new for the research teams, but all found this a successful approach for deciding on research priorities. Attendance of relevant stakeholders was secured by flexibility and direct invitations, including personal invitation of patients from their own doctors. Feedback from patients after attendance was extremely positive, some citing this as the only time they had been asked for their opinions.</p><p>In order to mitigate against potential power imbalances, patient stakeholders were consulted in a separate group, but research teams emphasised parity of all stakeholders’ contributions, with one team giving patients name cards at the prioritisation meeting, naming them ‘patient experts’ to demonstrate that they were valued members of the meeting.</p><p>All research teams reflected on the importance of good facilitation during the meeting, in terms of rephrasing study material using lay terminology to optimise understanding, ensuring engagement of all participants, and refocusing discussion to the specific research topics in question.</p></div><div id="s4-4"><h3>Outcomes</h3><p>The prioritisation process was successful in identifying the top research priorities in each country, which both informed the successfully delivered Breathe Well research programme<a class="bibr" href="#ref1-bib14" rid="ref1-bib14"><sup>14</sup></a><sup>–</sup><a class="bibr" href="#ref1-bib17" rid="ref1-bib17"><sup>17</sup></a> and provided the rationale for subsequent and future projects. Informed by country-specific priorities, the Breathe Well programme included topics to identify the most efficient screening strategies for undiagnosed COPD in Brazil and China, a study to adapt and evaluate the feasibility of delivering pulmonary rehabilitation in Georgia, and a trial to evaluate the effectiveness of providing information on lung age on quitting among smokers in Macedonia. Subsequently, two teams explored developing topics to improve education on respiratory disease for primary care staff. Aside from the selection of research topics, the prioritisation process had additional beneficial impacts for the teams, including being a springboard for patient and stakeholder involvement that continued throughout the research topics, increasing awareness of the respiratory research programme within the locality and influencing national policy.<a class="bibr" href="#ref1-bib18" rid="ref1-bib18"><sup>18</sup></a></p></div></div><div id="s5"><h2 id="_s5_">Discussion</h2><p>We developed a rapid prioritisation process which was successfully implemented across four distinct settings with stakeholder groups that had no prior experience of inputting to research ideas. Local research teams successfully convened and conducted this rapid prioritisation exercise with minimal support. Four to eight members of each stakeholder group (individual groups of patients, clinicians and managers/policy-makers, or combined where locally appropriate) participated in a 3- to 4-hour meeting, prioritising the research questions most important to their local context.</p><p>Our simple metrics-based approach was pragmatic, accessible and acceptable, and of particular value in LMIC settings where stakeholder involvement in prioritisation is a relatively novel concept and patient organisations for either peer support or inputting to service or research activities rarely exist. It provided an objective approach to prioritisation based on majority ranking but also allowed us to highlight differing perspectives among stakeholders. Using qualitative analysis of the discussions, we gained insights into factors influencing prioritisation decisions.</p><p>While the summary ratings produced variable results across stakeholders and between countries, rankings were more consistent, more easily interpretable and likely to better represent the discussions. The ratings and subsequent discussion probably allowed people to reflect about the topics before deciding on the final rankings. There were five research topics which were consistently highly ranked (<i>identifying effective COPD screening test strategies, exploring how to improve clinical education for primary care staff, evaluating adapted pulmonary rehabilitation programmes, testing of lung age to aid smoking cessation, and exploring barriers and enablers to good-quality COPD management</i>). The ordering varied a little across the countries, generally reflecting the final selected research projects, but screening for undiagnosed COPD was the lead priority in Brazil, China and Georgia and the second priority in North Macedonia. In Georgia, priorities were more consistent between the different stakeholder groups than in the other three countries but overall there were no particular patterns of note. With a simple descriptive process and limited data, it was not possible to unpick any clear trends of differences between groups. There were three research questions which were consistently at the bottom of the rankings (<i>evaluations of handwashing to reduce exacerbations, the impact of weight management on dyspnoea and quality of life</i>, and <i>the use of e-cigarettes for quitting smoking</i>).</p><p>Observations and reflections about the rapid process of prioritisation revealed important learning. Researchers and participants engaged well and gave very positive feedback about the process. Patients in particular were enthusiastic about the opportunity to inform future research on their own illness. Having a structured approach was helpful to ensure adequate discussion of the 10 proposed topics. The evidence briefs provided a useful starting point, although facilitators needed to further clarify the topics or context during the meeting, especially for patient participants. Facilitator style varied, and it was important to maintain a balance between avoiding being too directive and ensuring focus on the topics and domains of relevance. Participants found equity to be the most difficult domain to consider, and feasibility sometimes dominated conversations, although eventually decisions were often based on likely research impact. Facilitators were able to find prompts to encourage participants to give their views but recognised the need for good communication skills and more training in this area.</p><p>It was clear from both the differences in priorities and the recorded discussions that this process truly reflected local needs, that context was influential during decision-making and that the perceived acceptance and impact of interventions were the strongest factors influencing the decision-making. Economic factors were also important for clinicians and managers/policy-makers.</p><div id="s5-1"><h3>Comparison with other literature</h3><p>Our method brings together and adapts the most useful aspects of previously published prioritisation methods to provide an approach suitable for rapid prioritisation with a range of different stakeholders in LMIC settings. The CHNRI method<a class="bibr" href="#ref1-bib6" rid="ref1-bib6"><sup>6</sup></a> requires research ideas to be suggested by expert participants or the management team based on current evidence and these are scored using five standard criteria: answerability, equity, impact, deliverability and effectiveness. Our tool also uses research ideas generated by experts, but uses a simpler framework with only three criteria, which may be simpler for participants. Another advantage over the CHNRI process is the ability for discussion and clarification of the research synopsis provided while still maintaining independent grading by participants. This type of social process can add value over a purely technical approach, as observed in other prioritisation approaches such as the Socio-Technical Allocation of Resources (STAR) process for distributing funding for patient treatments because it recognises that successful resource allocation processes depend on transparent stakeholder engagement and discussion that elicits their different weighting of judging criteria.<a class="bibr" href="#ref1-bib18" rid="ref1-bib18"><sup>18</sup></a><sup>,</sup><a class="bibr" href="#ref1-bib19" rid="ref1-bib19"><sup>19</sup></a> The addition of discussion and reflection prior to the final ranking allowed some degree of consensus building.</p><p>Our research teams considered six criteria, but this did not add particular value over the three criteria used by the other participants. In contrast with the James Lind Alliance approach,<a class="bibr" href="#ref1-bib8" rid="ref1-bib8"><sup>8</sup></a> an extensive systematic review of the evidence was not required; we used topic and methodology experts’ knowledge of the literature, and local practitioner input of their context, to create accessible vignettes to discuss with participants. All consensus building processes were completed in less than one day, which is much faster than the multistep, time-consuming process required by other methods.<a class="bibr" href="#ref1-bib6" rid="ref1-bib6"><sup>6</sup></a><sup>,</sup><a class="bibr" href="#ref1-bib7" rid="ref1-bib7"><sup>7</sup></a><sup>,</sup><a class="bibr" href="#ref1-bib9" rid="ref1-bib9"><sup>9</sup></a></p></div><div id="s5-2"><h3>Strengths and limitations</h3><p>To our knowledge, this rapid, pragmatic approach is novel, especially when applied to LMIC settings. Other researchers have adapted the James Lind Alliance method to a more rapid approach,<a class="bibr" href="#ref1-bib20" rid="ref1-bib20"><sup>20</sup></a> mainly focusing on efficient literature review methods, but our approach was closer to an adaptation of the CHNRI method, bringing in aspects of consensus building. We relied on the knowledge of topic, methodology and local practitioner experts all working in respiratory health to identify topics for prioritisation. We assumed that their expertise and knowledge of the literature was sufficient to identify relevant research gaps within the context of the project remit. However, it is possible that a more thorough literature review would have identified additional topics.</p><p>While some local LMIC research teams had previously collaborated with clinicians and policy-makers, particularly those with policy roles, no teams had prior experience of involving patients in this way. With no established patient support groups in these countries (nor in many other LMICs), recruiting and involving appropriate patients was a new challenge. Although a range of patients were recruited successfully through personal invitations, this approach may have limited the type of patients who participated and doctors’ subconscious biases may have influenced patient selection. Nevertheless, this pragmatic approach resulted in a range of patient views to be considered, and benefit to the involved patients was also reported. Anecdotal evidence as well as qualitative data demonstrated that all participants engaged in the process, valued the contribution of all stakeholders and were willing to participate in such initiatives in the future.</p><p>All research teams were able to recruit sufficient numbers and choose appropriate participants from all stakeholder groups and were able to implement the prioritisation process in their localities with minimal support. The meetings were relatively quick and cheap to organise, suggesting it could be a sustainable model to use in the future. We tested our process in four diverse LMICs with different demography, social and political situations and healthcare structures, which suggests that our approach is transferable to multiple settings. Learning could also be tested for transferability to high-income settings where a pragmatic rapid approach is required.</p><p>Despite efforts to obtain participants’ perceptions of the selected research topics, it is possible that the facilitators’ own views may have influenced the discussions or decisions of the groups. While facilitator intervention was required on occasions to refocus discussion or clarify meanings, it is possible that their input will have influenced the discussions.</p><p>As participant recruitment took place in one geographical area of each country, the results of the prioritisation process are not necessarily representative and the results therefore need interpreting with caution. The process therefore could be repeated in localities with different socio-demographic characteristics, to capture the views of the wider society.</p></div><div id="s5-3"><h3>Implications for future practice</h3><p>While we gave brief training to all facilitator teams in advance of the meetings, and this was sufficient for delivering the process, our findings suggest that additional targeted training would have been beneficial, focusing on how to orientate participants at the start of the session regarding the purpose, how best to facilitate active and inclusive discussion, and clarifying the meaning and purpose of each study proposal. In addition, the importance of a supporting role for the facilitator team was noted, that is an external person attending the meetings, with a clear awareness of the overall process, with an ability to generate good working relationships with facilitators and to discuss the practicalities of running the process.</p><p>Specific lessons learnt include:</p><ul><li class="half_rhythm"><div>Plan timings and location to optimise attendance and participation.</div></li><li class="half_rhythm"><div>Personal invitation especially from doctors is helpful to engage patients, although this should be balanced by ensuring inclusivity of a diverse range of patients.</div></li><li class="half_rhythm"><div>Local context is important in terms of determining group membership and whether stakeholder groups can be combined or remain separate. Potential power imbalances should also be considered.</div></li><li class="half_rhythm"><div>Simple criteria for driving discussions are more easily understood than multiple domains; equity was found to be a difficult concept.</div></li><li class="half_rhythm"><div>A simple traffic light system was good for ratings, but rankings were eventually the most discriminatory.</div></li><li class="half_rhythm"><div>Hold sufficient training sessions before the prioritisation meeting to ensure all facilitators are fully prepared.</div></li><li class="half_rhythm"><div>Build in time and prompts to allow for additional topics to be contributed.</div></li><li class="half_rhythm"><div>Double-check translation to maximise clarity and understanding of the process and vignettes.</div></li></ul></div><div id="s5-4"><h3>Recommendations for future research</h3><p>Although we successfully adapted and simplified the prioritisation process, this needs replication in other contexts. Based on our experience, there are several aspects of the rapid prioritisation process that need further exploration to allow validation and potentially further simplification. These include:</p><ul><li class="half_rhythm"><div>The research topic identification was led by expert knowledge and gaps filled by checking the list against knowledge of other stakeholders during the prioritisation workshops. A comparison of this approach against a formal systematic literature review is needed to validate it.</div></li><li class="half_rhythm"><div>We used a summary of rankings from different stakeholder groups to decide on priorities. The ranking was undertaken after a group discussion and reflection on each topic. A comparison of this approach against independent ranking (i.e. with no prior group discussion) would allow us to understand to what extent the discussion process contributes to consensus building.</div></li><li class="half_rhythm"><div>Rating against different domains by researchers showed little discrimination between domains and all participants struggled with equity as a domain. Future research should tease out whether and to what extent explicit rating against domains is helpful or whether a simpler single rating with implicit consideration of domains would be sufficient.</div></li><li class="half_rhythm"><div>We held meetings with only one group of each type of stakeholder in each country. Further validation should be obtained by assessing replicability of rankings in other identity-specific stakeholder groups with different compositions, or by asking another set of stakeholders to check and comment on the rankings obtained.</div></li></ul></div><div id="s5-5"><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We developed an efficient, comprehensive approach for health research priority setting within a time-limited research programme that was successfully implemented in four countries. Despite some limitations, it was well-received by participating stakeholders and enabled comparison of views from different stakeholder groups. The process allowed researchers and policy-makers to focus on research that would be of most value to each country, although stakeholder participation was geographically limited to the centres where local researchers were based, and may not be fully representative of the needs of everyone. Due to the minimal resources required and the brevity of the process, it may be attractive to other investigators in LMICs, and would also be transferable to higher income settings.</p></div></div><div id="ack1"><h2 id="_ack1_">Additional information</h2><div id="ack1-1"><h3>Contributions of authors</h3><p><b>Andrew P Dickens(<a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7591-8129" ref="pagearea=body&targetsite=external&targetcat=link&targettype=uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7591-8129</a>)</b> (Epidemiologist Research Fellow) conceptualised and designed the process and trained the research teams; contributed to identification of the research topics for prioritisation and the development of the prioritisation process; qualitative analyses; wrote the first draft of the paper; approved the final draft.</p><p><b>Nicola Gale(<a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5295-8841" ref="pagearea=body&targetsite=external&targetcat=link&targettype=uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5295-8841</a>)</b> (Health Sociologist and Qualitative Expert) conceptualised and designed the process and trained the research teams; contributed to identification of the research topics for prioritisation and the development of the prioritisation process; qualitative analyses (supervision); wrote the first draft of the paper (supervision); approved the final draft.</p><p><b>Peymane Adab(<a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9087-3945" ref="pagearea=body&targetsite=external&targetcat=link&targettype=uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9087-3945</a>)</b> (Co-PI, Public Health Physician) conceptualised and designed the process and trained the research teams; contributed to identification of the research topics for prioritisation and the development of the prioritisation process; wrote the first draft of the paper (supervision); approved the final draft.</p><p><b>KK Cheng(<a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1516-1857" ref="pagearea=body&targetsite=external&targetcat=link&targettype=uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1516-1857</a>)</b> (Professor of Primary Care and Epidemiology) contributed to identification of the research topics for prioritisation and the development of the prioritisation process; approved the final draft.</p><p><b>Chunhua Chi(<a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3566-5582" ref="pagearea=body&targetsite=external&targetcat=link&targettype=uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3566-5582</a>)</b> (Professor of Family and Respiratory Medicine) led the delivery of the stakeholder engagement in each country; contributed to identification of the research topics for prioritisation and the development of the prioritisation process; approved the final draft.</p><p><b>Jaime Correia de Sousa(<a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6459-7908" ref="pagearea=body&targetsite=external&targetcat=link&targettype=uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6459-7908</a>)</b> (Primary Care Professor) contributed to identification of the research topics for prioritisation and the development of the prioritisation process; approved the final draft.</p><p><b>Alexandra Enocson(<a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4415-0989" ref="pagearea=body&targetsite=external&targetcat=link&targettype=uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4415-0989</a>)</b> (Breathe Well Programme Manager and Respiratory Practitioner) contributed to identification of the research topics for prioritisation and the development of the prioritisation process; approved the final draft.</p><p><b>Amanda Farley(<a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4370-0264" ref="pagearea=body&targetsite=external&targetcat=link&targettype=uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4370-0264</a>)</b> (Epidemiologist) contributed to identification of the research topics for prioritisation and the development of the prioritisation process; approved the final draft.</p><p><b>Kate Jolly(<a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6224-2115" ref="pagearea=body&targetsite=external&targetcat=link&targettype=uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6224-2115</a>)</b> (Professor of Public Health) contributed to identification of the research topics for prioritisation and the development of the prioritisation process; approved the final draft.</p><p><b>Sue Jowett(<a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8936-3745" ref="pagearea=body&targetsite=external&targetcat=link&targettype=uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8936-3745</a>)</b> (Health Economist) contributed to identification of the research topics for prioritisation and the development of the prioritisation process; approved the final draft.</p><p><b>Mariam Maglakelidze(<a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6513-0509" ref="pagearea=body&targetsite=external&targetcat=link&targettype=uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6513-0509</a>)</b> (Public Health Clinician) led the delivery of the stakeholder engagement in each country; contributed to identification of the research topics for prioritisation and the development of the prioritisation process; approved the final draft.</p><p><b>Tamaz Maghlakelidze(<a href="https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1237-8558" ref="pagearea=body&targetsite=external&targetcat=link&targettype=uri">https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1237-8558</a>)</b> (Respiratory Consultant) led the delivery of the stakeholder engagement in each country; contributed to identification of the research topics for prioritisation and the development of the prioritisation process; approved the final draft.</p><p><b>Sonia Martins(<a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5405-5064" ref="pagearea=body&targetsite=external&targetcat=link&targettype=uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5405-5064</a>)</b> (Primary Care Respiratory Physician) led the delivery of the stakeholder engagement in each country; contributed to identification of the research topics for prioritisation and the development of the prioritisation process; approved the final draft.</p><p><b>Zihan Pan(<a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4502-1107" ref="pagearea=body&targetsite=external&targetcat=link&targettype=uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4502-1107</a>)</b> (Primary Care Clinician) led the delivery of the stakeholder engagement in each country (support); contributed to identification of the research topics for prioritisation and the development of the prioritisation process; approved the final draft.</p><p><b>Alice Sitch(<a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7727-4497" ref="pagearea=body&targetsite=external&targetcat=link&targettype=uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7727-4497</a>)</b> (Medical Statistician) contributed to identification of the research topics for prioritisation and the development of the prioritisation process; approved the final draft.</p><p><b>Katrina Stavrikj(<a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8319-4554" ref="pagearea=body&targetsite=external&targetcat=link&targettype=uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8319-4554</a>)</b> (Director of Centre for Family Medicine) led the delivery of the stakeholder engagement in each country; contributed to identification of the research topics for prioritisation and the development of the prioritisation process; approved the final draft.</p><p><b>Alice Turner(<a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5947-3254" ref="pagearea=body&targetsite=external&targetcat=link&targettype=uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5947-3254</a>)</b> (Professor of Respiratory Medicine) contributed to identification of the research topics for prioritisation and the development of the prioritisation process; approved the final draft.</p><p><b>Siân Williams(<a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0527-2254" ref="pagearea=body&targetsite=external&targetcat=link&targettype=uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0527-2254</a>)</b> (Public Health Manager and Chief Executive of the International Primary Care Respiratory Group) contributed to identification of the research topics for prioritisation and the development of the prioritisation process; approved the final draft.</p><p><b>Rachel E Jordan(<a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0747-6883" ref="pagearea=body&targetsite=external&targetcat=link&targettype=uri">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0747-6883</a>)</b> (PI, Epidemiologist) conceptualised and designed the process and trained the research teams; contributed to identification of the research topics for prioritisation and the development of the prioritisation process; wrote the first draft of the paper (supervision); approved the final draft.</p></div><div id="ack1-2"><h3>Acknowledgements</h3><p>The investigator and collaborative team includes: Rachel E Jordan, Peymane Adab (CIs), Andrew P Dickens, Nicola Gale, Alexandra Enocson, Brendan G Cooper, Alice Sitch, Sue Jowett, Rafael Stelmach, Rachel Adams, Kar Keung Cheng, Chunhua Chi, Jaime Correia de Sousa, Amanda Farley, Kate Jolly, Mariam Maglakelidze, Tamaz Maghlakelidze, Zihan Pan, Katrina Stavrikj, Alice Turner and Siân Williams. We are grateful for support from our International Scientific Advisory Committee (Professor Debbie Jarvis, Faculty of Medicine, National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London [Chair]; Dr Semira Manaseki-Holland, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham; Professor David Mannino, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky; Professor Niels Chavannes, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center). We acknowledge work done by Jihong Kim (sociology master’s student) who conducted the initial data analyses, supervised by Dickens and Gale. We especially want to thank the stakeholders who participated in the described meetings and the research teams for their assistance, without whom this work would not have been possible. We gratefully acknowledge International Primary Care Respiratory Group (IPCRG) for introducing us to the primary care networks involved in this study and for its continued facilitation of clinical engagement. We would also like to acknowledge Radmila Ristovska (1955–2020), also involved in the initiation of this study.</p></div><div id="ack1-3"><h3>Data-sharing statement</h3><p>All available data are held securely and enquiries for access can be made through the corresponding author.</p></div><div id="ack1-4"><h3>Ethics statement</h3><p>This report is based on the description of a process of stakeholder consultation to establish research priorities, rather than a research study. As such, no ethical approval was sought.</p></div><div id="ack1-5"><h3>Information governance statement</h3><p>The University of Birmingham is committed to handling all personal information in line with the UK Data Protection Act (2018) and the General Data Protection Regulation (EU GDPR) 2016/679. Under the Data Protection legislation, The University of Birmingham is the Data Controller, and you can find out more about how we handle personal data, including how to exercise your individual rights and the contact details for our Data Protection Officer here: <a href="https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/documents/university/legal/university-of-birmingham-data-protection-policy.pdf" ref="pagearea=body&targetsite=external&targetcat=link&targettype=uri">www.birmingham.ac.uk/documents/university/legal/university-of-birmingham-data-protection-policy.pdf</a></p></div><div id="ack1-6"><h3>Disclosure of interests</h3><p><b>Full disclosure of interests:</b> Completed ICMJE forms for all authors, including all related interests, are available in the toolkit on the NIHR Journals Library report publication page at <a href="https://doi.org/10.3310/CTHF1385" ref="pagearea=body&targetsite=external&targetcat=link&targettype=uri">https://doi.org/10.3310/CTHF1385</a>.</p><p><b>Primary conflicts of interest:</b> Peymane Adab declares grant funding paid to her institution from NIHR, MRC and Colt Foundation, funding to her institution and to cover expenses as Chair of NIHR Public Health Research Funding Committee, Deputy Director of NIHR School for Public Health Research, funding to cover expenses as Member of Wellcome Trust Early Career Advisory Group in Population and Public Health, Output Assessor for Panel A, Subpanel 2 in 2021 Research Excellence Framework, and unfunded contributions as Chair for several NIHR funded TSCs, Member of the MRC funded Natural Experiments Evaluations Project Oversight Group, Member of Obesity Health Alliance Independent Obesity Strategy Working Group, Member of NIHR Palliative and End of Life Care Research Partnerships Call Panel, NIHR/UKRI Long COVID Funding Call Panel, NIHR COVID-19 Recovery and Learning Funding Committee; Jaime Correia de Sousa declares grant funding to his institution from AstraZeneca and GSK, advisory board and consulting fees paid to himself from Boheringer Ingelheim, GSK, AstraZeneca, Bial and Medinfar, payment for lectures from GSK, AstraZeneca and Sanofi Pasteur, support for attending meetings from Mundipharma and Mylan, leadership role for International Primary Care Respiratory Group (IPCRG); Amanda Farley declares grant funding paid to her institution from NIHR HTA, NIHR EME, MRC and Ethicon (Johnson and Johnson), membership on DMEC for NIHR funded e-cigarette trial (no honorarium), personal funding for leadership role for International Primary Care Respiratory Group (IPCRG) and as expert funding panel member for Cancer Research, UK;; Kate Jolly declares sub-committee chair of NIHR Programme Grants for Applied Health Research (payments to institution); Rachel E Jordan declares grant funding to her institution from NIHR, membership of Boehringer Ingelheim Primary Care Advisory Board, unfunded leadership role for International Primary Care Respiratory Group (IPCRG) – research sub-committee, membership of NIHR Global Health Group panel and RfPB COPD Highlight panel; Sue Jowett declares unfunded membership of the HTA Funding Committee Policy Group (formerly CSG) and the HTA Clinical Evaluation and Trials Committee; Alice Sitch declares grant funding to her institution from NIHR Birmingham BRC and AstraZeneca; Alice Turner declares grant funding to her institution from AstraZeneca and Chiesi, payment of honoraria from GSK and Boehringer, support for attending meetings and/or travel from AstraZeneca and Chiesi; Siân Williams declares her institution has received conference sponsorship and independent educational grants from Pfizer Global Medical Grants, AstraZeneca, GSK, Boehringer Ingelheim, Vitalograph, Caire Diagnostics and Thorasys; KK Cheng, Chunhua Chi, Andrew P Dickens, Alexandra Enocson, Nicola Gale, Tamaz Maghlakelidze, Mariam Maglakelidze, Sonia Martins, Katrina Stavrikj and Zihan Pan have no conflicts to declare.</p></div><div id="ack1-7"><h3>Department of Health and Social Care disclaimer</h3><p>This publication presents independent research commissioned by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). The views and opinions expressed by authors in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NHS, the NIHR, MRC, NIHR Coordinating Centre, the Global Health Research programme or the Department of Health and Social Care.</p><p>This article was published based on current knowledge at the time and date of publication. NIHR is committed to being inclusive and will continually monitor best practice and guidance in relation to terminology and language to ensure that we remain relevant to our stakeholders.</p></div><div id="ack1-8"><h3>Funding</h3><p>This research was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Global Health Research programme (NIHR award ref: 16/137/95) using UK aid from the UK Government to support global health research. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the UK government.</p><div id="box4" class="box boxed-text-box whole_rhythm hide-overflow"><p>This article reports on one component of the research award NIHR Global Health Research Group on Global COPD in Primary Care, University of Birmingham. Other articles published as part of this thread are: <b>[LINKS to other articles]</b>. For more information about this research please view the award page (<a href="https://www.fundingawards.nihr.ac.uk/award/16/137/95" ref="pagearea=body&targetsite=external&targetcat=link&targettype=uri">https://www.fundingawards.nihr.ac.uk/award/16/137/95</a>)</p></div></div><div id="ack1-9"><h3>About this article</h3><p>The contractual start date for this research was in June 2017. This article began editorial review in May 2023 and was accepted for publication in May 2024. The authors have been wholly responsible for all data collection, analysis and interpretation, and for writing up their work. The Global Health Research editors and publisher have tried to ensure the accuracy of the authors’ article and would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments on the draft document. However, they do not accept liability for damages or losses arising from material published in this article.</p></div><div id="ack1-10"><h3>Copyright</h3><p>Copyright © 2024 Dickens <i>et al</i>. This work was produced by Dickens <i>et al</i>. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. This is an Open Access publication distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaption in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. See: <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" ref="pagearea=body&targetsite=external&targetcat=link&targettype=uri">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</a>. For attribution the title, original author(s), the publication source – NIHR Journals Library, and the DOI of the publication must be cited.</p></div></div><div id="g1"><h2 id="_g1_">List of abbreviations</h2><dl><dt id="g1-term1">CAM</dt><dd><p>Combined Approach Matrix</p></dd><dt id="g1-term2">CHNRI</dt><dd><p>Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative</p></dd><dt id="g1-term3">COPD</dt><dd><p>chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</p></dd><dt id="g1-term4">HCP</dt><dd><p>primary health care professionals</p></dd><dt id="g1-term5">IPCRG</dt><dd><p>International Primary Care Respiratory Group</p></dd><dt id="g1-term6">LMIC</dt><dd><p>low- and middle-income countries</p></dd><dt id="g1-term7">NIHR</dt><dd><p>National Institute for Health and Care Research</p></dd><dt id="g1-term8">PR</dt><dd><p>pulmonary rehabilitation programme</p></dd><dt id="g1-term9">RAPID-RP</dt><dd><p>rapid research prioritisation approach</p></dd><dt id="g1-term10">STAR</dt><dd><p>Socio-Technical Allocation of Resources</p></dd></dl></div><div id="ref1"><h2 id="_ref1_">References</h2><dl class="temp-labeled-list"><dl class="bkr_refwrap"><dt>1.</dt><dd><div class="bk_ref" id="ref1-bib1">Fleurence RL, Torgerson DJ. Setting priorities for research. Health Policy
|
|
2004;69:1–10. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.11.002.
|
|
[<a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15484602" ref="pagearea=cite-ref&targetsite=entrez&targetcat=link&targettype=pubmed">PubMed<span class="bk_prnt">: 15484602</span></a>] [<a href="http://dx.crossref.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.11.002" ref="pagearea=cite-ref&targetsite=external&targetcat=link&targettype=uri">CrossRef</a>]</div></dd></dl><dl class="bkr_refwrap"><dt>2.</dt><dd><div class="bk_ref" id="ref1-bib2">Crowe
|
|
S, Fenton
|
|
M, Hall
|
|
M, Cowan
|
|
K, Chalmers
|
|
I. Patients’, clinicians’ and the research communities’ priorities for treatment research: there is an important mismatch. Res Invol Engag
|
|
2015;1:2. [<a href="/pmc/articles/PMC5598091/" ref="pagearea=cite-ref&targetsite=entrez&targetcat=link&targettype=pmc">PMC free article<span class="bk_prnt">: PMC5598091</span></a>] [<a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29062491" ref="pagearea=cite-ref&targetsite=entrez&targetcat=link&targettype=pubmed">PubMed<span class="bk_prnt">: 29062491</span></a>]</div></dd></dl><dl class="bkr_refwrap"><dt>3.</dt><dd><div class="bk_ref" id="ref1-bib3">Tallon
|
|
D, Chard
|
|
J, Dieppe
|
|
P. Relation between agendas of the research community and the research consumer. Lancet
|
|
2000;355:2037–40.
|
|
[<a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10885355" ref="pagearea=cite-ref&targetsite=entrez&targetcat=link&targettype=pubmed">PubMed<span class="bk_prnt">: 10885355</span></a>]</div></dd></dl><dl class="bkr_refwrap"><dt>4.</dt><dd><div class="bk_ref" id="ref1-bib4">Yoshida
|
|
S. Approaches, tools and methods used for setting priorities in health research in the 21st century. J Glob Health
|
|
2016;6:010507.
|
|
[<a href="/pmc/articles/PMC4576459/" ref="pagearea=cite-ref&targetsite=entrez&targetcat=link&targettype=pmc">PMC free article<span class="bk_prnt">: PMC4576459</span></a>] [<a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26401271" ref="pagearea=cite-ref&targetsite=entrez&targetcat=link&targettype=pubmed">PubMed<span class="bk_prnt">: 26401271</span></a>]</div></dd></dl><dl class="bkr_refwrap"><dt>5.</dt><dd><div class="bk_ref" id="ref1-bib5">Viergever
|
|
RF, Olifson
|
|
S, Ghaffar
|
|
A, Terry
|
|
RF. A checklist for health research priority setting: nine common themes of good practice. Health Res Policy Syst
|
|
2010;8:36.
|
|
[<a href="/pmc/articles/PMC3018439/" ref="pagearea=cite-ref&targetsite=entrez&targetcat=link&targettype=pmc">PMC free article<span class="bk_prnt">: PMC3018439</span></a>] [<a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21159163" ref="pagearea=cite-ref&targetsite=entrez&targetcat=link&targettype=pubmed">PubMed<span class="bk_prnt">: 21159163</span></a>]</div></dd></dl><dl class="bkr_refwrap"><dt>6.</dt><dd><div class="bk_ref" id="ref1-bib6">Rudan
|
|
I, Gibson
|
|
JL, Ameratunga
|
|
S, El Arifeen
|
|
S, Bhutta
|
|
ZA, Black
|
|
M, et al.; Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative. Setting priorities in global child health research investments: guidelines for implementation of CHNRI method. Croat Med J
|
|
2008;49:720–33.
|
|
[<a href="/pmc/articles/PMC2621022/" ref="pagearea=cite-ref&targetsite=entrez&targetcat=link&targettype=pmc">PMC free article<span class="bk_prnt">: PMC2621022</span></a>] [<a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19090596" ref="pagearea=cite-ref&targetsite=entrez&targetcat=link&targettype=pubmed">PubMed<span class="bk_prnt">: 19090596</span></a>]</div></dd></dl><dl class="bkr_refwrap"><dt>7.</dt><dd><div class="bk_ref" id="ref1-bib7">Dalkey
|
|
N, Helmer
|
|
O. An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Manage Sci
|
|
1963;9:458–67.</div></dd></dl><dl class="bkr_refwrap"><dt>8.</dt><dd><div class="bk_ref" id="ref1-bib8">The James Lind Alliance. The James Lind Alliance Guidebook. 2021. URL: <a href="https://www.jla.nihr.ac.uk/jla-guidebook/" ref="pagearea=cite-ref&targetsite=external&targetcat=link&targettype=uri">www<wbr style="display:inline-block"></wbr>​.jla.nihr.ac.uk/jla-guidebook/</a> (accessed 18 March 2024).</div></dd></dl><dl class="bkr_refwrap"><dt>9.</dt><dd><div class="bk_ref" id="ref1-bib9">Ghaffar
|
|
A, Collins
|
|
T, Matlin
|
|
SA, Olifson
|
|
S. The 3D Combined Approach Matrix: An Improved Tool for Setting Priorities in Research for Health. Geneva: Global Forum for Health Research; 2009.</div></dd></dl><dl class="bkr_refwrap"><dt>10.</dt><dd><div class="bk_ref" id="ref1-bib10">Kapiriri
|
|
L, Schuster-Wallace
|
|
C, Chanda-Kapata
|
|
P. Evaluating health research priority-setting in low-income countries: a case study of health research priority-setting in Zambia. Health Res Policy Syst
|
|
2018;16:105.
|
|
[<a href="/pmc/articles/PMC6223066/" ref="pagearea=cite-ref&targetsite=entrez&targetcat=link&targettype=pmc">PMC free article<span class="bk_prnt">: PMC6223066</span></a>] [<a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30404639" ref="pagearea=cite-ref&targetsite=entrez&targetcat=link&targettype=pubmed">PubMed<span class="bk_prnt">: 30404639</span></a>]</div></dd></dl><dl class="bkr_refwrap"><dt>11.</dt><dd><div class="bk_ref" id="ref1-bib11">Pickler
|
|
RH, Tubbs-Cooley
|
|
HL. Patient-centered outcomes research: a ‘new’ research agenda. J Pediatr Health Care
|
|
2014;28:101–4.
|
|
[<a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24100007" ref="pagearea=cite-ref&targetsite=entrez&targetcat=link&targettype=pubmed">PubMed<span class="bk_prnt">: 24100007</span></a>]</div></dd></dl><dl class="bkr_refwrap"><dt>12.</dt><dd><div class="bk_ref" id="ref1-bib12">Tembo
|
|
D, Hickey
|
|
G, Montenegro
|
|
C, Chandler
|
|
D, Nelson
|
|
E, Porter
|
|
K, et al. Effective engagement and involvement with community stakeholders in the co-production of global health research. BMJ
|
|
2021;372:n178.
|
|
[<a href="/pmc/articles/PMC7879275/" ref="pagearea=cite-ref&targetsite=entrez&targetcat=link&targettype=pmc">PMC free article<span class="bk_prnt">: PMC7879275</span></a>] [<a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33593805" ref="pagearea=cite-ref&targetsite=entrez&targetcat=link&targettype=pubmed">PubMed<span class="bk_prnt">: 33593805</span></a>]</div></dd></dl><dl class="bkr_refwrap"><dt>13.</dt><dd><div class="bk_ref" id="ref1-bib13">Gale
|
|
NK, Heath
|
|
G, Cameron
|
|
E, Rashid
|
|
S, Redwood
|
|
S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol
|
|
2013;13:117.
|
|
[<a href="/pmc/articles/PMC3848812/" ref="pagearea=cite-ref&targetsite=entrez&targetcat=link&targettype=pmc">PMC free article<span class="bk_prnt">: PMC3848812</span></a>] [<a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24047204" ref="pagearea=cite-ref&targetsite=entrez&targetcat=link&targettype=pubmed">PubMed<span class="bk_prnt">: 24047204</span></a>]</div></dd></dl><dl class="bkr_refwrap"><dt>14.</dt><dd><div class="bk_ref" id="ref1-bib14">Martins
|
|
SM, Dickens
|
|
AP, Salibe-Filho
|
|
W, Albuquerque Neto
|
|
AA, Adab
|
|
P, Enocson
|
|
A, et al. Accuracy and economic evaluation of screening tests for undiagnosed COPD among hypertensive individuals in Brazil. NPJ: Prim Care Resp Med
|
|
2022;32:55. [<a href="/pmc/articles/PMC9747958/" ref="pagearea=cite-ref&targetsite=entrez&targetcat=link&targettype=pmc">PMC free article<span class="bk_prnt">: PMC9747958</span></a>] [<a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36513683" ref="pagearea=cite-ref&targetsite=entrez&targetcat=link&targettype=pubmed">PubMed<span class="bk_prnt">: 36513683</span></a>]</div></dd></dl><dl class="bkr_refwrap"><dt>15.</dt><dd><div class="bk_ref" id="ref1-bib15">Maglakelidze
|
|
M, Kurua
|
|
I, Maglakelidze
|
|
N, Maglakelidze
|
|
T, Chkhaidze
|
|
I, Gogvadze
|
|
K, et al. Feasibility of a pulmonary rehabilitation programme for patients with symptomatic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Georgia: a single-site, randomised controlled trial from the Breathe Well Group. BMJ Open
|
|
2022;12:e056902. [<a href="/pmc/articles/PMC9511586/" ref="pagearea=cite-ref&targetsite=entrez&targetcat=link&targettype=pmc">PMC free article<span class="bk_prnt">: PMC9511586</span></a>] [<a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36153030" ref="pagearea=cite-ref&targetsite=entrez&targetcat=link&targettype=pubmed">PubMed<span class="bk_prnt">: 36153030</span></a>]</div></dd></dl><dl class="bkr_refwrap"><dt>16.</dt><dd><div class="bk_ref" id="ref1-bib16">Pang
|
|
H, Pan
|
|
Z, Adams
|
|
R, Duncan
|
|
E, Chi
|
|
C, Kong
|
|
X, et al. Community lung health service design for COPD patients in China by the Breathe Well group. NPJ: Prim Care Resp Med
|
|
2022;32:27. [<a href="/pmc/articles/PMC9388970/" ref="pagearea=cite-ref&targetsite=entrez&targetcat=link&targettype=pmc">PMC free article<span class="bk_prnt">: PMC9388970</span></a>] [<a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35985992" ref="pagearea=cite-ref&targetsite=entrez&targetcat=link&targettype=pubmed">PubMed<span class="bk_prnt">: 35985992</span></a>]</div></dd></dl><dl class="bkr_refwrap"><dt>17.</dt><dd><div class="bk_ref" id="ref1-bib17">Pan
|
|
Z, Dickens
|
|
AP, Chi
|
|
C, Kong
|
|
X, Enocson
|
|
A, G Cooper
|
|
B, et al. Accuracy and cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for identifying undiagnosed COPD among primary care patients (≥40 years) in China: a cross-sectional screening test accuracy study: findings from the Breathe Well group. BMJ Open
|
|
2021;11:e051811. [<a href="/pmc/articles/PMC8461701/" ref="pagearea=cite-ref&targetsite=entrez&targetcat=link&targettype=pmc">PMC free article<span class="bk_prnt">: PMC8461701</span></a>] [<a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34556515" ref="pagearea=cite-ref&targetsite=entrez&targetcat=link&targettype=pubmed">PubMed<span class="bk_prnt">: 34556515</span></a>]</div></dd></dl><dl class="bkr_refwrap"><dt>18.</dt><dd><div class="bk_ref" id="ref1-bib18">Fernandes
|
|
G, Williams
|
|
S, Adab
|
|
P, Gale
|
|
N, de Jong
|
|
C, de Sousa
|
|
JC, et al. Engaging stakeholders to level up COPD care in LMICs: lessons learned from the ‘Breathe Well’ programme in Brazil, China, Georgia, and North Macedonia. BMC Health Serv Res
|
|
2024;24:66.
|
|
[<a href="/pmc/articles/PMC10790249/" ref="pagearea=cite-ref&targetsite=entrez&targetcat=link&targettype=pmc">PMC free article<span class="bk_prnt">: PMC10790249</span></a>] [<a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38216986" ref="pagearea=cite-ref&targetsite=entrez&targetcat=link&targettype=pubmed">PubMed<span class="bk_prnt">: 38216986</span></a>]</div></dd></dl><dl class="bkr_refwrap"><dt>19.</dt><dd><div class="bk_ref" id="ref1-bib19">Airoldi
|
|
M, Morton
|
|
A, Smith
|
|
JAE, Bevan
|
|
G. STAR – people-powered prioritization: a 21st-century solution to allocation headaches. Med Decis Mak: Int J Soc Med Decis Mak
|
|
2014;34:965–75. [<a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25118084" ref="pagearea=cite-ref&targetsite=entrez&targetcat=link&targettype=pubmed">PubMed<span class="bk_prnt">: 25118084</span></a>]</div></dd></dl><dl class="bkr_refwrap"><dt>20.</dt><dd><div class="bk_ref" id="ref1-bib20">Cowan
|
|
K, Fulop
|
|
NJ, Harshfield
|
|
A, Ng
|
|
PL, Ntouva
|
|
A, Sidhu
|
|
M, et al. Rapid prioritisation of topics for rapid evaluation: the case of innovations in adult social care and social work. Health Res Pol Syst
|
|
2021;19:34. [<a href="/pmc/articles/PMC7944624/" ref="pagearea=cite-ref&targetsite=entrez&targetcat=link&targettype=pmc">PMC free article<span class="bk_prnt">: PMC7944624</span></a>] [<a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33691703" ref="pagearea=cite-ref&targetsite=entrez&targetcat=link&targettype=pubmed">PubMed<span class="bk_prnt">: 33691703</span></a>]</div></dd></dl></dl></div><div id="app1"><h2 id="_app1_">Appendix 1. Example of a lay summary vignette</h2><div id="app1-1"><h3>A study to find the most efficient screening test strategy for identifying new cases of COPD</h3><p>‘Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (or COPD) is a very common condition across the world. It is a lung disease caused mainly by smoking or exposure to indoor or outdoor air pollution. Patients with COPD do not recover and many suffer ill health and many admissions to hospital. However, we also know that at least half of people with the disease do not know they have it, and therefore we could try to identify them earlier and give them appropriate care. We could offer screening, or testing, to many people to try to find those affected who don’t yet know it. There are several different tests we can use, such as offering different symptom questionnaires and simple breathing tests on a large scale to people who might be at risk. But we do not know which test or combination of tests is the best, or the best value for money, particularly in lower resource countries. We could plan a study to compare all of these test. With the results, we could identify the best and most cost-effective approach to use to identify new patients.’</p></div></div><div id="app2"><h2 id="_app2_">Appendix 2. Participant rating form</h2><div id="app2-1"><h3>Breathe Well research prioritisation: rating</h3><p>
|
|
<span class="graphic"><img src="/books/NBK612379/bin/NIHR135810_figi1.jpg" alt="Image NIHR135810_figi1.jpg" /></span>
|
|
</p><p>
|
|
<span class="graphic"><img src="/books/NBK612379/bin/NIHR135810_figi2.jpg" alt="Image NIHR135810_figi2.jpg" /></span>
|
|
</p></div></div><div id="app3"><h2 id="_app3_">Appendix 3. Participant ranking form</h2><div id="app3-1"><h3>Breathe Well prioritisation: ranking</h3><div class="iconblock whole_rhythm clearfix ten_col table-wrap" id="figtableu1"><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/tableu1/?report=objectonly" target="object" title="Table" class="img_link icnblk_img" rid-ob="figobtableu1"><img class="small-thumb" src="/corehtml/pmc/css/bookshelf/2.26/img/table-icon.gif" alt="Table Icon" /></a><div class="icnblk_cntnt"><h4 id="tableu1"><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/tableu1/?report=objectonly" target="object" rid-ob="figobtableu1">Table</a></h4></div></div><p>In the previous session, you were asked to rate the importance of each proposed research question.</p><p>Now, with the previous exercise in mind, please rank all studies in priority order for research. Mark the highest priority with a ‘1’ and the lowest priority with a ‘10’.</p><div class="iconblock whole_rhythm clearfix ten_col table-wrap" id="figtableu2"><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/tableu2/?report=objectonly" target="object" title="Table" class="img_link icnblk_img" rid-ob="figobtableu2"><img class="small-thumb" src="/corehtml/pmc/css/bookshelf/2.26/img/table-icon.gif" alt="Table Icon" /></a><div class="icnblk_cntnt"><h4 id="tableu2"><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/tableu2/?report=objectonly" target="object" rid-ob="figobtableu2">Table</a></h4></div></div></div></div><div id="app4"><h2 id="_app4_">Appendix 4. Research team rating form</h2><div id="app4-1"><h3>Breathe Well research prioritisation: research team scoring (Part 1)</h3><div class="iconblock whole_rhythm clearfix ten_col table-wrap" id="figtableu3"><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/tableu3/?report=objectonly" target="object" title="Table" class="img_link icnblk_img" rid-ob="figobtableu3"><img class="small-thumb" src="/corehtml/pmc/css/bookshelf/2.26/img/table-icon.gif" alt="Table Icon" /></a><div class="icnblk_cntnt"><h4 id="tableu3"><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/tableu3/?report=objectonly" target="object" rid-ob="figobtableu3">Table</a></h4></div></div><p>Please score each of the proposed research studies in three different categories: local importance, feasibility and equity. The table below gives some guidance on what the categories could include from the viewpoint of patients, clinicians and policy-makers:</p><div class="iconblock whole_rhythm clearfix ten_col table-wrap" id="figtableu4"><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/tableu4/?report=objectonly" target="object" title="Table" class="img_link icnblk_img" rid-ob="figobtableu4"><img class="small-thumb" src="/corehtml/pmc/css/bookshelf/2.26/img/table-icon.gif" alt="Table Icon" /></a><div class="icnblk_cntnt"><h4 id="tableu4"><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/tableu4/?report=objectonly" target="object" rid-ob="figobtableu4">Table</a></h4></div></div><p>Please rate the below research studies on a score from 0 to 5, where 0 = not at all and 5 = very much for each category.</p><div class="iconblock whole_rhythm clearfix ten_col table-wrap" id="figtableu5"><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/tableu5/?report=objectonly" target="object" title="Table" class="img_link icnblk_img" rid-ob="figobtableu5"><img class="small-thumb" src="/corehtml/pmc/css/bookshelf/2.26/img/table-icon.gif" alt="Table Icon" /></a><div class="icnblk_cntnt"><h4 id="tableu5"><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/tableu5/?report=objectonly" target="object" rid-ob="figobtableu5">Table</a></h4></div></div></div><div id="app4-2"><h3>Breathe Well research prioritisation: research team scoring (Part 2)</h3><div class="iconblock whole_rhythm clearfix ten_col table-wrap" id="figtableu6"><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/tableu6/?report=objectonly" target="object" title="Table" class="img_link icnblk_img" rid-ob="figobtableu6"><img class="small-thumb" src="/corehtml/pmc/css/bookshelf/2.26/img/table-icon.gif" alt="Table Icon" /></a><div class="icnblk_cntnt"><h4 id="tableu6"><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/tableu6/?report=objectonly" target="object" rid-ob="figobtableu6">Table</a></h4></div></div><p>Please score each of the proposed research studies in three different categories:</p><ul><li class="half_rhythm"><div>Novelty of research study internationally</div></li><li class="half_rhythm"><div>Potential for future funding (local or international)</div></li><li class="half_rhythm"><div>Capacity building.</div></li></ul><p>Please rate the below research studies on a score from 0 to 5, where 0 = not at all and 5 = very much for each category.</p><div class="iconblock whole_rhythm clearfix ten_col table-wrap" id="figtableu7"><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/tableu7/?report=objectonly" target="object" title="Table" class="img_link icnblk_img" rid-ob="figobtableu7"><img class="small-thumb" src="/corehtml/pmc/css/bookshelf/2.26/img/table-icon.gif" alt="Table Icon" /></a><div class="icnblk_cntnt"><h4 id="tableu7"><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/tableu7/?report=objectonly" target="object" rid-ob="figobtableu7">Table</a></h4></div></div></div></div><div id="app5"><h2 id="_app5_">Appendix 5. Research team ranking form</h2><div id="app5-1"><h3>Breathe Well prioritisation: research team ranking</h3><div class="iconblock whole_rhythm clearfix ten_col table-wrap" id="figtableu8"><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/tableu8/?report=objectonly" target="object" title="Table" class="img_link icnblk_img" rid-ob="figobtableu8"><img class="small-thumb" src="/corehtml/pmc/css/bookshelf/2.26/img/table-icon.gif" alt="Table Icon" /></a><div class="icnblk_cntnt"><h4 id="tableu8"><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/tableu8/?report=objectonly" target="object" rid-ob="figobtableu8">Table</a></h4></div></div><p>In the previous session, you were asked to rate the importance of each proposed research question.</p><p>Now, with the previous exercise in mind, please rank all studies in priority order for research. Mark the highest priority with a ‘1’ and the lowest priority with a ‘10’.</p><div class="iconblock whole_rhythm clearfix ten_col table-wrap" id="figtableu9"><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/tableu9/?report=objectonly" target="object" title="Table" class="img_link icnblk_img" rid-ob="figobtableu9"><img class="small-thumb" src="/corehtml/pmc/css/bookshelf/2.26/img/table-icon.gif" alt="Table Icon" /></a><div class="icnblk_cntnt"><h4 id="tableu9"><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/tableu9/?report=objectonly" target="object" rid-ob="figobtableu9">Table</a></h4></div></div></div></div><div id="app6"><h2 id="_app6_">Appendix 6</h2><div id="fig4" class="figure bk_fig"><div class="graphic"><a href="/core/lw/2.0/html/tileshop_pmc/tileshop_pmc_inline.html?title=FIGURE%204.%20Stakeholder%20ratings%2C%20by%20country.&p=BOOKS&id=612379_NIHR135810_fig4.jpg" target="tileshopwindow" class="inline_block pmc_inline_block ts_canvas img_link" title="Click on image to zoom"><div class="ts_bar small" title="Click on image to zoom"></div><img src="/books/NBK612379/bin/NIHR135810_fig4.jpg" alt="FIGURE 4. Stakeholder ratings, by country." class="tileshop" title="Click on image to zoom" /></a></div><h3><span class="label">FIGURE 4</span></h3><div class="caption"><p>Stakeholder ratings, by country. 1 = e-cigarettes; 2 = lung age; 3 = screening tests; 4 = early treatment; 5 = quality management; 6 = PR feasibility; 7 = PR outcomes; 8 = weight management; 9 = handwashing; 10 = HCP education.</p></div></div></div><div style="display:none"><div style="display:none" id="figfig4"><img alt="Image NIHR135810_fig4" src-large="/books/NBK612379/bin/NIHR135810_fig4.jpg" /></div></div></div><div class="fm-sec"><div class="pmc_boxed-text-box fm-sec whole_rhythm"><h3>About the Series</h3><div class="half_rhythm"><div>Global Health Research</div></div><div class="half_rhythm"><div>ISSN (Electronic): 2631-7613</div></div></div><div><div id="n1-1"><h2>Article history</h2><p>The contractual start date for this research was in June 2017. This article began editorial review in May 2023 and was accepted for publication in May 2024. The authors have been wholly responsible for all data collection, analysis and interpretation, and for writing up their work. The Global Health Research editors and publisher have tried to ensure the accuracy of the authors’ article and would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments on the draft document. However, they do not accept liability for damages or losses arising from material published in this article.</p></div></div><p class="small">Last reviewed: May 2023; Accepted: May 2024.</p><div><dl class="temp-labeled-list small"><dl class="bkr_refwrap"><dt>†</dt><dd><div id="fn001"><p class="no_top_margin">Joint first authors</p></div></dd></dl></dl></div><div class="half_rhythm"><a href="/books/about/copyright/">Copyright</a> © 2024 Dickens <i>et al</i>.<p class="small">This work was produced by Dickens <i>et al</i>. under the terms of a commissioning contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. This is an Open Access publication distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. See: <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" ref="pagearea=meta&targetsite=external&targetcat=link&targettype=uri">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</a>. For attribution the title, original author(s), the publication source – NIHR Journals Library, and the DOI of the publication must be cited.</p></div><div class="small"><span class="label">Bookshelf ID: NBK612379</span><span class="label">PMID: <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40014739" title="PubMed record of this title" ref="pagearea=meta&targetsite=entrez&targetcat=link&targettype=pubmed">40014739</a></span>DOI: <a href="http://dx.crossref.org/10.3310/CTHF1385" ref="pagearea=body&targetsite=external&targetcat=link&targettype=uri">10.3310/CTHF1385</a></div></div><div class="small-screen-prev"></div><div class="small-screen-next"></div></article><article data-type="fig" id="figobfig1"><div id="fig1" class="figure bk_fig"><div class="graphic"><a href="/core/lw/2.0/html/tileshop_pmc/tileshop_pmc_inline.html?title=FIGURE%201.%20Research%20prioritisation%20model.&p=BOOKS&id=612379_NIHR135810_fig1.jpg" target="tileshopwindow" class="inline_block pmc_inline_block ts_canvas img_link" title="Click on image to zoom"><div class="ts_bar small" title="Click on image to zoom"></div><img data-src="/books/NBK612379/bin/NIHR135810_fig1.jpg" alt="FIGURE 1. Research prioritisation model." class="tileshop" title="Click on image to zoom" /></a></div><h3><span class="label">FIGURE 1</span></h3><div class="caption"><p>Research prioritisation model.</p></div></div></article><article data-type="table-wrap" id="figobtable1"><div id="table1" class="table"><h3><span class="label">TABLE 1</span></h3><div class="caption"><p>Final list of research topics used for prioritisation</p></div><p class="large-table-link" style="display:none"><span class="right"><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/table1/?report=objectonly" target="object">View in own window</a></span></p><div class="large_tbl" id="__table1_lrgtbl__"><table id="t1"><thead><tr><th id="hd_h_table1_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Study</th><th id="hd_h_table1_1_1_1_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Study title</th><th id="hd_h_table1_1_1_1_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Short title</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td headers="hd_h_table1_1_1_1_1 hd_h_table1_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table1_1_1_1_3" colspan="3" rowspan="1" style="background-color:#E8F1F5;vertical-align:top;">
|
|
<b>
|
|
<i>Prevention</i>
|
|
</b>
|
|
</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table1_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#95B3D7;vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_table1_1_1_1_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">A study to explore the views of patients and healthcare professionals on the use of e-cigarettes for quitting smoking.</td><td headers="hd_h_table1_1_1_1_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">E-cigarettes</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table1_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#F79646;vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_table1_1_1_1_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">A study to assess the effectiveness of communicating ‘lung age’ to adult smokers in primary care to promote smoking cessation.</td><td headers="hd_h_table1_1_1_1_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Lung age</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table1_1_1_1_1 hd_h_table1_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table1_1_1_1_3" colspan="3" rowspan="1" style="background-color:#E8F1F5;vertical-align:top;">
|
|
<b>
|
|
<i>Diagnosis/screening</i>
|
|
</b>
|
|
</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table1_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_table1_1_1_1_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">A study to find the most efficient screening test strategy for identifying new cases of COPD.</td><td headers="hd_h_table1_1_1_1_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Screening tests</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table1_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#FFC000;vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_table1_1_1_1_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">A study to assess the effectiveness of treatment for people with newly diagnosed COPD (through case-finding).</td><td headers="hd_h_table1_1_1_1_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Early treatment</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table1_1_1_1_1 hd_h_table1_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table1_1_1_1_3" colspan="3" rowspan="1" style="background-color:#E8F1F5;vertical-align:top;">
|
|
<b>
|
|
<i>Management</i>
|
|
</b>
|
|
</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table1_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#C02E2E;vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_table1_1_1_1_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">A study to explore the views of patients, healthcare professionals and policy-makers on the barriers and enablers to good-quality COPD management.</td><td headers="hd_h_table1_1_1_1_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Quality management</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table1_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#92D050;vertical-align:top;">6</td><td headers="hd_h_table1_1_1_1_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">A study to assess the feasibility of a new pulmonary rehabilitation programme (PR), adapted to local needs in low-resource settings.</td><td headers="hd_h_table1_1_1_1_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">PR feasibility</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table1_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#7030A0;vertical-align:top;">7</td><td headers="hd_h_table1_1_1_1_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">A study to assess whether an adapted pulmonary rehabilitation programme improves outcomes in patients with case-found and mild COPD, in settings where medication is suboptimal.</td><td headers="hd_h_table1_1_1_1_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">PR outcomes</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table1_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#984806;vertical-align:top;">8</td><td headers="hd_h_table1_1_1_1_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">A study to assess whether a weight management programme improves dyspnoea and quality of life among COPD patients.</td><td headers="hd_h_table1_1_1_1_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Weight management</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table1_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#808080;vertical-align:top;">9</td><td headers="hd_h_table1_1_1_1_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">A study to assess whether a simple behavioural intervention to promote handwashing and reduce transmission of infections can reduce exacerbations among COPD patients.</td><td headers="hd_h_table1_1_1_1_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Handwashing</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table1_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#DBE5F1;vertical-align:top;">10</td><td headers="hd_h_table1_1_1_1_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">A study to explore how to improve clinical education about COPD for primary health care professionals (HCP)</td><td headers="hd_h_table1_1_1_1_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">HCP education</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div></article><article data-type="fig" id="figobfig2"><div id="fig2" class="figure bk_fig"><div class="graphic"><a href="/core/lw/2.0/html/tileshop_pmc/tileshop_pmc_inline.html?title=FIGURE%202.%20Star%20diagram%20(by%20LMIC%20country)%20summarising%20research%20team%20ratings%20for%20each%20of%2010%20research%20topics%20across%206%20domains.&p=BOOKS&id=612379_NIHR135810_fig2.jpg" target="tileshopwindow" class="inline_block pmc_inline_block ts_canvas img_link" title="Click on image to zoom"><div class="ts_bar small" title="Click on image to zoom"></div><img data-src="/books/NBK612379/bin/NIHR135810_fig2.jpg" alt="FIGURE 2. Star diagram (by LMIC country) summarising research team ratings for each of 10 research topics across 6 domains." class="tileshop" title="Click on image to zoom" /></a></div><h3><span class="label">FIGURE 2</span></h3><div class="caption"><p>Star diagram (by LMIC country) summarising research team ratings for each of 10 research topics across 6 domains. Research study key: 1 = E-cigarettes; 2 = Lung age; 3 = Screening tests; 4 = Early treatment; 5 = Quality management; 6 = PR feasibility; 7 = PR outcomes; 8 = Weight management; 9 = Handwashing; 10 = HCP education.</p></div></div></article><article data-type="table-wrap" id="figobtable2"><div id="table2" class="table"><h3><span class="label">TABLE 2</span></h3><div class="caption"><p>Analytical framework for qualitative analysis</p></div><p class="large-table-link" style="display:none"><span class="right"><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/table2/?report=objectonly" target="object">View in own window</a></span></p><div class="large_tbl" id="__table2_lrgtbl__"><table id="t2"><tbody><tr><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">
|
|
<b>1. Facilitation, engagement and interaction</b>
|
|
</td><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">
|
|
<b>3. Culture and society</b>
|
|
</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1.1 Questioning (facilitator)</td><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3.1 Laws/regulations</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1.2 Further discussion (facilitator)</td><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3.2 Politics and policies</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1.3 Managing contributions (facilitator)</td><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3.3 Economic context</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1.4 Active listening/reflecting (participants)</td><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3.4 Demographic/social differences</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1.5 Agreement/disagreement (participants)</td><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3.5 Health literacy and education</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1.6 Reflections on prioritisation methodology (facilitator/participants)</td><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3.6 Trust/respect for doctors and health professionals</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1.7 Reflections on engagement/experience of the process (facilitator/participants)</td><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3.7 Role of family and social networks</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1.8 Facilitator- vs. participant-led</td><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">
|
|
<b>4. Reasoning (for/against a study)</b>
|
|
</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1.9 Confusions vs. clarity</td><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4.1 Level of potential impact/benefit</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">
|
|
<b>2. Research topics and research literacy</b>
|
|
</td><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4.2 Likelihood of eventual uptake/routinisation</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2.1 Confusion/clarification/understanding of research topic</td><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4.3 Absence/presence of evidence</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2.2 Practicalities of conducting study</td><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4.4 Role in patient–doctor consultations</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2.3 Experiences of dealing with issue in own practice/experience</td><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4.5 Time efficiency</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2.4 Focus (study-specific vs. general topic)</td><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4.6 Cost or cost-effectiveness</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2.5 Other suggestions for research</td><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4.7 Balance primary/secondary care settings</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div></article><article data-type="table-wrap" id="figobtable3"><div id="table3" class="table"><h3><span class="label">TABLE 3</span></h3><div class="caption"><p>Description of patient, clinician and policy-maker/manager participants</p></div><p class="large-table-link" style="display:none"><span class="right"><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/table3/?report=objectonly" target="object">View in own window</a></span></p><div class="large_tbl" id="__table3_lrgtbl__"><table id="t3"><thead><tr><th id="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_1" rowspan="2" colspan="1" headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_1" style="vertical-align:top;">Country</th><th id="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2" colspan="2" rowspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Patients</th><th id="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3" colspan="2" rowspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Clinicians</th><th id="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4" colspan="2" rowspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Policy-makers/managers</th></tr><tr><th headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2" id="hd_h_table3_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Age group (years)</th><th headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2" id="hd_h_table3_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Sex</th><th headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3" id="hd_h_table3_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Role</th><th headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3" id="hd_h_table3_1_1_2_4" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Work place</th><th headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4" id="hd_h_table3_1_1_2_5" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Role</th><th headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4" id="hd_h_table3_1_1_2_6" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Work place</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">China</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">70–75</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">M</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">General practitioner</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_4" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Suburban community hospital</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_5" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Department director</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_6" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Urban university hospital</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">70–75</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">M</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">General practitioner</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_4" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Suburban community hospital</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_5" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Department director</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_6" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Urban community health service centre</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">65–70</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">M</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">General practitioner</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_4" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Suburban community hospital</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_5" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Department director</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_6" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Urban county health service centre</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">50–55</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">M</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">General practitioner</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_4" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Suburban community hospital</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_5" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Director</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_6" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Health commission</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_4" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_5" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Assistant dean</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_6" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Suburban community hospital</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Brazil</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">75–80</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">M</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Nurse</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_4" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Basic health unit</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_5" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Department director</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_6" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Primary care</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">75–80</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">M</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Nurse</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_4" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Basic health unit</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_5" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Department director</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_6" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Secondary care</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">60–65</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">M</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Nurse</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_4" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Specialty centre</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_5" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Technical support</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_6" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Secondary care</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">75–80</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">M</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Physiotherapist</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_4" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Basic health unit</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_5" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Hospital superintendent</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_6" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Tertiary care</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">55–60</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">F</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Physiotherapist</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_4" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Specialty centre</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_5" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Medical co-ordinator</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_6" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Urgency and emergency</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">60–65</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">F</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Family physician</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_4" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Basic health unit</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_5" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Care line manager</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_6" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Office of the Secretary of Health</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Family physician</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_4" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Basic health unit</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_5" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Nursing co-ordinator</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_6" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Urgency and emergency</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Pharmaceutical</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_4" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Basic health unit</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_5" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_6" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;"></td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Georgia</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">65–70</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">F</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Family doctor</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_4" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Primary care</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_5" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Non-communicable disease department</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_6" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">National Centre for Disease Control and Public Health</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">65–70</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">F</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Family doctor</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_4" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Primary care</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_5" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Non-communicable disease department</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_6" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">National Centre for Disease Control and Public Health</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">65–70</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">F</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Family doctor</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_4" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Primary care</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_5" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Non-communicable disease department, head</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_6" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">National Centre for Disease Control and Public Health</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">65–70</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">F</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Family doctor, head of family medicine</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_4" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Primary care</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_5" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Advocacy in tobacco control</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_6" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">NGO</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">75–80</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">M</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Family doctor</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_4" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Primary care</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_5" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_6" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;"></td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">75–80</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">M</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">General practitioner</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_4" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Primary care</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_5" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_6" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;"></td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">70–75</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">M</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">General practitioner</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_4" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Multi-profile hospital</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_5" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_6" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;"></td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">70–75</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">M</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">General practitioner</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_4" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Multi-profile hospital</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_5" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_6" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;"></td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Macedonia</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">65–70</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">M</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Head of department</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_4" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">University clinic</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_5" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Director, pharmaceutical department</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_6" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Government agency</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">60–65</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">M</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Head of department</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_4" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Secondary care institute</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_5" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Executive director</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_6" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">NGO</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">65–70</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">F</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Family physician</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_4" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Primary care centre</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_5" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">National contact person</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_6" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Government agency</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">50–55</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">F</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Head of department</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_4" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">General hospital</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_5" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Head of department for primary care</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_6" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Government agency</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">50–55</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">F</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Hospital doctor</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_4" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">General hospital</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_5" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Junior collaborator</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_6" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Government agency</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">60–65</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">F</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Hospital doctor</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_4" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Hospital</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_5" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Financial manager</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_6" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Government agency</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Family physician</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_4" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Primary care centre</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_5" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Manager of private health institution</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_6" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Primary care centre</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_2 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_3 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_4" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;"></td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_5" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Advisor to the director</td><td headers="hd_h_table3_1_1_1_4 hd_h_table3_1_1_2_6" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#D9D9D9;vertical-align:top;">Government agency</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div></article><article data-type="fig" id="figobfig3"><div id="fig3" class="figure bk_fig"><div class="graphic"><a href="/core/lw/2.0/html/tileshop_pmc/tileshop_pmc_inline.html?title=FIGURE%203.%20Stakeholder%20and%20research%20team%20rankings%20of%20the%2010%20research%20topics%2C%20by%20country.&p=BOOKS&id=612379_NIHR135810_fig3.jpg" target="tileshopwindow" class="inline_block pmc_inline_block ts_canvas img_link" title="Click on image to zoom"><div class="ts_bar small" title="Click on image to zoom"></div><img data-src="/books/NBK612379/bin/NIHR135810_fig3.jpg" alt="FIGURE 3. Stakeholder and research team rankings of the 10 research topics, by country." class="tileshop" title="Click on image to zoom" /></a></div><h3><span class="label">FIGURE 3</span></h3><div class="caption"><p>Stakeholder and research team rankings of the 10 research topics, by country. 1 = E-cigarettes; 2 = Lung age; 3 = Screening tests; 4 = Early treatment; 5 = Quality management; 6 = PR feasibility; 7 = PR outcomes; 8 = Weight management; 9 = Handwashing; 10 = HCP education.</p></div></div></article><article data-type="boxed-text" id="figobbox1"><div id="box1" class="box"><h3><span class="label">Box 1</span></h3><div class="caption"><p>Recommendations based on ‘what worked’</p></div><ul><li class="half_rhythm"><div>Ensure research topics are articulated clearly with a clear message about potential importance/impact.</div></li><li class="half_rhythm"><div>Ensure participants have the opportunity to ask questions to help them understand the problem, relevance and potential impact of each research topic before full group discussion.</div></li><li class="half_rhythm"><div>Ensure participants are reminded about the three domains (importance, feasibility and equity) to consider when discussing and rating each topic.</div></li></ul></div></article><article data-type="boxed-text" id="figobbox2"><div id="box2" class="box"><h3><span class="label">Box 2</span></h3><div class="caption"><p>Examples of useful prompts used by facilitators</p></div><ul><li class="half_rhythm"><div>‘Can you elaborate on this?’ (China patient group, researcher 1)</div></li><li class="half_rhythm"><div>‘Do you see any negative reactions? How likely is this study to be cost-effective?’ (Georgia doctors/policy-maker group, researcher 1)</div></li><li class="half_rhythm"><div>‘Does anyone have a slightly different opinion?’ (Macedonia patient group, researcher 1)</div></li><li class="half_rhythm"><div>‘Someone else want to share their opinion, or should I ask you some questions?’ (Macedonia patient group, researcher 1)</div></li><li class="half_rhythm"><div>‘Can we please hear your opinion?’ (Macedonia patient group, researcher 2)</div></li></ul></div></article><article data-type="boxed-text" id="figobbox3"><div id="box3" class="box"><h3><span class="label">Box 3</span></h3><div class="caption"><p>Contextual issues influencing decisions</p></div><ul><li class="half_rhythm"><div><i>Socio-cultural</i>: ‘It is social culture and sometimes cigarettes are indispensable in social situations, it is true … At home, … I do not smoke, but … guests may say that, you did not even prepare a cigarette for me when I visit you? … So, as for quitting smoking, even if I quit, I can’t live without cigarettes. Because wherever I go, I have to give other people cigarettes’ (China patient group)</div></li><li class="half_rhythm"><div>‘Maybe quitting with an electronic cigarette can work in urban areas, but in the rural even if they are free of charge people will not use them. Not from the perspective that is something new, but because of a long tradition we have, 500 years under the Ottoman Empire in these areas they use rolled tobacco cigarettes as a ritual and would not be acceptable and there would be no effect as one that we are looking for’n (Macedonia policy-maker group)</div></li><li class="half_rhythm"><div><i>Practical barriers</i>: ‘People in Tbilisi … know this but you should see what’s going on in less developed regions of Georgia. They don’t even have water to wash hands’ (Georgia patient group)</div></li><li class="half_rhythm"><div><i>Organisational</i>: ‘I think it’s [clinical education on COPD] important, because it will make it easier for the doctor himself to treat the patient’ (Brazil patient group)</div></li></ul></div></article><article data-type="boxed-text" id="figobbox4"><div id="box4" class="box boxed-text-box whole_rhythm hide-overflow"><p>This article reports on one component of the research award NIHR Global Health Research Group on Global COPD in Primary Care, University of Birmingham. Other articles published as part of this thread are: <b>[LINKS to other articles]</b>. For more information about this research please view the award page (<a href="https://www.fundingawards.nihr.ac.uk/award/16/137/95" ref="pagearea=body&targetsite=external&targetcat=link&targettype=uri">https://www.fundingawards.nihr.ac.uk/award/16/137/95</a>)</p></div></article><article data-type="table-wrap" id="figobtableu1"><div id="tableu1" class="table"><p class="large-table-link" style="display:none"><span class="right"><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/tableu1/?report=objectonly" target="object">View in own window</a></span></p><div class="large_tbl" id="__tableu1_lrgtbl__"><table id="tu1"><tbody><tr><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Name:</td><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Please circle: patient/clinician/policy-maker</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Job role:</td><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Date:</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div></article><article data-type="table-wrap" id="figobtableu2"><div id="tableu2" class="table"><p class="large-table-link" style="display:none"><span class="right"><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/tableu2/?report=objectonly" target="object">View in own window</a></span></p><div class="large_tbl" id="__tableu2_lrgtbl__"><table id="tu2"><thead><tr><th id="hd_h_tableu2_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Please rank all studies (1 = highest priority, 10 = lowest priority)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu2_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#E8F1F5;vertical-align:top;">
|
|
<b>
|
|
<i>Prevention</i>
|
|
</b>
|
|
</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu2_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1. A study to explore the views of patients and healthcare professionals on the use of e-cigarettes for quitting smoking<br />2. A study to assess the additional effectiveness of communicating ‘lung age’ to adult smokers in primary care to promote smoking cessation</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu2_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#E8F1F5;vertical-align:top;">
|
|
<b>
|
|
<i>Diagnosis/screening</i>
|
|
</b>
|
|
</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu2_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3. A study to find the most efficient screening test strategy for identifying new cases of COPD<br />4. A study to assess the effectiveness of treatment for people with newly case-found COPD</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu2_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#E8F1F5;vertical-align:top;">
|
|
<b>
|
|
<i>Management</i>
|
|
</b>
|
|
</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu2_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5. A study to explore the views of patients, healthcare professionals and policy-makers on the barriers and enablers to good-quality COPD management<br />6. A study to assess the feasibility of a new pulmonary rehabilitation programme adapted to local needs in low-resource settings</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu2_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">7. A study to assess whether an adapted pulmonary rehabilitation programme improves outcomes in patients with case-found and mild COPD, in settings where medication is suboptimal<br />8. A study to assess whether a weight management programme improves dyspnoea and quality of life among COPD patients</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu2_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">9. A study to assess whether a simple behavioural intervention to promote handwashing and reduce transmission of infections can reduce exacerbations among COPD patients<br />10. A study to explore how to improve clinical education about COPD for primary care staff</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div></article><article data-type="table-wrap" id="figobtableu3"><div id="tableu3" class="table"><p class="large-table-link" style="display:none"><span class="right"><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/tableu3/?report=objectonly" target="object">View in own window</a></span></p><div class="large_tbl" id="__tableu3_lrgtbl__"><table id="tu3"><tbody><tr><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Name:</td><td rowspan="2" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Group session facilitated (please circle):<br />Patients<br />Clinicians<br />Policy-makers<br />Clinicians/policy-makers (combined)</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Date:</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div></article><article data-type="table-wrap" id="figobtableu4"><div id="tableu4" class="table"><p class="large-table-link" style="display:none"><span class="right"><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/tableu4/?report=objectonly" target="object">View in own window</a></span></p><div class="large_tbl" id="__tableu4_lrgtbl__"><table id="tu4"><thead><tr><th id="hd_h_tableu4_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;"></th><th id="hd_h_tableu4_1_1_1_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Important: In an ideal world, how important is this? Is this a priority?</th><th id="hd_h_tableu4_1_1_1_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Feasible: In the real world, how feasible/acceptable is this idea?</th><th id="hd_h_tableu4_1_1_1_4" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Equitable: Will this benefit all patient groups? Will it be accessible to all?</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu4_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Patients</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu4_1_1_1_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Would this make your quality of life better? Is this important to you? Is this a short- or long-term priority?</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu4_1_1_1_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Would you realistically be able to participate in this kind of project? Or in the longer term would you be able to participate in the proposed service?</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu4_1_1_1_4" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Would you and other patients all be able to access this service and participate in the project? Would it be of benefit to all patients who took part?</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu4_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Clinicians</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu4_1_1_1_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Would you feel you could provide a better service? Would it improve your professional satisfaction?</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu4_1_1_1_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Would this be technically feasible? How complex would implementation be? Would this work within your relationship with patients?</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu4_1_1_1_4" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Could you set up this project and the service in locations which would reach all types of patients?</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu4_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Policy-makers</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu4_1_1_1_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">How does this compare in importance to other international, national and local goals?</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu4_1_1_1_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Are the resources available for this? Are the knowledge and skills available for this? Is the workforce available for this?</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu4_1_1_1_4" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Will this lead to benefit for all eligible patients? Will it help to reduce health inequalities?</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div></article><article data-type="table-wrap" id="figobtableu5"><div id="tableu5" class="table"><p class="large-table-link" style="display:none"><span class="right"><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/tableu5/?report=objectonly" target="object">View in own window</a></span></p><div class="large_tbl" id="__tableu5_lrgtbl__"><table id="tu5"><thead><tr><th id="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_1" rowspan="2" colspan="1" headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_1" style="background-color:#A6A6A6;vertical-align:top;">Research study</th><th id="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2" colspan="18" rowspan="1" style="background-color:#A6A6A6;vertical-align:top;">0 = Not at all, 5 = Very much</th></tr><tr><th headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2" id="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" colspan="6" rowspan="1" style="background-color:#A6A6A6;vertical-align:top;">Important</th><th headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2" id="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" colspan="6" rowspan="1" style="background-color:#A6A6A6;vertical-align:top;">Feasible</th><th headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2" id="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" colspan="6" rowspan="1" style="background-color:#A6A6A6;vertical-align:top;">Equitable</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_1 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" colspan="19" rowspan="1" style="background-color:#E8F1F5;vertical-align:top;">
|
|
<b>
|
|
<i>Prevention</i>
|
|
</b>
|
|
</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1. A study to explore the views of patients and healthcare professionals on the use of e-cigarettes for quitting smoking</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2. A study to assess the additional effectiveness of communicating ‘lung age’ to adult smokers in primary care to promote smoking cessation</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_1 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" colspan="19" rowspan="1" style="background-color:#E8F1F5;vertical-align:top;">
|
|
<b>
|
|
<i>Diagnosis/screening</i>
|
|
</b>
|
|
</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3. A study to find the most efficient screening test strategy for identifying new cases of COPD</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4. A study to assess the effectiveness of treatment for people with newly case-found COPD</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_1 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" colspan="19" rowspan="1" style="background-color:#E8F1F5;vertical-align:top;">
|
|
<b>
|
|
<i>Management</i>
|
|
</b>
|
|
</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5. A study to explore the views of patients, healthcare professionals and policy-makers on the barriers and enablers to good-quality COPD management</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">6. A study to assess the feasibility of a new pulmonary rehabilitation programme adapted to local needs in low-resource settings</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">7. A study to assess whether an adapted pulmonary rehabilitation programme improves outcomes in patients with case-found and mild COPD, in settings where medication is suboptimal</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">8. A study to assess whether a weight management programme improves dyspnoea and quality of life among COPD patients</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">9. A study to assess whether a simple behavioural intervention to promote handwashing and reduce transmission of infections can reduce exacerbations among COPD patients</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">10. A study to explore how to improve clinical education about COPD for primary care staff</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_1 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_1 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_2 hd_h_tableu5_1_1_2_3" colspan="19" rowspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">
|
|
<b>Please write any comments here (continue overleaf):</b>
|
|
</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div></article><article data-type="table-wrap" id="figobtableu6"><div id="tableu6" class="table"><p class="large-table-link" style="display:none"><span class="right"><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/tableu6/?report=objectonly" target="object">View in own window</a></span></p><div class="large_tbl" id="__tableu6_lrgtbl__"><table id="tu6"><tbody><tr><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Name:</td><td rowspan="2" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Group session facilitated (please circle):<br />Patients<br />Clinicians<br />Policy-makers<br />Clinicians/policy-makers (combined)</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Date:</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div></article><article data-type="table-wrap" id="figobtableu7"><div id="tableu7" class="table"><p class="large-table-link" style="display:none"><span class="right"><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/tableu7/?report=objectonly" target="object">View in own window</a></span></p><div class="large_tbl" id="__tableu7_lrgtbl__"><table id="tu7"><thead><tr><th id="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_1" rowspan="2" colspan="1" headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_1" style="background-color:#A6A6A6;vertical-align:top;">Research study</th><th id="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2" colspan="18" rowspan="1" style="background-color:#A6A6A6;vertical-align:top;">0 = Not at all, 5 = Very much</th></tr><tr><th headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2" id="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" colspan="6" rowspan="1" style="background-color:#A6A6A6;vertical-align:top;">Novelty</th><th headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2" id="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" colspan="6" rowspan="1" style="background-color:#A6A6A6;vertical-align:top;">Future funding</th><th headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2" id="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" colspan="6" rowspan="1" style="background-color:#A6A6A6;vertical-align:top;">Capacity building</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_1 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" colspan="19" rowspan="1" style="background-color:#E8F1F5;vertical-align:top;">
|
|
<b>
|
|
<i>Prevention</i>
|
|
</b>
|
|
</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1. A study to explore the views of patients and healthcare professionals on the use of e-cigarettes for quitting smoking</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2. A study to assess the additional effectiveness of communicating ‘lung age’ to adult smokers in primary care to promote smoking cessation</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_1 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" colspan="19" rowspan="1" style="background-color:#E8F1F5;vertical-align:top;">
|
|
<b>
|
|
<i>Diagnosis/screening</i>
|
|
</b>
|
|
</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3. A study to find the most efficient screening test strategy for identifying new cases of COPD</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4. A study to assess the effectiveness of treatment for people with newly case-found COPD</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_1 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" colspan="19" rowspan="1" style="background-color:#E8F1F5;vertical-align:top;">
|
|
<b>
|
|
<i>Management</i>
|
|
</b>
|
|
</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">• A study to explore the views of patients, healthcare professionals and policy-makers on the barriers and enablers to good-quality COPD management</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">6. A study to assess the feasibility of a new pulmonary rehabilitation programme adapted to local needs in low-resource settings</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">7. A study to assess whether an adapted pulmonary rehabilitation programme improves outcomes in patients with case-found and mild COPD, in settings where medication is suboptimal</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">8. A study to assess whether a weight management programme improves dyspnoea and quality of life among COPD patients</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">9. A study to assess whether a simple behavioural intervention to promote handwashing and reduce transmission of infections can reduce exacerbations among COPD patients</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">10. A study to explore how to improve clinical education about COPD for primary care staff</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">0</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4</td><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_1 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_1_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_1 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_2 hd_h_tableu7_1_1_2_3" colspan="19" rowspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">
|
|
<b>Please write any comments here (continue overleaf):</b>
|
|
</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div></article><article data-type="table-wrap" id="figobtableu8"><div id="tableu8" class="table"><p class="large-table-link" style="display:none"><span class="right"><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/tableu8/?report=objectonly" target="object">View in own window</a></span></p><div class="large_tbl" id="__tableu8_lrgtbl__"><table id="tu8"><tbody><tr><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Name:</td><td rowspan="2" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Group session facilitated (please circle):<br />Patients<br />Clinicians<br />Policy-makers<br />Clinicians/policy-makers (combined)</td></tr><tr><td rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">Date:</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div></article><article data-type="table-wrap" id="figobtableu9"><div id="tableu9" class="table"><p class="large-table-link" style="display:none"><span class="right"><a href="/books/NBK612379/table/tableu9/?report=objectonly" target="object">View in own window</a></span></p><div class="large_tbl" id="__tableu9_lrgtbl__"><table id="tu9"><thead><tr><th id="hd_h_tableu9_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#A6A6A6;vertical-align:top;">Please rank all studies (1 = highest priority, 10 = lowest priority)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu9_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#E8F1F5;vertical-align:top;">
|
|
<b>
|
|
<i>Prevention</i>
|
|
</b>
|
|
</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu9_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">1. A study to explore the views of patients and healthcare professionals on the use of e-cigarettes for quitting smoking</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu9_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">2. A study to assess the additional effectiveness of communicating ‘lung age’ to adult smokers in primary care to promote smoking cessation</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu9_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#E8F1F5;vertical-align:top;">
|
|
<b>
|
|
<i>Diagnosis/screening</i>
|
|
</b>
|
|
</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu9_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">3. A study to find the most efficient screening test strategy for identifying new cases of COPD</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu9_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">4. A study to assess the effectiveness of treatment for people with newly case-found COPD</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu9_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="background-color:#E8F1F5;vertical-align:top;">
|
|
<b>
|
|
<i>Management</i>
|
|
</b>
|
|
</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu9_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">5. A study to explore the views of patients, healthcare professionals and policy-makers on the barriers and enablers to good-quality COPD management</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu9_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">6. A study to assess the feasibility of a new pulmonary rehabilitation programme adapted to local needs in low-resource settings</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu9_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">7. A study to assess whether an adapted pulmonary rehabilitation programme improves outcomes in patients with case-found and mild COPD, in settings where medication is suboptimal</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu9_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">8. A study to assess whether a weight management programme improves dyspnoea and quality of life among COPD patients</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu9_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">9. A study to assess whether a simple behavioural intervention to promote handwashing and reduce transmission of infections can reduce exacerbations among COPD patients</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu9_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">10. A study to explore how to improve clinical education about COPD for primary care staff</td></tr><tr><td headers="hd_h_tableu9_1_1_1_1" rowspan="1" colspan="1" style="vertical-align:top;">
|
|
<b>Please write any comments here:</b>
|
|
</td></tr></tbody></table></div></div></article><article data-type="fig" id="figobfig4"><div id="fig4" class="figure bk_fig"><div class="graphic"><a href="/core/lw/2.0/html/tileshop_pmc/tileshop_pmc_inline.html?title=FIGURE%204.%20Stakeholder%20ratings%2C%20by%20country.&p=BOOKS&id=612379_NIHR135810_fig4.jpg" target="tileshopwindow" class="inline_block pmc_inline_block ts_canvas img_link" title="Click on image to zoom"><div class="ts_bar small" title="Click on image to zoom"></div><img data-src="/books/NBK612379/bin/NIHR135810_fig4.jpg" alt="FIGURE 4. Stakeholder ratings, by country." class="tileshop" title="Click on image to zoom" /></a></div><h3><span class="label">FIGURE 4</span></h3><div class="caption"><p>Stakeholder ratings, by country. 1 = e-cigarettes; 2 = lung age; 3 = screening tests; 4 = early treatment; 5 = quality management; 6 = PR feasibility; 7 = PR outcomes; 8 = weight management; 9 = handwashing; 10 = HCP education.</p></div></div></article></div><div id="jr-scripts"><script src="/corehtml/pmc/jatsreader/ptpmc_3.22/js/libs.min.js"> </script><script src="/corehtml/pmc/jatsreader/ptpmc_3.22/js/jr.min.js"> </script></div></div>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- Book content -->
|
|
|
|
<script type="text/javascript" src="/portal/portal3rc.fcgi/rlib/js/InstrumentNCBIBaseJS/InstrumentPageStarterJS.js"> </script>
|
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- CE8B5AF87C7FFCB1_0191SID /projects/books/PBooks@9.11 portal105 v4.1.r689238 Tue, Oct 22 2024 16:10:51 -->
|
|
<span id="portal-csrf-token" style="display:none" data-token="CE8B5AF87C7FFCB1_0191SID"></span>
|
|
|
|
<script type="text/javascript" src="//static.pubmed.gov/portal/portal3rc.fcgi/4216699/js/3968615.js" snapshot="books"></script></body>
|
|
</html>
|