Preliminary comparison of the performance of the National Library of Medicine's systematic review publication type and the sensitive clinical queries filter for systematic reviews in PubMed
- PMID: 35210961
- PMCID: PMC8830395
- DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1286
Preliminary comparison of the performance of the National Library of Medicine's systematic review publication type and the sensitive clinical queries filter for systematic reviews in PubMed
Abstract
Objective: The National Library of Medicine (NLM) inaugurated a "publication type" concept to facilitate searches for systematic reviews (SRs). On the other hand, clinical queries (CQs) are validated search strategies designed to retrieve scientifically sound, clinically relevant original and review articles from biomedical literature databases. We compared the retrieval performance of the SR publication type (SR[pt]) against the most sensitive CQ for systematic review articles (CQrs) in PubMed.
Methods: We ran date-limited searches of SR[pt] and CQrs to compare the relative yield of articles and SRs, focusing on the differences in retrieval of SRs by SR[pt] but not CQrs (SR[pt] NOT CQrs) and CQrs NOT SR[pt]. Random samples of articles retrieved in each of these comparisons were examined for SRs until a consistent pattern became evident.
Results: For SR[pt] NOT CQrs, the yield was relatively low in quantity but rich in quality, with 79% of the articles being SRs. For CQrs NOT SR[pt], the yield was high in quantity but low in quality, with only 8% being SRs. For CQrs AND SR[pt], the quality was highest, with 92% being SRs.
Conclusions: We found that SR[pt] had high precision and specificity for SRs but low recall (sensitivity), whereas CQrs had much higher recall. SR[pt] OR CQrs added valid SRs to the CQrs yield at low cost (i.e., added few non-SRs). For searches that are intended to be exhaustive for SRs, SR[pt] can be added to existing sensitive search filters.
Keywords: evidence-based medicine; information retrieval; systematic reviews.
Copyright © 2022 Tamara Navarro-Ruan, R. Brian Haynes.
Similar articles
-
The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews.Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 23;2:115. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-115. Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 24360284 Free PMC article.
-
Database selection and data gathering methods in systematic reviews of qualitative research regarding diabetes mellitus - an explorative study.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Apr 30;21(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01281-2. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021. PMID: 33941105 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions during pregnancy to prevent preterm birth: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 14;11(11):CD012505. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012505.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30480756 Free PMC article.
-
Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 11;2013(9):MR000022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000022.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 24022476 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Sensitivity and predictive value of 15 PubMed search strategies to answer clinical questions rated against full systematic reviews.J Med Internet Res. 2012 Jun 12;14(3):e85. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2021. J Med Internet Res. 2012. PMID: 22693047 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Search strategies (filters) to identify systematic reviews in MEDLINE and Embase.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Sep 8;9(9):MR000054. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000054.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37681507 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Systems for rating bodies of evidence used in systematic reviews of air pollution exposure and reproductive and children's health: a methodological survey.Environ Health. 2024 Mar 28;23(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12940-024-01069-z. Environ Health. 2024. PMID: 38539160 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- National Library of Medicine. Systematic review: MeSH descriptor data 2021. [Internet]. [cited 28 Jan 2021]. <https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/2028176>.
-
- National Library of Medicine. Review: MeSH descriptor data 2021. [Internet]. [cited 28 Jan 2021].<https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/68016454>.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous