Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Dec;22(6):e13396.
doi: 10.1111/tid.13396. Epub 2020 Jul 27.

Coinfection rates and clinical outcome data for cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus in post-transplant patients: A systematic review of the literature

Affiliations
Review

Coinfection rates and clinical outcome data for cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus in post-transplant patients: A systematic review of the literature

Colin Anderson-Smits et al. Transpl Infect Dis. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Background: In transplant recipients, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection increases morbidity and mortality; furthermore, coinfection with other human herpesviruses like the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) may complicate their management. This systematic literature review aimed to summarize rates of CMV-EBV coinfection and associated clinical outcomes among solid organ transplant (SOT) and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients.

Methods: An electronic literature search was performed using pre-specified search strategies (January 1, 2010-October 31, 2018) and following established/best practice methodology. Of 316 publications identified, 294 did not report CMV-EBV coinfection and were excluded. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were further analyzed. Due to limited reporting/heterogeneity, data were not meta-analyzable.

Results: Nine studies (six SOT; three HSCT) reported CMV-EBV coinfection; rates of coinfection post transplantation varied between 2.6% and 32.7%. Two studies indicated CMV reactivation to be an independent variable associated with EBV reactivation. Among SOT studies, higher rates of graft dysfunction (47.4% vs 22.9%), rejection episodes (20.0% vs 8.9%), or acute rejection (50.0% vs 31.0%) were reported for patients with coinfection than without. In HSCT studies, patients with graft-vs-host disease were not reported separately for coinfection. Two studies described cases of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) in patients with CMV-EBV coinfection and reported rates of PTLD of 92% and 100%.

Conclusion: The CMV-EBV coinfection rate in HSCT and SOT recipients varied and was associated with increased graft rejection and PTLD compared with patients without coinfection. Further research may improve understanding of the burden of CMV-EBV coinfection among transplant recipients.

Keywords: Epstein-Barr virus; cytomegalovirus; hematopoietic stem cell transplant; solid organ transplant.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CA‐S and IH are employees of, and hold stock in, Shire International GmbH, a Takeda company. ERB is an employee of CTI Clinical Trial and Consulting Services, which was funded by Shire, a Takeda company, to conduct this study.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Disposition and selection of publications by screening level and the final number of studies reviewed. aNumber of studies reporting coinfections other than CMV‐EBV: pneumonia (3), HIV (4), RSV (1), BK virus (4), Clostridium difficile (1), norovirus (1), bacterial enterocolitis (1), hepatitis C (1), HHV (3), HHV‐6 (9), HHV‐7 (3), fungal or mold infections (5), and Merkel cell polyomavirus (1). Some publications reported ≥ 1 agent. These publications included in vivo and in vitro studies. CMV, cytomegalovirus; EBV, Epstein‐Barr virus; HHV, human herpesvirus; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; RSV, respiratory syncytial virus
Figure 2
Figure 2
Post‐transplantation CMV‐EBV coinfection rates in SOT and HSCT recipients aCases also included in the separate CMV and EBV cohorts. CMV, cytomegalovirus; EBV, Epstein‐Barr virus; HSCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplant; SOT, solid organ transplant

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sia IG, Patel R. New strategies for prevention and therapy of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in solid‐organ transplant recipients. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000;13(1):83‐121. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ramanan P, Razonable RR. Cytomegalovirus infections in solid organ transplantation: a review. Infect Chemother. 2013;45(3):260‐271. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Azevedo LS, Pierrotti LC, Abdala E, et al. Cytomegalovirus infection in transplant recipients. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2015;70(7):515‐523. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kotton CN, Fishman JA. Viral infection in the renal transplant recipient. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16(6):1758‐1774. - PubMed
    1. Tolkoff‐Rubin NE, Rubin RH. Control of herpesvirus infection in organ transplant recipients. Can J Infect Dis. 1993;4(suppl C):59C‐64C.

MeSH terms

Grants and funding