Utilization of Clinical Trials Registries in Obstetrics and Gynecology Systematic Reviews
- PMID: 26942350
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001204
Utilization of Clinical Trials Registries in Obstetrics and Gynecology Systematic Reviews
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the use of clinical trials registries in published obstetrics and gynecologic systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Methods: We performed a metaepidemiologic study of systematic reviews between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2015, from six obstetric and gynecologic journals (Obstetrics & Gynecology, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, Human Reproduction Update, Gynecologic Oncology, British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, and American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology). All systematic reviews included after exclusions were independently reviewed to determine whether clinical trials registries had been included as part of the search process. Studies that reported using a trials registry were further examined to determine whether trial data were included in the analysis of these systematic reviews.
Results: Our initial search resulted in 292 articles, which was narrowed to 256 after exclusions. Of the 256 systematic reviews meeting our selection criteria, 47 (18.4%) used a clinical trials registry. Eleven of the 47 (23.4%) systematic reviews found unpublished data and two included unpublished data in their results.
Conclusion: A majority of systematic reviews in clinical obstetrics and gynecology journals do not conduct searches of clinical trials registries or do not make use of data obtained from these searches. Failure to make use of such data may lead to an inaccurate summary of available evidence and may contribute to an overrepresentation of published, statistically significant outcomes.
Similar articles
-
Clinical trials registries are underused in the pregnancy and childbirth literature: a systematic review of the top 20 journals.BMC Res Notes. 2016 Oct 21;9(1):475. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2280-3. BMC Res Notes. 2016. PMID: 27769265 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical trial registry use in anaesthesiology systematic reviews: A cross-sectional study of systematic reviews published in anaesthesiology journals and the Cochrane Library.Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017 Dec;34(12):797-807. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000671. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017. PMID: 28731924
-
Systematic Reviewers in Clinical Neurology Do Not Routinely Search Clinical Trials Registries.PLoS One. 2015 Jul 30;10(7):e0134596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134596. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26225564 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic Reviews Published in Emergency Medicine Journals Do Not Routinely Search Clinical Trials Registries: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Oct;66(4):424-427.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Oct 23. Ann Emerg Med. 2015. PMID: 25447560 Free PMC article.
-
Scientific publications in obstetrics and gynecology journals from China, 2000-2009.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 Nov;123(2):96-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.05.020. Epub 2013 Aug 1. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013. PMID: 23972956 Review.
Cited by
-
Manual search approaches used by systematic reviewers in dermatology.J Med Libr Assoc. 2016 Oct;104(4):302-304. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.104.4.009. J Med Libr Assoc. 2016. PMID: 27822152 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the robustness of results from clinical trials and meta-analyses with the fragility index.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Mar;228(3):276-282. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.08.053. Epub 2022 Sep 6. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023. PMID: 36084702 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Availability of results of clinical trials registered on EU Clinical Trials Register: cross sectional audit study.BMJ Med. 2024 Jan 12;3(1):e000738. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2023-000738. eCollection 2024. BMJ Med. 2024. PMID: 38274035 Free PMC article.
-
Inadequate diversity of information resources searched in US-affiliated systematic reviews and meta-analyses: 2005-2016.J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Oct;102:50-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.05.024. Epub 2018 Jun 4. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018. PMID: 29879464 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical trials registries are underused in the pregnancy and childbirth literature: a systematic review of the top 20 journals.BMC Res Notes. 2016 Oct 21;9(1):475. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2280-3. BMC Res Notes. 2016. PMID: 27769265 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical