Comparison of search strategies on CD Plus/MEDLINE
- PMID: 1878827
- PMCID: PMC1335828
Comparison of search strategies on CD Plus/MEDLINE
Abstract
Objective: To compare two strategies for searching MEDLINE using the CD Plus/MEDLINE program on compact disc.
Design: Comparison study.
Interventions: Two search strategies were designed and executed for each of two topics (patient recruitment to clinical trials and attitudes of patients, the public and health care professionals toward clinical trials). Strategy A: searches based on key words selected from the medical subject heading (MeSH) tree structure. Strategy B: searches based on MeSH terms most frequently used to index a known set of relevant articles. Defined search restrictions were then applied. The effects of the restrictions on the absolute number of citations retrieved and on the proportion of relevant citations were assessed.
Outcome measures: Number of articles retrieved, number of relevant articles, precision and recall of each search strategy and overlap between strategies.
Main results: Strategy A produced more citations than strategy B (recruitment 147 v. 38, attitude 366 v. 57) but had more inappropriate citations (recruitment 75 v. 17, attitude 265 v. 25). Both strategies produced 73 relevant recruitment citations and 101 relevant attitude citations. In the recruitment search although the precision did not differ significantly between strategies A and B the difference in recall was significant (98.6% v. 28.8% respectively, p less than 0.0001). In the attitude search strategy A had a lower precision than strategy B (27.6% v. 56.1%, p less than 0.0001) but a much higher recall (100% v. 31.7%, p less than 0.0001).
Conclusions: Strategy A would be more valuable to researchers doing extensive reviews, whereas strategy B would be useful for the busy clinician who simply wants a few appropriate references quickly and is willing to sacrifice comprehensive retrieval in the interest of efficiency.
Comment in
-
Comparison of search strategies on CD Plus/MEDLINE.CMAJ. 1992 Jan 15;146(2):100-1. CMAJ. 1992. PMID: 1735025 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Errors in search strategies were identified by type and frequency.J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Oct;59(10):1057-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.01.007. Epub 2006 Jun 23. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006. PMID: 16980145
-
Search strategies for retrieving complementary and alternative medicine clinical trials in oncology.Integr Cancer Ther. 2006 Sep;5(3):202-5. doi: 10.1177/1534735406292146. Integr Cancer Ther. 2006. PMID: 16880424
-
A comparison of MEDLINE CD-ROM and librarian-mediated search service users.Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1993 Jan;81(1):63-6. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1993. PMID: 8428194 Free PMC article.
-
The art and science of searching MEDLINE to answer clinical questions. Finding the right number of articles.Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1999 Spring;15(2):281-96. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1999. PMID: 10507188 Review.
-
MEDLINE and MeSH: challenges for end users.Med Ref Serv Q. 1992 Fall;11(3):29-46. doi: 10.1300/J115V11N03_03. Med Ref Serv Q. 1992. PMID: 10122123 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources