{"id":13822,"date":"2018-07-10T11:00:20","date_gmt":"2018-07-10T15:00:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/circulatingnow.nlm.nih.gov\/?p=13822"},"modified":"2024-09-30T14:32:13","modified_gmt":"2024-09-30T18:32:13","slug":"first-science-anatomy-1829-30","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/circulatingnow.nlm.nih.gov\/2018\/07\/10\/first-science-anatomy-1829-30\/","title":{"rendered":"First Science\u2014Anatomy, 1829\u201330"},"content":{"rendered":"
By Michael Sappol and Eva \u00c5hr\u00e9n ~<\/em><\/p>\n Originally published in<\/em> Hidden Treasure: The National Library of Medicine<\/a>, 2011.<\/em><\/p>\n Once upon a time, before originality was prized, copying was a very good thing. Pupils copied out passages from literature and long-division exercises. Art students copied masterworks or prints or casts (which were themselves copies). Medical students copied illustrations from anatomical atlases. And even when artists drew from human models in poses, and medical men drew from specimens and cadavers, such drawings were regarded as a kind of copy, an imitative representation of the observer\u2019s view. The act of drawing was a \u201cheuristic device,\u201d a way to develop skill at rendering and powers of observation. There was a culture of copying, far removed from today\u2019s preoccupation with exclusive copyright and patent law. In 1927 the Army Medical Library (now the National Library of Medicine) acquired a relic of that culture, some folded pages of drawings and notes from the hand of \u201cClorion,\u201d a resident of New Harmony, Indiana (the utopian community founded in 1824 by the socialist reformer Robert Owen).<\/p>\n Clorion\u2019s twenty-three faithfully rendered anatomical illustrations (in pencil, ink, and watercolor) were copied from a London weekly, The Medical Adviser and Complete Guide to Health and Long Life<\/em> (1825), which claimed to offer \u201cplain and easy directions for the treatment of every disorder incidental to the Human Frame,\u201d and was devoted to discussions of diseases (\u201cBilious Colic\u201d), odd cases (\u201cThe Living Skeleton\u201d), and healthy living (\u201cEarly Rising\u201d). Every issue featured an anatomy lesson with captioned engravings. At the time, a knowledge of anatomy was a mark of refinement. Anatomical education enabled one to appreciate works of art, attain insight into God\u2019s design (\u201cnatural theology\u201d), and contemplate human mortality (through images of skeletons and skulls). Anatomy was a subject where art, medicine, and philosophy converged.<\/p>\n Clorion\u2019s identity is unknown. Was he or she an aspiring medical student or artist or just studying anatomy and draftsmanship as an intellectual and moral exercise? The notebook consists entirely of copied material. Clorion offers no explanation but was almost certainly motivated by a desire for self-improvement. Acute observation improves drawing ability; drawing helps develop the ability to observe acutely. And both help the student to memorize information and reflect on its meaning. The Romantic pedagogical reformer Johann Heinrich Pestalozzi (1746\u20131827) preached that learning through doing, using the senses, was superior to methods that relied solely on the word. New Harmony had a Pestalozzian school.<\/p>\n Clorion\u2019s manuscript<\/a> was a link in a chain of copies. The Medical Adviser<\/em>\u2019s engravings were themselves copied, without attribution, from illustrations that Gerard Vandergucht made for William Cheselden\u2019s Anatomy of the Human Body<\/em> (1740) and from other sources. It\u2019s unlikely this was accounted as plagiarism. By 1825 Cheselden\u2019s engravings may have been so well known as not to require attribution. Or perhaps anatomy was a knowledge category that implicitly made a truth claim: here is the reality of humanity. If so, even derivatively, anatomical illustration could be taken as a report from nature, a transcription\u2014and author and artist were irrelevant.<\/p>\n Visit the National Library of Medicine to view this and other manuscript collections in the History of Medicine Reading Room<\/a>. <\/em>\u00a0For questions about this manuscript, please contact the History of Medicine Division Reference staff at\u00a0<\/em>NLM Customer Support<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/a>
<\/a>