Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Apr 6;140(7):528-32.
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-140-7-200404060-00013.

Predicting adherence to colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy on the basis of physician appointment-keeping behavior

Affiliations

Predicting adherence to colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy on the basis of physician appointment-keeping behavior

Barbara J Turner et al. Ann Intern Med. .

Abstract

Background: Poor patient attendance to scheduled flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy may contribute to deficient colorectal cancer screening.

Objective: To examine the association of physician appointment-keeping behavior with attendance to scheduled endoscopic studies of the colon.

Design: Retrospective cohort.

Setting: 23 sites performing endoscopic procedures in a health care system.

Patients: 11 803 patients scheduled for a first colon study with 3 or more scheduled physician visits from June 1999 through November 2001.

Measurement: 2 outcomes from health system computerized records: 1) attendance at the first scheduled colon study and 2) among nonattendees, attendance at the study rescheduled within 6 months. Physician visit adherence was defined as the proportion of physician visits kept, grouped by quartile. Adjusted associations were examined in conditional logistic regression.

Results: Of 11 803 patients, 62% attended the first colon study. Of the 4496 nonattendees, 2739 (61%) rescheduled and, of these, 64% kept that appointment. Compared with the highest quartile of physician visit adherence (>85%), the adjusted odds ratio of attending the first colon study decreased as physician visit adherence decreased: Adjusted odds ratios were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.89 to 1.00) for 76% to 85% adherence, 0.87 (CI, 0.81 to 0.92) for 66% to 75% adherence, and 0.79 (CI, 0.73 to 0.85) for adherence of 65% or less. Among nonattendees who rescheduled, the lowest quartile of physician visit adherence (< or =65%) was the only statistically significant predictor of attending the rescheduled study (adjusted odds ratio, 0.87 [CI, 0.78 to 0.98]).

Limitations: The adherence measure applies only to patients with at least 3 scheduled visits. Persons having a colon study outside of the system could have been misclassified.

Conclusion: Physician appointment-keeping behavior predicted attendance to colorectal endoscopic studies in this cohort and may help identify persons who need interventions to promote adherence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources