U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Probe Reports from the NIH Molecular Libraries Program [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Center for Biotechnology Information (US); 2010-.

Cover of Probe Reports from the NIH Molecular Libraries Program

Probe Reports from the NIH Molecular Libraries Program [Internet].

Show details

Optimization and Characterization of an Inhibitor for NADPH Oxidase 1 (NOX-1)

, , , , , , , , , , , and .

Author Information and Affiliations

Received: ; Last Update: December 12, 2011.

The NADPH oxidase (NOX) family catalyzes the regulated formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). ROS generated via NOX1 have been reported to play a role in a growing number of diseases, including cancer, atherosclerosis, hypertension, neurological disorders and inflammation. Since ROS are also produced by other cellular enzymes, the ability to selectively inhibit NOX1 can be expected to provide reversible, mechanistic insights into these cellular processes with which it is involved. The Scripps Research Institute Molecular Screening Center (SRIMSC), part of the Molecular Libraries Probe Production Centers Network (MLPCN), identified a potent and selective phenothiazine NOX1 inhibitor probe, ML171, by high-throughput screening using a cell-based luminescence assay. ML171 is a potent and selective inhibitor of NOX1, with an IC50 of 129–156 nM in cell-based assays. ML171 is not cytotoxic, and is selective among NOX family members NOX2, NOX3, and NOX4, as well as against xanthine oxidase, another cellular source of ROS. In addition, ML171 is highly effective in inhibiting the cellular production of invadopodia in a human colon cancer cell line. These results elucidate the relevance of NOX1-dependent ROS generation in mechanisms of cancer invasion, and define compound ML171 as a powerful NOX1 chemical probe and a potential therapeutic agent for treatment of this pathology.

Assigned Assay Grant #: 1 R03 MH083264-01A1

Screening Center Name & PI: Scripps Research Institute Molecular Screening Center (SRIMSC), Hugh Rosen

Chemistry Center Name & PI: SRIMSC, Hugh Rosen

Assay Submitter & Institution: Gary M. Bokoch, The Scripps Research Institute

PubChem Summary Bioassay Identifier (AID): 1796

Probe Structure & Characteristics

CID/ML#Target NameIC50 (nM) [SID, AID]Anti-target Name(s)IC50 (μM) [SID, AID]Fold SelectiveSecondary Assay(s) Name: IC50 (nM) [SID, AID]
CID 81131/ML171NOX1129 [SID 57287864, AID 2808]
156 [SID 92093115, AID 2538]
NOX2, NOX3, NOX4, xanthine oxidase5 (NOX2), 3 (NOX3), 5 (NOX4) [SID 57287864, AID 435013], 5.5 (xanthine oxidase) [SID 57287864, AID 435009]NOX2, NOX4 & xanthine oxidase: >30 fold; NOX3: 20 foldHEK293 INH: 250 [SID 57287864, AID 435002]
Inhibition of invadopodia formation: Active [SID 57287864, AID 434993
Inhibition of ECM degradation: [SID 57287864, AID 488778]

Recommendations for scientific use of the probe

The NADPH oxidase (NOX) family catalyzes the regulated formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [1]. ROS generated via NOX1 have been reported to play a role in a growing number of diseases, including cancer, atherosclerosis, hypertension, neurological disorders and inflammation [2–7]. A few non-specific NOX1 inhibitors have been reported in the literature [8–11]. Our first NOX1 inhibitor probe (ML090, CID 616479), based on a quinoxaline scaffold, is the first specific NOX inhibitor to be described [12]. Since ROS are also produced by other cellular enzymes, the ability to selectively inhibit NOX1 can be expected to provide reversible, mechanistic insights into these cellular processes with which it is involved. The results reported here demonstrate the identification of a subset of phenothiazines as nanomolar, cell-active and specific NOX1 inhibitors that potently block NOX1-dependent ROS generation, with only marginal activity on other cellular ROS-producing enzymes and receptors including the other NOX isoforms. The probe compound ML171 reported here also blocks the ROS-dependent formation of ECM-degrading invadopodia in colon cancer cells. These results elucidate the relevance of NOX1-dependent ROS generation in mechanisms of cancer invasion, and define probe compound ML171 as a powerful NOX1 chemical probe and a potential therapeutic agent for treatment of this pathology. Interestingly, Dr. Brent Stockwell from Columbia has recently successfully used compound ML171 to protect against erastin-induced cell death (personal communication to Dr. Hugh Rosen), confirming the rapid uptake of this probe by the research community and the value of this compound.

1. Introduction

The NADPH oxidase (NOX) family, consisting of the homologous enzymes NOX1-4 and the more distantly related NOX5, Duox1 and Duox2, catalyzes the regulated formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [1]. Among all seven NOX isoforms, the NOX1-4 enzymes share the highest level of structural similarities [13]. All NOX enzymes have been implicated in physiological and pathophysiological processes [14]. Particularly, NOX1-dependent ROS generation has been shown to play a pivotal role in cell signaling, cell growth, angiogenesis, motility and blood pressure regulation [15–19]. ROS generated via NOX1 have been reported to contribute to a growing number of diseases, including cancer, atherosclerosis, hypertension, neurological disorders and inflammation [2–7]. There appear to be significant differences between human and mouse NOX1 [20].

Consistent with a role of NOX1 in colon cancer, Gianni et al have recently shown that in human colon cancer cells NOX1-derived ROS are necessary for the formation of extracellular matrix (ECM)-degrading, actin-rich cellular structures known as invadopodia [21], whose presence directly correlates with the ability of cells to invade the surrounding tissues [22,23].

Since it has been reported that ROS can also be produced by other cellular enzymes such as xanthine oxidase (XO), cytochrome P450, and mitochondrial oxidases [23–26], dissecting the contribution to these pathophysiological conditions of NOX1-derived ROS in contrast to those of other ROS generators has been complicated by the lack of potent, selective and specific NOX1 inhibitors. Selective inhibition of NOX1 can be expected to provide reversible, mechanistic insights into these cellular processes, in contrast to other non-NOX1 mechanisms for scavenging or inhibiting ROS production.

Currently, only a few non-specific inhibitors, such as diphenylene iodonium (DPI) and apocynin have been reported in the literature [8]. Issues of selectivity, specificity, potency and toxicity have been raised against the use of these compounds as NOX1 inhibitors both as research and clinical tools [9–11]. DPI, the most widely used NOX inhibitor, rapidly and irreversibly blocks not only all NOX isoforms but also many other flavin-dependent enzymes such as xanthine oxidase because of its chemical mechanism of inhibition which involves accepting an electron from flavin, followed by covalently reacting with the enzymes or its prosthetic group [8].

Apocynin (CID 2214) is another non-selective NADPH oxidase inhibitor [8] that reduces levels of gp91phox, p22phox, p47phox and p67phox NADPH oxidase subunits in vivo [27,28]. High throughput screening efforts have identified VAS2870 (3-benzyl-7-(2-benzoxazolyl)thio-1,2,3-triazolo[4,5-d]pyrimidine; Vasopharm Biotech GmbH, Würzburg, Germany) as a novel NADPH oxidase inhibitor, which was shown to dose-dependently inhibit NADPH oxidase activity in both cell-free assays (IC50 = 10 μM) and in PMA-stimulated HL-60 cells (IC50 = 2 μM) [29]. VAS2870 (5 μM) did not alter levels of NOX4 mRNA in human endothelial cells [30]. No data on NOX1 was presented in these studies. Both intracellular ROS and NADPH oxidase activity were inhibited by the antioxidants tiron and N-acetylcysteine in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell lines [31].

Our first NOX1 inhibitor probe (ML090, CID 616479), based on a quinoxaline scaffold, is the first specific NOX inhibitor to be described [12]. It has a target IC50 of 360 nM in a HEK293 transfection format (AID 2532) and antitarget IC50s of >10 μM against NOX2, NOX3, and NOX4 (AID 2539), and 3.5 μM against xanthine oxidase (AID 2556). Currently, no other specific NOX inhibitors have been reported in the literature.

A search of patents posted on the US Patent and Trademark Office web site on September 15, 2010, returned no results for NOX1-specific inhibitors.

The results reported here demonstrate the identification of a subset of phenothiazines as nanomolar, cell-active and specific NOX1 inhibitors that potently block NOX1-dependent ROS generation, with only marginal activity on other cellular ROS-producing enzymes and receptors including the other NOX isoforms. The probe compound ML171 reported here also blocks the ROS-dependent formation of ECM-degrading invadopodia in colon cancer cells. These results elucidate the relevance of NOX1-dependent ROS generation in mechanisms of cancer invasion, and define probe compound ML171 as a powerful NOX1 chemical probe and a potential therapeutic agent for treatment of this pathology.

2. Materials and Methods

The following reagents were purchased from Sigma: 2-Acetylphenothiazine (175226), chlorpromazine (C0982), DPI (D2926), horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (77330), fMet- Leu-Phe (fMLP) (F3506), NADPH (N5130), FAD (F6625), cytochrome c (105201) and luminol (09253) H2O2 (95321), rotenone (R8875), xanthine oxidase (X4376), hypoxanthine (HX) (H9377). Cell culture medium, fetal bovine serum, supplements Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution, and lipofectamine were from Invitrogen. NOX1, NOXA1, NOXO1 and Rac1-Q61L expression plasmids were provided by Dr. Gary M. Bokoch. Plasmids for transfection were purified using the Qiagen Qiafilter system. DLD1 and HT29 colonic adenocarcinoma cells (Cat# CCL-221 and HTB-38) were purchased from ATCC. 35S-GTPγS (Cat# NEG030H) was obtained from Perkin Elmer. 2-(Trifluoromethyl)- phenothiazine (CID 7082, product code JFD03930), compound library (HitFinder version 4, Maybridge) and other positive hits from primary assay were purchased from Maybridge. 2-acetylphenothiazine (CID 81131, product code STK301831) was purchased from Vitas-M Laboratories. Mouse monoclonal cortactin antibody 4F10 was purchased from Millipore, and anti-mouse Alexa-Fluor-568 and Alexa-Fluor-568 phalloidin antibodies were purchased from Molecular Probes. Reagents used by the NIMH Psychoactive Drug Screening Program (PDSP) were provided by the PDSP.

2.1. Assays

LC-MS/MS

All analytical methods were in MRM mode where the parent ion was selected in Q1 of the mass spectrometer. The parent ion was fragmented and a characteristic fragment ion monitored in Q3. MRM mass spectroscopy methods are particularly sensitive because additional time is spent monitoring the desired ions and not sweeping a large mass range. Methods were rapidly set up using Automaton® (Applied Biosystems), where the compounds were listed with their name and mass in an Excel datasheet. Compounds were submitted in a 96-well plate to the HPLC autosampler and slowly injected without a column present. A narrow range centered on the indicated mass was scanned to detect the parent ion. The software then evaluated a few pre-selected parameters to determine conditions that maximized the signal for the parent ion. The molecule was then fragmented in the collision cell of the mass spectrometer and fragments with m/z larger than 70 but smaller than the parent mass were determined. Three separate collision energies were evaluated to fragment the parent ion and the largest three ions were selected. Each of these three fragment ions was further optimized and the best fragment was chosen. The software then inserted the optimized masses and parameters into a template method and saved it with a unique name that indicated the individual compound being optimized. Spectra for the parent ion and the fragmentation pattern were saved and reviewable later.

Solubility

The solubility of compounds was tested in phosphate buffered saline, pH 7.4. Compounds were inverted for 24 hours in test tubes containing 1–2 mg of compound with 1 mL of PBS. The samples were centrifuged and analyzed by HPLC (Agilent 1100 with diode-array detector). Peak area was compared to a standard of known concentration. In cases when the concentration was too low for UV analysis or when the compound did not possess a good chromophore, LC-MS/MS analysis was used.

Stability

Demonstration of stability in PBS was conducted under conditions likely to be experienced in a laboratory setting. The compound was dissolved in 1 mL of PBS at a concentration of 10 μM, unless its maximum solubility was insufficient to achieve this concentration. Low solubility compounds were tested between ten and fifty percent of their solubility limit. The solution was immediately aliquoted into seven standard polypropylene microcentrifuge tubes which were stored at ambient temperature in a block microcentrifuge tube holder. Individual tubes were frozen at −80°C at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, and 48 hours. The frozen samples were thawed in a room temperature and an equal volume of acetonitrile was added prior to determination of concentration by LC-MS/MS.

Determination of glutathione reactivity

One μL of a 10 mM compound stock solution was added to 1 mL of a freshly prepared solution of 100 μM reduced glutathione. Final compound concentration was 10 μM unless solubility limited. The solution was allowed to incubate at 37°C for two hours prior to being directly analyzed for glutathione adduct formation. LC-MS/MS analysis of GSH adducts was performed on an API 4000 Q-TrapTM mass spectrometer equipped with a Turboionspray source (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Two methodologies were utilized—a negative precursor ion (PI) scan of m/z 272, corresponding to GSH fragmenting at the thioether bond, and a neutral loss scan of −129 AMU to detect GSH adducts. This triggered positive ion enhanced resolution and enhanced product ion scans [32,33].

Primary screen to identify NOX1 inhibitors (AIDs 1792, 2541, 2538, 2664, 2752, 2773, 2808, 2819, and 434997)

Assay Overview: The purpose of this cell-based assay was to identify compounds in the Maybridge collection that inhibit NOX1 activity. This chemiluminescence assay employs a luminol probe to monitor intracellular ROS in the HT29 transformed colonic epithelial cell line. HT29 cells express high endogenous levels of known NOX1 components and no other NOX family members. In this assay, the cells are incubated with test compounds, cell permeable luminol, and horseradish peroxidase. The interaction of luminol with NOX1-generated ROS/superoxide inside cells yields an unstable endoperoxide that generates light, leading to increased well luminescence. As designed, compounds that inhibit cellular NOX1 activity will reduce intracellular ROS and endoperoxide levels, leading to reduced luminol-ROS interactions, reduced endoperoxide production, reduced light emission, and reduced well luminescence. Test compounds were assayed in singlicate at a final nominal concentration of 6.7 μM (AID 1792), in triplicate at a final nominal concentration of 3.3 μM (AID 2541), in triplicate using a dilution series starting at a maximum concentration of 10 μM (AID 2538), in triplicate using a dilution series starting at a maximum concentration of 20 μM (AIDs 2808, 2819), in triplicate using a dilution series starting at a maximum concentration of 25 μM (AID 2773), or in triplicate using a dilution series starting at a maximum concentration of 50 μM (AIDs 2664, 2752).

Protocol Summary: HT29 cells were routinely cultured in 150 mm dishes at 37 °C and 95% relative humidity (RH). The growth media consisted of Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Media supplemented with 10% v/v fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-Glutamine, and 100U/mL penicillin and streptomycin. Prior to the start of the assay, cells were suspended to a concentration of 2.25 million cells/mL in Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution. 30 μL of cell suspension (67,500 cells) were dispensed into each well of 384-well tissue culture-treated microtiter plates and the plates were centrifuged briefly. The assay was started by dispensing 100 nL of test compound in DMSO, diphenylene iodonium (DPI) in DMSO, or DMSO alone (0.33% final concentration) to the appropriate wells. The plates were incubated for 1 hour at 37 °C, 5% CO2 and 95% RH, followed by the addition of 20 μL of a solution containing 400U/mL horseradish peroxidase and 50 mM luminol mix to all wells. The plates were centrifuged briefly and incubated for 10 minutes at 37 °C (5% CO2, 95% RH). Well luminescence was measured on the EnVision plate reader (Perkin Elmer). Assay Cutoff: 1) compounds that inhibited NOX1 ≥ 75% [(AID 1792); 2) compounds with ≥ 50% inhibitory activity (AID 2541); 3) compounds with an IC50 < 20 μM (AIDs 2538, 2664, 2752, 2773); and 4) compounds with an IC50 ≤ 17 μM (AIDs 2808, 2819) were declared active.

Maybridge library uHTS counterscreen to identify inhibitors of luminol (AID 1823)

Assay Overview: The purpose of this biochemical assay was to identify compounds in the Maybridge collection that directly inhibit luminescence generated by luminol in the peroxide reaction. This assay served as a counterscreen for a previous set of experiments entitled, “Luminescence-based primary cell-based high throughput screening assay to identify inhibitors of NADPH oxidase 1 (NOX1): Maybridge Library” (PubChem AID 1792). In this assay, compounds are incubated with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), horseradish peroxidase (HRP), and luminol. The interaction between luminol and H2O2 yields unstable peroxide radicals that generate light that can be detected by a luminometer. As designed, compounds that inhibit this reaction will reduce luminol interactions with H2O2 and production of the unstable peroxide, leading to reduced light emission and well luminescence. Test compounds were assayed in singlicate at a final nominal concentration of 6.7 μM.

Protocol Summary: Prior to the start of the assay, H2O2 was diluted to a concentration of 88 μM in Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution. 30 μL of the diluted H2O2 were dispensed into each well of 384-well tissue culture-treated microtiter plates and the plates were centrifuged briefly. The assay was started by dispensing 100 nL of test compound in DMSO, N-acetyl cysteine (NAC; 2.5 mM final concentration) in DMSO, or DMSO alone (0.33% final concentration) to the appropriate wells. The plates were incubated for 30 minutes at 25 °C, followed by the addition of 20 μL of a solution containing 400U/mL horseradish peroxidase and 50 mM luminol mix to all wells. The plates were centrifuged briefly and incubated for 10 minutes at 25 °C. Well luminescence was measured on the EnVision plate reader (Perkin Elmer). Assay Cutoff: compounds that inhibited luminol ≥ 25% were declared active.

Dose response assay to identify inhibitors of NOX1 in a human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 transfection format (AIDs 2532, 2545, and 435002)

Assay Overview: The purpose of this cell-based assay is to determine the potency of selected compounds identified as active in previous assays in a HEK293 transfection format. This chemiluminescence assay employs a luminol probe to monitor intracellular ROS in HEK293 cells. In this assay, HEK293 cells seeded into 6-well plates were cotransfected with expression vectors for NOX1, NOXA1, NOXO1 and constitutive active RAC1. After 16 hours, test or control compounds were added, followed 2 hours later by luminol and horseradish peroxidase. NOX activity was determined by chemiluminescence as described above (AID 1792). Test compounds were assayed in triplicate using a 4-point 1:3 dilution series starting at a maximum concentration of 10 μM.

Protocol Summary: HEK293 cells were maintained in DMEM containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 2 mM glutamine, and antibiotics (100 U/ml penicillin and 100 g/ml streptomycin) at 37°C in 5% CO2. 500,000 HEK293 cells were seeded into 6-well plates in media without antibiotics the day before transfection. Cells were transfected with pRK5-Myc-NOX1, -NOXO1, -NOXA1, and pRK5-myc-Rac1CAQ61L using Lipofectamine 2000. 16 hours after transfection, 50,000 HEK293 cells in 30 μL HBSS were dispensed into each well of a white 384-well plate. The assay was started by dispensing 50 nL of test compound in DMSO, diphenylene iodonium (DPI) in DMSO, or DMSO alone (0.33% final concentration) to the appropriate wells. The plates were incubated for 1 hour at 37 °C, 5% CO2 and 95% RH, followed by the addition of 20 μL of a mixture of 1 mM luminol plus 8 units of HRP in HBSS and luminescence quantified using a 384-well plate luminometer (EnVision). Chemiluminescence was measured for 30 minutes. Assay Cutoff: compounds with an IC50 ≤ 10 μM were declared active.

Dose response assay to identify inhibitors of NOX2, NOX3, or NOX4 in a human embryonic kidney (HEK)/293 transfection format (AIDs 2539 and 435013)

Assay Overview: The purpose of this family selectivity cell-based assay was to evaluate the ability of compounds identified as active in previous assays to inhibit NOX2, NOX3, or NOX4 activity in a HEK293 transfection format. This chemiluminescence assay employs a luminol probe to monitor intracellular ROS in HEK293 cells. HEK293 cells seeded into 6-well plates were cotransfected with the appropriate expression vectors for each NOX subtype. NOX activity was determined by chemiluminescence as described above (AID 1792).

Protocol Summary: HEK293 cells were maintained as described above (AID 435002). HEK293 cells seeded into 6-well plates were cotransfected with the appropriate expression vectors for each NOX subtype. For the NOX2 assay (Assay 1), cells were transfected with pRK5-Myc- NOX2, pRK5-p67phox, pRK5-p47phox and pRK5-myc-Rac1CA-Q61L. For the NOX-3 assay (Assay 2), cells were transfected with pRK5-Myc-NOX3, pRK5-NOXO1, pRK5-NOXA1and pRK5-myc- Rac1CA-Q61L. For the NOX-4 assay (Assay 3), cells were transfected with pRK5-Myc-NOX4 and pRK5-p22phox. After 16 hours, cells were dispensed into wells of a 384-well plate, test or control compounds were added, and NOX activity was determined by chemiluminescence as described above (AID 435002). Assay Cutoff: compounds with an IC50 ≤ 10 μM were declared active.

Dose response assay to identify inhibitors of xanthine oxidase (AIDs 2556 and 435009)

Assay Overview: The purpose of this cell-free assay was to evaluate the ability of compounds identified as active in previous assays to inhibit ROS production by another cellular source, xanthine oxidase. This chemiluminescence assay employs a luminol probe to monitor ROS production. In this assay, xanthine oxidase was dispensed to all wells of a 96-well plate followed by test or control compounds. Hypoxanthine was dispensed to all wells, followed by the addition of horseradish peroxide and luminal and reading luminescence. The interaction of luminol with xanthine oxidase-generated ROS/superoxide inside cells yields an unstable endoperoxide that generates light, leading to increased well luminescence. As designed, compounds that inhibit cellular xanthine oxidase activity will reduce intracellular ROS and endoperoxide levels, leading to reduced luminol-ROS interactions, reduced endoperoxide production, reduced light emission, and reduced well luminescence. Test compounds were assayed in triplicate using a 7-point dilution series starting at a maximum concentration of 10 μM.

Protocol Summary: 25 μL of freshly-prepared 0.25 U/ml xanthine oxidase were dispensed into a 384-well plate (white Corning) by FlexDrop. 50 nL of DPI, DMSO or library compounds were dispensed by Biomek FX into each individual well. Upon 10 minutes of incubation at room temperature, 20 μL of 1 mM luminol plus 8 units of HRP in HBSS was added and luminescence was quantified using a 384-well plate luminometer (EnVision). Assay Cutoff: Compounds with an IC50 ≤ 10 μM were declared active.

Dose response cytotoxicity assay (AID 434992 and 463255)

Assay Overview: The purpose of this assay was to eliminate cytotoxic compounds. In this assay, HT29 cells were incubated with test compounds, followed by determination of cell viability. The assay utilizes the CellTiter-Glo luminescent reagent to measure intracellular ATP in viable cells. Luciferase present in the reagent catalyzes the oxidation of beetle luciferin to oxyluciferin and light in the presence of cellular ATP. Well luminescence is directly proportional to ATP levels and cell viability. As designed, compounds that reduce cell viability will reduce ATP levels, luciferin oxidation and light production, resulting in decreased well luminescence. Compounds were tested in triplicate in a 10-point 1:3 dilution series starting at a nominal test concentration of 40 μM.

Protocol Summary: Prior to the start of the assay 50,000 HT29 cells in 20 μL HBSS were dispensed into each well of 384-well tissue culture-treated microtiter plates. The assay was started by immediately dispensing 50 nL of test compound in DMSO, DMSO alone, or rotenone as a positive control (150 μM final concentration) to the appropriate wells. The plates were then incubated for 1 hour at 37 °C. The assay was stopped by dispensing 20 μL of CellTiter-Glo reagent to each well, followed by incubation at room temperature for 15 minutes. Well luminescence was measured on the ViewLux plate reader. Assay Cutoff: compounds with a CC50 ≤ 10 μM were declared active.

Microscopic assay to identify inhibitors of invadopodia formation (AID 434993)

Assay Overview: The purpose of this assay was to determine whether a compound that inhibits NOX1 can block invadopodia formation in DLD1 human colon cancer cells. In this assay, cells were transfected with tyrosine kinase c-Src, which is required for the formation of functional invadopodia. Cells were then treated with test or control compounds, then stained with invadopodia markers phalloidin or cortactin, and then prepared for confocal and epifluorescence microscopy. As designed, a compound that inhibits NOX1 will inhibit invadopodia formation and result in fewer phalloidin- and contactin-positive structures.

Protocol Summary: Human DLD1 cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 2 mM glutamine, and antibiotics (100 units/ml penicillin and 100 g/ml streptomycin) at 37 °C in 5% CO2. DLD1 cells were plated on glass coverslips and after 24 hours cells were transfected with active SrcYF or empty vector (mock) in the presence of Lipofectamine 2000. 48 hours after transfection, cells were treated for 1 hour with 10 μM test compound, DMSO, or 10 μM DPI. Afterwards, cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 10 minutes. Successively, cells were permeabilized in 0.5% Triton for 10 minutes, then blocked in 2% BSA in PBS for 45 minutes at room temperature. Cells were then immunolabeled with appropriate primary and Alexa-Fluor 568-conjugated secondary antibodies. F-actin was detected by using Alexa-Fluor 568-conjugated phalloidin. Cells were mounted on slides with Mowiol mounting medium (Calbiochem) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Epifluorescence images of fixed cells were acquired on an inverted microscope (Eclipse TE 2000-U, Nikon) equipped with an electronically controlled shutter, filter wheels, and a 14-bit cooled CCD camera (Cool SNAP HQ, Photometrics) controlled by MetaMorph software (Universal Imaging Corp.) by using a 60x/1.4 NA Plan Apo DIC or a 40x/1.4 NA Plan Apo Ph3 objective lens (Nikon). Confocal images were acquired on a spinning disk confocal microscope system, equipped with a CoolSnapHQ camera and 100x/1.4 NA Plan Apo or a 60x/1.4 NA Plan Apo objective lens (Nikon). Invadopodia structures in typical fields were counted. Data were collected from three independent experiments. Assay Cutoff: compounds that exhibited a SEM of p < 0.05 compared to the DMSO control were declared active.

Microscopic assay to identify inhibitors of extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation (AID 488778)

Assay Overview: The purpose of this assay was to determine whether a NOX1 inhibitor compound that was shown to block invadopodia formation in DLD1 human colon cancer cells in a previous assay, “Late-stage microscopic assay to identify inhibitors of NADPH oxidase 1 (NOX1): Inhibition of invadopodia formation” (AID 434993), can block the ability of DLD1 cells to degrade ECM. This assay also tests whether NOX1 overexpression restores the capacity of the DLD1 cells to degrade ECM in the presence of NOX1 inhibitor compound. In this assay, cells are transfected with empty vector, tyrosine kinase c-Src (SrcYF), which is required for the formation of functional invadopodia, or SrcYF plus a NOX1 expression plasmid. After transfection, cells are plated on fluorescently labeled gelatin-coated coverslips. Cells are treated with test compound or control, then stained with invadopodia marker phalloidin (that stains actin), and then prepared for epifluorescence microscopy. As designed, a compound that inhibits NOX1 will inhibit the NOX1-mediated formation of functional invadopodia and reduce the ability of c-Src-transfected DLD1 cells to degrade the ECM

Protocol Summary: Human DLD1 cells were maintained as described above (AID 434993). DLD1 cells were transfected with empty vector, vector with constitutive active Src (SrcYF), or SrcYF plus a NOX1 expresssion plasmid, in the presence of Lipofectamine 2000. 24 hrs after transfection, cells were trypsinized and plated on FITC-labeled gelatin-coated coverslips. After 2 hours, cells were treated with test compound, DPI (positive control), or DMSO (negative control) for 1.5 hours. 24 hours later, cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 10 minutes. Successively, cells were permeabilized in 0.5% Triton for 10 minutes and blocked in 2% BSA in PBS for 45 minutes at room temperature. Cells were then immunolabeled with Alexa-Fluor 568-conjugated phalloidin and visualized by epifluorescence microscopy (60X) as described above (AID 434993). Quantification from three independent biological experiments is reported for each condition. Assay Cutoff: compounds that exhibited a SEM of p < 0.05 compared to the DMSO control were declared active.

NIMH Psychoactive Drug Screening Program (PDSP) primary assay (AIDs 434974 and 504381)

Assay Overview: The purpose of this panel of radioligand binding assays performed by the NIMH PDSP was to identify a subset of potential receptors, transporters, or ion channels for which the test compound displays affinity. In this assay, test compounds are incubated with radioligand and receptor-containing crude membrane fractions. Bound radioactivity is isolated by filtration onto filter mats and counted. As designed, membrane fractions to which test compound bind will bind less radioligand and decrease the radioactivity measured in the assay.

Protocol Summary: Test and reference compounds were diluted to 5X final assay concentration (50 μM for a final assay concentration of 10 μM) in the appropriate radioligand binding buffer. 50 μL aliquots of buffer (negative control), test compound, and reference compound (positive control) were added in quadruplicate to the wells of a 96-well plate, each of which contained 50 μL 5X radioligand and 100 μL buffer. Receptor-containing, crude membrane fractions were resuspended in an appropriate volume of buffer and dispensed (50 μL per well) into the 96-well plate. Radioligand binding was allowed to equilibrate for 1.5 hours at room temperature, and then bound radioactivity was isolated by filtration onto 0.3% polyethyleneimine-treated, 96-well filter mats using a 96-well Filtermate harverster. The filter mats were dried, scintillant was melted onto the filters, and the radioactivity retained on the filters was counted in a Microbeta scintillation counter. Test compound was tested in quadruplicate. Assay Cutoff: inhibition of > 50% for a particular target was considered active.

NIMH Psychoactive Drug Screening Program (PDSP) secondary assay (AIDs 434953 and 504410)

Assay Overview: The purpose of this panel of radioligand binding assays performed by the NIMH PDSP was to determine Ki values for test compounds in selected assays from the PDSP primary assay (AID 434974). In this assay, test compounds are incubated with radioligand and receptor-containing crude membrane fractions. Bound radioactivity is isolated by filtration onto Whatman glass fiber filters and counted. As designed, membrane fractions to which test compound binds will bind less radioligand and decrease the radioactivity measured in the assay. Compounds were tested in duplicate in an 11-point dilution series starting at a nominal test concentration of 50 μM.

Protocol Summary: A solution of the compound to be tested was prepared as a 1 mg/ml stock in buffer or DMSO according to its solubility. A similar stock of a reference compound (positive control) was also prepared. Eleven dilutions (5X assay concentration) of the test and reference compounds were prepared by serial dilution: 0.05 nM, 0.5 nM, 1.5 nM, 5 nM, 15 nM, 50 nM, 150 nM, 500 nM, 1.5 μM, 5 μM, 50 μM (thus, the corresponding assay concentrations span from 10 pM to 10 μM and include semilog points in the range where high-to-moderate affinity ligands compete with radioligand for binding sites). Radioligand was dispensed into the wells of a 96-well plate. (Typically, the assay concentration of radioligand is a value between one half the KD and the KD of a particular radioligand at its target). Duplicate 50 μL aliquots of the test and reference compound dilutions are added. Then, crude membrane fractions of cells expressing recombinant receptor are dispensed into each well. The 250 μL reactions are incubated at room temperature and shielded from light (to prevent photolysis of light-sensitive ligands), then harvested by rapid filtration onto Whatman glass fiber filters. Filters are placed in scintillation tubes and allowed to dry overnight. The next day scintillation cocktail is added to each tube. The tubes are capped, labeled, and counted by liquid scintillation counting. Assay Cutoff: compounds with a Ki of ≤ 10 μM are considered active.

Table 1 gives an overview of the PubChem assays associated with the NOX1 inhibitor project and indicates which are associated with the current probe development effort for ML171.

Table 1. Overview of PubChem assays for NOX1 inhibitor project.

Table 1

Overview of PubChem assays for NOX1 inhibitor project.

2.2. Probe Chemical Characterization

The probe structure was verified by NMR and high resolution MS (Figures 1 and 2):

Figure 1. LC-MS of probe ML178.

Figure 1

LC-MS of probe ML178.

Figure 2. LRMS of probe ML178.

Figure 2

LRMS of probe ML178.

1 H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) d 8.75 (s, 1H), 7.32 (dd, J = 8.0, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 7.18 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.01 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.99 (td, J = 7.6, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 6.89 (dd, J = 7.6, 0.8 Hz, 1H), 6.75 (td, J = 7.6, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.65 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 2.47 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) d 196.7, 142.0, 141.2, 136.1, 127.9, 126.2, 126.1, 123.2, 122.10, 122.06, 115.2, 114.5, 112.7, 26.4; IR (neat) 3346, 2255, 1667, 1026. LRMS (EI): m/z for C14H11NOS [M]+ calcd 241.06, found 241.1

Solubility in PBS (137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM sodium phosphate dibasic, 2 mM potassium phosphate monobasic, pH 7.4) at room temperature (23 °C) was determined to be 1.2 μM. The probe has a half-life of > 48 hours in PBS at room temperature (84% compound remaining at 48 hours) (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Stability of Probe ML171 in PBS.

Figure 3

Stability of Probe ML171 in PBS.

No Michael acceptor adducts were observed when a sample of the probe was incubated with 100 μM glutathione and analyzed by LC-MS.

The compounds in Table 2 have been submitted to the SMR collection. Compound numbers refer to the SAR Table.

Table 2. Compounds Submitted to the MLSMR.

Table 2

Compounds Submitted to the MLSMR.

2.3. Probe Preparation

In our SAR analysis for this project, compounds were tested for inhibitory activity in the primary assay for two rounds of SAR by purchase (AIDs 2808 and 2819) and three rounds of SAR by synthesis (AIDs 2664, 2752, and 2773). The probe we chose was a purchased compound (compound 1 in the Table 3). The structure of the purchased compound was verified by NMR (Figure 2) and LC-MS (Figure 1). Two synthetic schemes from the literature are provided (Figure 4) [34,35].

Figure 4. Synthetic schemes for probe compound 1.

Figure 4

Synthetic schemes for probe compound 1.

3. Results

Compound 1 (see Table 4) satisfies the goals for the probe characteristics identified at the outset of the project: 1) probes should not induce cell death, 2) probes should exhibit saturable inhibitor activity, and 3) probes should exhibit inhibitory activity against NOX1 selectively or against other NOX proteins in general. We have demonstrated that probe compound 1 is a potent and selective inhibitor of NOX1. Its IC50 was determined to be 129–156 nM in a cell-based assay using HT29 cells (AID 2808, 2538), and 250 nM in a cell-based HEK293 transfection format (AID 435002). Compound 1 is not cytotoxic (AID 463255), and is selective among family members NOX2, NOX3, and NOX4 (AID 435013), as well as against xanthine oxidase, another cellular source of ROS (AID 435009). In order to gain mechanistic insight into the inhibition of NOX1 by compound 1, assays were run to determine its effect on the formation of functional invadopodia and inhibition of extracellular matrix (ECM) degration in a human colon cancer cell line (AIDs 434993 and 488778, respectively). Invadopodia are actin protrusions of the ventral plasma membrane and their formation in human cancer cells correlates with their invasiveness both in vitro and in vivo [36]. Compound 1 was found to be highly effective at blocking invadopodia formation and reducing the ability of invadopodia to degrade the ECM in this system, supporting the validity of its use as a specific and selective NOX1 inhibitor.

3.1. Summary of Screening Results

In the primary luminol-based chemiluminescence HTS screen (AID 1792) (see Figure 5), 16,000 compounds from the Maybridge Hitfinder library were screened. The cell line chosen for this screen was human HT29 colon cancer cells, as it had previously been shown that these cells endogenously expressed NOX1 as the only members of the NOX family and its cytosolic regulators NOXA1 and NOXO1 [37]. A total of 130 compounds (0.81%) were active, passing the set threshold of 75% NOX1 inhibition. Of these 130 compounds, 100 (77%) did not exhibit H2O2 scavenger activity in a luminol biochemical H2O2-based HTS counterscreen (AID 1823). In a HTS confirmation screen (AID 2541), 68 out of 96 compounds (71%) confirmed activity.

Figure 5. Flow chart of HTS screening for NOX1 inhibitors.

Figure 5

Flow chart of HTS screening for NOX1 inhibitors.

One of the hits from the primary screen, CID 616479, was tested in secondary confirmation, cytotoxicity, and selectivity assays, and found to be a potent and selective inhibitor of NOX1. It was declared a probe and a probe report was submitted in April of 2009.

A number of other compounds of interest emerged from the HTS screening, including a phenothiazine, 2-(trifluoromethyl)-phenothiazine (compound 3). A number of these compounds were tested in a dose response NOX1 inhibition assay (AID 434997), where they were found to have IC50s ranging from 230 nM to 670 nM. A set of related phenothiazine compounds from the MLSMR library was tested in a dose response assay for NOX1 inhibitory activity (AID 2538). In this assay, two compounds of interest, compound 1 (2-acetylphenothiazine) and compound 2, had IC50s of 156 nM and 44.5 nM, respectively.

The primary screen and follow-up assays identified several chemotypes with selective inhibition of NOX1. SAR analysis was undertaken. Initial lead expansion of these chemotypes was focused upon phenothiazines because the compounds were potent, closely related to well-known drugs, and highly selective. Compounds were tested for inhibitory activity in the primary assay for two rounds of SAR by purchase (AIDs 2808 and 2819) and three rounds of SAR by synthesis (AIDs 2664, 2752, and 2773).

Seven of the most promising lead compounds were tested for their ability to selectively block NOX1-dependent ROS generation using the HEK293-NOX1 cell system reconstituted with protein components required for ROS generation by NOX1 (AID 435002). The most potent was compound 1, with an IC50 of 250 nM. These seven compounds, plus three purchased compounds with IC50s in the 78 nM to 517 nM range, were tested for their ability to inhibit reactive oxygen species by another cellular source, xanthine oxidase, in a biochemical assay (AID 435009). Compounds 1 and 3 had IC50s for xanthine oxidase around 5 μM.

Compounds with the highest IC50s for xanthine oxidase were tested for family selectivity in a HEK293-NOX cell system reconstituted with protein components required for ROS generation by NOX2, NOX3, and NOX4 (AID 435013). Compound 1 exhibited the greatest selectivity, with 12 to 20 fold greater activity against NOX1 in the HEK293 transfection format (AID 435002) than against the other NOX family members (AID 435013). Cell-based cytotoxicity assays were run to determine the cytotoxicity of compound 3 (AID 434992) and compound 1 (AID 463255). No cytotoxicity of these compounds was observed in HT29 cells at the highest concentration tested, 40 μM (AID 434992) or 20 μM (AID 463255).

In order to gain mechanistic insight into the inhibition of NOX1 by compound 1, assays were run to determine whether this compound could block the formation of functional invadopodia (AID 434993) and inhibit extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation (AID 488778) in DLD1 human colon cancer cells. Invadopodia are dynamic phospho-tyrosine-rich structures with an actin core and abundant actin regulatory proteins (e.g. cortactin) capable of proteolytically degrading the ECM [38]. They appear as actin protrusions of the ventral plasma membrane and their formation in human cancer cells correlates with their invasiveness both in vitro and in vivo [36]. Activation of the tyrosine kinase c-Src is required for the formation of functional invadopodia [39]. Evidence has recently demonstrated that NOX-mediated ROS generation is required for invadopodia formation and ECM degradation in different cancer cells. To test compound 1 in this system, DLD1 cells were transfected with empty vector or with constitutive active Src (SrcYF) to trigger the formation of invadopodia and then treated for 1hour with compound 1 (ML171), DMSO (negative control), or DPI (positive control). After staining with invadopodia markers phalloidin and cortactin, treatment with compound 1 (ML171) was found to strongly decrease SrcYF-induced invadopodia formation (AID 434993). As shown by confocal microscopy in Figure 6a and in the quantification of three independent experiments in Figure 6b, this inhibition of invadopodia formation by compound 1 (ML171) was as effective as that seen after treatment with DPI.

Figure 6. Compound 1 (ML171) treatment significantly blocks invadopodia formation in DLD1 cells.

Figure 6

Compound 1 (ML171) treatment significantly blocks invadopodia formation in DLD1 cells. (a) Cells were stained with Alexa-Fluor-568 phalloidin (left column) or cortactin (right column) antibody, followed by Alexa-Fluor 568-conjugated secondary antibody (more...)

To further confirm that compound 1 blocks the ROS-dependent, NOX1- mediated formation of functional invadopodia, its effect on ECM degradation in DLD1 cells was tested (AID 488778). SrcYF overexpression induced ECM degradation when cells were treated with DMSO control, while DPI treatment blocked this effect (Figure 6a). Treatment with compound 1 (ML171) strongly reduced the ability of SrcYF-transfected DLD1 cells to degrade the ECM. Importantly, the overexpression of NOX1 at least partially restored the capacity of these cells to degrade the ECM when treated with compound 1. The quantification of three independent experiments is shown in Figure 7b. These results support the validity of the use of compound 1 as a specific and selective NOX1 inhibitor.

Figure 7. Treatment with compound 1 (ML171) significantly blocks ECM degradation in DLD1 cells.

Figure 7

Treatment with compound 1 (ML171) significantly blocks ECM degradation in DLD1 cells. (a) DLD1 cells were transfected as indicated with SrcYF, empty vector (mock) or NOX1 expression plasmid. 24 hours later, cells were trypsinized and plated on FITC-labeled (more...)

2-(Trifluoromethyl)-phenothiazine (compound 3) belongs to the class of phenothiazines whose structure occurs in various antipsychotic drugs [40], such as chlorpromazine, promazine, and trifluperazine. With the intent of identifying related phenothiazines with higher potency in blocking NOX1-dependent ROS generation, we performed SAR analysis on several commercially available phenothiazines, including those used as anti-psychotic drugs, as well as analogs synthesized in our laboratories. These molecules were tested in HT29 cells by luminol-based CL assay for their ability to block ROS production. As summarized in Table 3, we found that chlorpromazine did not inhibit ROS generation in our assay (IC50 > 50 μM). Consistent with this, as indicated in Table 3, we observed that other phenothiazines such as trifluperazine (compound 17) and perphenazine (compound 16) used as anti-psychotic drugs were additionally unable to block Nox1-dependent ROS generation. In general, all phenothiazines tested in Table 4 with a substituent on the ring nitrogen were devoid of NOX1 activity if the substituent in the adjacent benzene ring is meta to the ring nitrogen. However, several compounds with ring N-methyl groups possessing an additional substituent para to the ring nitrogen on the adjacent phenyl ring, such as compounds 21, 25, and 29, were active. We selected the molecule with the highest potency (compound 1) and used it for further analyses. Compound 1 strongly blocks ROS generation in HT29 cells (IC50HT29 = 0.129 μM). Consistent with this, when compound 1 was tested in a HEK293-NOX1 reconstituted cell system, we observed higher potency in blocking NOX1-dependent ROS generation compared with compound 3. Of note, the IC50 values towards NOX2 and NOX3 were also slightly decreased, while this compound was still unable to inhibit xanthine oxidase-dependent ROS generation.

3.2. Dose Response Curves for Probe

Figure 8. Dose response curve for probe ML171.

Figure 8Dose response curve for probe ML171

3.3. Scaffold/Moiety Chemical Liabilities

No reactive functional groups are observed in the probe molecule, which is very stable with a half life of > 48 hours.

3.4. SAR Tables

Table 3Selectivity of parent hit and probe compounds compared to that of chlorpromazine

CompoundStructureIC50 (μM)
HT29 (NOX1)
IC50 (μM)
HEK293-NOX1
IC50 (μM)
HEK293-NOX2
IC50 (μM)
HEK293-NOX3
IC50 (μM)
HEK293-NOX4
IC50 (μM)
Xanthine oxidase
2-(trifluoromethyl)-phenothiazine (parent hit; compound 3)
Image ml171fu4.jpg
0.321.009.007.505.005.00
2-acetylphenothiazine (probe, compound 1)
Image ml171fu5.jpg
0.1290.255.003.005.005.50
Chlorpromazine (negative control)
Image ml171fu6.jpg
>50NDNDNDNDND
DPI (positive control)0.21.20.50.751.10.005

Table 4SAR Table of Phenothiazines

Fragment point of attachment is indicated with an *

SAR Analysis for Target
Image ml171fu7.jpg
Potency (μM) mean ± S.E.M.Target to Antitarget Fold Selectivity
EntryCIDSIDCenter Int. #P/SR1R2R3R4NSTargetAntitarget (NOX2)
n**IC50n**IC50
1811314242284SR- 01000597201-2P
Image ml171fu8.jpg
HHHH
Image ml171fu9.jpg
30.15615.00>30
57287864SR- 01000597201-30.25
0.128
271788092093123SR- 010007837 16-2PH—NH2HHMe
Image ml171fu9.jpg
10.044
3708226540425SR- 010004418 58-2P
Image ml171fu11.jpg
HHHH
Image ml171fu9.jpg
10.3219.0028
4710892093121SR- 01000721844-4PHHHHH
Image ml171fu9.jpg
10.349
5272657287810SR- 01000000012-5PClHHH
Image ml171fu14.jpg
Image ml171fu9.jpg
1>17
61668267192093122SR- 01000759464-4P-4-(2- ethylidene hydrazinyl) benzoic acidHHHH
Image ml171fu9.jpg
10.053
765262892093114SR- 01000477673-4P
Image ml171fu17.jpg
HHHH
Image ml171fu9.jpg
10.054
89140192093119SR- 01000683544-4P
Image ml171fu8.jpg
HHHMe
Image ml171fu9.jpg
11.0
97102492093111SR- 01000393539-5PHHHHH
Image ml171fu21.jpg
16.603
10154783592093110SR- 01000388343-5P
Image ml171fu22.jpg
HHHH
Image ml171fu21.jpg
1>20
1134572292093126SR- 01000852765-2PHHHH
Image ml171fu24.jpg
Image ml171fu21.jpg
1>20
127449192093105SR- 01000025134-4PH
Image ml171fu22.jpg
HHH
Image ml171fu9.jpg
1>20
137420092093124SR- 01000809845-2PHHHH
Image ml171fu24.jpg
Image ml171fu9.jpg
14.57
147101492093125SR- 01000852665-2PHHHHH
Image ml171fu30.jpg
1>20
1535092957287906SR- 03000000698-1PH
Image ml171fu22.jpg
HHH10.18
16474857287811SR- 01000000137-4PClHHH
Image ml171fu32.jpg
Image ml171fu9.jpg
1>17
176606957288079SR- 01000000224-4P
Image ml171fu11.jpg
HHH
Image ml171fu14.jpg
Image ml171fu9.jpg
1>17
181091565089649760SR- 03000001197-1SHBrHBrMe
Image ml171fu9.jpg
1>50
1963852989649761SR- 03000001198-1SHBrHHMe
Image ml171fu9.jpg
1>50
204482523389649762SR- 03000001199-1SH
Image ml171fu39.jpg
H
Image ml171fu39.jpg
Me
Image ml171fu9.jpg
17.051
214482523689649763SR- 03000001200-1SH
Image ml171fu39.jpg
HHMe
Image ml171fu9.jpg
10.73
224482523289649764SR- 03000001201-1SH
Image ml171fu39.jpg
HHMe
Image ml171fu9.jpg
117.66
234482522289649765SR- 03000001202-1SH
Image ml171fu46.jpg
HHMe
Image ml171fu9.jpg
1>50
244482524389649766SR- 03000001203-1SH
Image ml171fu48.jpg
HHMe
Image ml171fu9.jpg
10.653
254482522889649767SR- 03000001204-1SH
Image ml171fu50.jpg
HHMe
Image ml171fu9.jpg
12.379
264496811090944630SR- 03000001206-1SH
Image ml171fu52.jpg
HHMe
Image ml171fu9.jpg
1>20
274496811590944631SR- 03000001207-1SHHBrMe
Image ml171fu9.jpg
1>20
284496812590944632SR- 03000001208-1SH
Image ml171fu55.jpg
HHMe
Image ml171fu9.jpg
1>20
204496814690944633SR- 03000001209-1SH
Image ml171fu55.jpg
HBrMe
Image ml171fu9.jpg
113.7
304496812490944634SR- 03000001210-1SH
Image ml171fu59.jpg
H—NH2Me
Image ml171fu9.jpg
10.201

P = Purchased; S = Synthesized

**

n = Number of Replicates

3.5. Cellular Activity

The primary NOX1 inhibition assay is a cell-based assay (AIDs 1792, 2541, 2538, 2664, 2752, 2773, 2808, 2819, and 434997). We also employed a HEK293 transfection format cell-based assay to determine potency of compounds (AID 435002), and to determine family selectivity using NOX2, NOX3, and NOX4 (AID 435013). In a cytotoxicity assay (AIDs 434992 and 463225), no cytotoxicity was observed in HT29 cells for compound 1 or the related compound 3. Two cell-based assays in human colon cancer cells overexpressing tyrosine kinase c-Src (AIDs 434993 and 488778) showed that compound 1 strongly inhibited invadopodia formation and strongly reduced the ability of the cells to degrade ECM. In summary, we have tested compound 1 and related compounds in multiple cell-based assays, where they have proven to have potent NOX1 inhibitory activity.

3.6. Profiling Assays

To date, compound 1 has been tested in 445 other bioassays deposited in PubChem, and has shown activity in 17 of those assays, giving a hit rate of 3.8%, indicating that this compound is not generally active across a broad range of cell-based and non-cell based assays.

Compound 1 was submitted to the NIMH’s Psychoactive Drug Screening Program (PDSP). The goal was to identify any potential receptors, transporters, or ion channels for which the compound displays affinity (AID 504381). A secondary screen provided Ki values for targets identified in the primary screen (AID 504410). The results of this screening are in Table 5. Compound 1 did not significantly bind most of the receptors tested in the binding assays, with the exception of serotonin 5-HT2B, dopamine D3, and opioid KOR receptors (>50% inhibition). Of note, secondary concentration-response analysis revealed Ki values in the mid-nanomolar (serotonin 5-HT2B receptor) and micromolar range (dopamine D3, and opioid KOR receptors), suggestive of low affinity of this low nanomolar NOX1 inhibitor for these GPCR receptors. These data suggest that compound 1 does not likely exert unwanted anti-psychotic effects.

Table 5. NIMH’s Psychoactive Drug Screening Program results for compound 1.

Table 5

NIMH’s Psychoactive Drug Screening Program results for compound 1.

4. Discussion

We have demonstrated that probe compound 1 is a potent and selective inhibitor of NOX1, with an IC50 of 129–156 nM in a cell-based assay using HT29 cells (AID 2808, 2538), and 250 nM in a cell-based HEK293 transfection format (AID 435002). Compound 1 is not cytotoxic to HT29 cells (AID 463255), and is selective among NOX family members NOX2, NOX3, and NOX4 (AID 435013), as well as against xanthine oxidase, another cellular source of ROS (AID 435009). In addition, compound 1 is highly effective in inhibiting the cellular production of invadopodia in a human colon cancer cell line (AID 434993) These results have been published [41].

4.1. Comparison to existing art and how the new probe is an improvement

Probe ML171 is potent and selective among the NOX family members NOX2, NOX3, and NOX4, (>30-fold selectivity for NOX2 and NOX4, and 20-fold selectivity for NOX3, AID 435013) as well as xanthine oxidase (>30-fold selectivity, AID 435009). No selective compounds have previously been reported in the literature.

Probe ML171 is comparable in potency and selectivity to the first NOX1 INH probe ML090 [12], but it is chemically more tractable than was probe ML090. ML171 has a phenothiazine scaffold, which is present in many anti-psychotic drugs. The large body of knowledge about this compound class, including that it is known to be nontoxic, will facilitate studies with this compound in animals. We have shown that compound ML171 is able to block the ROS-dependent formation of ECM-degrading invadopodia in colon cancer cells, a promising result that defines compound ML171 as a powerful NOX1 chemical probe and a potential therapeutic agent for treatment of this pathology.

4.2. Mechanism of Action Studies

We have addressed the mechanism of action of probe compound 1 in two ways. First, we tested its ability to block the formation of invadopodia, actin protrusions of the ventral plasma membrane, and invadopodia-mediated ECM degradation, in human colon cancer cells overexpressing tyrosine kinase c-Src (AIDs 434993 and 488778) and showed that it strongly inhibited invadopodia formation and strongly reduced the ability of the cells to degrade the ECM. The formation of invadopodia in human cancer cells correlates with their invasiveness both in vitro and in vivo [33]. Thus, this result is highly suggestive that NOX1 is mechanistically involved in the process of cancer invasion.

Secondly, we submitted compound 2, a close structural analog to probe compound 1, to the NIMH’s Psychoactive Drug Screening Program. The results of this testing reveal that compound 2 did not significantly bind most of the receptors tested in the binding assays and suggest that the probe compound 1 will not likely exert unwanted anti-psychotic effects.

4.3. Planned Future Studies

In the extended probe development period we plan to continue SAR studies to identify more potent compounds with increased selectivity that can be optimized for in vivo applications. The pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of the lead compounds will also be optimized using a series of in vitro and in vivo (mouse) PK studies to identify a compound that is suitable for use in animal studies. The most promising compounds will be tested for selectivity against the panel of off-target proteins including GPCRs and ion channels that may be implicated in antipsychotic mechanisms of the broader scaffold. We plan to develop compounds that inhibit NOX1 in human colon cancer lines implanted into the mouse, to test the role of NOX1 in the regulation of invasion and metastasis. In addition, pull-down chemical probes will also be useful for target identification in clinical specimens, and in the development of surrogate marker assays.

5. References

1.
Bedard K, Krause KH. The NOX family of ROS-generating NADPH oxidases: physiology and pathophysiology. Physiological reviews. 2007;87:245–313. [PubMed: 17237347]
2.
Block ML. NADPH oxidase as a therapeutic target in Alzheimer’s disease. BMC neuroscience. 2008;9(Suppl 2):S8. [PMC free article: PMC2604892] [PubMed: 19090996]
3.
Cave AC, Brewer AC, Narayanapanicker A, Ray R, Grieve DJ, Walker S, Shah AM. NADPH oxidases in cardiovascular health and disease. Antioxidants & redox signaling. 2006;8:691–728. [PubMed: 16771662]
4.
Cifuentes ME, Pagano PJ. Targeting reactive oxygen species in hypertension. Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension. 2006;15:179–186. [PubMed: 16481886]
5.
Nauseef WM. Nox enzymes in immune cells. Seminars in immunopathology. 2008;30:195–208. [PubMed: 18449540]
6.
Rokutan K, Kawahara T, Kuwano Y, Tominaga K, Sekiyama A, Teshima-Kondo S. NADPH oxidases in the gastrointestinal tract: a potential role of Nox1 in innate immune response and carcinogenesis. Antioxidants & redox signaling. 2006;8:1573–1582. [PubMed: 16987012]
7.
Ushio-Fukai M, Nakamura Y. Reactive oxygen species and angiogenesis: NADPH oxidase as target for cancer therapy. Cancer letters. 2008;266:37–52. [PMC free article: PMC2673114] [PubMed: 18406051]
8.
Jaquet V, Scapozza L, Clark RA, Krause KH, Lambeth JD. Small-molecule NOX inhibitors: ROS-generating NADPH oxidases as therapeutic targets. Antioxidants & redox signaling. 2009;11:2535–2552. [PubMed: 19309261]
9.
Aldieri E, Riganti C, Polimeni M, Gazzano E, Lussiana C, Campia I, Ghigo D. Classical inhibitors of NOX NAD(P)H oxidases are not specific. Current drug metabolism. 2008;9:686–696. [PubMed: 18855607]
10.
O’Donnell BV, Tew DG, Jones OT, England PJ. Studies on the inhibitory mechanism of iodonium compounds with special reference to neutrophil NADPH oxidase. The Biochemical journal. 1993;290(Pt 1):41–49. [PMC free article: PMC1132380] [PubMed: 8439298]
11.
O’Donnell VB, Smith GC, Jones OT. Involvement of phenyl radicals in iodonium inhibition of flavoenzymes. Molecular pharmacology. 1994;46:778–785. [PubMed: 7969060]
12.
Brown SJ, Gianni D, Bokoch G, Mercer BA, Hodder P, Rosen H. Probe report for NOX1 inhibitors. MLPCN probe report. 2009
13.
Lambeth JD. NOX enzymes and the biology of reactive oxygen. Nature reviews. 2004;4:181–189. [PubMed: 15039755]
14.
Lambeth JD, Krause KH, Clark RA. NOX enzymes as novel targets for drug development. Seminars in immunopathology. 2008;30:339–363. [PubMed: 18509646]
15.
Arbiser JL, Petros J, Klafter R, Govindajaran B, McLaughlin ER, Brown LF, Cohen C, Moses M, Kilroy S, Arnold RS, Lambeth JD. Reactive oxygen generated by Nox1 triggers the angiogenic switch. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2002;99:715–720. [PMC free article: PMC117371] [PubMed: 11805326]
16.
Gavazzi G, Banfi B, Deffert C, Fiette L, Schappi M, Herrmann F, Krause KH. Decreased blood pressure in NOX1-deficient mice. FEBS Lett. 2006;580:497–504. [PubMed: 16386251]
17.
Komatsu D, Kato M, Nakayama J, Miyagawa S, Kamata T. NADPH oxidase 1 plays a critical mediating role in oncogenic Ras-induced vascular endothelial growth factor expression. Oncogene. 2008;27:4724–4732. [PubMed: 18454179]
18.
Sadok A, Bourgarel-Rey V, Gattacceca F, Penel C, Lehmann M, Kovacic H. Nox1-dependent superoxide production controls colon adenocarcinoma cell migration. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2008;1783:23–33. [PubMed: 18023288]
19.
Sancho P, Fabregat I. The NADPH oxidase NOX1 controls autocrine growth of liver tumor cells through up-regulation of the epidermal growth factor receptor pathway. The Journal of biological chemistry. [PMC free article: PMC2915717] [PubMed: 20525691]
20.
Bedard K, Krause KH. The NOX family of ROS-generating NADPH oxidases: physiology and pathophysiology. Physiol Rev. 2007;87:245–313. [PubMed: 17237347]
21.
Gianni D, Diaz B, Taulet N, Fowler B, Courtneidge SA, Bokoch GM. Novel p47(phox)-related organizers regulate localized NADPH oxidase 1 (Nox1) activity. Science signaling. 2009;2:ra54. [PMC free article: PMC2850287] [PubMed: 19755710]
22.
Buccione R, Caldieri G, Ayala I. Invadopodia: specialized tumor cell structures for the focal degradation of the extracellular matrix. Cancer metastasis reviews. 2009;28:137–149. [PubMed: 19153671]
23.
Linder S. The matrix corroded: podosomes and invadopodia in extracellular matrix degradation. Trends in cell biology. 2007;17:107–117. [PubMed: 17275303]
24.
Faggioni R, Gatti S, Demitri MT, Delgado R, Echtenacher B, Gnocchi P, Heremans H, Ghezzi P. Role of xanthine oxidase and reactive oxygen intermediates in LPS- and TNF-induced pulmonary edema. The Journal of laboratory and clinical medicine. 1994;123:394–399. [PubMed: 8133151]
25.
Gottlieb RA. Cytochrome P450: major player in reperfusion injury. Archives of biochemistry and biophysics. 2003;420:262–267. [PubMed: 14654065]
26.
Jaeschke H, Mitchell JR. Mitochondria and xanthine oxidase both generate reactive oxygen species in isolated perfused rat liver after hypoxic injury. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 1989;160:140–147. [PubMed: 2540741]
27.
Tian N, Moore RS, Phillips WE, Lin L, Braddy SJ, Pryor JS, Stockstill RL, Hughson MD, Manning RD Jr. Nadph Oxidase Contributes to Renal Damage and Dysfunction in Dahl Salt-Sensitive Hypertension. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2008;295:R1858–1865. [PMC free article: PMC2685289] [PubMed: 18922960]
28.
Yu J, Weiwer M, Linhardt RJ, Dordick JS. The role of the methoxyphenol apocynin, a vascular NADPH oxidase inhibitor, as a chemopreventative agent in the potential treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2008;6:204–217. [PubMed: 18673160]
29.
ten Freyhaus H, Huntgeburth M, Wingler K, Schnitker J, Baumer AT, Vantler M, Bekhite MM, Wartenberg M, Sauer H, Rosenkranz S. Novel Nox inhibitor VAS2870 attenuates PDGF-dependent smooth muscle cell chemotaxis, but not proliferation. Cardiovasc Res. 2006;71:331–341. [PubMed: 16545786]
30.
Stielow C, Catar RA, Muller G, Wingler K, Scheurer P, Schmidt HH, Morawietz H. Novel Nox inhibitor of oxLDL-induced reactive oxygen species formation in human endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;344:200–205. [PubMed: 16603125]
31.
Vaquero EC, Edderkaoui M, Pandol SJ, Gukovsky I, Gukovskaya AS. Reactive Oxygen Species Produced by NAD(P)H Oxidase Inhibit Apoptosis in Pancreatic Cancer Cells. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2004;279:34643–34654. [PubMed: 15155719]
32.
Li X, He Y, Ruiz CH, Koenig M, Cameron MD. Characterization of dasatinib and its structural analogs as CYP3A4 mechanism-based inactivators and the proposed bioactivation pathways. Drug Metab Dispos. 2009;37:1242–1250. [PMC free article: PMC3202349] [PubMed: 19282395]
33.
Li X, Kamenecka TM, Cameron MD. Bioactivation of the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor gefitinib: implications for pulmonary and hepatic toxicities. Chem Res Toxicol. 2009;22:1736–1742. [PubMed: 19803472]
34.
Baltzly R, Hargenist M, Webb FJ. J Am Chem Soc. 1946;68:2672–2678.
35.
Ma D, Geng Q, Zhang H, Jiang Y. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2010;8:1291–1294. [PubMed: 20058286]
36.
Weaver AM. Invadopodia: specialized cell structures for cancer invasion. Clinical & experimental metastasis. 2006;23:97–105. [PubMed: 16830222]
37.
Gianni D, Bohl B, Courtneidge SA, Bokoch GM. The involvement of the tyrosine kinase c-Src in the regulation of reactive oxygen species generation mediated by NADPH oxidase-1. Molecular biology of the cell. 2008;19:2984–2994. [PMC free article: PMC2441655] [PubMed: 18463161]
38.
Gimona M, Buccione R, Courtneidge SA, Linder S. Assembly and biological role of podosomes and invadopodia. Current opinion in cell biology. 2008;20:235–241. [PubMed: 18337078]
39.
Lowe C, Yoneda T, Boyce BF, Chen H, Mundy GR, Soriano P. Osteopetrosis in Src-deficient mice is due to an autonomous defect of osteoclasts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1993;90:4485–4489. [PMC free article: PMC46536] [PubMed: 7685105]
40.
Mitchell SC. Phenothiazine: the parent molecule. Current drug targets. 2006;7:1181–1189. [PubMed: 17017893]
41.
Gianni D, Taulet N, Zhang H, Der Mardirossian C, Kister J, Martinez L, Roush WR, Brown SJ, Bokoch GM, Rosen H. A Novel and Specific NADPH Oxidase-1 (Nox1) Small-Molecule Inhibitor Blocks the Formation of Functional Invadopodia in Human Colon Cancer Cells. ACS Chem Biol. 2010;5:981–993. [PMC free article: PMC2955773] [PubMed: 20715845]

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this page (919K)

Related information

Similar articles in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...