U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

National Cancer Institute’s Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory Assay Cascade Protocols [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Cancer Institute (US); 2005 May 1-. doi: 10.17917/ZQ6R-KD69

Cover of National Cancer Institute’s Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory Assay Cascade Protocols

National Cancer Institute’s Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory Assay Cascade Protocols [Internet].

Show details

NCL Method ITA-17Analysis of Nanoparticle Effects on Leukocyte Procoagulant Activity

Version 3

, , , and .

Author Information and Affiliations

Published: .

1. Introduction

Leukocyte procoagulant activity (PCA) is accepted as an important component in the onset of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). DIC is common in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) and other forms of cancer [15]. DIC in cancer patients is often observed after initiation of therapy with cytotoxic oncology drugs that act by altering DNA replication (e.g., doxorubicin, daunorubicin, and vincristin) [3, 6]. Cytotoxic oncology drugs acting by other mechanisms, (e.g., methotrexate and paclitaxel) do not induce DIC [78]. DIC is also a common complication in sepsis [912]. Cytotoxic drugs (doxorubicin, daunorubicin and vincristin) and endotoxin have previously been shown to induce leukocyte PCA in vitro and DIC in vivo [1321]. In vitro, doxorubicin-induced leukocyte PCA has previously been linked to DIC in vivo [3].

2. Principles

This document describes a protocol for assessing the ability of a nanoparticle formulation to induce leukocyte procoagulant activity. This protocol includes two cell models: normal leukocytes, represented by PBMC isolated from blood of healthy donor volunteers, and acute promyelocytic leukemia cells, represented by the HL-60 cell line. Briefly, cells are treated with nanoparticles, and then undergo a wash step to remove excess particles. Isolated cells are then used to initiate plasma coagulation, which is measured using coagulometer (following NCL protocol ITA-12) for analysis of prothrombin time.

3. Reagents, Materials, Cell Lines, and Equipment

Note: The NCL does not endorse any of the suppliers listed below; these reagents were used in the development of the protocol and their inclusion is for informational purposes only. Equivalent supplies from alternate vendors can be substituted. Please note that suppliers may undergo a name change due to a variety of factors. Brands and part numbers typically remain consistent but may also change over time.

3.1.

Reagents

3.1.1.

Human blood from at least 3 donors, anti-coagulated with Li-heparin for PBMC isolation and anti-coagulated with Na-citrate for plasma coagulation test

3.1.2.

Ficoll Paque Premium (GE Healthcare, 17-5442-02)

3.1.3.

Phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (GE Life Sciences, Hyclone, SH30256.01)

3.1.4.

Ultrapure LPS (InvivoGen, tlrl-peklps)

3.1.5.

Doxorubicin Hydrochloride (Bedford Labs, NIH DVR pharmacy)

3.1.6.

Fetal bovine serum (FBS) (GE Life Sciences, Hyclone, SH30070.03)

3.1.7.

RPMI-1640 (GE Life Sciences, HyClone, SH30096.01)

3.1.8.

Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS) (Gibco, 14175-095)

3.1.9.

Penicillin streptomycin solution (GE Life Sciences, Hyclone, SV30010)

3.1.10.

L-glutamine (GE Life Sciences, Hyclone, SH30034.01)

3.1.11.

Trypan Blue solution (Gibco, 15250-061)

3.1.12.

Neoplastine Cl Plus (Diagnostica Stago, 00667)

3.1.13.

CoagControl N+ABN (Diagnostica Stago, 00677)

3.1.14.

Calcium ionophore (Sigma-Aldrich, C7522)

3.2.

Materials

3.2.1.

Pipettes covering the range of 0.05 to 10 mL

3.2.2.

6-well plates

3.2.3.

Polypropylene tubes, 50 and 15 mL

3.2.4.

Finntip, 1.25 mL (ThermoScientific, NC0298434)

3.2.5.

4-well cuvettes (Diagnostica Stago, 38876)

3.2.6.

Polystyrene tubes, 5 mL (Falcon, 352058)

3.2.7.

Scintillation vials, 20 mL (Research Products International, FS74511-20)

3.3.

Cell Lines

3.3.1.

HL-60 promyelocytic cells (ATCC, CCL-240)

3.4.

Equipment

3.4.1.

Centrifuge

3.4.2.

Refrigerator, 2-8ºC

3.4.3.

Freezer, −20ºC

3.4.4.

Cell culture incubator with 5% CO2 and 95% humidity.

3.4.5.

Biohazard safety cabinet approved for level II handling of biological material

3.4.6.

Inverted microscope

3.4.7.

Vortex

3.4.8.

Hemocytometer

3.4.9.

Coagulometer STart4 (Diagnostica Stago) or comparable

4. Reagent and Control Preparation

4.1.

Heat-Inactivated Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS)

Thaw a bottle of FBS at room temperature or overnight at 2-8ºC, and allow to equilibrate to room temperature. Incubate 30 minutes in a 56ºC water bath, mixing every 5 minutes. Fifty (50) mL single use aliquots may be stored at 2-8ºC for up to one month or at a nominal temperature of −20ºC indefinitely.

4.2.

Complete RPMI-1640 Medium

The complete RPMI medium should contain the following reagents: heat inactivated FBS (10% for PBMC and 20% for HL-60), 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin sulfate. Store at 2-8ºC, protected from light, no longer than one month. Before use, warm in a 37°C water bath.

4.3.

Lipopolysaccharide, 1 mg/mL (LPS, Stock)

Add 1 mL of sterile PBS or cell culture medium per 1 mg of LPS to the vial and vortex to mix. Store daily use aliquots at a nominal temperature of −20°C.

4.4.

Doxorubicin, Stock

Doxorubicin (adriamycin) is provided as a solution at 2 mg/mL and stored at 2-8ºC.

4.5.

Positive Controls for Cell Culture

Positive Control for PBMC

Dilute stock LPS solution in cell culture medium to a final concentration of 1 µg/mL. Store at room temperature. Discard unused portion after experiment.

Alternatively, calcium ionophore at the final concentration of 50 ng/mL can be used.

Positive Control for HL-60 Cells

Dilute doxorubicin stock solution in cell culture medium to a final concentration of 50 µg/mL. Store at room temperature. Discard unused portion after experiment. Alternatively, calcium ionophore at the final concentration of 50 ng/mL can be used.

4.6.

Negative Control

Use PBS as a negative control. Process it the same way as your study samples.

4.7.

Buffer A

Prepare Buffer A by dissolving NaCl to a final concentration of 150 mM and CaCl2 to a final concentration of 6.6 mM in 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4.

4.8.

Coagulation Controls (Coag N+ABN)

Reconstitute lyophilized control plasmas with 2 mL of distilled water. Let the solutions stand at room temperature 30 minutes prior to use. Mix thoroughly before use. Keep unused portion refrigerated and use within 48 hr after reconstitution. These plasma samples are used as instrument controls.

4.9.

Plasma for Coagulation Test

Use freshly collected whole blood anti-coagulated with Na-citrate (blue top vacutainers) within 1 hour after collection. Spin the blood 10 min at 2500xg at 20-22°C; collect plasma and pool. Pooled plasma is stable for 8 hr at RT. Do not refrigerate or freeze. Analyze 2 duplicates of test-plasma in each coagulation assay, run one duplicate before nanoparticle-treated plasma samples and the second duplicate at the end of each run.

4.10.

Vehicle Control

Vehicle control is the buffer or media used to formulate test nanomaterials. Common excipients used in nanoformulations are trehalose, sucrose, and albumin. However, other reagents and materials are also used alone or in combination. Vehicle control should match formulation buffer of the test-nanomaterial by both composition and concentration. This control can be skipped if nanoparticles are stored in PBS.

4.11.

Neoplastin Reagent

This reagent is supplied as lyophilized powder along with reconstitution buffer. Reconstitute according to the manufacturer’s instructions and use fresh or refrigerate and use within the time specified by the manufacturer.

5. Preparation of Study Samples

This assay requires 3 mL of nanoparticles or 1.5 mL if using only PBMC or HL-60 model. The particles should be dissolved/resuspended in complete culture medium at a concentration 10X the highest tested concentration. The concentration is selected based on the plasma concentration of the nanoparticle at the intended therapeutic dose. For the purpose of this protocol this concentration is called “theoretical plasma concentration”. Considerations for estimating theoretical plasma concentration were reviewed elsewhere [22] and are summarized in Box 1 below.

The assay will evaluate 4 concentrations: 10X (or when feasible 100X, 30X or 5X) of the theoretical plasma concentration, theoretical plasma concentration and two 1: 5 serial dilutions of the theoretical plasma concentration. When the intended therapeutic concentration is unknown, the highest final concentration is 1 mg/mL or the highest reasonably achievable concentration.

For example, if the final theoretical plasma concentration to be tested is 0.2 mg/mL, then a stock of 20 mg/mL will be prepared and diluted 10-fold (2 mg/mL), followed by two 1: 5 serial dilutions (0.4 and 0.08 mg/mL). When 400 μL of each of these samples are combined in a culture plate well with 3.6mL of cells, the final concentrations of nanoparticles are 0.008, 0.04, 0.2, and 2 mg/mL. Each nanoparticle concentration is plated two times.

Box 1Example Calculation to Determine Nanoparticle Concentration for In Vitro Tests

In this example, we assume a mouse dose of 123 mg/kg. Therefore, the scaled equivalent human dose would be:

Humandose=mousedose12.3=123mg/kg12.3=10mg/kg
Blood volume constitutes approximately 8% of the body weight. Therefore, an average human of 70 kg body weight has approximately 5.6 L of blood. Assuming all the nanoparticle injected goes into the systemic circulation, this provides a rough approximation of the potential maximum nanoparticle concentration in blood, which is used as the in vitro test concentration.

invitroconcentrationhumanmatrix=humandosehumanbloodvolume=70kg10mg/kg5.6L=0.125mg/mL

6. Cell Preparation

6.1.

Isolation of Human Lymphocytes

6.1.1.

Place freshly drawn blood anticoagulated with Li-heparin (green top vacutainers) into 15- or 50-mL conical centrifuge tubes; add an equal volume of room-temperature PBS and mix well.

6.1.2.

Slowly layer the Ficoll-Paque solution underneath the blood/PBS mixture by placing the tip of the pipet containing the Ficoll-Paque at the bottom of the blood sample tube. Alternatively, blood/PBS mixture may be slowly layered over Ficoll-Paque solution. Use 3 mL of Ficoll-Paque solution per 4 mL of blood/PBS mixture.

Note: To maintain Ficoll-blood interface it is helpful to hold tube at 45° angle.

6.1.3.

Centrifuge 30 minutes at 900xg, 18-20°C, slow acceleration and without brake.

6.1.4.

Using a sterile pipet, remove the upper layer containing plasma and platelets, and discard.

6.1.5.

Using a fresh sterile pipet, transfer mononuclear cell layer into another centrifuge tube.

6.1.6.

Wash cells by adding an excess of HBSS; centrifuge for 10 min at 400xg, 18-20°C. The HBSS volume should be ~3 times the volume of the mononuclear layer.

Note: Typically, 4 mL of blood/PBS mixture results in ~2 mL of mononuclear layer and requires 6 mL of HBSS for the wash step.

6.1.7.

Discard supernatant and repeat wash step once more.

6.1.8.

Resuspend cells in complete RPMI 1640 medium. Count an aliquot of cells and determine viability using trypan blue exclusion.

6.1.9.

If cell viability is ≥ 80%, dilute cells in complete culture media to the concentration of 3x106 cells/mL and proceed to step 7.1.1.

6.2.

Preparation of HL-60 Cells

6.2.1.

Grow cells in complete culture media; avoid a cell density greater than 1x106 cells/mL. On the day of experiment, count cells; if cell viability is ≥ 80%, concentrate cells in complete culture media to the concentration of 3x106cells/mL and proceed to step 7.1.1.

7. Experimental Procedure

7.1.

Cell Treatment

7.1.1.

Aliquot 3.6 mL of cell suspension into each well of a 6-well plate.

7.1.2.

Add 400 µL of test nanoparticle, positive control and negative control to respective wells. Negative control for both cell models is PBS. Positive control for PBMC is LPS at final concentration of 1 µg/mL. Positive control for HL-60 cells is doxorubicin at a final concentration of 50 µg/mL. Ca2+ ionophore can also be used as a positive control. Prepare two wells for each sample. See Appendix for example plate map.

7.1.3.

Incubate cells with nanoparticles and controls. Time of incubation is 5 hr for the HL-60 model and 24 hr for PBMC.

7.1.4.

At the end of the incubation time, remove cells from the incubator, transfer cells into 5mL falcon tubes, and wash cells two times with 1 mL of PBS. For each wash cycle spin cells at 400xg for 5 min.

7.1.5.

After last wash, reconstitute cell pellet in 1 mL of Buffer A which usually results in cell concentration of 10x106 cells/mL and transfer cells into 20 mL scintillation vial or equivalent.

Note: Any vial or tube can be used if it fits into coagulometer warming well.

7.1.6.

Keep cell suspensions at room temperature; place in the incubator (37˚C) 5-10 minutes prior to testing to warm up. The sample will then be transferred to the 37˚C chamber on the coagulometer when ready to start.

7.2.

Determining Plasma Coagulation Time

7.2.1.

Set-up the instrument test parameters as shown below:

  • Max Time: 360 sec
  • Incubation Time: 120 sec
  • Single/Duplicate: Duplicate
  • Precision: 5%

Allow instrument to warm up to 5-10 minutes prior to use.

7.2.2.

Prepare all reagents and cells, and warm them up to 37°C prior to use. Note that lyophilized reagents should be reconstituted at least 30 minutes prior to use. It is not advised to keep more than 10 cell samples at 37°C at one time.

7.2.3.

Place cuvettes into A, B, C and D test rows on coagulometer. (Note this protocol is based on semi-automatic STart4 coagulometer from Diagnostica Stago; if using a different instrument, please follow operation guidelines recommended by the instrument manufacturer.)

7.2.4.

Add one metal ball into each cuvette and allow to warm for at least 3 minutes before use.

7.2.5.

Add 100 µL of control plasma (step 4.8) or test plasma (step 4.9) to a cuvette. Prepare 1 strip of cuvettes (1 strip, 4 wells) for each plasma sample.

7.2.6.

Start timer for each of the test rows by pressing A, B, C or D buttons. Ten seconds before time is up, timer starts beeping. When this happens, immediately transfer cuvettes to PIP row and press PIP button to activate pipettor.

7.2.7.

When time is up, add 100 µL of Neoplastin reagent to control plasma samples or 100 µL of cell suspension from step 7.1.6 in lieu of coagulation activation reagent to corresponding cuvettes, and record coagulation time.

8. Calculations

8.1.

A percent coefficient of variation should be calculated for each control or test sample according to the following formula:

%CV=standarddeviationmean100%

8.2.

A percent procoagulant activity of a nanoparticle test sample is calculated according to the following formula:

%PCA=meantimepositivecontrolsampletimetestsample100%

9. Acceptance Criteria

9.1.

%CV between replicates representing individual wells in the cuvette should be within 5%. This limit is stored in the instrument setting. When %CV is greater than 5, you will see a * mark on the printout.

9.2.

% CV between replicates of test plasma samples should be within 25%.

9.3.

If two duplicates of the same study sample demonstrated results >25% different, this test sample should be re-analyzed.

9.4.

Positive control is considered positive if coagulation time in this sample is less than 360 sec. Coagulation time induced by HL-60 cells treated with doxorubicin and that induced by PBMC treated with LPS may vary from passage to passage and from donor to donor, respectively. Typical coagulation times observed in our lab with HL-60 cells treated with 50 µg/mL doxorubicin is 60-90 seconds. Typical coagulation times observed in our lab with PBMC treated with 1 µg/mL LPS is 200-300 seconds; that induced by ionophore is about 150 seconds.

10. References

1.
Barbui T, Falanga A: Disseminated intravascular coagulation in acute leukemia. Semin Thromb Hemost. 27(6), 593–604 (2001). [PubMed: 11740683]
2.
Franchini M, Dario Di Minno MN, Coppola A: Disseminated intravascular coagulation in hematologic malignancies. Semin Thromb Hemost. 36(4), 388–403 (2010). [PubMed: 20614391]
3.
Higuchi T, Toyama D, Hirota Y et al.: Disseminated intravascular coagulation complicating acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a study of childhood and adult cases. Leuk Lymphoma. 46(8), 1169–1176 (2005). [PubMed: 16085558]
4.
Levi M: Cancer and DIC. Haemostasis. 31 Suppl 1, 47–48 (2001). [PubMed: 11990477]
5.
Levi M: Disseminated intravascular coagulation in cancer patients. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 22(1), 129–136 (2009). [PubMed: 19285279]
6.
Uchiumi H, Matsushima T, Yamane A et al.: Prevalence and clinical characteristics of acute myeloid leukemia associated with disseminated intravascular coagulation. Int J Hematol. 86(2), 137–142 (2007). [PubMed: 17875527]
7.
Napoleone E, Zurlo F, Latella MC et al.: Paclitaxel downregulates tissue factor in cancer and host tumour-associated cells. Eur J Cancer. 45(3), 470–477 (2009). [PubMed: 19046877]
8.
Swystun LL, Shin LY, Beaudin S, Liaw PC: Chemotherapeutic agents doxorubicin and epirubicin induce a procoagulant phenotype on endothelial cells and blood monocytes. J Thromb Haemost. 7(4), 619–626 (2009). [PubMed: 19187077]
9.
Khemani RG, Bart RD, Alonzo TA et al.: Disseminated intravascular coagulation score is associated with mortality for children with shock. Intensive Care Med. 35(2), 327–333 (2009). [PubMed: 18802683]
10.
Lando PA, Edgington TS: Lymphoid procoagulant response to bacterial endotoxin in the rat. Infect Immun. 50(3), 660–666 (1985). [PMC free article: PMC261129] [PubMed: 3840772]
11.
Oh D, Jang MJ, Lee SJ et al.: Evaluation of modified non-overt DIC criteria on the prediction of poor outcome in patients with sepsis. Thromb Res. 126(1), 18–23 (2010). [PubMed: 20079919]
12.
Slofstra SH, ten Cate H, Spek CA: Low dose endotoxin priming is accountable for coagulation abnormalities and organ damage observed in the Shwartzman reaction. A comparison between a single-dose endotoxemia model and a double-hit endotoxin-induced Shwartzman reaction. Thromb J. 4, 13 (2006). [PMC free article: PMC1563996] [PubMed: 16930474]
13.
Fibach E, Treves A, Korenberg A, Rachmilewitz EA: In vitro generation of procoagulant activity by leukemic promyelocytes in response to cytotoxic drugs. Am J Hematol. 20(3), 257–265 (1985). [PubMed: 3904416]
14.
Gralnick HR, Abrell E: Studies of the procoagulant and fibrinolytic activity of promyelocytes in acute promyelocytic leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 24(1), 89–99 (1973). [PubMed: 4577065]
15.
Hiller E, Saal JG, Ostendorf P, Griffiths GW: The procoagulant activity of human granulocytes, lymphocytes and monocytes stimulated by endotoxin. Coagulation and electron microscopic studies. Klin Wochenschr. 55(15), 751–757 (1977). [PubMed: 197302]
16.
Kwaan HC, Wang J, Boggio LN: Abnormalities in hemostasis in acute promyelocytic leukemia. Hematol Oncol. 20(1), 33–41 (2002). [PubMed: 11921015]
17.
Stein E, McMahon B, Kwaan H et al.: The coagulopathy of acute promyelocytic leukaemia revisited. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 22(1), 153–163 (2009). [PubMed: 19285282]
18.
ten Cate H, Falanga A: Overview of the postulated mechanisms linking cancer and thrombosis. Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb. 36(3–4), 122–130 (2008). [PubMed: 19176985]
19.
ten Cate H, Falanga A: The pathophysiology of cancer and thrombosis. Summary and conclusions. Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb. 36(3–4), 212–214 (2008). [PubMed: 19176994]
20.
Walsh J, Wheeler HR, Geczy CL: Modulation of tissue factor on human monocytes by cisplatin and adriamycin. Br J Haematol. 81(4), 480–488 (1992). [PubMed: 1390232]
21.
Wheeler HR, Geczy CL: Induction of macrophage procoagulant expression by cisplatin, daunorubicin and doxorubicin. Int J Cancer. 46(4), 626–632 (1990). [PubMed: 2120134]
22.
Dobrovolskaia MA, McNeil SE. Understanding the correlation between in vitroand in vivo immunotoxicity tests for nanomedicines. J Control Release. 2013 Dec10;172(2):456–66 [PMC free article: PMC5831149] [PubMed: 23742883]

11. Abbreviations

APL

acute promyelocytic leukemia

CV

coefficient of variation

DIC

disseminated intravascular coagulation

FBS

fetal bovine serum

HBSS

Hank’s balanced salt solution

LPS

lipopolysaccharide

PBMC

peripheral blood mononuclear cells

PBS

phosphate buffered saline

PCA

procoagulant activity

RPMI

Roswell Park Memorial Institute

RT

room temperature

SD

standard deviation

U

units

12. Appendix

Example Culture Plate Maps.

Example Culture Plate Maps

This protocol assumes an intermediate level of scientific competency with regard to techniques, instrumentation, and safety procedures. Rudimentary assay details have been omitted for the sake of brevity.

*

address correspondence to: vog.hin.liam@aniram

Potter TM, Cedrone E, Neun BW, Dobrovolskaia MA, NCL Method ITA-17: Analysis of Nanoparticle effects on Leukocyte Procoagulant Activity. https://ncl.cancer.gov/resources/assay-cascade-protocols DOI: 10.17917/ZQ6R-KD69

Views

  • PubReader
  • Print View
  • Cite this Page
  • PDF version of this page (424K)

Related information

  • PMC
    PubMed Central citations
  • PubMed
    Links to PubMed

Similar articles in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...