Evidence review: Modifiable risk factors for a second seizure
Evidence review 2
NICE Guideline, No. 217
Authors
National Guideline Centre (UK).1. Modifiable risk factors for a further seizure after a first seizure
1.1. Review question
What are the modifiable risk factors for a further seizure after a first seizure, and what is the magnitude of risk of those factors?
1.1.1. Introduction
The likelihood of having a further seizure following a first seizure differs between individuals. Understanding and quantifying the magnitude or risk associated with different factors may help people to manage that risk and influence the impact on their lives as well as informing their shared decision to start long term antiseizure medication. This review area examines modifiable risk factors for a further seizure after a first seizure and what the magnitude of risk is for those factors.
Assessing modifiable risk factors for a second seizure is different from the prediction of a second seizure. Prediction is assessing if a tool can accurately predict a second seizure using all, or most of, the known risk factors for a second seizure. This will provide a risk score based on an individual’s risk factors. So, this identifies who is at risk of a second seizure. In comparison, analysing potential modifiable risk factors looks for individual modifiable risk factors which may have an impact on second seizures. This informs us which risk factors may be modified in people who are identified to be at risk of a second seizure.
1.1.2. Summary of the protocol
For full details see the review protocol in Appendix A.
Table 1
PICO characteristics of review question.
1.1.3. Methods and process
This evidence review was developed using the methods and process described in Developing NICE guidelines: the manual. Methods specific to this review question are described in the review protocol in appendix A and the methods document.
Declarations of interest were recorded according to NICE’s conflicts of interest policy.
1.1.4. Prognostic evidence: Included studies
Six cohort studies were found investigating the modifiable risk factors for a second seizure after having a first seizure and were included in the review.2, 4, 5, 12, 31, 33
Within the six studies included within the review, the risk factors considered were psychological factors, health conditions (e.g., diabetes and hypertension), infection or raised temperature and types of seizures. No evidence was found for the other risk factors considered:
- Blood pressure
- Activity/exercise levels
- Alcohol/ recreational drugs
- Psychosocial factors
- Sleep deprivation
- AED use
- Other drugs that reduce seizure thresholds
- Tumours
- Drugs affecting sleep
Of the included studies, two2, 4 cohort studies investigated adult participants who were followed up from 1 – 5 years; one31 study assessed adults, followed up for more than 5 years; and three5, 12, 33 studies reviewed children (under 18) who were followed up for 1 – 5 years after their first seizure. No studies were found for other stratifications or those who had a mixed adult and child population.
Evidence from these studies is summarised in the clinical evidence summary below (Table 5).
See also the study selection flow chart in Appendix A, study evidence tables in Appendix D, forest plots in Appendix E and GRADE tables in Appendix F.
1.1.4.1. Excluded studies
See the excluded studies list in Appendix J.
1.1.5. Summary of studies included in the prognostic evidence
Table 2
Summary of studies included in the evidence review – Adults >18 years (follow up 1 – 5 years).
Table 3
Summary of studies included in the evidence review – Adults > 18 (follow up > 5 years).
Table 4
Summary of studies included in the evidence review – Children <18 years (follow up 1 – 5 years).
See Appendix D for full evidence tables.
1.1.5.1. Summary of the prognostic evidence: Adults >18 years (follow up 1 – 5 years)
Table 5
Clinical evidence summary: Lifetime generalized anxiety disorder.
Table 6
Clinical evidence summary: Lifetime mood disorder.
Table 7
Clinical evidence summary: Psychiatric Disorders.
Table 8
Clinical evidence summary: Sepsis.
1.1.5.2. Summary of the prognostic evidence: Adults >18 years (follow up >5 years)
Table 9
Clinical evidence summary: Partial seizures.
Table 10
Clinical evidence summary: Status Epilepticus.
Table 11
Clinical evidence summary: Diabetes Mellitus.
Table 12
Clinical evidence summary: Hypertension.
Table 13
Clinical evidence summary: Atrial Fibrillation.
Table 14
Clinical evidence summary: Functional disability – severe.
Table 15
Clinical evidence summary: Functional disability – moderate.
1.1.5.3. Summary of the prognostic evidence: Children <18 years (follow up 1-5 years)
Table 16
Clinical evidence summary: Unprovoked Seizures.
Table 17
Clinical evidence summary: Temperature ≥38 degrees.
Table 18
Clinical evidence summary: Temperature (per F increase).
Table 19
Clinical evidence summary: Temperature (per F increase).
See Appendix F for full GRADE tables.
1.1.6. Economic evidence
1.1.7. Included studies
No health economic studies were included.
1.1.8. Excluded studies
No relevant health economic studies were excluded due to assessment of limited applicability or methodological limitations.
See also the health economic study selection flow chart in Appendix G.
1.1.9. Economic model
This area was not prioritised for a new cost-effectiveness analysis.
1.1.10. Evidence statements
1.1.10.1. Clinical evidence statements
- None
1.1.10.2. Economic
- No relevant economic evaluations were identified.
1.1.11. The committee’s discussion and interpretation of the evidence
1.1.11.1. The outcomes that matter most
The only outcome for this review question was a second seizure, as this review question was designed to evaluate the modifiable risk factors for second seizure in people who have had a first seizure.
1.1.11.2. The quality of the evidence
The evidence concerning the modifiable risk factors for second seizure was of low or very low quality. The main reasons were the risk of bias and indirectness. As all the studies were observational studies, they had to show adjustment was made for potential confounders, and one of the main reasons for downgrading was the failure of studies to adjust for at least two of the modifiable risk factors specified. Appropriate statistical adjustment for confounding variables should lead to the results that would be observed if the confounding variables are the same across the risk factor and no-risk factor groups, which should increase our confidence that the results are not confounded. Where the confidence interval of the odds, hazard or risk crosses the null line, this signifies that the result is consistent with the possibility of no effect from the risk factor in the population. The committee took note of these different elements in the quality assessment of the evidence in order to decide on recommendations.
1.1.11.3. Benefits and harms
The evidence showed that in adults who are followed up between one to five years, the presence of psychiatric disorders leads to almost three times the odds of a second seizure as no psychiatric disorders. In addition, people with sepsis have an odds of a second seizure that is almost five times greater than the odds in people who do not have sepsis. In adults followed up for over five years, vascular risk factors such as diabetes, hypertension and atrial fibrillation do not show significant effects in relation to a second seizure. However, the committee noted that vascular risk factors can predispose to late onset epilepsy. The committee, therefore, considered it good practice to assess these areas of a person’s health when they are assessed following a seizure.
The evidence showed that in children followed up for one to five years, unprovoked seizures result in 3.5 times the risk of a second seizure as no unprovoked seizures. One study showed that a temperature of over 38 degrees carries an odds of a second seizure that is double the odds observed with a temperature below 38 degrees. However, two studies also showed that a higher temperature can be a protective factor against premature mortality. They showed that people with higher temperatures have 0.3 to 0.8 times the risk of a second seizure, compared to lower temperatures.
No evidence was found in relation to other factors that the committee considered modifiable risk factors such as alcohol and recreational drug use and sleep deprivation. There are good pathophysiological reasons why these may cause seizures, and this is seen in clinical practice.
The committee agreed to emphasize that a comprehensive assessment of potential psychological, biological, and social risk factors should be carried out after a person’s first seizure and that these risks, and advice on how they may be modified, should be discussed with the person, their family, or carers.
1.1.11.4. Cost effectiveness and resource use
No economic evidence was identified for this review question.
The committee discussed the clinical evidence noting the low quality of the evidence presented for determining risk factors of a second seizure for both adults and a paediatric population. The committee noted that in adults, underlying psychiatric disorders and sepsis are non-modifiable risk factors that may increase a person’s risk of a second seizure. Therefore, the committee made a recommendation to assess the presence of these risk factors when presenting with an initial seizure.
The committee also discussed the clinical evidence presented for children, noting that children presenting with an initial afebrile seizure may be at increased risk of a second seizure.
The committee agreed that the recommendations made for adults are current best practice, but noted current practice varies. The committee estimated that only 25% of people presenting with an initial seizure are fully assessed for modifiable risk factors. In addition, the committee acknowledged that in current practice, biological risk factors are more likely to be reviewed than psychosocial risk factors.
The committee also acknowledged that in current practice, children presenting with an initial seizure will always be assessed to try and determine if they experienced an afebrile seizure. The committee noted that for those children presenting with an afebrile seizure, appropriate safety advice will be provided to the child’s parent or carer, and urgent referral advice will be provided, which can be used if a child experiences a second seizure.
The committee noted that if people are not appropriately assessed for risk of a second seizure, this could have a negative impact on a person’s quality of life in the long-term for those people who experience a second seizure. A first seizure may significantly impact a person’s life (for example, through social interactions or driving privileges), but the committee also noted experiencing a second seizure can result in a more severe negative impact on a person’s QoL compared to those people only experiencing one initial seizure. The committee also noted people who were appropriately assessed for risk of a second seizure are less likely to experience such a significant impact on their overall QoL if they experience a second seizure compared to those who were not assessed. This is because making people aware of the risks of second seizure enables them to understand these risks and manage the future impact seizures may have on their lives. Conversely, people who are not aware of these risks may be unaware they are at risk of a second seizure. In addition, people who experience a second seizure and have not been informed of these risks may feel annoyed they were not appropriately informed when they presented with an initial seizure. An epilepsy diagnosis can significantly impact a person’s daily living (for example, driving restrictions). Therefore, some people may perceive not being fully informed at the early stages of diagnosis pathway as ‘lost time’ in coming to terms with their diagnosis if they are later diagnosed with epilepsy.
The committee also acknowledged that not appropriately assessing a person’s risk factors when presenting with initial seizure may result in some people experiencing increased anxiety. For example, a person presenting with an initial seizure may be at low risk of a second seizure but if this is not appropriately assessed and conveyed to the person presenting with an initial seizure, they may seek information on the internet that does not necessarily apply to them.
Overall, the committee concluded there will likely be a change in clinical practice for how a large proportion of adults are managed after their first seizure resulting in additional costs for the NHS. However, the recommendations are not expected to lead to a substantial resource impact because the assessment of risk factors does not take long and can be discussed and assessed with the clinician when a person presents with an initial seizure. This will not constitute an additional visit with a health care professional but may require some additional time with a clinician assessing the person who has presented with an initial seizure. The additional costs incurred by the NHS observed in the form of additional staff time will likely be offset by the QoL gains observed from providing people with the appropriate information regarding their individualised risk of a second seizure.
There is not expected to be a substantial resource impact associated with the recommendation made for children as this recommendation reflects current practice.
1.1.11.5. Other factors the committee took into account
The committee agreed it was important to highlight that modifying risk factors to prevent second seizures is a multifactorial process. This is because the exact reason why some of these risk factors have a direct impact on seizure occurrence is not completely understood.
The committee discussed that after a person has had a seizure it is important to provide information to the person, and their families or carers on how to recognise a further seizure and to give advice on first aid and any measures they could take to reduce their risk of another seizure, as well as who they should contact if they experience a further seizure before their first appointment with the epilepsy service.
1.1.12. Recommendations supported by this evidence review
This evidence review supports recommendations 1.1.1 to 1.1.9 in the NICE guideline.
References
- 1.
- Arboix A, Garcia-Eroles L, Massons JB, Oliveres M, Comes E. Predictive factors of early seizures after acute cerebrovascular disease. Stroke. 1997; 28(8):1590–1594 [PubMed: 9259754]
- 2.
- Assis T, Bacellar A, Costa G, Pires E, Nascimento O. Predictors of early seizure recurrence among elderly inpatients admitted to a tertiary center: A prospective cohort study. Epilepsy & Behavior. 2019; 98(Pt A):145–152 [PubMed: 31374470]
- 3.
- Assis TM, Bacellar A, Costa G, Nascimento OJ. Mortality predictors of epilepsy and epileptic seizures among hospitalized elderly. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria. 2015; 73(6):510–515 [PubMed: 26083887]
- 4.
- Baldin E, Hauser WA, Pack A, Hesdorffer DC. Stress is associated with an increased risk of recurrent seizures in adults. Epilepsia. 2017; 58(6):1037–1046 [PubMed: 28418198]
- 5.
- Berg AT, Darefsky AS, Holford TR, Shinnar S. Seizures with fever after unprovoked seizures: an analysis in children followed from the time of a first febrile seizure. Epilepsia. 1998; 39(1):77–80 [PubMed: 9578016]
- 6.
- Berg AT, Shinnar S, Shapiro ED, Salomon ME, Crain EF, Hauser WA. Risk factors for a first febrile seizure: a matched case-control study. Epilepsia. 1995; 36(4):334–341 [PubMed: 7541745]
- 7.
- Bethune P, Gordon K, Dooley J, Camfield C, Camfield P. Which child will have a febrile seizure? American Journal of Diseases of Children. 1993; 147(1):35–39 [PubMed: 7678187]
- 8.
- Bhatia D, Mikulich-Gilbertson SK, Sakai JT. Prescription opioid misuse and risky adolescent behavior. Pediatrics. 2020; 145(2):e20192470 [PubMed: 31907292]
- 9.
- Bleich S, Degner D, Bandelow B, von Ahsen N, Ruther E, Kornhuber J. Plasma homocysteine is a predictor of alcohol withdrawal seizures. Neuroreport. 2000; 11(12):2749–2752 [PubMed: 10976956]
- 10.
- Chang TR, Kowalski RG, Carhuapoma JR, Tamargo RJ, Naval NS. Cocaine use as an independent predictor of seizures after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2016; 124(3):730–735 [PubMed: 26315001]
- 11.
- Chen WC, Magill ST, Englot DJ, Baal JD, Wagle S, Rick JW et al. Factors associated with pre- and postoperative seizures in 1033 patients undergoing supratentorial meningioma resection. Neurosurgery. 2017; 81(2):297–306 [PMC free article: PMC5572484] [PubMed: 28327947]
- 12.
- Cheung ACK. Predictors of recurrent seizure before admission in children presented with seizure to emergency department. Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2015; 22(5):297–302
- 13.
- Chopra DA, Shah AB, Vadhariya AH, Painter JT. The risk of varenicline-induced seizure among those who have attempted to quit smoking using pharmacotherapy. Epilepsy & Behavior. 2019; 97:169–173 [PubMed: 31252274]
- 14.
- Chou IJ, Kuo CF, Tanasescu R, Tench CR, Tiley CG, Constantinescu CS et al. Epilepsy and associated mortality in patients with multiple sclerosis. European Journal of Neurology. 2019; 26(2):342–e323 [PubMed: 30312502]
- 15.
- Christensen J, Pedersen HS, Fenger-Gron M, Fann JR, Jones NC, Vestergaard M. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and risk of epilepsy after traumatic brain injury - A population based cohort study. PloS One. 2019; 14(7):e0219137 [PMC free article: PMC6641473] [PubMed: 31323024]
- 16.
- Dayan PS, Lillis K, Bennett J, Conners G, Bailey P, Callahan J et al. Prevalence of and risk factors for intracranial abnormalities in unprovoked seizures. Pediatrics. 2015; 136(2):e351–360 [PMC free article: PMC4516940] [PubMed: 26195538]
- 17.
- De Herdt V, Dumont F, Henon H, Derambure P, Vonck K, Leys D et al. Early seizures in intracerebral hemorrhage: incidence, associated factors, and outcome. Neurology. 2011; 77(20):1794–1800 [PubMed: 21975203]
- 18.
- Delpisheh A, Veisani Y, Sayehmiri K, Fayyazi A. Febrile seizures: etiology, prevalence, and geographical variation. Iranian Journal of Child Neurology. 2014; 8(3):30–37 [PMC free article: PMC4135278] [PubMed: 25143771]
- 19.
- Dhakar MB, Sivakumar S, Bhattacharya P, Shah A, Basha MM. A retrospective cross-sectional study of the prevalence of generalized convulsive status epilepticus in traumatic brain injury: United States 2002-2010. Seizure. 2015; 32:16–22 [PubMed: 26552556]
- 20.
- Duncan R, Oto M. Predictors of antecedent factors in psychogenic nonepileptic attacks: multivariate analysis. Neurology. 2008; 71(13):1000–1005 [PubMed: 18809836]
- 21.
- Dworetzky BA, Bromfield EB, Townsend MK, Kang JH. A prospective study of smoking, caffeine, and alcohol as risk factors for seizures or epilepsy in young adult women: data from the Nurses’ Health Study II. Epilepsia. 2010; 51(2):198–205 [PMC free article: PMC3090289] [PubMed: 19694796]
- 22.
- Eyer F, Schuster T, Felgenhauer N, Pfab R, Strubel T, Saugel B et al. Risk assessment of moderate to severe alcohol withdrawal--predictors for seizures and delirium tremens in the course of withdrawal. Alcohol and Alcoholism. 2011; 46(4):427–433 [PubMed: 21593124]
- 23.
- Hamerle M, Ghaeni L, Kowski A, Weissinger F, Holtkamp M. Alcohol use and alcohol-related seizures in patients with epilepsy. Frontiers in Neurology. 2018; 9:401 [PMC free article: PMC5996121] [PubMed: 29922217]
- 24.
- Huang CC, Wang ST, Chang YC, Huang MC, Chi YC, Tsai JJ. Risk factors for a first febrile convulsion in children: a population study in southern Taiwan. Epilepsia. 1999; 40(6):719–725 [PubMed: 10368069]
- 25.
- Hundozi Z, Shala A, Boshnjaku D, Bytyqi S, Rrustemi J, Rama M et al. Hypertension on admission is associated with a lower risk of early seizures after stroke. Seizure. 2016; 36:40–43 [PubMed: 26895465]
- 26.
- Hwang K, Joo JD, Kim YH, Han JH, Oh CW, Yun CH et al. Risk factors for preoperative and late postoperative seizures in primary supratentorial meningiomas. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. 2019; 180:34–39 [PubMed: 30889470]
- 27.
- Hwang SL, Lin CL, Lee KS, Lieu AS, Kuo TH, Chang CZ et al. Factors influencing seizures in adult patients with supratentorial astrocytic tumors. Acta Neurochirurgica. 2004; 146(6):589–594 [PubMed: 15168227]
- 28.
- Jeon SM, Park S, Kim D, Kwon JW. Risk of seizures associated with antipsychotic treatment in pediatrics with psychiatric disorders: a nested case-control study in Korea. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2021; 30(3):391–399 [PubMed: 32266577]
- 29.
- Johnson EL, Krauss GL, Lee AK, Schneider ALC, Dearborn JL, Kucharska-Newton AM et al. Association between midlife risk factors and late-onset epilepsy: Results from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. JAMA Neurology. 2018; 75(11):1375–1382 [PMC free article: PMC6248112] [PubMed: 30039175]
- 30.
- Kantamalee W, Katanyuwong K, Louthrenoo O. Clinical characteristics of febrile seizures and risk factors of its recurrence in chiang mai university hospital. Neurology Asia. 2017; 22(3):203–208
- 31.
- Kim HJ, Park KD, Choi KG, Lee HW. Clinical predictors of seizure recurrence after the first post-ischemic stroke seizure. BMC Neurology. 2016; 16(1):212 [PMC free article: PMC5097386] [PubMed: 27814760]
- 32.
- Kotsopoulos I, de Krom M, Kessels F, Lodder J, Troost J, Twellaar M et al. Incidence of epilepsy and predictive factors of epileptic and non-epileptic seizures. Seizure. 2005; 14(3):175–182 [PubMed: 15797352]
- 33.
- Kumar N, Midha T, Rao YK. Risk factors of recurrence of febrile seizures in children in a tertiary care hospital in kanpur: A one year follow up study. Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology. 2019; 22(1):31–36 [PMC free article: PMC6327698] [PubMed: 30692757]
- 34.
- Kumari PL, Nair MK, Nair SM, Kailas L, Geetha S. Iron deficiency as a risk factor for simple febrile seizures--a case control study. Indian Pediatrics. 2012; 49(1):17–19 [PubMed: 21719928]
- 35.
- Labovitz DL, Hauser WA, Sacco RL. Prevalence and predictors of early seizure and status epilepticus after first stroke. Neurology. 2001; 57(2):200–206 [PubMed: 11468303]
- 36.
- Li X, Breteler MM, de Bruyne MC, Meinardi H, Hauser WA, Hofman A. Vascular determinants of epilepsy: the Rotterdam Study. Epilepsia. 1997; 38(11):1216–1220 [PubMed: 9579923]
- 37.
- Mehta A, Zusman BE, Choxi R, Shutter LA, Yassin A, Antony A et al. Seizures after intracerebral hemorrhage: Incidence, risk factors, and impact on mortality and morbidity. World Neurosurgery. 2018; 112:e385–e392 [PubMed: 29355799]
- 38.
- Morais NM, Ranzan J, Riesgo RS. Predictors of epilepsy in children with cerebrovascular disease. Journal of Child Neurology. 2013; 28(11):1387–1391 [PubMed: 23143721]
- 39.
- Murray BP, Carpenter JE, Dunkley CA, Moran TP, Alfaifi M, Alsukaiti WS et al. Seizures in tramadol overdoses reported in the ToxIC registry: predisposing factors and the role of naloxone. Clinical Toxicology: The Official Journal of the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology & European Association of Poisons Centres & Clinical Toxicologists. 2019; 57(8):692–696 [PubMed: 30676832]
- 40.
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Developing NICE guidelines: the manual [updated October 2020]. London. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2014. Available from: http://www
.nice.org.uk /article/PMG20/chapter /1%20Introduction%20and%20overview - 41.
- Parmontree P, Tunthanathip T, Doungngern T, Rojpitbulstit M, Kulviwat W, Ratanalert S. Predictive risk factors for early seizures in traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice. 2019; 10(4):582–587 [PMC free article: PMC6906099] [PubMed: 31831975]
- 42.
- Phabphal K, Geater A, Limapichat K, Sathirapanya P, Setthawatcharawanich S. Risk factors of recurrent seizure, co-morbidities, and mortality in new onset seizure in elderly. Seizure. 2013; 22(7):577–580 [PubMed: 23664806]
- 43.
- Pugh MJ, Knoefel JE, Mortensen EM, Amuan ME, Berlowitz DR, Van Cott AC. New-onset epilepsy risk factors in older veterans. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2009; 57(2):237–242 [PubMed: 19207140]
- 44.
- Rantala H, Uhari M. Risk factors for recurrences of febrile convulsions. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. 1994; 90(3):207–210 [PubMed: 7847062]
- 45.
- Reith J, Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Seizures in acute stroke: predictors and prognostic significance. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Stroke. 1997; 28(8):1585–1589 [PubMed: 9259753]
- 46.
- Shinnar S, Berg AT, Moshe SL, O’Dell C, Alemany M, Newstein D et al. The risk of seizure recurrence after a first unprovoked afebrile seizure in childhood: an extended follow-up. Pediatrics. 1996; 98(2 Pt 1):216–225 [PubMed: 8692621]
- 47.
- Sittichanbuncha Y, Chomrak C, Naksensin W, Sawanyawisuth K. Seizures at the emergency department in thailand and risk factors for recurrent seizures. Neurology Asia. 2015; 20(2):139–142
- 48.
- Skardelly M, Brendle E, Noell S, Behling F, Wuttke TV, Schittenhelm J et al. Predictors of preoperative and early postoperative seizures in patients with intra-axial primary and metastatic brain tumors: A retrospective observational single center study. Annals of Neurology. 2015; 78(6):917–928 [PubMed: 26385488]
- 49.
- Skardelly M, Rother C, Noell S, Behling F, Wuttke TV, Schittenhelm J et al. Risk factors of preoperative and early postoperative seizures in patients with meningioma: A retrospective single-center cohort study. World Neurosurgery. 2017; 97:538–546 [PubMed: 27777150]
- 50.
- Stimmel GL, Dopheide JA. Psychotropic drug-induced reductions in seizure threshold. Incidence and consequences. CNS Drugs. 1996; 5(1):37–50
- 51.
- Tosun A, Koturoglu G, Serdaroglu G, Polat M, Kurugol Z, Gokben S et al. Ratios of nine risk factors in children with recurrent febrile seizures. Pediatric Neurology. 2010; 43(3):177–182 [PubMed: 20691939]
- 52.
- Turon M, Abraira L, Cazorla S, Fonseca E, Quintana M, Toledo M et al. Vascular risk factors as independent predictors of neurocognitive impairments in patients with late-onset epilepsy who have small-vessel disease. Epilepsy & Behavior. 2020; 104(Pt B):106443 [PubMed: 31399342]
- 53.
- Vaaramo K, Puljula J, Tetri S, Juvela S, Hillbom M. Predictors of new-onset seizures: a 10-year follow-up of head trauma subjects with and without traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry. 2014; 85(6):598–602 [PubMed: 23761917]
- 54.
- Wolpert F, Lareida A, Terziev R, Grossenbacher B, Neidert MC, Roth P et al. Risk factors for the development of epilepsy in patients with brain metastases. Neuro-Oncology. 2020; 22(5):718–728 [PMC free article: PMC7229256] [PubMed: 31498867]
- 55.
- Wu CS, Liu HY, Tsai HJ, Liu SK. Seizure risk associated with antidepressant treatment among patients with depressive disorders: A population-based case-crossover study. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2017; 78(9):e1226–e1232 [PubMed: 29068610]
- 56.
- Wu CS, Wang SC, Yeh IJ, Liu SK. Comparative risk of seizure with use of first- and second-generation antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia and mood disorders. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2016; 77(5):e573–579 [PubMed: 27249081]
- 57.
- Xue H, Sveinsson O, Bartek J, Jr., Forander P, Skyrman S, Kihlstrom L et al. Long-term control and predictors of seizures in intracranial meningioma surgery: a population-based study. Acta Neurochirurgica. 2018; 160(3):589–596 [PubMed: 29327143]
Appendices
Appendix A. Review protocols
A.1. Review protocol for modifiable risk factors for second seizure
Download PDF (225K)
A.2. Health economic review protocol
Download PDF (164K)
Appendix B. Literature search strategies
This literature search strategy was used for the following reviews:
- What are the modifiable risk factors for a further seizure after a first seizure, and what is the magnitude of risk of those factors?
- What are the modifiable risk factors for epilepsy-related mortality, including SUDEP, and what is the magnitude of risk of the factors?
The literature searches for this review are detailed below and complied with the methodology outlined in Developing NICE guidelines: the manual.40
For more information, please see the Methodology review published as part of the accompanying documents for this guideline.
B.1. Clinical search literature search strategy
Download PDF (183K)
B.2. Health Economics literature search strategy
Download PDF (145K)
Appendix C. Prognostic evidence study selection
Appendix D. Prognostic evidence
Download PDF (231K)
Appendix E. Forest plots
E.1. Adults >18 years (follow up 1 – 5 years)
Download PDF (171K)
E.2. Adults >18 years (follow up >5 years)
Download PDF (202K)
E.3. Children <18 years (follow up 1 – 5 years)
Download PDF (155K)
Appendix F. GRADE tables
F.1. Adults >18 years (follow up 1 – 5 years)
Download PDF (157K)
F.2. Adults >18 years (follow up >5 years)
Download PDF (181K)
F.3. Children <18 years (follow up 1 – 5 years)
Download PDF (160K)
Appendix G. Economic evidence study selection
Download PDF (131K)
Appendix H. Economic evidence tables
None.
Appendix I. Health economic model
No original economic modelling was undertaken for this review question.
Appendix J. Excluded studies
J.1. Clinical studies
Download PDF (150K)
J.2. Health Economic studies
Download PDF (118K)
FINAL
Evidence review underpinning recommendations 1.1.1 – 1.1.9 in the NICE guideline
Developed by the National Guideline Centre
Disclaimer: The recommendations in this guideline represent the view of NICE, arrived at after careful consideration of the evidence available. When exercising their judgement, professionals are expected to take this guideline fully into account, alongside the individual needs, preferences and values of their patients or service users. The recommendations in this guideline are not mandatory and the guideline does not override the responsibility of healthcare professionals to make decisions appropriate to the circumstances of the individual patient, in consultation with the patient and/or their carer or guardian.
Local commissioners and/or providers have a responsibility to enable the guideline to be applied when individual health professionals and their patients or service users wish to use it. They should do so in the context of local and national priorities for funding and developing services, and in light of their duties to have due regard to the need to eliminate unlawful discrimination, to advance equality of opportunity and to reduce health inequalities. Nothing in this guideline should be interpreted in a way that would be inconsistent with compliance with those duties.
NICE guidelines cover health and care in England. Decisions on how they apply in other UK countries are made by ministers in the Welsh Government, Scottish Government, and Northern Ireland Executive. All NICE guidance is subject to regular review and may be updated or withdrawn.