Table 25Studies excluded from the clinical review that were included in the previous guideline (CG127)

StudyExclusion reason
Arima 200610Study took place prior to 2000 date cut off
Arima 200911Incorrect population (not treated)
Asayama 200917Incorrect population (not hypertension), study design and analysis
Assmann 200520No relevant outcomes, incorrect comparison. Prognostic study predicting cardiovascular outcomes based on pulse pressure.
Barengo 200925Incorrect comparison, incorrect analysis
Barengo 200926Incorrect study design, incorrect population. Population included normotensive people and compared cardiovascular risk between groups.
Benetos 200329Incorrect comparison. Comparing people with hypertension to normotensive people.
Borghi 200335Incorrect study design, incorrect interventions. Not comparing treatment initiation thresholds. Study comparing link between systolic and diastolic blood pressure with cardiovascular outcomes.
Britton 200938Incorrect population; including people with heart failure
Carlsson 200947Study took place prior to 2000 date cut off
Conen 200749Incorrect comparison. Comparing people with hypertension to normotensive people.
Deckers 200651Incorrect population
Fagard 200761Incorrect comparison. Study did not compare initation of treatment at different blood pressure thresholds
Fagard 200460Incorrect study design. Comparing ambulatory and clinic blood pressure measurements as predictors of cardiovascular events
Fang 200662Incorrect comparison. Comparing risk of stroke in hypertensive and nomotensive people.
Gustavsen 200376Incorrect population; white coat hypertension only
Haider 200377Incorrect study design. Prognostic study comparing predictive value of systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and pulse pressure for the onset of congestive heart failure.
Head 201080Incorrect comparison, incorrect study design. Correlations between ambulatory and clinic blood pressure.
Inoue 200786Incorrect study design. Prognostic study comparing predictive value of systolic blood pressure amd diastolic blood pressure for predicting cardiovascular events
Ishikawa 199789Incorrect analysis
Kagiyama 200896Study took place prior to 2000 date cut off
Kokubo 2008101Incorrect comparison
Kono 2005102Incorrect comparison. Class comparison of different drugs, comparing the effect on cardiovascular events (case-control study).
Kshirsagar 2006103Incorrect population. Population had a blood pressure below the diagnsotic threshold for hypertension
Obara 2007139Incorrect comparison. Comparing predictive value of systolic and diastolic blood pressure for cardiovascular outcomes.
Okayama 2006143Study took place prior to 2000 date cut off. Incorrect comparison; comparing predictive value of systolic and diastolic blood pressure for cardiovascular outcomes
Sairenchi 2005153Incorrect study design. Prognostic study comparing predictive value of systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure for the onset of mortality
Weitzman 2005186Incorrect comparison, incorrect population. Comparing people with normotensive blood pressure to people with hypertension

From: Evidence review for initiating treatment

Cover of Evidence review for initiating treatment
Evidence review for initiating treatment: Hypertension in adults: diagnosis and management: Evidence review C.
NICE Guideline, No. 136.
National Guideline Centre (UK).
Copyright © NICE 2019.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.