Table 23Clinical evidence profile: Treatment versus no treatment at diastolic blood pressure thresholds (with and without type 2 diabetes)

Quality assessmentNo of patientsEffectQualityImportance
No of studiesDesignRisk of biasInconsistencyIndirectnessImprecisionOther considerationsTreatment versus no treatmentControlRelative (95% CI)Absolute
Stroke (diastolic) - >80mmHg (follow-up mean 4 years)
1randomised trialsno serious risk of biasno serious inconsistencyvery serious1serious2none

735/21807

(3.4%)

943/20792

(4.5%)

RR 0.74 (0.68 to 0.82)12 fewer per 1000 (from 8 fewer to 15 fewer)

⨁◯◯◯

VERY LOW

CRITICAL
Stroke (diastolic) - 80–84mmHg (follow-up mean 4 years)
1randomised trialsno serious risk of biasno serious inconsistencyvery serious1serious2none

393/18780

(2.1%)

516/18736

(2.8%)

RR 0.76 (0.67 to 0.87)7 fewer per 1000 (from 4 fewer to 9 fewer)

⨁◯◯◯

VERY LOW

CRITICAL
Stroke (diastolic) - 85–89mmHg (follow-up mean 4 years)
1randomised trialsno serious risk of biasno serious inconsistencyvery serious1no serious imprecisionnone

709/23105

(3.1%)

749/16626

(4.5%)

RR 0.68 (0.62 to 0.75)14 fewer per 1000 (from 11 fewer to 17 fewer)

⨁⨁◯◯

LOW

CRITICAL
Stroke (diastolic) - 90–94mmHg (follow-up mean 4 years)
1randomised trialsno serious risk of biasno serious inconsistencyvery serious1no serious imprecisionnone

399/19368

(2.1%)

631/19278

(3.3%)

RR 0.63 (0.56 to 0.71)12 fewer per 1000 (from 9 fewer to 14 fewer)

⨁⨁◯◯

LOW

CRITICAL
Stroke (diastolic) - >95mmHg (follow-up mean 4 years)
1randomised trialsno serious risk of biasno serious inconsistencyvery serious1no serious imprecisionnone

123/3331

(3.7%)

209/2864

(7.3%)

RR 0.51 (0.41 to 0.63)36 fewer per 1000 (from 27 fewer to 43 fewer)

⨁⨁◯◯

LOW

CRITICAL
1

Downgraded by 1 increment due to population or outcome indirectness, or by 2 increments for both population and outcome indirectness.

2

Downgraded by 1 increment if the confidence interval crossed 1 MID or by 2 increments if the confidence interval crossed both MIDs.

From: Evidence review for initiating treatment

Cover of Evidence review for initiating treatment
Evidence review for initiating treatment: Hypertension in adults: diagnosis and management: Evidence review C.
NICE Guideline, No. 136.
National Guideline Centre (UK).
Copyright © NICE 2019.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.