Evidence review for long-term systemic steroids
Evidence review E
NICE Guideline, No. 121
Authors
National Guideline Alliance (UK).Intrapartum care for women on long-term systemic steroid medication
Review question
What steroid replacement regimen should be used during the peripartum period for women on long-term systemic steroid medication?
Introduction
The aim of this review is to determine what kind, if any, of steroid replacement regimen should be used during labour and birth for women who are on long-term steroid medication. This is important because although women with an underlying condition requiring long-term systemic steroid therapy can usually continue using oral corticosteroid medication (such as prednisone) during pregnancy (because prednisone does not cross the placenta), during the highly stressful events of labour and birth, a temporary increase in steroid therapy (that is, a stress dose of steroids) might be needed.
Summary of the protocol
See Table 1 for a summary of the population, intervention, comparison and outcomes (PICO) characteristics of this review.
Table 1
Summary of the protocol (PICO) table.
For further details see the full review protocol in Appendix A. The search strategies are presented in Appendix B.
Clinical evidence
Included studies
One retrospective cohort study was included in this review (see ‘Summary of clinical studies included in the evidence review’).
This study compared additional high dose hydrocortisone (100 mg) and low dose hydrocortisone (50 mg) in labour (Owa 2017).
Evidence from the studies included in the review is summarised below (see ‘Quality assessment of clinical studies included in the evidence review’).
Data was reported on the critical outcome, acute adrenal insufficiency for the woman, long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes for the baby, and the important outcome, adverse effects for the woman. There was no evidence identified for the following outcomes for the woman, mortality (critical outcome) and women’s satisfaction with labour and birth (important outcome). There was no evidence identified for the following outcomes for the baby, mortality (critical outcome), acute adrenal insufficiency (critical outcome) and admission to a neonatal unit (of limited importance).
There was no evidence available for other interventions, continuation of antenatal steroid medication, or variation of or addition to antenatal steroid therapy regimen, including variation in dose, mode of administration, timing and interval of administration or type of corticosteroid.
There was no evidence available for other comparisons, no steroid medication, different modes of administration, different timings and intervals of administration or different corticosteroids.
See also the study selection flow chart in Appendix C.
Excluded studies
Studies not included in this review with reasons for their exclusions are provided in Appendix D.
Summary of clinical studies included in the evidence review
Table 2 provides a brief summary of included studies.
Table 2
Summary of included studies.
See also the study evidence tables in Appendix E. No meta-analysis was undertaken for this review (and so there are no forest plots in Appendix F).
Quality assessment of clinical studies included in the evidence review
The clinical evidence profiles for this review question are presented in Appendix G.
Economic evidence
Included studies
No economic evidence was identified for this review.
See the study selection flow chart in Supplement 2 (Health economics).
Excluded studies
No full-text copies of articles were requested for this review and so there is no excluded studies list (see Supplement 2 (Health economics)).
Summary of studies included in the economic evidence review
No economic evidence was identified for this review (and so there are no economic evidence tables in Supplement 2 (Health economics)).
Economic model
No economic modelling was undertaken for this review because the committee agreed that other topics were higher priorities for economic evaluation (see Supplement 2 (Health economics)).
Evidence statements
Comparison: High dose hydrocortisone versus low dose hydrocortisone
Outcomes for the woman
Acute adrenal insufficiency: adrenal insufficiency
Very low quality evidence from one retrospective cohort study (N=102) reported that there was no case of adrenal insufficiency in either the group of women who received high dose hydrocortisone or those who had low dose hydrocortisone.
Adverse effects: endometriosis or hyperglycaemia or wound infection
Very low quality evidence from one retrospective cohort study (N=102) reported that there was no clinically important difference in the risk of adverse effects (endometriosis or hyperglycaemia or wound infection) between the group of women who received high dose and those who received low dose hydrocortisone.
Outcomes for the baby
Long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes: oesophageal atresia or cleft lip or congenital cystic adenomatoid malformations
Very low quality evidence from one retrospective cohort study (N=102) reported that there was no clinically important difference in the risk of long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes of babies (oesophageal atresia or cleft lip or congenital cystic adenomatoid malformations) between the group of women who received high dose hydrocortisone and those who received low dose hydrocortisone.
The committee’s discussion of the evidence
Interpreting the evidence
The outcomes that matter most
Maternal and neonatal outcomes were prioritised for review, as the committee considered these important and believed that steroids could influence them.
Mortality and acute adrenal insufficiency (hypotension, cardiovascular collapse, hypoglycaemia, disorientation, weakness and hyponatremia) were considered as critically important outcomes for women and babies because these are disastrous and fatal consequences for both the woman and the baby if there is failure to give adequate steroids to women who require them. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes such as cerebral palsy and developmental delay were regarded as being of critical importance to the baby because these are serious and lifelong complications.
Women’s satisfaction with labour and birth (including psychological wellbeing) and incidence of adverse effects were considered to be important outcomes for women because these would act as proxy measures for successful control of adrenaline levels during labour.
The quality of the evidence
The quality of the evidence was very low and it came from a single retrospective cohort study. The study considered only women who took steroid therapy orally during pregnancy. There was an increased proportion of women with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) in the high dose (HD) hydrocortisone group compared to the low dose (LD) hydrocortisone group and the study authors did not perform any adjustment in their analysis. The study periods for the HD and LD groups were also different and thus, there is a possibility that pregnancy and labour care other than hydrocortisone treatment could have differed between the groups. There was no clinically important difference in the reported outcomes, with the confidence intervals being very wide. Thus, it was considered that no definite conclusion could be drawn from this very low quality evidence, and so the committee based their recommendations on their knowledge and experience.
Benefits and harms
The committee discussed that taking a smaller dose of prednisolone for a defined period of time would not suppress adrenal function and thus, supplementary steroids during labour would not be recommended in these circumstances. They explained that recommendations would be beneficial for women taking 5 mg or more of daily oral prednisolone for more than 3 weeks or the equivalent amount of other form of steroids. Thus, the committee made their recommendations based on preventing adrenal crisis (which could be fatal) while attempting to limit the woman’s dose of steroids as far as possible. As the committee believed that the physiological stress of labour was lower than for caesarean section, they made separate recommendations for the 2 situations.
In the case of women with adrenal insufficiency, or taking 5 mg or more of daily oral prednisolone for more than 3 weeks or the equivalent amount of other forms of steroids, and planning a vaginal birth, regular oral steroids should be continued. The committee explained that the risk in discontinuing the steroids to more accurately gauge dose of supplementary steroids was that this might cause problems for the woman in restarting steroids after the birth, and that continuing oral medication would not make a significant difference to outcomes for the woman or the baby (since oral medication is not well absorbed during labour). In addition, 6-hourly intravenous or intramuscular hydrocortisone of 50 mg or more should be added in the established first stage of labour and this dosage should be continued until 6 hours after the baby is born.
The committee recommended that supplementary steroids be given by the intravenous or intramuscular route, since oral medication is not well absorbed during labour (blood is required by the uterus and so the bowel receives less supply) and vomiting is not uncommon. This means the intravenous or intramuscular route is likely to be a more reliable method of medication delivery. The committee recommended hydrocortisone, because a smaller amount of hydrocortisone crosses the placenta than beta- or dexa-methasone and this minimises the risk of fetal toxicity. The committee recommended that a minimum of 50 mg of hydrocortisone should be given per dose if the woman is in established labour. This was based on clinical consensus. The committee explained that existing guidelines (such as the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guideline on the management of asthma, Addison’s disease self-help group (ADSHG) surgical guidelines, Bancos 2015) recommended doses of between 50 mg and 100 mg with the dosage interval of 6–8 hourly. Thus, these were important cut-off points for use in clinical practice. The committee noted that there was no evidence for either threshold, and also that an extended duration of increased steroid dose carried potential risks, but the committee was unable to recommend how to respond in this situation as it would depend on many factors specific to the individual woman. However, they explained that using the lower 50 mg dose would minimise the side effects of acute administration of high-dose steroids.
In the case of women giving birth through caesarean section and who have adrenal insufficiency or who have been taking long-term oral steroids, the committee recommended continuing with regular oral steroids and adding hydrocortisone, but they added that the dose would depend on whether the woman had already been in labour. The committee intended for the total dose for a woman having a caesarean section to be 100 mg (the upper end of clinical consensus), with a supplementary 50 mg 6 hours after the baby is born. In order to reach this dose, either 100 mg should be given outright if the woman has not already had any hydrocortisone for labour (as above) and 50 mg if she has already had a 50 mg dose in labour. The committee discussed how this could mean the woman might have as little as 75 mg overall (if the last 50 mg dose she received in labour was around 6 hours prior to the 50 mg caesarean section dose) but they concluded that there was insufficient evidence that the added benefit of the remaining 25 mg hydrocortisone justified more invasive blood monitoring, which could make the woman anxious. The risks associated with this higher dose were greatly reduced by the fact that caesarean section could be completed much faster than labour and so the total dose (that is, the number of doses times the amount per dose) was relatively small. The committee recommended giving the dose every 6 hours since they knew this to be the half-life of steroids in the body (and this would therefore give better control over the dose). They recommended giving a final dose 6 hours after the baby was born in order to prevent adrenal collapse in the immediate postpartum period.
The committee discussed how most women taking inhaled or topical steroids do not require supplemental hydrocortisone in the intrapartum period, because the bioavailability of steroids in this form is known to be poor and so these women would be unlikely to be receiving a high dose of steroids from an inhaled or topical dose alone. This would prevent such women from being exposed to the harmful side-effects of steroids, without increasing their risk of adrenal crisis. However the committee explained that this was not always the case, and a specialist may be required to determine whether the dose was high enough to be treated as being 5 mg or more prednisolone daily for more than 3 weeks or an equivalent amount of another steroid.
The committee explained that antenatal steroids given for fetal lung maturation should be treated as for any other steroid for the purpose of determining intrapartum dosing; although they agreed that stopping the dose during the intrapartum period did not carry the same risk as stopping the dose for a condition that would persist after the birth (since the dose would be stopping anyway). The committee considered that the high levels of steroids used for fetal lung maturation might mean that suddenly stopping them could have a negative effect on the woman’s health, for example provoking an adrenal crisis. For the sake of continuing the dose for a few extra hours the committee believed the risk was balanced by the likely benefits.
Cost effectiveness and resource use
No evidence was found for this review and the committee made a qualitative assessment of cost effectiveness.
The committee noted that steroids are relatively inexpensive and so they reasoned that recommendations that minimised the risk of an adrenal crisis, which can be fatal, were likely to be cost effective. The committee believed that recommending a higher dose of additional steroids for women having a caesarean section would be cost effective as this procedure is more stressful physiologically than labour.
The committee believed that there is variation in practice and that steroids are likely to be overprescribed for women in labour. Therefore the recommendations might reduce the amount of steroids given, particularly for women using inhaled or topical steroids. However, because steroids are inexpensive, this is unlikely to have a significant impact on resource use within the NHS in England.
Other factors the committee took into account
As only very low quality evidence from one study was identified, the committee made a research recommendation on whether supplemental steroids are required in the intrapartum period for women taking regular antenatal steroids. See Appendix L for further details.
References
Bancos 2015
Bancos, Irina, Hahner, Stefanie, Tomlinson, Jeremy, Arlt, Wiebke, Diagnosis and management of adrenal insufficiency, The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, 3, 216–226, 2015 [PubMed: 25098712]Owa 2017
Owa, Takao, Mimura, Kazuya, Kakigano, Aiko, Matsuzaki, Shinya, Kumasawa, Keiichi, Endo, Masayuki, Tomimatsu, Takuji, Kimura, Tadashi, Pregnancy outcomes in women with different doses of corticosteroid supplementation during labor and delivery, The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, 43, 1132–1138, 2017 [PubMed: 28422424]
Appendices
Appendix A. Review protocol
Intrapartum care for women on long-term systemic steroid medication
Appendix B. Literature search strategies
Intrapartum care for women on long-term systemic steroid medication
Database: Medline; Medline EPub Ahead of Print; and Medline In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations
Database: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials
Database: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Database: Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects
Appendix C. Clinical evidence study selection
Intrapartum care for women on long-term steroid medication
Appendix D. Excluded studies
Intrapartum care for women on long-term systemic steroid medication
Clinical studies
Table
IBD: inflammatory bowel disease
Economic studies
See Supplement 2 (Health economics) for details of economic evidence reviews and health economic modelling.
Appendix E. Clinical evidence tables
Intrapartum care for women on long-term systemic steroid medication (PDF, 168K)
Appendix F. Forest plots
Intrapartum care for women on long-term systemic steroid medication
No meta-analysis was undertaken for this review and so there are no forest plots
Appendix G. GRADE tables
Intrapartum care for women on long-term systemic steroid medication
Appendix H. Economic evidence study selection
Intrapartum care for women on long-term systemic steroid medication
See Supplement 2 (Health economics) for details of economic evidence reviews and health economic modelling.
Appendix I. Economic evidence tables
Intrapartum care for women on long-term systemic steroid medication
See Supplement 2 (Health economics) for details of economic evidence reviews and health economic modelling.
Appendix J. Health economic evidence profiles
Intrapartum care for women on long-term systemic steroid medication
See Supplement 2 (Health economics) for details of economic evidence reviews and health economic modelling.
Appendix K. Health economic analysis
Intrapartum care for women on long-term systemic steroid medication
See Supplement 2 (Health economics) for details of economic evidence reviews and health economic modelling.
Appendix L. Research recommendations
Intrapartum care for women on long-term systemic steroid medication
Are supplemental steroids required in the intrapartum period for women taking regular antenatal steroids?
Why this is important
Pregnant women who require long-term anti-inflammatory steroids are expected to have suppressed production of endogenous steroids from their adrenal glands. This would make them less able to mount a natural steroid response to stress, such as that experienced at the time of child birth.
Based on the committee’s experience and expertise, this guideline has recommended that pregnant women receiving long-term oral steroids (equivalent to a low anti-inflammatory dose of 5mg or more prednisolone daily, for more than 3 weeks) should receive a minimum of 50mg of hydrocortisone every 6 hours from the onset of established labour until 6 hours postpartum.
There has been no clinical study to determine at what regular dose of prednisolone or any other steroid formulation, is a pregnant woman unable to mount an adrenal steroid response to stress. Furthermore, it is unknown what dose of intrapartum hydrocortisone supplementation is required to protect the woman with chronically suppressed adrenal glands from adrenal crisis. It is unknown what effects antenatal hydrocortisone have on peripartum outcome for woman and neonate.
This research question aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of current NICE recommendation of steroid supplementation during childbirth.
Research recommendation rationale
Table
N/A: not applicable; NICE: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
Research recommendation PICO
Table
Number of women in each group receiving intrapartum hydrocortisone supplementation Acceptability of both regimes to women
Final
Evidence reviews for women at high risk of adverse outcomes for themselves and/or their baby because of existing maternal medical conditions
Developed by the National Guideline Alliance hosted by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
Disclaimer: The recommendations in this guideline represent the view of NICE, arrived at after careful consideration of the evidence available. When exercising their judgement, professionals are expected to take this guideline fully into account, alongside the individual needs, preferences and values of their patients or service users. The recommendations in this guideline are not mandatory and the guideline does not override the responsibility of healthcare professionals to make decisions appropriate to the circumstances of the individual patient, in consultation with the patient and/or their carer or guardian.
Local commissioners and/or providers have a responsibility to enable the guideline to be applied when individual health professionals and their patients or service users wish to use it. They should do so in the context of local and national priorities for funding and developing services, and in light of their duties to have due regard to the need to eliminate unlawful discrimination, to advance equality of opportunity and to reduce health inequalities. Nothing in this guideline should be interpreted in a way that would be inconsistent with compliance with those duties.
NICE guidelines cover health and care in England. Decisions on how they apply in other UK countries are made by ministers in the Welsh Government, Scottish Government, and Northern Ireland Executive. All NICE guidance is subject to regular review and may be updated or withdrawn.