Effect of a protective-ventilation strategy on mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome
- PMID: 9449727
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199802053380602
Effect of a protective-ventilation strategy on mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome
Abstract
Background: In patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome, massive alveolar collapse and cyclic lung reopening and overdistention during mechanical ventilation may perpetuate alveolar injury. We determined whether a ventilatory strategy designed to minimize such lung injuries could reduce not only pulmonary complications but also mortality at 28 days in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Methods: We randomly assigned 53 patients with early acute respiratory distress syndrome (including 28 described previously), all of whom were receiving identical hemodynamic and general support, to conventional or protective mechanical ventilation. Conventional ventilation was based on the strategy of maintaining the lowest positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) for acceptable oxygenation, with a tidal volume of 12 ml per kilogram of body weight and normal arterial carbon dioxide levels (35 to 38 mm Hg). Protective ventilation involved end-expiratory pressures above the lower inflection point on the static pressure-volume curve, a tidal volume of less than 6 ml per kilogram, driving pressures of less than 20 cm of water above the PEEP value, permissive hypercapnia, and preferential use of pressure-limited ventilatory modes.
Results: After 28 days, 11 of 29 patients (38 percent) in the protective-ventilation group had died, as compared with 17 of 24 (71 percent) in the conventional-ventilation group (P<0.001). The rates of weaning from mechanical ventilation were 66 percent in the protective-ventilation group and 29 percent in the conventional-ventilation group (P=0.005): the rates of clinical barotrauma were 7 percent and 42 percent, respectively (P=0.02), despite the use of higher PEEP and mean airway pressures in the protective-ventilation group. The difference in survival to hospital discharge was not significant; 13 of 29 patients (45 percent) in the protective-ventilation group died in the hospital, as compared with 17 of 24 in the conventional-ventilation group (71 percent, P=0.37).
Conclusions: As compared with conventional ventilation, the protective strategy was associated with improved survival at 28 days, a higher rate of weaning from mechanical ventilation, and a lower rate of barotrauma in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Protective ventilation was not associated with a higher rate of survival to hospital discharge.
Comment in
-
Protective ventilation for the acute respiratory distress syndrome.N Engl J Med. 1998 Jul 16;339(3):196-7; author reply 198-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199807163390311. N Engl J Med. 1998. PMID: 9669911 No abstract available.
-
Protective ventilation for the acute respiratory distress syndrome.N Engl J Med. 1998 Jul 16;339(3):197; author reply 198-9. N Engl J Med. 1998. PMID: 9669913 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of a ventilation strategy to prevent barotrauma in patients at high risk for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Pressure- and Volume-Limited Ventilation Strategy Group.N Engl J Med. 1998 Feb 5;338(6):355-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199802053380603. N Engl J Med. 1998. PMID: 9449728 Clinical Trial.
-
Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome.N Engl J Med. 2000 May 4;342(18):1301-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801. N Engl J Med. 2000. PMID: 10793162 Clinical Trial.
-
High-inflation pressure and positive end-expiratory pressure. Injurious to the lung? Yes.Crit Care Clin. 1996 Jul;12(3):627-34. doi: 10.1016/s0749-0704(05)70266-9. Crit Care Clin. 1996. PMID: 8839594 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A high positive end-expiratory pressure, low tidal volume ventilatory strategy improves outcome in persistent acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized, controlled trial.Crit Care Med. 2006 May;34(5):1311-8. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000215598.84885.01. Crit Care Med. 2006. PMID: 16557151 Clinical Trial.
-
High-inflation pressure and positive end-expiratory pressure. Injurious to the lung? No.Crit Care Clin. 1996 Jul;12(3):603-25. doi: 10.1016/s0749-0704(05)70265-7. Crit Care Clin. 1996. PMID: 8839593 Review.
Cited by
-
Standard versus individualised positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) compared by electrical impedance tomography in neurocritical care: a pilot prospective single centre study.Intensive Care Med Exp. 2024 Aug 5;12(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s40635-024-00654-3. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2024. PMID: 39103646 Free PMC article.
-
Lung protective mechanical ventilation and two year survival in patients with acute lung injury: prospective cohort study.BMJ. 2012 Apr 5;344:e2124. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2124. BMJ. 2012. PMID: 22491953 Free PMC article.
-
Adjusting tidal volume to stress index in an open lung condition optimizes ventilation and prevents overdistension in an experimental model of lung injury and reduced chest wall compliance.Crit Care. 2015 Jan 13;19(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0726-3. Crit Care. 2015. PMID: 25583125 Free PMC article.
-
Be Patient: Prolonged Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support Including Full System Switch With Favorable Outcome.J Med Cases. 2022 Oct;13(10):483-490. doi: 10.14740/jmc3979. Epub 2022 Oct 31. J Med Cases. 2022. PMID: 36407859 Free PMC article.
-
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.Anesthesiology. 2021 Feb 1;134(2):270-282. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003571. Anesthesiology. 2021. PMID: 33016981 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials