Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 2;14(4):e081394.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081394.

Measurement properties of the Mental Health Literacy Scale (MHLS) validation studies: a systematic review protocol

Rouwida ElKhalil  1 , Mohamad AlMekkawi  2 , Matt O'Connor  3 , Moustafa Sherif  1 , Emad Masuadi  1 , Luai A Ahmed  1 , Rami H Al-Rifai  1 , Messaouda Belfakir  1 , Rasha Bayoumi  4 , Iffat Elbarazi  5
Affiliations

Measurement properties of the Mental Health Literacy Scale (MHLS) validation studies: a systematic review protocol

Rouwida ElKhalil et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Mental Health Literacy (MHL) is important for improving mental health and reducing inequities in treatment. The Mental Health Literacy Scale (MHLS) is a valid and reliable assessment tool for MHL. This systematic review will examine and compare the measurement properties of the MHLS in different languages, enabling academics, clinicians and policymakers to make informed judgements regarding its use in assessments.

Methods and analysis: The review will adhere to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Manual for Evidence Synthesis and will be presented following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis 2020 checklist. The review will be conducted in four stages, including an initial search confined to PubMed, a search of electronic scientific databases PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, MEDLINE, Embase (Elsevier), PubMed (NLM) and ERIC, an examination of the reference lists of all papers to locate relevant publications and finally contacting the MHLS original author to identify validation studies that the searches will not retrieve. These phases will assist us in locating studies that evaluate the measurement properties of MHLS across various populations, demographics and contexts. The search will focus on articles published in English between May 2015 and December 2023. The methodological quality of the studies will be evaluated using the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist, and a comprehensive qualitative and quantitative data synthesis will be performed.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval is not required. The publication will be in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences.

Prospero registration number: CRD42023430924.

Keywords: Health Literacy; MENTAL HEALTH; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Psychometrics; Systematic Review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: MO’C is among the MHLS’s authors. The authors do not disclose any additional potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Systematic review methodology summary. MHLS, Mental Health Literacy Scale. SD, Standard Deviation.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. World Health Orgainsation . WHO menu of cost-effective interventions for mental health. 2021. Available: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789240031081 [Accessed 31 Jan 2024].
    1. Healthy People 2030 . History of health literacy definitions. Available: https://health.gov/healthypeople/priority-areas/health-literacy-healthy-... [Accessed 03 Feb 2024].
    1. Kutcher S, Wei Y, Coniglio C. Mental health literacy: past, present, and future. Can J Psychiatry 2016;61:154–8. 10.1177/0706743715616609 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jorm AF, Korten AE, Jacomb PA, et al. . "Mental health literacy”: a survey of the public’s ability to recognise mental disorders and their beliefs about the effectiveness of treatment. Med J Aust 1997;166:182–6. 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1997.tb140071.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jorm AF. Why we need the concept of ‘mental health literacy'. Health Commun 2015;30:1166–8. 10.1080/10410236.2015.1037423 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types