Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr;13(3):840-854.
doi: 10.1177/21925682221125766. Epub 2022 Sep 7.

Long-Term Survivorship of Cervical Spine Procedures; A Survivorship Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression

Affiliations

Long-Term Survivorship of Cervical Spine Procedures; A Survivorship Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression

Mohamed Sarraj et al. Global Spine J. 2023 Apr.

Abstract

Study design: Systematic Review.

Objectives: To conduct a meta-analysis on the survivorship of commonly performed cervical spine procedures to develop survival function curves for (i) second surgery at any cervical level, and (ii) adjacent level surgery.

Methods: A systematic review of was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Articles with cohorts of greater than 20 patients followed for a minimum of 36 months and with available survival data were included. Procedures included were anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), cervical disc arthroplasty (ADR), laminoplasty (LAMP), and posterior laminectomy and fusion (PDIF). Reconstructed individual patient data were pooled across studies using parametric Bayesian survival meta-regression.

Results: Of 1829 initial titles, 16 citations were included for analysis. 73 811 patients were included in the second surgery analysis and 2858 patients in the adjacent level surgery analysis. We fit a Log normal accelerated failure time model to the second surgery data and a Gompertz proportional hazards model to the adjacent level surgery data. Relative to ACDF, the risk of second surgery was higher with ADR and PDIF with acceleration factors 1.73 (95% CrI: 1.04, 2.80) and 1.35 (95% CrI: 1.25, 1.46) respectively. Relative to ACDF, the risk of second surgery was lower with LAMP with deceleration factor .06 (95% CrI: .05, .07). ADR decreased the risk of adjacent level surgery with hazard ratio .43 (95% CrI: .33, .55).

Conclusions: In cases of clinical equipoise between fusion procedures, our analysis suggests superior survivorship with anterior procedures. For all procedures, laminoplasty demonstrated superior survivorship.

Keywords: anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; cervical disc arthroplasty; degenerative cervical myelopathy; survivorship curve.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study flow diagram.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Individual study survival curves, and parametric summary survival curve for second surgery.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Individual study survival curves, and parametric summary survival curve for adjacent level surgery.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Liu CY, Zygourakis CC, Yoon S, et al. Trends in utilization and cost of cervical spine surgery using the national inpatient sample database, 2001 to 2013. Spine. 2017;42(15):E906-E913. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000001999 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oglesby M, Fineberg SJ, Patel AA, Pelton MA, Singh K. Epidemiological trends in cervical spine surgery for degenerative diseases between 2002 and 2009. Spine. 2013;38(14):1226-1232. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828be75d - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alvin MD, Miller JA, Lubelski D, et al. Variations in cost calculations in spine surgery cost-effectiveness research. Neurosurgical focus. 2014;36(6):E1. doi:10.3171/2014.3.FOCUS1447 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fehlings MG, Kwon BK, Tetreault LA. Guidelines for the management of degenerative cervical myelopathy and spinal cord injury: An introduction to a focus issue. Global Spine Journal. 2017;7(3_supplement):6S-7S. doi:10.1177/2192568217701714 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fehlings MG, Tetreault LA, Riew KD, et al. A clinical practice guideline for the management of patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy: Recommendations for patients with mild, moderate, and severe disease and nonmyelopathic patients with evidence of cord compression. Global Spine Journal. 2017;7(3_supplement):70S-83S. doi:10.1177/2192568217701914 - DOI - PMC - PubMed