Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Nov;132(Pt 11):3175-86.
doi: 10.1093/brain/awp236. Epub 2009 Sep 18.

Prevalence of genetic muscle disease in Northern England: in-depth analysis of a muscle clinic population

Affiliations

Prevalence of genetic muscle disease in Northern England: in-depth analysis of a muscle clinic population

Fiona L M Norwood et al. Brain. 2009 Nov.

Abstract

We have performed a detailed population study of patients with genetic muscle disease in the northern region of England. Our current clinic population comprises over 1100 patients in whom we have molecularly characterized 31 separate muscle disease entities. Diagnostic clarity achieved through careful delineation of clinical features supported by histological, immunological and genetic analysis has allowed us to reach a definitive diagnosis in 75.7% of our patients. We have compared our case profile with that from Walton and Nattrass' seminal study from 1954, also of the northern region, together with data from other more recent studies from around the world. Point prevalence figures for each of the five major disease categories are comparable with those from other recent studies. Myotonic dystrophies are the most common, comprising 28.6% of our clinic population with a point prevalence of 10.6/100,000. Next most frequent are the dystrophinopathies and facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy making up 22.9% (8.46/100,000) and 10.7% (3.95/100,000) of the clinic population, respectively. Spinal muscular atrophy patients account for 5.1% or 1.87/100,000 patients. Limb girdle muscular dystrophy, which was described for the first time in the paper by Walton and Nattrass (1954) and comprised 17% of their clinic population, comprises 6.2% of our clinic population at a combined prevalence of 2.27/100,000. The clinic population included patients with 12 other muscle disorders. These disorders ranged from a point prevalence of 0.89/100 000 for the group of congenital muscular dystrophies to conditions with only two affected individuals in a population of three million. For the first time our study provides epidemiological information for X-linked Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy and the collagen VI disorders. Each of the X-linked form of Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy and Ullrich muscular dystrophy has a prevalence of 0.13/100,000, making both very rare. Bethlem myopathy was relatively more common with a prevalence of 0.77/100,000. Overall our study provides comprehensive epidemiological information on individually rare inherited neuromuscular conditions in Northern England. Despite the deliberate exclusion of relatively common groups such as hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy (40/100,000) and mitochondrial disorders (9.2/100,000), the combined prevalence is 37.0/100,000, demonstrating that these disorders, taken as a group, encompass a significant proportion of patients with chronic disease. The study also illustrates the immense diagnostic progress since the first regional survey over 50 years ago by Walton and Nattrass.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The northern region of England showing catchment area for this study and location of Newcastle muscle clinic within the region.
The catchment area includes the counties of Northumberland, Durham, Cumbria and parts of Yorkshire and Lancashire with an estimated total population of 2.99 million.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Geographical distribution of cases within northern region of England.
Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1), facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD), Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anderson LV, Davison K. Multiplex Western blotting system for the analysis of muscular dystrophy proteins. Am J Pathol. 1999;154:1017–22. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Angelini C. Limb-girdle muscular dystrophies: heterogeneity of clinical phenotypes and pathogenetic mechanisms. Acta Myol. 2004;23:130–6. - PubMed
    1. Ausems MG, Verbiest J, Hermans MP, Kroos MA, Beemer FA, Wokke JH, et al. Frequency of glycogen storage disease type II in The Netherlands: implications for diagnosis and genetic counselling. Eur J Hum Genet. 1999;7:713–6. - PubMed
    1. Bachinski LL, Udd B, Meola G, Sansone V, Bassez G, Eymard B, et al. Confirmation of the type 2 myotonic dystrophy (CCTG)n expansion mutation in patients with proximal myotonic myopathy/proximal myotonic dystrophy of different European origins: a single shared haplotype indicates an ancestral founder effect. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;73:835–48. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Balci B, Aurino S, Haliloglu G, Talim B, Erdem S, Akcoren Z, et al. Calpain-3 mutations in Turkey. Eur J Pediatr. 2006;165:293–8. - PubMed

Publication types