Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Sep-Oct;13(5):526-35.
doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2051. Epub 2006 Jun 23.

Enhancing text categorization with semantic-enriched representation and training data augmentation

Affiliations

Enhancing text categorization with semantic-enriched representation and training data augmentation

Xinghua Lu et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Objective: Acquiring and representing biomedical knowledge is an increasingly important component of contemporary bioinformatics. A critical step of the process is to identify and retrieve relevant documents among the vast volume of modern biomedical literature efficiently. In the real world, many information retrieval tasks are difficult because of high data dimensionality and the lack of annotated examples to train a retrieval algorithm. Under such a scenario, the performance of information retrieval algorithms is often unsatisfactory, therefore improvements are needed.

Design: We studied two approaches that enhance the text categorization performance on sparse and high data dimensionality: (1) semantic-preserving dimension reduction by representing text with semantic-enriched features; and (2) augmenting training data with semi-supervised learning. A probabilistic topic model was applied to extract major semantic topics from a corpus of text of interest. The representation of documents was projected from the high-dimensional vocabulary space onto a semantic topic space with reduced dimensionality. A semi-supervised learning algorithm based on graph theory was applied to identify potential positive training cases, which were further used to augment training data. The effects of data transformation and augmentation on text categorization by support vector machine (SVM) were evaluated.

Results and conclusion: Semantic-enriched data transformation and the pseudo-positive-cases augmented training data enhance the efficiency and performance of text categorization by SVM.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Representing concepts with word distributions. Two hypothetical topics are depicted. The bar lengths indicate the word-sage preference or the conditional probability of observing the a word for a given topic.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The directed acyclic graphical representation of the LDA model. Each node represents a variable, and a shaded node indicates an observed variable. Each rectangle plate represents a replica of the data structure. The variables D and Nd at the bottom right of plate indicate the number of the replicates of the structure.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Baseline performance of SVM. Different with different cost-factor settings were used for training SVM. Panel A: Recall; Panel B: Precision; Panel C: F scores; and Panel D: normalized utility.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Semantic representation and classification. Text documents are represented in vocabulary (VocRep) and semantic space (SemRep). Panels A, B, C and D correspond to the recall, precision, F value and utility score comparisons of VocRep and SemRep.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The ROC curve analysis for the TREC text categorization. The panels correspond to the A, E, G, and T subtasks respectively. Within each panel, the ROC curve for VocRep is shown as dashed line and open boxes, while that for the SemRep is shown as solid line and open circles. Each symbol represents the sensitivity and false positive rate (1 - specificity) of the trained SVMlight classifier with a given cost-factor (-j) value.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Effect of data augmentation. The panels A, B, C and D correspond to recall, precision, utility score and F value.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bourne P. Will a Biological Database Be Different from a Biological Journal? Plos Computational Biology 2005;1(3):179. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hersh WR, Bhuptiraju RT, Ross L, Johnson P, Cohen AM, Kreamer DF. TREC 2004 genomics track overview. 2004. Paper presented at: Text Retrieval Conference (TREC) 2004.
    1. Hirschman L, Yeh A, Blaschke C, Valencia A. Overview of BioCreAtIvEcritical assessment of information extraction for biology. BMC Bioinformatics 2005;6(Suppl 1):S1. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium Nat Genet 2000;25(1):25-29. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hersh W, Bhupatiraju R. TREC genomics track overview. 2003. Paper presented at: Twelfth Text Retrieval Conference - TREC 2003.

Publication types