Optimal search strategies for identifying sound clinical prediction studies in EMBASE
- PMID: 15862125
- PMCID: PMC1097733
- DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-5-11
Optimal search strategies for identifying sound clinical prediction studies in EMBASE
Abstract
Background: Clinical prediction guides assist clinicians by pointing to specific elements of the patient's clinical presentation that should be considered when forming a diagnosis, prognosis or judgment regarding treatment outcome. The numbers of validated clinical prediction guides are growing in the medical literature, but their retrieval from large biomedical databases remains problematic and this presents a barrier to their uptake in medical practice. We undertook the systematic development of search strategies ("hedges") for retrieval of empirically tested clinical prediction guides from EMBASE.
Methods: An analytic survey was conducted, testing the retrieval performance of search strategies run in EMBASE against the gold standard of hand searching, using a sample of all 27,769 articles identified in 55 journals for the 2000 publishing year. All articles were categorized as original studies, review articles, general papers, or case reports. The original and review articles were then tagged as 'pass' or 'fail' for methodologic rigor in the areas of clinical prediction guides and other clinical topics. Search terms that depicted clinical prediction guides were selected from a pool of index terms and text words gathered in house and through request to clinicians, librarians and professional searchers. A total of 36,232 search strategies composed of single and multiple term phrases were trialed for retrieval of clinical prediction studies. The sensitivity, specificity, precision, and accuracy of search strategies were calculated to identify which were the best.
Results: 163 clinical prediction studies were identified, of which 69 (42.3%) passed criteria for scientific merit. A 3-term strategy optimized sensitivity at 91.3% and specificity at 90.2%. Higher sensitivity (97.1%) was reached with a different 3-term strategy, but with a 16% drop in specificity. The best measure of specificity (98.8%) was found in a 2-term strategy, but with a considerable fall in sensitivity to 60.9%. All single term strategies performed less well than 2- and 3-term strategies.
Conclusion: The retrieval of sound clinical prediction studies from EMBASE is supported by several search strategies.
Similar articles
-
Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound and relevant causation studies in EMBASE.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2005 Mar 22;5:8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-5-8. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2005. PMID: 15784134 Free PMC article.
-
Optimal search strategies for detecting cost and economic studies in EMBASE.BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Jun 6;6:67. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-67. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006. PMID: 16756662 Free PMC article.
-
Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound causation studies in MEDLINE.AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003;2003:719-23. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003. PMID: 14728267 Free PMC article.
-
Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 11;2013(9):MR000022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000022.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 24022476 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Consistency and accuracy of indexing systematic review articles and meta-analyses in medline.Health Info Libr J. 2009 Sep;26(3):203-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2008.00823.x. Health Info Libr J. 2009. PMID: 19712212 Review.
Cited by
-
Applying 'cultural humility' to occupational therapy practice: a scoping review protocol.BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 29;12(7):e063655. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063655. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35906054 Free PMC article.
-
Search strategies to identify observational studies in MEDLINE and Embase.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 12;3(3):MR000041. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000041.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 30860595 Free PMC article.
-
Design Characteristics Influence Performance of Clinical Prediction Rules in Validation: A Meta-Epidemiological Study.PLoS One. 2016 Jan 5;11(1):e0145779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145779. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 26730980 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Search Strategy for Search Performance; Off-the-cuff or Being Sensitive.Bull Emerg Trauma. 2019 Oct;7(4):431-432. doi: 10.29252/beat-070417. Bull Emerg Trauma. 2019. PMID: 31858011 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
A generalised model for individualising a treatment recommendation based on group-level evidence from randomised clinical trials.BMJ Open. 2013 Aug 13;3(8):e003143. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003143. BMJ Open. 2013. PMID: 23943775 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Steiner JF. Clinical prediction rules as guides to treatment. Hosp Pract (Off Ed) 1999;34:17–20. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources