Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Feb;27(1):25-9.
doi: 10.1136/jme.27.1.25.

Balancing rationalities: gatekeeping in health care

Affiliations

Balancing rationalities: gatekeeping in health care

D L Willems. J Med Ethics. 2001 Feb.

Abstract

Physicians are increasingly confronted with the consequences of allocation policies. In several countries, physicians have been assigned a gatekeeper role for secondary health care. Many ethicists oppose this assignment for several reasons, concentrating on the harm the intrusion of societal arguments would inflict on doctor-patient relations. It is argued that these arguments rest on a distinction of spheres of values and of rationality, without taking into account the mixing of values and rationalities that takes place in everyday medical practice. If medical practice, then, does not follow a single, pure rationality, can it also incorporate the societal rationality of the gatekeeper role? Using a case from general practice, I try to show how physicians may integrate societal arguments into their practice in a morally acceptable way. A version of the model of reflective equilibrium and especially Beauchamp and Childress's safeguards, may be helpful both to analyse and teach such balancing of values and rationalities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Soc Sci Med. 1986;23(8):783-7 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1998 Aug 6;339(6):397-8 - PubMed
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1992 Jun 1;116(11):920-6 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1992 Apr 11;304(6832):969-71 - PubMed
    1. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1994 Feb;17(2):135-7 - PubMed

Publication types