EUS in preoperative staging of pancreatic cancer
- PMID: 11023561
- DOI: 10.1067/mge.2000.107725
EUS in preoperative staging of pancreatic cancer
Abstract
Background: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is believed to be highly accurate in the local (T) and nodal (N) staging of pancreatic cancer. However, there are scant data concerning the predictive value of EUS for resectability of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This study was performed to determine the accuracy of TNM staging by EUS in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and to evaluate the role of preoperative TNM staging by EUS for determining resectability in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Methods: This is a retrospective review of a cohort of 89 patients evaluated preoperatively with EUS for pancreatic adenocarcinoma between January 1995 and December 1997. Preoperative TNM classification by EUS was compared with surgical and histopathologic TNM staging. Resectability rates were determined and compared with the preoperative TNM staging by EUS.
Results: The overall accuracy of EUS for T and N staging was found to be 69% and 54%, respectively. The overall proportion of tumors that were deemed resectable by EUS and were actually found to be resectable during surgical exploration was 46%. The proportion of tumors staged as T4 N1, T4 N0, T3 N1 and T3 N0 by EUS that were found to be resectable during surgical exploration was 45%, 37%, 44% and 62%, respectively.
Conclusions: In a tertiary referral patient population, EUS is not as accurate as previously reported in the T and N staging of pancreatic cancer. EUS is also not predictive of resectability in stage T3 or T4 pancreatic cancer.
Comment in
-
Role of EUS in the evaluation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 Oct;52(4):578-82. doi: 10.1067/mge.2000.108719. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000. PMID: 11023593 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Role of endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 Aug;95(8):1926-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.02245.x. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000. PMID: 10950037
-
Preoperative assessment of pancreatic malignancy using endoscopic ultrasound.Abdom Imaging. 2003 Jul-Aug;28(4):556-62. doi: 10.1007/s00261-002-0072-9. Abdom Imaging. 2003. PMID: 14580100
-
Role of EUS in the preoperative staging of pancreatic cancer: a large single-center experience.Gastrointest Endosc. 1999 Dec;50(6):786-91. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(99)70159-8. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999. PMID: 10570337
-
Pretherapeutic evaluation of patients with upper gastrointestinal tract cancer using endoscopic and laparoscopic ultrasonography.Dan Med J. 2012 Dec;59(12):B4568. Dan Med J. 2012. PMID: 23290296 Review.
-
[Endoscopy in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer].Tumori. 1999 Jan-Feb;85(1 Suppl 1):S14-8. Tumori. 1999. PMID: 10235074 Review. Italian.
Cited by
-
Role of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasonography in 2010.World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Oct 16;2(10):335-43. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v2.i10.335. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2010. PMID: 21160583 Free PMC article.
-
Quality indicators for EUS.Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan;110(1):102-13. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.387. Epub 2014 Dec 2. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 25448871 No abstract available.
-
Efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration in patients with solid pancreatic neoplasms.Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2012 Nov-Dec;18(6):358-63. doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.103426. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2012. PMID: 23150020 Free PMC article.
-
The use of "overall accuracy" to evaluate the validity of screening or diagnostic tests.J Gen Intern Med. 2004 May;19(5 Pt 1):460-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30091.x. J Gen Intern Med. 2004. PMID: 15109345 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pancreatic carcinomas smaller than 3.0 cm: endosonography (EUS) in diagnosis, staging and prediction of resectability.HPB (Oxford). 2003;5(4):226-30. doi: 10.1080/13651820310001342. HPB (Oxford). 2003. PMID: 18332991 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical