Users' guides to the medical literature: XXII: how to use articles about clinical decision rules. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group
- PMID: 10872017
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.284.1.79
Users' guides to the medical literature: XXII: how to use articles about clinical decision rules. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group
Abstract
Clinical experience provides clinicians with an intuitive sense of which findings on history, physical examination, and investigation are critical in making an accurate diagnosis, or an accurate assessment of a patient's fate. A clinical decision rule (CDR) is a clinical tool that quantifies the individual contributions that various components of the history, physical examination, and basic laboratory results make toward the diagnosis, prognosis, or likely response to treatment in a patient. Clinical decision rules attempt to formally test, simplify, and increase the accuracy of clinicians' diagnostic and prognostic assessments. Existing CDRs guide clinicians, establish pretest probability, provide screening tests for common problems, and estimate risk. Three steps are involved in the development and testing of a CDR: creation of the rule, testing or validating the rule, and assessing the impact of the rule on clinical behavior. Clinicians evaluating CDRs for possible clinical use should assess the following components: the method of derivation; the validation of the CDR to ensure that its repeated use leads to the same results; and its predictive power. We consider CDRs that have been validated in a new clinical setting to be level 1 CDRs and most appropriate for implementation. Level 1 CDRs have the potential to inform clinical judgment, to change clinical behavior, and to reduce unnecessary costs, while maintaining quality of care and patient satisfaction. JAMA. 2000;284:79-84
Similar articles
-
A systematic review of clinical decision rules for epilepsy.Epilepsy Behav. 2016 Apr;57(Pt A):69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.01.019. Epub 2016 Feb 26. Epilepsy Behav. 2016. PMID: 26922491 Review.
-
Which decision rules meet methodological standards in children with febrile neutropenia? Results of a systematic review and analysis.Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014 Oct;61(10):1786-91. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25106. Epub 2014 Jun 29. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014. PMID: 24975886 Review.
-
Does this patient have pulmonary embolism?JAMA. 2003 Dec 3;290(21):2849-58. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.21.2849. JAMA. 2003. PMID: 14657070 Review.
-
Users' guides to the medical literature: XX. Integrating research evidence with the care of the individual patient. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.JAMA. 2000 Jun 7;283(21):2829-36. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.21.2829. JAMA. 2000. PMID: 10838653
-
Performance of 4 clinical decision rules in the diagnostic management of acute pulmonary embolism: a prospective cohort study.Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jun 7;154(11):709-18. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-11-201106070-00002. Ann Intern Med. 2011. PMID: 21646554
Cited by
-
The value of signs, symptoms and plasma heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP) in evaluating patients presenting with symptoms possibly matching acute coronary syndrome: background and methods of a diagnostic study in primary care.BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Dec 12;15:203. doi: 10.1186/s12875-014-0203-8. BMC Fam Pract. 2014. PMID: 25738970 Free PMC article.
-
Approach to fever assessment in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a clinical practice guideline.Curr Oncol. 2016 Aug;23(4):280-5. doi: 10.3747/co.23.3098. Epub 2016 Aug 12. Curr Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27536179 Free PMC article.
-
Development and Validation of a Mortality Prediction Model for Patients Receiving 14 Days of Mechanical Ventilation.Crit Care Med. 2015 Nov;43(11):2339-45. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001205. Crit Care Med. 2015. PMID: 26247337 Free PMC article.
-
Identification of a metabolic signature for multidimensional impairment and mortality risk in hospitalized older patients.Aging Cell. 2013 Jun;12(3):459-66. doi: 10.1111/acel.12068. Epub 2013 Apr 10. Aging Cell. 2013. PMID: 23496093 Free PMC article.
-
Derivation and validation of clinical prediction rules for diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis: a prospective cohort study.BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 27;13(2):e068877. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068877. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 36849213 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources