Physical measures of physical functioning as prognostic factors to predict outcomes in low back pain: Protocol for a systematic review
- PMID: 38079434
- PMCID: PMC10712879
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295761
Physical measures of physical functioning as prognostic factors to predict outcomes in low back pain: Protocol for a systematic review
Abstract
Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a highly prevalent condition that substantially impairs individuals' physical functioning. This highlights the need for effective management strategies to improve patient outcomes. It is, therefore, crucial to have knowledge of physical functioning prognostic factors that can predict outcomes to facilitate the development of targeted treatment plans aiming to achieve better patient outcomes. There is no synthesis of evidence for physical functioning measures as prognostic factors in the LBP population. The objective of this systematic review is to synthesize evidence for physical measures of physical functioning as prognostic factors to predict outcomes in LBP.
Methods: The protocol is registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews and reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P). Prospective longitudinal observational studies investigating potential physical prognostic factors in LBP and/or low back-related leg pain population will be included, with no restriction on outcome. Searches will be performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL databases, grey literature search using Open Grey System and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, hand-searching journals, and reference lists of included studies. Two independent reviewers will evaluate the eligibility of studies, extract data, assess risk of bias and quality of evidence. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool. Adequacy of clinical, methodological, and statistical homogeneity among included studies will decide quantitative (meta-analysis) or qualitative analysis (narrative synthesis) focused on prognostic factors and strength of association with outcomes. Quality of cumulative evidence will be evaluated using a modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE).
Discussion: Information about prognostic factors can be used to predict outcomes in LBP. Accurate outcome prediction is essential for identifying high-risk patients that allows targeted allocation of healthcare resources, ultimately reducing the healthcare burden.
Registration: PROSPERO, CRD42023406796.
Copyright: © 2023 Rashed et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
Association between physical measures of spinopelvic alignment and physical functioning with patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) after total hip arthroplasty: Protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2024 May 24;19(5):e0304382. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304382. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38787884 Free PMC article.
-
The association between depressive symptoms or depression and health outcomes in adults with low back pain with or without radiculopathy: protocol of a systematic review.Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 8;8(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1192-4. Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31703727 Free PMC article.
-
Can screening instruments accurately determine poor outcome risk in adults with recent onset low back pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Med. 2017 Jan 19;15(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0774-4. BMC Med. 2017. PMID: 28100231 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Physical prognostic factors predicting outcome following lumbar discectomy surgery: systematic review and narrative synthesis.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Sep 11;19(1):326. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2240-2. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018. PMID: 30205812 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Cieza A, Causey K, Kamenov K, Hanson SW, Chatterji S, Vos T. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet. 2020;396(10267):2006–17. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32340-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous