Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 13;87(9):e00091-21.
doi: 10.1128/AEM.00091-21. Print 2021 Apr 13.

Biosurfactants Produced by Phyllosphere-Colonizing Pseudomonads Impact Diesel Degradation but Not Colonization of Leaves of Gnotobiotic Arabidopsis thaliana

Affiliations

Biosurfactants Produced by Phyllosphere-Colonizing Pseudomonads Impact Diesel Degradation but Not Colonization of Leaves of Gnotobiotic Arabidopsis thaliana

S Oso et al. Appl Environ Microbiol. .

Abstract

Biosurfactant production is a common trait in leaf surface-colonizing bacteria that has been associated with increased survival and movement on leaves. At the same time, the ability to degrade aliphatics is common in biosurfactant-producing leaf colonizers. Pseudomonads are common leaf colonizers and have been recognized for their ability to produce biosurfactants and degrade aliphatic compounds. In this study, we investigated the role of biosurfactants in four non-plant-pathogenic Pseudomonas strains by performing a series of experiments to characterize their surfactant properties and their role during leaf colonization and diesel degradation. The biosurfactants produced were identified using mass spectrometry. Two strains produced viscosin-like biosurfactants, and the other two produced massetolide A-like biosurfactants, which aligned with the phylogenetic relatedness between the strains. To further investigate the role of surfactant production, random Tn5 transposon mutagenesis was performed to generate knockout mutants. The knockout mutants were compared to their respective wild types with regard to their ability to colonize gnotobiotic Arabidopsis thaliana and to degrade diesel or dodecane. It was not possible to detect negative effects during plant colonization in direct competition or individual colonization experiments. When grown on diesel, knockout mutants grew significantly slower than their respective wild types. When grown on dodecane, knockout mutants were less impacted than during growth on diesel. By adding isolated wild-type biosurfactants, it was possible to complement the growth of the knockout mutants.IMPORTANCE Many leaf-colonizing bacteria produce surfactants and are able to degrade aliphatic compounds; however, whether surfactant production provides a competitive advantage during leaf colonization is unclear. Furthermore, it is unclear if leaf colonizers take advantage of the aliphatic compounds that constitute the leaf cuticle and cuticular waxes. Here, we tested the effect of surfactant production on leaf colonization, and we demonstrate that the lack of surfactant production decreases the ability to degrade aliphatic compounds. This indicates that leaf surface-dwelling, surfactant-producing bacteria contribute to degradation of environmental hydrocarbons and may be able to utilize leaf surface waxes. This has implications for plant-microbe interactions and future studies.

Keywords: aliphatics; leaf cuticle; leaf wax; massetolide A; phyllosphere-inhabiting microbes; plant-microbe interactions; viscosin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Phylogenetic placement of the four isolated pseudomonads. The newly sequenced isolates are highlighted in bold. NCBI accession numbers of the respective sequences are given after the species names. Azotobacter chroococcum was used as an outgroup.
FIG 2
FIG 2
(A to F) Atomized-oil assays to demonstrate the production of surfactants. (A to D) Wild-type colonies of PFF1, PFF2, PFF3, and PFF4, respectively, exhibiting a halo indicative of surfactant production. (E) Tween 20. (F) E. coli DH5α. (G to L) Drop collapse assays to demonstrate the production of surfactants. (G to J) Culture supernatants of wild-type PFF1, PFF2, PFF3, and PFF4, respectively, collapsed into oil, indicative of surfactant production. (K) Collapsed drop containing Tween 20. (J) Noncollapsed drop of E. coli culture supernatant (arrow).
FIG 3
FIG 3
MS/MS spectra of extracted surfactants of PFF1, PFF2, PFF3, and PFF4 (A to D, respectively). PFF1 and PFF2 produce viscosin-like surfactants; PFF3 and PFF4 produce massetolide A-like surfactants. Spectra were normalized against the maximal intensity.
FIG 4
FIG 4
(A to D) Atomized-oil assay to demonstrate the production of surfactants. Tn5 insertion mutant colonies of PFF1::ezTn5-visB, PFF2::ezTn5-visB, PFF3::ezTn5-massB, and PFF4::ezTn5-massB, respectively, lacking a halo indicative of surfactant production. (E to H) Drop collapse assays to demonstrate the production of surfactants. Culture supernatants of Tn5 insertion mutants PFF1::ezTn5-visB, PFF2::ezTn5-visB, PFF3::ezTn5-massB, and PFF4::ezTn5-massB, respectively, showing a beaded bubble swimming on top of the oil, indicative of the lack of surfactants. The noncollapsed droplets are indicated by arrows.
FIG 5
FIG 5
Knockout mutants show no sign of surfactant production. MS/MS spectra of extracts of PFF1::ezTn5-viscB, PFF2::ezTn5-viscB, PFF3::ezTn5-massB, and PFF4::ezTn5-massB (A to D, respectively), are shown. None of the random knockout mutants produced detectable surfactant peaks at the corresponding wild-type m/z values. Spectra were normalized against the maximal intensity.
FIG 6
FIG 6
Utilization of diesel by biosurfactant knockout mutants and wild types. (A) PFF1; (B) PFF2; (C) PFF3; (D) PFF4. Each wild type and knockout mutant was grown in Bushnell-Haas broth supplemented with diesel as the sole source of carbon (circles and squares, respectively). Knockout mutants were complemented with either wild-type surfactant (triangles) or Tween 20 (inverted triangles) or were incubated with no additional carbon source (diamonds). The statistical analysis can be found in Table S3. Error bars depict the standard deviations of the means. Experiments were performed in triplicate.
FIG 7
FIG 7
Growth of Pseudomonas knockout strains on dodecane as the sole carbon source. Bushnell-Haas broth (BHB) supplemented with dodecane was inoculated with either wild-type strains (circles) or surfactant knockout mutant (squares) or was left noninoculated (diamonds). (A) Growth of PFF1 and the respective surfactant mutant. The growth of the surfactant mutant was significantly lower than that of the wild type on days 5 and 9. (B) Growth of PFF2 and the respective surfactant mutant. From day 7 to day 13, the growth of the surfactant mutant was significantly lower than that of the wild type. (C) Growth of PFF3 and the respective surfactant mutant. The growth of the surfactant mutant was significantly lower than that of the wild type on days 7, 11, and 15. (D) Growth of PFF4 and the respective surfactant mutant. From day 9 to day 19, the growth of the surfactant mutant was significantly lower than that of the wild type. The statistical analysis can be found in Table S3. Error bars depict the standard deviations of the means from three replicates.
FIG 8
FIG 8
In planta competition of wild types (circles) and mutants (squares). (A) PFF1 versus PFF1::ezTn5-visB; (B) PFF2 versus PFF2::ezTn5-visB; (C) PFF3 versus PFF3::ezTn5-massB; (D) PFF4 versus PFF2::ezTn5-massB. Symbols represent the mean number of CFU on five plants per measurement. The statistical analysis can be found in Table S3. Error bars depict the standard deviations of the means. Experiments were performed in quintuplicate.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kolattukudy PE. 1980. Biopolyester membranes of plants: cutin and suberin. Science 208:990–1000. doi:10.1126/science.208.4447.990. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zeisler-Diehl VV, Barthlott W, Schreiber L. 2018. Plant cuticular waxes: composition, function, and interactions with microorganisms, p 1–16. In Wilkes H (ed), Hydrocarbons, oils and lipids: diversity, origin, chemistry and fate. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland.
    1. Yeats TH, Buda GJ, Wang Z, Chehanovsky N, Moyle LC, Jetter R, Schaffer AA, Rose JKC. 2012. The fruit cuticles of wild tomato species exhibit architectural and chemical diversity, providing a new model for studying the evolution of cuticle function. Plant J 69:655–666. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04820.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Riederer M, Schreiber L. 2001. Protecting against water loss: analysis of the barrier properties of plant cuticles. J Exp Bot 52:2023–2032. doi:10.1093/jexbot/52.363.2023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Serrano M, Coluccia F, Torres M, L’Haridon F, Métraux J-P. 2014. The cuticle and plant defense to pathogens. Front Plant Sci 5:274. doi:10.3389/fpls.2014.00274. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources