Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 1;59(11):3147-3157.
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa150.

A systematic review exploring the evidence reported to underpin exercise dose in clinical trials of rheumatoid arthritis

Graham Boniface  1 , Varsha Gandhi  1 , Meriel Norris  2 , Esther Williamson  1 , Shona Kirtley  1 , Neil E O'Connell  2
Affiliations

A systematic review exploring the evidence reported to underpin exercise dose in clinical trials of rheumatoid arthritis

Graham Boniface et al. Rheumatology (Oxford). .

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the evidence reported to underpin exercise dose in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using strengthening exercise in RA. We searched six different databases between 1 January 2000 and 3 April 2019. We included RCTs, where a main component of the intervention and/or control used strengthening exercise. Evidence sources cited to underpin dose were judged for their quality, consistency and applicability. Thirty-two RCTs were reviewed. Four (12.5%) piloted the intervention without using dose-escalation designs to determine optimal dose-response. Twenty (62.5%) reported no evidence underpinning dose. Where reported, quality, consistency and applicability of the underpinning evidence was a cause for methodological concern. The majority of RCTs did not report the evidence underpinning dose. When reported, the evidence was often not applicable to the clinical population. Frequently, the dose used differed to the dose reported/recommended by the underpinning evidence. Our findings illustrate exercise dose may not be optimised for use with clinical populations prior to evaluation by RCT.

Keywords: RCT; dose response; exercise; intervention; rheumatoid arthritis; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

<sc>Fig</sc>. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA study flow diagram
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Rheumatoid arthritis in adults: management. NICE guideline [NG100]. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, London, 2018.
    1. Baillet A, Vaillant M, Guinot M, Juvin R, Gaudin P. Efficacy of resistance exercises in rheumatoid arthritis: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Rheumatology 2012;51:519–27. - PubMed
    1. Cairns AP, McVeigh JG. A systematic review of the effects of dynamic exercise in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int 2009;30:147–58. - PubMed
    1. Santo RCE, Fernandes KZ, Lora PS, Filippin LI, Xavier RM. Prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2018;9: 816–25. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cooney JK, Law R, Matschke V et al. Benefits of exercise in rheumatoid arthritis. J Aging Res 2011;2011:1–14. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms