Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May 1;156(5):570-575.
doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.0352.

Association of Afamelanotide With Improved Outcomes in Patients With Erythropoietic Protoporphyria in Clinical Practice

Affiliations

Association of Afamelanotide With Improved Outcomes in Patients With Erythropoietic Protoporphyria in Clinical Practice

Debby Wensink et al. JAMA Dermatol. .

Abstract

Importance: The effectiveness of afamelanotide treatment in patients with erythropoietic protoporphyria (EPP) in clinical practice who experience pain after light exposure that substantially impairs quality of life is unknown.

Objective: To evaluate the association of afamelanotide treatment with outcomes in patients with EPP in regular practice during longer-term follow-up.

Design, setting, and participants: This single-center, prospective postauthorization safety and efficacy cohort study was directed and approved by the European Medicines Agency. Data were collected from patients with EPP treated with afamelanotide at Erasmus MC between June 2016 and September 2018. Analysis began October 2018.

Main outcomes and measures: Time spent outside during treatment, number of phototoxic reactions, disease-specific quality of life, usage of protective clothing, and adverse events.

Results: A total of 117 patients with EPP (59 women [50.4%]; mean [SD] age, 43.0 [15.5] years) were treated with afamelanotide. Nearly all patients continued treatment (115 [98%]) with a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 2.0 (1.3-2.1) years. Compared with baseline, mean time spent outside during treatment increased significantly by an added 6.1 hours per week (95% CI, 3.62-8.67; P < .001). Mean quality of life score improved significantly by 14.01% (95% CI, 4.53%-23.50%; P < .001). Phototoxic reactions were less painful (β, -0.85; 95% CI, -1.43 to -0.26; P < .001), but there was no significant difference in number or duration of reactions. Minor self-limiting adverse events occurred, such as nausea, fatigue, and headache.

Conclusions and relevance: This cohort study found that afamelanotide treatment was associated with improved clinical outcomes and a good safety profile for patients with EPP. The treatment has clinically significant, sustained positive associations with quality of life, is associated with increased duration of sun exposure, and is associated with less severe phototoxic reactions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Drs Wagenmakers and Langendonk report financial support from Clinuvel to cover expenses incurred for data entry for the European Medicines Agency directed afamelanotide registry. Dr Wilson reports grants and travel fees from Clinuvel during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Individual Patient-Reported Time Outside
Before (A) and after (B) treatment with afamelanotide, displayed as total hours spent outside during a week for their best treated period. In panel B, the total length of the bar represents the total hours in the week in which time spent outside was the longest (maximum). The colors provide information on how time spent outside increases over the subsequent visits, until it reaches its maximum. For patients with missing data, before or after treatment, the value 0 was filled in. Each line of data represents the same patient in panel A and panel B. Y indicates year; V, visit.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Porter RM, Anstey A. Evidence and conjecture about mechanisms of cutaneous disease in photodermatology. Exp Dermatol. 2014;23(8):543-546. doi:10.1111/exd.12467 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lecha M, Puy H, Deybach JC. Erythropoietic protoporphyria. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2009;4:19. doi:10.1186/1750-1172-4-19 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bonkovsky HL, Guo JT, Hou W, Li T, Narang T, Thapar M. Porphyrin and heme metabolism and the porphyrias. Compr Physiol. 2013;3(1):365-401. doi:10.1002/cphy.c120006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Holme SA, Anstey AV, Finlay AY, Elder GH, Badminton MN. Erythropoietic protoporphyria in the UK: clinical features and effect on quality of life. Br J Dermatol. 2006;155(3):574-581. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07472.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Todd DJ. Erythropoietic protoporphyria. Br J Dermatol. 1994;131(6):751-766. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.1994.tb08577.x - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms