Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Sep 6;9(9):e032024.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032024.

Using the CONSORT statement to evaluate the completeness of reporting of addiction randomised trials: a cross-sectional review

Matthew Vassar  1 , Sam Jellison  1 , Hannah Wendelbo  1 , Cole Wayant  2 , Harrison Gray  1 , Michael Bibens  1
Affiliations
Review

Using the CONSORT statement to evaluate the completeness of reporting of addiction randomised trials: a cross-sectional review

Matthew Vassar et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: Evaluate the completeness of reporting of addiction randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement.

Setting: Not applicable.

Participants: RCTs identified using a PubMed search of 15 addiction journals and a 5-year cross-section.

Outcome measures: Completeness of reporting.

Results: Our analysis of 394 addiction RCTs found that the mean number of CONSORT items reported was 19.2 (SD 5.2), out of a possible 31. Twelve items were reported in <50% of RCTs; similarly, 12 items were reported in >75% of RCTs. Journal endorsement of CONSORT was found to improve the number of CONSORT items reported.

Conclusions: Poor reporting quality may prohibit readers from critically appraising the methodological quality of addiction trials. We recommend journal endorsement of CONSORT since our study and those previous have shown that CONSORT endorsement improves the quality of reporting.

Keywords: CONSORT; addiction; clinical trials; reporting quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of included and excluded studies. RCT, (drug, alcohol, and tobacco) randomised controlled trial.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Histogram of trial adherence to CONSORT.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sims MT, Henning NM, Wayant CC, et al. . Do emergency medicine journals promote trial registration and adherence to reporting guidelines? A survey of “Instructions for Authors”. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2016;24:137 10.1186/s13049-016-0331-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG, et al. . The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials. BMC Med Res Methodol 2001;1:2 10.1186/1471-2288-1-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lim S, Liang X, Hill B, et al. . A systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention characteristics in postpartum weight management using the TIDieR framework: a summary of evidence to inform implementation. Obes Rev 2019;20:1045–56. 10.1111/obr.12846 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liljeberg E, Andersson A, Lövestam E, et al. . Incomplete descriptions of oral nutritional supplement interventions in reports of randomised controlled trials. Clin Nutr 2018;37:61–71. 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.03.024 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Koffel JB, Rethlefsen ML. Reproducibility of search strategies is poor in systematic reviews published in high-impact pediatrics, cardiology and surgery journals: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One 2016;11:e0163309 10.1371/journal.pone.0163309 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms