Knowledge and understanding of pharmacogenomic testing among patients and health care professionals: A scoping review
- PMID: 31229328
- DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.06.008
Knowledge and understanding of pharmacogenomic testing among patients and health care professionals: A scoping review
Abstract
Objective: To support the introduction of pharmacogenomic tests in current practice, this study identifies the factors associated with a better understanding of the information related to genetic, genomic and/or pharmacogenomic tests by patients and health care professionals.
Methods: Following a scoping review methodology, a search for literature was conducted with keywords related to health literacy and knowledge translation in the context of pharmacogenomic tests. Since only 6 articles were identified, the context of genetic or genomic testing were added to the inclusion criteria, leading to 24 articles.
Results: Fourteen of the studies analyzed focused on genetic predictive, diagnostic or carrier tests, or concerned genetics in general, while ten addressed or included the use of pharmacogenomic tests. Demographic, individual, experiential and contextual factors were associated with a better understanding of the information related to genetic, genomic and/or pharmacogenomic tests among the targeted populations.
Research implications: Our review shows that there is currently little empirical research available to identify the factors to consider in order to develop educational tools and resources specific to pharmacogenomics.
Conclusion: Expanding our review to include genetic and genomic testing factors can serve as a starting point for the evidence to be validated in future empirical research.
Keywords: Health literacy; Knowledge translation; Pharmacogenetics; Pharmacogenomic testing; Scoping review.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Defining the optimum strategy for identifying adults and children with coeliac disease: systematic review and economic modelling.Health Technol Assess. 2022 Oct;26(44):1-310. doi: 10.3310/ZUCE8371. Health Technol Assess. 2022. PMID: 36321689 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015. PMID: 26571290
-
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024. Wellcome Open Res. 2024. PMID: 39839977 Free PMC article.
-
Qualitative evidence synthesis informing our understanding of people's perceptions and experiences of targeted digital communication.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 23;10(10):ED000141. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000141. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31643081 Free PMC article.
-
The use of Open Dialogue in Trauma Informed Care services for mental health consumers and their family networks: A scoping review.J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):681-698. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 17. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024. PMID: 38230967
Cited by
-
Public Attitudes toward Pharmacogenomic Testing and Establishing a Statewide Pharmacogenomics Database in the State of Minnesota.J Pers Med. 2022 Sep 30;12(10):1615. doi: 10.3390/jpm12101615. J Pers Med. 2022. PMID: 36294754 Free PMC article.
-
The New Precision Stewards?J Pers Med. 2022 Aug 12;12(8):1308. doi: 10.3390/jpm12081308. J Pers Med. 2022. PMID: 36013256 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical