Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Sep 27;7(1):147.
doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0819-1.

A review of recent publication trends from top publishing countries

Paul Fontelo  1 , Fang Liu  2
Affiliations
Review

A review of recent publication trends from top publishing countries

Paul Fontelo et al. Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Evidence-based medicine relies on current best evidence from the medical literature, the patient's history, and the clinician's own experience to provide the best care for patients. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis are considered the highest levels of evidence for informing clinical decisions. Recently, reports have shown an increase in the number but a decrease in quality of meta-analysis publications. We reviewed publication trends and determined the countries with the most journal articles and types of publications in PubMed from 1995 to 2015.

Methods: We examined journal entries in PubMed from 1995 to 2015 from top publishing countries for total number of publications and citations in core clinical journals and in specific publication types (systematic reviews, meta-analysis, randomized controlled trials).

Results: Yearly, only 30 countries generated 94.6% of all publications and 98.1% of core clinical journals worldwide. All publication types increased but with a significant increase in meta-analysis publications from China. Collaborative and co-authored papers among the 30 countries also showed an increasing trend.

Conclusion: The USA leads in all publication citations and specific publication types, except for meta-analysis where China publishes more. Collaborative publishing among international collaborators is also increasing.

Keywords: Collaborative publishing; Evidence-based medicine; Meta-analysis; PubMed; Publication type; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The top 10 publishing countries and total number of entries in PubMed from 1995 to 2015
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews all PubMed-indexed publications from 1995 to 2015. Numbers next to the country name indicate 20-year totals
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Percentage of collaborative publications from the five top publishing countries based on each country’s total publications, 2006–2015
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Sackett D. L, Rosenberg W. M C, Gray J A M., Haynes R B., Richardson W S. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ. 1996;312(7023):71–72. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Petrisor B.A., Keating J., Schemitsch E. Grading the evidence: Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation. Injury. 2006;37(4):321–327. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.02.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Patsopoulos Nikolaos A. Relative Citation Impact of Various Study Designs in the Health Sciences. JAMA. 2005;293(19):2362. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.19.2362. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ye Xiao-Fei, Yu Dang-Hui, He Jia. The Rise in Meta-analyses from China. Epidemiology. 2013;24(2):335–336. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31828264be. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ioannidis JP. The mass production of redundant, misleading, and conflicted systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Milbank Q. 2016;94(3):485–514. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12210. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources