Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jun;35(2):121-129.
doi: 10.1111/hir.12213. Epub 2018 Mar 31.

The development of search filters for adverse effects of surgical interventions in medline and Embase

Affiliations
Review

The development of search filters for adverse effects of surgical interventions in medline and Embase

Su Golder et al. Health Info Libr J. 2018 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Search filter development for adverse effects has tended to focus on retrieving studies of drug interventions. However, a different approach is required for surgical interventions.

Objective: To develop and validate search filters for medline and Embase for the adverse effects of surgical interventions.

Methods: Systematic reviews of surgical interventions where the primary focus was to evaluate adverse effect(s) were sought. The included studies within these reviews were divided randomly into a development set, evaluation set and validation set. Using word frequency analysis we constructed a sensitivity maximising search strategy and this was tested in the evaluation and validation set.

Results: Three hundred and fifty eight papers were included from 19 surgical intervention reviews. Three hundred and fifty two papers were available on medline and 348 were available on Embase. Generic adverse effects search strategies in medline and Embase could achieve approximately 90% relative recall. Recall could be further improved with the addition of specific adverse effects terms to the search strategies.

Conclusion: We have derived and validated a novel search filter that has reasonable performance for identifying adverse effects of surgical interventions in medline and Embase. However, we appreciate the limitations of our methods, and recommend further research on larger sample sizes and prospective systematic reviews.

Keywords: EMBASE; medline; information retrieval; literature searching; medical subject headings (MeSH); meta analysis; methodological filters; review; search strategies; searching; systematic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Badgett, R. , Chiquette, E. , Anagnostelis, B. , & Mulrow, C. (1999). Locating reports of serious adverse drug reactions. Paper presented at the 7th Annual Cochrane Colloquium Abstracts, Rome, Italy.
    1. Beynon, R. , Leeflang, M. M. , McDonald, S. , Eisinga, A. , Mitchell, R. L. , Whiting, P. , & Glanville, J. M. (2013). Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (9), Mr000022 10.1002/14651858.MR000022.pub3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Farrah, K. , Mierzwinski‐Urban, M. , & Cimon, K. (2016). Effectiveness of adverse effects search filters: Drugs versus medical devices. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 104, 221–225. 10.3163/1536-5050.104.3.007 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Golder, S. , & Loke, Y. K. (2012a). The performance of adverse effects search filters in MEDLINE and EMBASE. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 29, 141–151. 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2012.00980.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Golder, S. , & Loke, Y. K. (2012b). Failure or success of electronic search strategies to identify adverse effects data. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 100, 130–134. 10.3163/1536-5050.100.2.012 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms