Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Apr;73(2):181-183.
doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2016.11.008. Epub 2016 Dec 24.

The ethics of peer and editorial requests for self-citation of their work and journal

Jaime A Teixeira da Silva  1
Affiliations
Review

The ethics of peer and editorial requests for self-citation of their work and journal

Jaime A Teixeira da Silva. Med J Armed Forces India. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Peer reviewers are expected to be experts in a field of study and should be versed with the pertinent literature related with the manuscript they are reviewing. Editors might not necessarily be experts in a particular field, but they have the responsibility of overseeing the requests made by peers, and assessing whether these are ethically appropriate, or not. Thus, requests by peers to cite unrelated literature, which may or may not be their own literature, could be unethical, especially if the objective is to improve their own citations or to boost the citations of the journal for which they are reviewing. In contrast, requests to cite pertinent work that is in fact missing from the paper's literature, even if it may be the reviewer or editor's work, or from the same journal, is acceptable. Editors ultimately approve the requests and suggestions made by reviewers, so inappropriate suggestions made by peer reviewers are the responsibility of the editor and journal. There needs to be a bias-free mechanism in place that offers protection to authors who wish to complain, and consequences for editors who do not conduct an impartial decision. Authors have the right to challenge such suggestions, but may face unfair retaliation in the form of a rejection if they resist making changes that they perceive as being inappropriate.

Keywords: Citation manipulation; Journal impact factor (JIF); Self-citation; Unrelated or inappropriate references.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Casadevall A., Fang F.C. Impacted science: impact is not importance. mBio. 2015;6(5):e01593–e1615. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Qiu J. Publish or perish in China. Nature. 2010;463:142–143. - PubMed
    1. Nielsen M.B., Seitz K. Impact factors and prediction of popular topics in a journal. Ultraschall Med. 2016;37(4):343–345. - PubMed
    1. Mongeon P., Waltman L., de Rijcke S. 2016. What do we know about journal citation cartels? Some evidence and a call for information.https://www.cwts.nl/blog?article=n-q2w2b4 (accessed 23.10.16)
    1. Biagioli M. Watch out for cheats in citation game. Nature. 2016;535:201. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources