Prediction models for cardiovascular disease risk in the general population: systematic review
- PMID: 27184143
- PMCID: PMC4868251
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i2416
Prediction models for cardiovascular disease risk in the general population: systematic review
Abstract
Objective: To provide an overview of prediction models for risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the general population.
Design: Systematic review.
Data sources: Medline and Embase until June 2013.
Eligibility criteria for study selection: Studies describing the development or external validation of a multivariable model for predicting CVD risk in the general population.
Results: 9965 references were screened, of which 212 articles were included in the review, describing the development of 363 prediction models and 473 external validations. Most models were developed in Europe (n=167, 46%), predicted risk of fatal or non-fatal coronary heart disease (n=118, 33%) over a 10 year period (n=209, 58%). The most common predictors were smoking (n=325, 90%) and age (n=321, 88%), and most models were sex specific (n=250, 69%). Substantial heterogeneity in predictor and outcome definitions was observed between models, and important clinical and methodological information were often missing. The prediction horizon was not specified for 49 models (13%), and for 92 (25%) crucial information was missing to enable the model to be used for individual risk prediction. Only 132 developed models (36%) were externally validated and only 70 (19%) by independent investigators. Model performance was heterogeneous and measures such as discrimination and calibration were reported for only 65% and 58% of the external validations, respectively.
Conclusions: There is an excess of models predicting incident CVD in the general population. The usefulness of most of the models remains unclear owing to methodological shortcomings, incomplete presentation, and lack of external validation and model impact studies. Rather than developing yet another similar CVD risk prediction model, in this era of large datasets, future research should focus on externally validating and comparing head-to-head promising CVD risk models that already exist, on tailoring or even combining these models to local settings, and investigating whether these models can be extended by addition of new predictors.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at
Figures



Comment in
-
Predicting cardiovascular disease.BMJ. 2016 May 16;353:i2621. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2621. BMJ. 2016. PMID: 27185596 No abstract available.
-
Author's reply to Woodward.BMJ. 2016 Aug 16;354:i4485. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4485. BMJ. 2016. PMID: 27530225 No abstract available.
-
On validation of cardiovascular risk scores.BMJ. 2016 Aug 16;354:i4483. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4483. BMJ. 2016. PMID: 27530313 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Cardiovascular disease risk prediction models in the Chinese population- a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Public Health. 2022 Aug 24;22(1):1608. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13995-z. BMC Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35999550 Free PMC article.
-
One Heartbeat Away from a Prediction Model for Cardiovascular Diseases in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review.Cardiorenal Med. 2023;13(1):109-142. doi: 10.1159/000529791. Epub 2023 Feb 20. Cardiorenal Med. 2023. PMID: 36806550 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Performance of the Framingham risk models and pooled cohort equations for predicting 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Med. 2019 Jun 13;17(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1340-7. BMC Med. 2019. PMID: 31189462 Free PMC article.
-
Performance of prediction models for nephropathy in people with type 2 diabetes: systematic review and external validation study.BMJ. 2021 Sep 28;374:n2134. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2134. BMJ. 2021. PMID: 34583929 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review of prognostic prediction models for acute kidney injury (AKI) in general hospital populations.BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 27;7(9):e016591. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016591. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 28963291 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The prognostic role of inflammation score in patients with gastric cancer following Da Vinci robot surgery.J Robot Surg. 2024 Oct 29;18(1):385. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02142-y. J Robot Surg. 2024. PMID: 39470895 No abstract available.
-
The Impact of the 2019 European Guideline for Cardiovascular Risk Management: A Cross-Sectional Study in General Practice.J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 7;9(7):2140. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072140. J Clin Med. 2020. PMID: 32645925 Free PMC article.
-
The Application of Mendelian Randomization in Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction: Current Status and Future Prospects.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jul 11;25(7):262. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2507262. eCollection 2024 Jul. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024. PMID: 39139440 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Statistical Learning Methods Applicable to Genome-Wide Association Studies on Unbalanced Case-Control Disease Data.Genes (Basel). 2021 May 13;12(5):736. doi: 10.3390/genes12050736. Genes (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34068248 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Construction and Validation of a Predictive Model for Coronary Artery Disease Using Extreme Gradient Boosting.J Inflamm Res. 2024 Jul 1;17:4163-4174. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S464489. eCollection 2024. J Inflamm Res. 2024. PMID: 38973999 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Eckel RH, Jakicic JM, Ard JD, et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2013 AHA/ACC guideline on lifestyle management to reduce cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2014;129(Suppl 2):S76-99. 10.1161/01.cir.0000437740.48606.d1. pmid:24222015. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Alwan A. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010: World Health Organization, 2011. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44579/1/9789240686458_eng.pdf.
-
- Anderson KM, Odell PM, Wilson PW, Kannel WB. Cardiovascular disease risk profiles. Am Heart J 1991;121:293-8. 10.1016/0002-8703(91)90861-B. pmid:1985385. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Anderson KM, Wilson PW, Odell PM, Kannel WB. An updated coronary risk profile. A statement for health professionals. Circulation 1991;83:356-62. 10.1161/01.CIR.83.1.356. pmid:1984895. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Wilson PW, D’Agostino RB, Levy D, Belanger AM, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation 1998;97:1837-47. 10.1161/01.CIR.97.18.1837. pmid:9603539. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources