Network Meta-analysis for Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Case Study on First-Line Medical Therapies for Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma
- PMID: 27088551
- PMCID: PMC5154244
- DOI: 10.7326/M15-2367
Network Meta-analysis for Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Case Study on First-Line Medical Therapies for Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma
Abstract
Background: Network meta-analysis compares multiple treatment options for the same condition and may be useful for developing clinical practice guidelines.
Purpose: To compare treatment recommendations for first-line medical therapy for primary open angle-glaucoma (POAG) from major updates of American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) guidelines with the evidence available at the time, using network meta-analysis.
Data sources: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched on 11 March 2014 for randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) of glaucoma monotherapies compared with placebo, vehicle, or no treatment or other monotherapies. The AAO Web site was searched in August 2014 to identify AAO POAG guidelines.
Study selection: Eligible RCTs were selected by 2 independent reviewers, and guidelines were selected by 1 person.
Data extraction: One person abstracted recommendations from guidelines and a second person verified. Two people independently abstracted data from included RCTs.
Data synthesis: Guidelines were grouped together on the basis of literature search dates, and RCTs that existed at 1991, 1995, 1999, 2004, and 2009 were analyzed. The outcome of interest was intraocular pressure (IOP) at 3 months. Only the latest guideline made a specific recommendation: prostaglandins. Network meta-analyses showed that all treatments were superior to placebo in decreasing IOP at 3 months. The mean reductions (95% credible intervals [CrIs]) for the highest-ranking class compared with placebo were as follows: 1991: β-blockers, 4.01 (CrI, 0.48 to 7.43); 1995: α2-adrenergic agonists, 5.64 (CrI, 1.73 to 9.50); 1999: prostaglandins, 5.43 (CrI, 3.38 to 7.38); 2004: prostaglandins, 4.75 (CrI, 3.11 to 6.44); 2009: prostaglandins, 4.58 (CrI, 2.94 to 6.24).
Limitation: When comparisons are informed by a small number of studies, the treatment effects and rankings may not be stable.
Conclusion: For timely recommendations when multiple treatment options are available, guidelines developers should consider network meta-analysis.
Primary funding source: National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Defining the optimum strategy for identifying adults and children with coeliac disease: systematic review and economic modelling.Health Technol Assess. 2022 Oct;26(44):1-310. doi: 10.3310/ZUCE8371. Health Technol Assess. 2022. PMID: 36321689 Free PMC article.
-
Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 6;2013(6):CD008933. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008933.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 23744561 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3. Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 39593159 Free PMC article.
-
Medical versus surgical interventions for open angle glaucoma.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD004399. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004399.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 22972069 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Bortezomib in multiple myeloma and lymphoma: a systematic review and clinical practice guideline.Curr Oncol. 2006 Oct;13(5):160-72. doi: 10.3747/co.v13i5.106. Curr Oncol. 2006. PMID: 22792013 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Multiple Outcomes in Dental Research.J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2020 Mar;20(1):101403. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2020.101403. Epub 2020 Jan 29. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2020. PMID: 32381410 Free PMC article.
-
Network meta-analysis: an introduction for clinicians.Intern Emerg Med. 2017 Feb;12(1):103-111. doi: 10.1007/s11739-016-1583-7. Epub 2016 Dec 2. Intern Emerg Med. 2017. PMID: 27913917 Free PMC article.
-
Mechanisms of Qing-Gan Li-Shui Formulation in Ameliorating Primary Open Angle Glaucoma: An Analysis Based on Network Pharmacology.Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Jul 20;2022:8336131. doi: 10.1155/2022/8336131. eCollection 2022. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022. PMID: 35911154 Free PMC article.
-
Network meta-analyses should be the highest level of evidence in treatment guidelines.Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2016 Sep;266(6):477-80. doi: 10.1007/s00406-016-0715-4. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2016. PMID: 27435721 No abstract available.
-
Visualizing the evolution of evidence: Cumulative network meta-analyses of new generation antidepressants in the last 40 years.Res Synth Methods. 2021 Jan;12(1):74-85. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1413. Epub 2020 May 25. Res Synth Methods. 2021. PMID: 32352639 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Graham R, Mancher M, Wolman DM, Greenfield S, Steinberg E, editors. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. National Academies Pr; Washington, DC: 2011. - PubMed
-
- Eddy DM. Evidence-based medicine: a unified approach. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005;24:9–17. PMID: 15647211. - PubMed
-
- Eden J, Wheatley B, McNeil B, Sox H, editors. Knowing What Works in Health Care: A Roadmap for the Nation. National Academies Pr; Washington, DC: 2008.
-
- Tricoci P, Allen JM, Kramer JM, Califf RM, Smith SC., Jr Scientific evidence underlying the ACC/AHA clinical practice guidelines. JAMA. 2009;301:831–41. [PMID: 19244190] doi:10.1001/jama.2009.205. - PubMed
-
- Salanti G. Indirect and mixed-treatment comparison, network, or multiple-treatments meta-analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool. Res Synth Methods. 2012;3:80–97. [PMID: 26062083] doi:10.1002/jrsm.1037. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources