Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Dec 30;5(12):e008431.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008431.

Reporting missing participant data in randomised trials: systematic survey of the methodological literature and a proposed guide

Affiliations
Review

Reporting missing participant data in randomised trials: systematic survey of the methodological literature and a proposed guide

Elie A Akl et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: We conducted a systematic survey of the methodological literature to identify recommended approaches for how and what randomised clinical trial (RCT) authors should report on missing participant data and, on the basis of these approaches, to propose guidance for RCT authors.

Methods: We defined missing participant data (MPD) as missing outcome data for trial participants. We considered both categorical and continuous outcome data. We searched MEDLINE and the Cochrane Methodology Register for articles in which authors proposed approaches to reporting MPD from RCTs. We selected eligible articles independently and in duplicate and extracted data in duplicate. Using an iterative process of discussion and revisions, we used the findings to develop guidance.

Results: Of 10,501 unique citations identified, 13 articles reporting on 10 approaches proved eligible. The identified approaches recommend reporting the following aspects (from most to least frequently recommended): number of participants with MPD (n=10), reasons for MPD (n=7), methods used to handle MPD in the analysis (n=4), flow of participants (n=3), pattern of missingness (eg, whether at random) (n=3), differences in rates of MPD between trial arms (n=2), differences between participants with and without MPD (n=2), results of any sensitivity analyses (n=2), implication of MPD on interpreting the results (n=2) and methods used to prevent missing data (n=1). We propose a guide with nine items related to reporting the number, reasons, patterns, analytical methods and interpretation of MPD.

Conclusions: Most identified approaches invite trial authors to report the extent of MPD and the underlying reasons. Fewer approaches focus on reporting missingness patterns, methods for handling MPD and implications of MPD on results. Our proposed guidance could help RCT authors to better report, and readers to better identify participants with missing data.

Keywords: EPIDEMIOLOGY; Missing participant data; Randomized clinical trials; Systematic reviews.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow diagram (MPD, missing participant data).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Akl EA, Briel M, You JJ et al. . Potential impact on estimated treatment effects of information lost to follow-up in randomised controlled trials (LOST-IT): systematic review. BMJ 2012;344:e2809 10.1136/bmj.e2809 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sylvestre Y. CONSORT: missing data guidelines, the effects on HTA monograph reporting. Trials 2011;12(Suppl 1):A61 10.1186/1745-6215-12-S1-A61 - DOI
    1. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:834–40. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Calvert M, Blazeby J, Altman DG et al. . Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in randomized trials: the CONSORT PRO extension JAMA 2013;309:814–22. 10.1001/jama.2013.879 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ioannidis JP, Evans SJ, Gøtzsche PC et al. . Better reporting of harms in randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:781–8. 10.7326/0003-4819-141-10-200411160-00009 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources