Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Sep 12;3(1):20.
doi: 10.1186/2191-1991-3-20.

Review of economic evidence in the prevention and early detection of colorectal cancer

Affiliations

Review of economic evidence in the prevention and early detection of colorectal cancer

Kim E Jeong et al. Health Econ Rev. .

Abstract

This paper aims to systematically review the cost-effectiveness evidence, and to provide a critical appraisal of the methods used in the model-based economic evaluation of CRC screening and subsequent surveillance. A search strategy was developed to capture relevant evidence published 1999-November 2012. Databases searched were MEDLINE, EMBASE, National Health Service Economic Evaluation (NHS EED), EconLit, and HTA. Full economic evaluations that considered costs and health outcomes of relevant intervention were included. Sixty-eight studies which used either cohort simulation or individual-level simulation were included. Follow-up strategies were mostly embedded in the screening model. Approximately 195 comparisons were made across different modalities; however, strategies modelled were often simplified due to insufficient evidence and comparators chosen insufficiently reflected current practice/recommendations. Studies used up-to-date evidence on the diagnostic test performance combined with outdated information on CRC treatments. Quality of life relating to follow-up surveillance is rare. Quality of life relating to CRC disease states was largely taken from a single study. Some studies omitted to say how identified adenomas or CRC were managed. Besides deterministic sensitivity analysis, probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) was undertaken in some studies, but the distributions used for PSA were rarely reported or justified. The cost-effectiveness of follow-up strategies among people with confirmed adenomas are warranted in aiding evidence-informed decision making in response to the rapidly evolving technologies and rising expectations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Included studies.
Figure 2
Figure 2
At a glance. Barium enema (BE) (brown solid) and colonoscopy (BE + COL) (brown dotted), Capsule endoscopy (CapEndo) (green solid), Computerised-tomography colonography (CTC) (grey solid), Computerised-tomography colonography followed by colonoscopy (CTCCOL), Colonoscopy (COL) (red solid), Narrow-band imaging (NBI) (purple dotted), No intervention (black solid). Sigmoidoscopy (SIG) (turquoise solid). Sigmoidoscopy combined with barium enema (SIG + BE) (olive green dashed). Stool tests (blue solid). Stool tests combined with BE (stool tests + BE) (brown solide). Stool tests combined with COL (stool tests + COL) (red dotted), Stool tests combined with SIG (stool tests + SIG) (turquoise dotted), ‘+’ combination of tests,‘’ sequence of test.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Martinez ME, Baron JA, Lieberman DA, Schatzkin A, Lanza E, Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Jiang R, Ahnen DJ, Bond JH, Church TR, Robertson DJ, Smith-Warner SA, Jacobs ET, Alberts DS, Greenberg ER. A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses after colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology. 2009;3(3):832–841. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN. et al.Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med. 1993;3:658–662. - PubMed
    1. Muto T, Bussey HRJ, Morson BC. The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer. 1975;3:2250–2270. - PubMed
    1. Olsen AH, Lawrence W, Snook E. et al.Risk factors and screening techniques in 500 patients with benign and malignant polyps. Dis Colon Rectum. 1988;3:216–221. - PubMed
    1. Atkin WS, Edwards R, Kralj-Hans I, Wooldrage K, Hart AR, Northover JM, Parkin DM, Wardle J, Duffy SW, Cuzik J. UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Trial Investigators. Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;3(9726):1624–1633. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources