Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Mar-Apr;20(2):363-8.
doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001075. Epub 2012 Sep 27.

MEDLINE clinical queries are robust when searching in recent publishing years

Nancy L Wilczynski  1 , K Ann McKibbon, Stephen D Walter, Amit X Garg, R Brian Haynes
Affiliations

MEDLINE clinical queries are robust when searching in recent publishing years

Nancy L Wilczynski et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To determine if the PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE clinical queries (which were developed in the publishing year 2000, for the purpose categories therapy, diagnosis, prognosis, etiology, and clinical prediction guides) perform as well when searching in current publishing years.

Methods: A gold standard database of recently published research literature was created using the McMaster health knowledge refinery (http://hiru.mcmaster.ca/hiru/HIRU_McMaster_HKR.aspx) and its continuously updated database, McMaster PLUS (http://hiru.mcmaster.ca/hiru/HIRU_McMaster_PLUS_projects.aspx). This database contains articles from over 120 clinical journals that are tagged for meeting or not meeting criteria for scientific merit and clinical relevance. The clinical queries sensitive ('broad') and specific ('narrow') search filters were tested in this gold standard database, and sensitivity and specificity were calculated and compared with those originally reported for the clinical queries.

Results: In all cases, the sensitivity of the highly sensitive search filters and the specificity of the highly specific search filters did not differ substantively when comparing results derived in 2000 with those derived in a more current database. In addition, in all cases, the specificities for the highly sensitive search filters and the sensitivities for the highly specific search filters remained above 50% when testing them in the current database.

Discussion: These results are reassuring for modern-day searchers. The clinical queries that were derived in the year 2000 perform equally well a decade later.

Conclusion: The PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE clinical queries have been revalidated and remain a useful public resource for searching the world's medical literature for research that is most relevant to clinical care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health. Fact Sheet MEDLINE. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/medline.html (accessed 5 Apr 2012).
    1. Cullen RJ. In search of evidence: family practitioners’ use of the Internet for clinical information. J Med Libr Assoc 2002;90:370–9 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Westbrook JI, Gosling AS, Coiera E. Do clinicians use online evidence to support patient care? A study of 55,000 clinicians. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004;11:113–20 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schwartz KL, Roe T, Northup J, et al. Family medicine patients’ use of the Internet for health information: a MetroNet study. J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:39–45 - PubMed
    1. Peterson G, Aslani P, Williams KA. How do consumers search for and appraise information on medicines on the Internet? A qualitative study using focus groups. J Med Intern Res 2003;5:e33 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types