Comparison of the efficacy of three PubMed search filters in finding randomized controlled trials to answer clinical questions
- PMID: 20846321
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01554.x
Comparison of the efficacy of three PubMed search filters in finding randomized controlled trials to answer clinical questions
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the performance of three search methods in the retrieval of relevant clinical trials from PubMed to answer specific clinical questions.
Methods: Included studies of a sample of 100 Cochrane reviews which recorded in PubMed were considered as the reference standard. The search queries were formulated based on the systematic review titles. Precision, recall and number of retrieved records for limiting the results to clinical trial publication type, and using sensitive and specific clinical queries filters were compared. The number of keywords, presence of specific names of intervention and syndrome in the search keywords were used in a model to predict the recalls and precisions.
Results: The Clinical queries-sensitive search strategy retrieved the largest number of records (33) and had the highest recall (41.6%) and lowest precision (4.8%). The presence of specific intervention name was the only significant predictor of all recalls and precisions (P = 0.016).
Conclusion: The recall and precision of combination of simple clinical search queries and methodological search filters to find clinical trials in various subjects were considerably low. The limit field strategy yielded in higher precision and fewer retrieved records and approximately similar recall, compared with the clinical queries-sensitive strategy. Presence of specific intervention name in the search keywords increased both recall and precision.
Keywords: PubMed; clinical trials; precision; recall; search filters.
© 2010 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of PubMed filters used for evidence-based searching: validation using relative recall.J Med Libr Assoc. 2009 Jul;97(3):186-93. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.97.3.007. J Med Libr Assoc. 2009. PMID: 19626144 Free PMC article.
-
An alternative to the hand searching gold standard: validating methodological search filters using relative recall.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Jul 18;6:33. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-33. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006. PMID: 16848895 Free PMC article.
-
Improving efficacy of PubMed Clinical Queries for retrieving scientifically strong studies on treatment.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Sep-Oct;13(5):485-7. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2084. Epub 2006 Jun 23. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006. PMID: 16799123 Free PMC article.
-
Sensitivity and predictive value of 15 PubMed search strategies to answer clinical questions rated against full systematic reviews.J Med Internet Res. 2012 Jun 12;14(3):e85. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2021. J Med Internet Res. 2012. PMID: 22693047 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Use of methodological search filters to identify diagnostic accuracy studies can lead to the omission of relevant studies.J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Mar;59(3):234-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.014. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006. PMID: 16488353 Review.
Cited by
-
Search strategies to identify observational studies in MEDLINE and Embase.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 12;3(3):MR000041. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000041.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 30860595 Free PMC article.
-
Retrieving clinical evidence: a comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar for quick clinical searches.J Med Internet Res. 2013 Aug 15;15(8):e164. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2624. J Med Internet Res. 2013. PMID: 23948488 Free PMC article.
-
The current landscape of spatial biomarkers for prediction of response to immune checkpoint inhibition.NPJ Precis Oncol. 2024 Aug 13;8(1):178. doi: 10.1038/s41698-024-00671-1. NPJ Precis Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39138341 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
