Prone positioning in patients with moderate and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 19903918
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.1614
Prone positioning in patients with moderate and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Context: Post hoc analysis of a previous trial has suggested that prone positioning may improve survival in patients with severe hypoxemia and with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
Objective: To assess possible outcome benefits of prone positioning in patients with moderate and severe hypoxemia who are affected by ARDS.
Design, setting, and patients: The Prone-Supine II Study, a multicenter, unblinded, randomized controlled trial conducted in 23 centers in Italy and 2 in Spain. Patients were 342 adults with ARDS receiving mechanical ventilation, enrolled from February 2004 through June 2008 and prospectively stratified into subgroups with moderate (n = 192) and severe (n = 150) hypoxemia.
Interventions: Patients were randomized to undergo supine (n = 174) or prone (20 hours per day; n = 168) positioning during ventilation.
Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were 6-month mortality and mortality at intensive care unit discharge, organ dysfunctions, and the complication rate related to prone positioning.
Results: Prone and supine patients from the entire study population had similar 28-day (31.0% vs 32.8%; relative risk [RR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-1.13; P = .72) and 6-month (47.0% vs 52.3%; RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.73-1.11; P = .33) mortality rates, despite significantly higher complication rates in the prone group. Outcomes were also similar for patients with moderate hypoxemia in the prone and supine groups at 28 days (25.5% vs 22.5%; RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.89-1.22; P = .62) and at 6 months (42.6% vs 43.9%; RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.76-1.25; P = .85). The 28-day mortality of patients with severe hypoxemia was 37.8% in the prone and 46.1% in the supine group (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.66-1.14; P = .31), while their 6-month mortality was 52.7% and 63.2%, respectively (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.53-1.14; P = .19).
Conclusion: Data from this study indicate that prone positioning does not provide significant survival benefit in patients with ARDS or in subgroups of patients with moderate and severe hypoxemia.
Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00159939.
Comment in
-
Improving outcomes in critically ill patients: the seduction of physiology.JAMA. 2009 Nov 11;302(18):2030-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1653. JAMA. 2009. PMID: 19903926 No abstract available.
-
Prone positioning in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.JAMA. 2010 Mar 3;303(9):832; author reply 832-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.183. JAMA. 2010. PMID: 20197525 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Effects of systematic prone positioning in hypoxemic acute respiratory failure: a randomized controlled trial.JAMA. 2004 Nov 17;292(19):2379-87. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.19.2379. JAMA. 2004. PMID: 15547166 Clinical Trial.
-
Prone Position for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Oct;14(Supplement_4):S280-S288. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201704-343OT. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017. PMID: 29068269 Review.
-
Effect of prone positioning on clinical outcomes in children with acute lung injury: a randomized controlled trial.JAMA. 2005 Jul 13;294(2):229-37. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.2.229. JAMA. 2005. PMID: 16014597 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The efficacy and safety of prone positional ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome: updated study-level meta-analysis of 11 randomized controlled trials.Crit Care Med. 2014 May;42(5):1252-62. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000122. Crit Care Med. 2014. PMID: 24368348
-
Should Early Prone Positioning Be a Standard of Care in ARDS With Refractory Hypoxemia?Respir Care. 2016 Jun;61(6):818-29. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04562. Respir Care. 2016. PMID: 27235316 Review.
Cited by
-
[Prone positioning in Covid-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and invasive mechanical ventilation].Enferm Intensiva. 2023 Apr-Jun;34(2):80-89. doi: 10.1016/j.enfi.2022.09.002. Epub 2022 Oct 24. Enferm Intensiva. 2023. PMID: 36311904 Free PMC article. Spanish.
-
Incidence and Determinants of Acute Kidney Injury after Prone Positioning in Severe COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Nov 4;11(21):2903. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11212903. Healthcare (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37958047 Free PMC article.
-
Oxygenation improves during the first 8 h of extended-duration prone positioning in patients with respiratory failure: a retrospective study.J Intensive Care. 2014 Sep 5;2(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s40560-014-0052-5. eCollection 2014. J Intensive Care. 2014. PMID: 25705410 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical review: Intra-abdominal hypertension: does it influence the physiology of prone ventilation?Crit Care. 2010;14(4):232. doi: 10.1186/cc9099. Epub 2010 Aug 27. Crit Care. 2010. PMID: 20804560 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ventilator-induced lung injury: historical perspectives and clinical implications.Ann Intensive Care. 2011 Jul 23;1(1):28. doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-1-28. Ann Intensive Care. 2011. PMID: 21906379 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources