The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: survey of major general medical journals
- PMID: 19010643
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.05.013
The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: survey of major general medical journals
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the quality of reporting of abstracts describing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in four major general medical journals.
Study design and setting: Systematic survey of published RCT abstracts, with two reviewers independently extracting data. We searched MEDLINE and identified 227 RCT abstracts published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), British Medical Journal (BMJ), and The Lancet in the year 2006.
Results: Most abstracts identified the study as a randomized trial (98.7%), reported the objectives (92.5%), described the population (90.3%), detailed the intervention (81.5%), and defined the primary outcome (71.3%). Methodological quality was poorly reported: one (0.4%) described allocation concealment; 21 (9.3%) clearly specified blinding; 51 (22.5%) described intention-to-treat analysis; and 32 (14.1%) outlined losses to follow-up. Most of the abstracts reported the effect size and the confidence intervals (62.3%), but just half of them reported side effects or harms.
Conclusion: The quality of reporting of RCT abstracts published in main general medical journals is suboptimal. Space limitations notwithstanding, with the recent recommendations from the CONSORT for Abstracts, it is expected that the transparency of abstract reporting can and should improve.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of adherence to the CONSORT statement for quality of reports on randomized controlled trial abstracts from four high-impact general medical journals.Trials. 2012 Jun 7;13:77. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-77. Trials. 2012. PMID: 22676267 Free PMC article.
-
Quality of abstracts describing randomized trials in the proceedings of American Society of Clinical Oncology meetings: guidelines for improved reporting.J Clin Oncol. 2004 May 15;22(10):1993-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.07.199. J Clin Oncol. 2004. PMID: 15143092
-
Quality of trials reported as conference abstracts in China: how well are they reported?Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Oct;25(4):479-84. doi: 10.1017/S0266462309990365. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009. PMID: 19845978
-
Quality of reporting of key methodological items of randomized controlled trials in clinical ophthalmic journals.Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2007 Nov-Dec;14(6):390-8. doi: 10.1080/09286580701344399. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2007. PMID: 18161613 Review.
-
Reporting in randomized clinical trials improved after adoption of the CONSORT statement.J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Mar;60(3):241-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.06.016. Epub 2006 Oct 2. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007. PMID: 17292017 Review.
Cited by
-
Active ingredients are reported more often for pharmacologic than non-pharmacologic interventions: an illustrative review of reporting practices in titles and abstracts.Trials. 2013 May 20;14:146. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-146. Trials. 2013. PMID: 23688143 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11(11):MR000030. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000030.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 23152285 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Assessment of adherence to the CONSORT statement for quality of reports on randomized controlled trial abstracts from four high-impact general medical journals.Trials. 2012 Jun 7;13:77. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-77. Trials. 2012. PMID: 22676267 Free PMC article.
-
Reporting of abstracts in studies that used routinely collected data for exploring drug treatment effects: a cross-sectional survey.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Jan 7;22(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01482-9. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022. PMID: 34996370 Free PMC article.
-
A review of 17 years of application of partnership care model on the consequences of chronic diseases: Describing and assessing the quality of the methodology of papers.Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020 Feb 18;34:7. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.34.7. eCollection 2020. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020. PMID: 32284931 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
