Analysis of queries sent to PubMed at the point of care: observation of search behaviour in a medical teaching hospital
- PMID: 18816391
- PMCID: PMC2567311
- DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-42
Analysis of queries sent to PubMed at the point of care: observation of search behaviour in a medical teaching hospital
Abstract
Background: The use of PubMed to answer daily medical care questions is limited because it is challenging to retrieve a small set of relevant articles and time is restricted. Knowing what aspects of queries are likely to retrieve relevant articles can increase the effectiveness of PubMed searches. The objectives of our study were to identify queries that are likely to retrieve relevant articles by relating PubMed search techniques and tools to the number of articles retrieved and the selection of articles for further reading.
Methods: This was a prospective observational study of queries regarding patient-related problems sent to PubMed by residents and internists in internal medicine working in an Academic Medical Centre. We analyzed queries, search results, query tools (Mesh, Limits, wildcards, operators), selection of abstract and full-text for further reading, using a portal that mimics PubMed.
Results: PubMed was used to solve 1121 patient-related problems, resulting in 3205 distinct queries. Abstracts were viewed in 999 (31%) of these queries, and in 126 (39%) of 321 queries using query tools. The average term count per query was 2.5. Abstracts were selected in more than 40% of queries using four or five terms, increasing to 63% if the use of four or five terms yielded 2-161 articles.
Conclusion: Queries sent to PubMed by physicians at our hospital during daily medical care contain fewer than three terms. Queries using four to five terms, retrieving less than 161 article titles, are most likely to result in abstract viewing. PubMed search tools are used infrequently by our population and are less effective than the use of four or five terms. Methods to facilitate the formulation of precise queries, using more relevant terms, should be the focus of education and research.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Search results outliers among MEDLINE platforms.J Med Libr Assoc. 2019 Jul;107(3):364-373. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2019.622. Epub 2019 Jul 1. J Med Libr Assoc. 2019. PMID: 31258442 Free PMC article.
-
A day in the life of PubMed: analysis of a typical day's query log.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Mar-Apr;14(2):212-20. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2191. Epub 2007 Jan 9. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007. PMID: 17213501 Free PMC article.
-
Finding query suggestions for PubMed.AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2009 Nov 14;2009:396-400. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2009. PMID: 20351887 Free PMC article.
-
Sensitivity and predictive value of 15 PubMed search strategies to answer clinical questions rated against full systematic reviews.J Med Internet Res. 2012 Jun 12;14(3):e85. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2021. J Med Internet Res. 2012. PMID: 22693047 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Literature search using PubMed: an essential tool for practicing evidence- based medicine.J Assoc Physicians India. 2006 Apr;54:303-8. J Assoc Physicians India. 2006. PMID: 16944614 Review.
Cited by
-
Classification of Clinically Useful Sentences in MEDLINE.AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2015 Nov 5;2015:2015-24. eCollection 2015. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2015. PMID: 26958301 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing patient characteristics, type of intervention, control, and outcome (PICO) queries with unguided searching: a randomized controlled crossover trial.J Med Libr Assoc. 2012 Apr;100(2):121-6. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.100.2.010. J Med Libr Assoc. 2012. PMID: 22514508 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Online Searching as a Practice for Evidence-Based Medicine in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, University of Malaya Medical Center, Malaysia: Cross-sectional Study.JMIR Form Res. 2022 Apr 6;6(4):e30687. doi: 10.2196/30687. JMIR Form Res. 2022. PMID: 35384844 Free PMC article.
-
Increasing the quantity and quality of searching for current best evidence to answer clinical questions: protocol and intervention design of the MacPLUS FS Factorial Randomized Controlled Trials.Implement Sci. 2014 Sep 20;9:125. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0125-9. Implement Sci. 2014. PMID: 25239537 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Automatic identification of high impact articles in PubMed to support clinical decision making.J Biomed Inform. 2017 Sep;73:95-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.07.015. Epub 2017 Jul 26. J Biomed Inform. 2017. PMID: 28756159 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Schwartz K, Northrup J, Israel N, Crowell K, Lauder N, Neale AV. Use of on-line evidence-based resources at the point of care. Fam Med. 2003;35:251–256. - PubMed
-
- Davidoff F, Florance V. The informationist: a new health profession? Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:996–998. - PubMed
-
- Straus SE, Richardson WS, Glasziou P, Haynes RB. Evidence-based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2005.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources