A qualitative study of evidence in primary care: what the practitioners are saying
- PMID: 12074118
- PMCID: PMC113797
A qualitative study of evidence in primary care: what the practitioners are saying
Abstract
Background: Little is known about the impact of evidence-based medicine in primary care. Our objective was to explore the influence of evidence on day-to-day family practice, with specific reference to cardiovascular disease.
Methods: A total of 9 focus groups were conducted in rural, semi-urban and urban settings in Nova Scotia. The participants were 50 family physicians who had practised in their communities for more than 1 year and who were treating patients with cardiovascular disease.
Findings: Two major themes emerged: evidence in the clinical encounter and the culture of evidence. The family physicians reported thinking about evidence during the clinical encounter but still situated that evidence within the specific context of their patients and their communities. They appreciated evidence that had been appraised, summarized and published as a guideline by an independent national organization. Evidence remained in the forefront of consciousness for a limited time frame. Local specialists, trusted because of their previous successes with shared patient care, were important sources and interpreters of evidence.
Interpretation: Day-to-day family practice offers both obstacles and opportunities for the application of evidence. Although evidence is an important part of clinical practice, it is not absolute and is considered along with many other factors.
Similar articles
-
Evidence-based cardiovascular care. Family physicians' views of obstacles and opportunities.Can Fam Physician. 2004 Oct;50:1397-405. Can Fam Physician. 2004. PMID: 15526877 Free PMC article.
-
Population-based evaluation of the management of antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation.Can J Cardiol. 2005 Mar;21(3):257-66. Can J Cardiol. 2005. PMID: 15776115
-
Orthopaedists' and family practitioners' knowledge of simple low back pain management.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jul 1;34(15):1600-3. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a96622. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009. PMID: 19564770
-
Why are physicians not persuaded by scientific evidence? A grounded theory interview study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Jul 27;6:92. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-92. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006. PMID: 16872522 Free PMC article.
-
[General practitioners who do not follow practice guidelines--may they have reasons not to?].Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2008 Oct 9;128(19):2218-20. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2008. PMID: 18846149 Norwegian. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Randomised controlled trials for evaluating the prescribing impact of information meetings led by pharmacists and of new information formats, in General Practice in Italy.BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Sep 28;7:158. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-158. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007. PMID: 17903266 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A real-world approach to Evidence-Based Medicine in general practice: a competency framework derived from a systematic review and Delphi process.BMC Med Educ. 2017 May 3;17(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0916-1. BMC Med Educ. 2017. PMID: 28468646 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evidence-based cardiovascular care in the community: a population-based cross-sectional study.BMC Fam Pract. 2004 Apr 1;5:6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-5-6. BMC Fam Pract. 2004. PMID: 15059290 Free PMC article.
-
Evolution of a mature clinical informationist model.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 May-Jun;12(3):249-55. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1726. Epub 2005 Jan 31. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005. PMID: 15684125 Free PMC article.
-
Family physicians and dementia in Canada: Part 1. Clinical practice guidelines: awareness, attitudes, and opinions.Can Fam Physician. 2009 May;55(5):506-7.e1-5. Can Fam Physician. 2009. PMID: 19439707 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Evidence-based medicine: a new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 1992;268(17):2420-5. - PubMed
-
- van Weel CV, Knottnerus JA. Evidence-based interventions and comprehensive treatment. Lancet 1999;353:916-8. - PubMed
-
- Rosser WW. Application of evidence from randomised controlled trials to general practice. Lancet 1999;353:661-4. - PubMed
-
- Culpepper L, Gilbert TT. Evidence and ethics. Lancet 1999;353:829-31. - PubMed
-
- Mant D. Can randomised trials inform clinical decisions about individual patients? Lancet 1999;353:743-6. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources