{"id":21223,"date":"2021-05-27T11:00:25","date_gmt":"2021-05-27T15:00:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/circulatingnow.nlm.nih.gov\/?p=21223"},"modified":"2024-10-21T10:57:55","modified_gmt":"2024-10-21T14:57:55","slug":"dissecting-gender-reframing-anatomical-history-through-the-female-body","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/circulatingnow.nlm.nih.gov\/2021\/05\/27\/dissecting-gender-reframing-anatomical-history-through-the-female-body\/","title":{"rendered":"Dissecting Gender: Reframing Anatomical History Through the Female Body"},"content":{"rendered":"

Allison Hill-Edgar<\/a>, MD, MFA will speak<\/a> on Thursday, June 3, 2021 at 2:00 PM ET. This program will be live-streamed<\/a> globally, and archived<\/a>, by NIH VideoCasting<\/a>. <\/em>Dr. Hill-Edgar is an Artist and Independent Scholar and a Lecturer at the Fenimore Art Museum, Cooperstown, NY and a 2020 NLM Michael E. DeBakey Fellow in the History of Medicine<\/a>.<\/em> Circulating Now interviewed her about her research and <\/em>upcoming <\/em>talk<\/em>.<\/em><\/p>\n

Circulating Now:<\/strong> Tell us a little about yourself. Where are you from? What do you do? What is your typical workday like?\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"A<\/a>Allison Hill-Edgar: <\/strong>As a visual artist, art historian, and MD, the intersection of medicine, art, and gender has been central to my work for many years. I have a BA from Harvard in Art History, an MD from Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons<\/span>, and an MFA in painting from the New York Academy of Art. I am currently an artist and independent scholar, working in both New York City and Cooperstown, NY. Given the different facets of my work and career, I generally organize my schedule around a week, in which I balance my anatomical history research, painting practice (both independent creative work and commissioned paintings), and teaching. I keep two active work-stations going in my studio at all times\u2014one with my desk, computer, books, and articles, and another with my painting projects and materials. Usually by the end of the week, both the concepts and materials have spilled over onto each other in the middle!<\/p>\n

CN: <\/strong>Your talk \u201cDissecting Gender: Reframing Anatomical History Through the Female Body<\/a>\u201d draws connections between early anatomical works and contemporary medical practice. When did you start to see those connections?<\/p>\n

AH: <\/strong>When I was a fourth year medical student, I researched and wrote a paper on an exquisitely illustrated medical student\u2019s notebook from an 1872 Obstetrics and Gynecology clinic in the collection of the Columbia Medical Library Archives and Special Collections. The notebook offered insight into not only the 19th-century female medical experience, but also how that experience was observed and recorded through a male medical point-of-view. I found that using an art historical approach to medical documents and images revealed a great deal about objectivity, bias, and the cultural lenses through which the body has been and is still interpreted. In my artistic practice, I am constantly examining how my own experience as a doctor influences how I approach the body, specifically the female body, and how other contemporary artists approach the same questions. The inspiration for this particular project arose while giving a talk on anatomical history at the New York Academy of Art, when I realized how depictions of women, when included, were presented according to certain recurring themes and stereotypes that remain present in much of mainstream and medical culture today.<\/p>\n

CN: <\/strong>What can we learn from historical representations of female anatomy?<\/p>\n

AH: <\/strong>Anatomical studies are a combination of medicine and art, as well as observation and interpretation. Consequently, they reveal much about the practices, beliefs, biases and power dynamics of the cultures in which they were created. Presented in medical documents, many anatomical theories have been inscribed on the body as biological truths. While we often look at these historical documents as artifacts from the past that have been amended and updated, some of the visual cues and framings have persisted and are very much present today in both medicine and mainstream media.<\/p>\n