Similar articles for PMID: 32437112

Year	Number of Results
1980	4
1981	3
1983	2
1984	5
1985	1
1986	1
1988	2
1989	2
1990	1
1991	1
1992	2
1993	2
1994	3
1996	2
1997	1
2000	1
2003	1
2005	2
2006	3
2007	1
2009	1
2010	1
2012	2
2013	7
2014	5
2015	5
2016	4
2017	5
2018	6
2019	6
2020	9
2021	7
2022	2
2023	3
2025	0

1

Evidence review for psychoacoustic measures: Tinnitus: assessment and management: Evidence review I.

National Guideline Centre (UK). National Guideline Centre (UK). London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2020 Mar. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2020 Mar. PMID: 32437112 Free Books & Documents. Review.

2

Computer-automated tinnitus assessment: noise-band matching, maskability, and residual inhibition.

Henry JA, Roberts LE, Ellingson RM, Thielman EJ. Henry JA, et al. J Am Acad Audiol. 2013 Jun;24(6):486-504. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.24.6.5. J Am Acad Audiol. 2013. PMID: 23886426 Clinical Trial.

3

Psychoacoustic classification of persistent tinnitus.

Suzuki FAB, Suzuki FA, Onishi ET, Penido NO. Suzuki FAB, et al. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Sep-Oct;84(5):583-590. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Aug 1. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2018. PMID: 28826945 Free PMC article.

4

Psychoacoustic assessment to improve tinnitus diagnosis.

Basile CÉ, Fournier P, Hutchins S, Hébert S. Basile CÉ, et al. PLoS One. 2013 Dec 12;8(12):e82995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082995. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 24349414 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.

5

Choice of test stimulus matters for pitch matching performance: Comparison between pure tone and narrow band noise.

Wollbrink A, Dobel C, Salvari V, Paraskevopoulos E, Kisker C, Mittmann K, Pantev C. Wollbrink A, et al. Hear Res. 2019 Sep 15;381:107776. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2019.107776. Epub 2019 Aug 2. Hear Res. 2019. PMID: 31401433 Free article.

6

Comparing pure tone and narrow band noise to measure tonal tinnitus pitch-match frequency.

Korth D, Wollbrink A, Lukas C, Ivansic D, Guntinas-Lichius O, Salvari V, Paraskevopoulos E, Pantev C, Dobel C. Korth D, et al. Prog Brain Res. 2021;262:115-137. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2020.06.023. Epub 2020 Aug 7. Prog Brain Res. 2021. PMID: 33931175

7

A comparison of variability among measurements of subjective tinnitus and objective stimuli.

Burns EM. Burns EM. Audiology. 1984;23(4):426-40. doi: 10.3109/00206098409081535. Audiology. 1984. PMID: 6466204

8

Tinnitus loudness matchings in relation to annoyance and grading of severity.

Andersson G. Andersson G. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2003 May;30(2):129-33. doi: 10.1016/s0385-8146(03)00008-7. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2003. PMID: 12753982

9

[Clinical value of psychoacoustic characteristics in patients with idiopathic tinnitus].

Li H, Li M, Zhang JN. Li H, et al. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Apr;32(8):570-575. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2018.08.003. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018. PMID: 29798137 Chinese.

10

[Clinical study of noise-induced deafness. Part 12: Results of tests on cases of tinnitus and evaluation].

Fujitani S. Fujitani S. Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho. 1990 Apr;93(4):543-53. doi: 10.3950/jibiinkoka.93.543. Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho. 1990. PMID: 2376790 Japanese.

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My Custom Filters

Results by year

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

96 results

Results by year

Filters

My Custom Filters

Results by year

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Additional filters

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

Similar articles for PMID: 32437112

96 results

Results by year