Entry - #615973 - CONE-ROD DYSTROPHY 20; CORD20 - OMIM
# 615973

CONE-ROD DYSTROPHY 20; CORD20


Phenotype-Gene Relationships

Location Phenotype Phenotype
MIM number
Inheritance Phenotype
mapping key
Gene/Locus Gene/Locus
MIM number
12q21.33 Cone-rod dystrophy 20 615973 AR 3 POC1B 614784
Clinical Synopsis
 
Phenotypic Series
 

INHERITANCE
- Autosomal recessive
HEAD & NECK
Eyes
- Reduced visual acuity
- Nystagmus (in some patients)
- Color vision defects
- Central scotoma, relative or absolute
- Constriction of peripheral visual field
- Bone-spicule pigmentation in peripheral retinal pigment epithelium (in some patients)
- Reduced or nonrecordable cone responses on electroretinography
- Severely reduced rod responses on electroretinography (in some patients)
MISCELLANEOUS
- Progression of phenotype with age
- Initially normal rod responses may become significantly reduced at older age
MOLECULAR BASIS
- Caused by mutation in the POC1B antisense RNA 1 gene (POC1B, 614784.0001)
Cone-rod dystrophy/Cone dystrophy - PS120970 - 33 Entries
Location Phenotype Inheritance Phenotype
mapping key
Phenotype
MIM number
Gene/Locus Gene/Locus
MIM number
1p22.1 Cone-rod dystrophy 3 AR 3 604116 ABCA4 601691
1p13.3 Cone-rod dystrophy 21 AR 3 616502 DRAM2 613360
1q12-q24 Cone-rod dystrophy 8 AR 2 605549 CORD8 605549
1q22 Cone-rod dystrophy 10 AR 3 610283 SEMA4A 607292
2p23.2 Retinitis pigmentosa 54 AR 3 613428 PCARE 613425
4p15.33 Cone-rod dystrophy 18 AR 3 615374 RAB28 612994
4p15.32 Cone-rod dystrophy 12 AD, AR 3 612657 PROM1 604365
6p21.1 Cone-rod dystrophy 14 AD 3 602093 GUCA1A 600364
6p21.1 Cone dystrophy-3 AD 3 602093 GUCA1A 600364
6q14 Cone-rod dystrophy 7 AD 2 603649 CORD7 603649
8p11.22 Cone-rod dystrophy 9 AR 3 612775 ADAM9 602713
8q22.1 Retinitis pigmentosa 64 AR 3 614500 CFAP418 614477
8q22.1 Cone-rod dystrophy 16 AR 3 614500 CFAP418 614477
10q23.1 Retinitis pigmentosa 65 AR 3 613660 CDHR1 609502
10q23.1 Cone-rod dystrophy 15 AR 3 613660 CDHR1 609502
10q23.1 Macular dystrophy, retinal AR 3 613660 CDHR1 609502
10q23.33 Cone dystrophy 4 AR 3 613093 PDE6C 600827
10q26 Cone-rod dystrophy 17 AD 2 615163 CORD17 615163
12q21.33 Cone-rod dystrophy 20 AR 3 615973 POC1B 614784
14q11.2 Cone-rod dystrophy 13 AR 3 608194 RPGRIP1 605446
14q24.3 Cone-rod dystrophy 19 AR 3 615860 TTLL5 612268
16p11.2 Cone-rod dystrophy 22 AR 3 619531 TLCD3B 615175
17p13.2-p13.1 Cone-rod dystrophy 5 AD 3 600977 PITPNM3 608921
17p13.1 Cone-rod dystrophy 6 AD, AR 3 601777 GUCY2D 600179
17q11.2 Cone-rod dystrophy 24 AD 3 620342 UNC119 604011
18q21.1-q21.3 Cone-rod retinal dystrophy-1 AD 2 600624 CORD1 600624
19p13.3 Cone-rod dystrophy 11 AD 3 610381 RAX2 610362
19q13.33 Cone-rod retinal dystrophy-2 AD 3 120970 CRX 602225
Xp11.4 Cone-rod dystrophy, X-linked, 1 XLR 3 304020 RPGR 312610
Xp11.23 Cone-rod dystrophy, X-linked, 3 XLR 3 300476 CACNA1F 300110
Xq27 Cone dystrophy, progressive X-linked, 2 XL 2 300085 COD2 300085
Xq28 Blue cone monochromacy XLR 3 303700 OPN1LW 300822
Xq28 Blue cone monochromacy XLR 3 303700 OPN1MW 300821

TEXT

A number sign (#) is used with this entry because of evidence that cone-rod dystrophy-20 (CORD20) is caused by homozygous or compound heterozygous mutation in the POC1B gene (614784) on chromosome 12q21.

For a general phenotypic description and a discussion of genetic heterogeneity of cone-rod dystrophy (CORD), see 120970.


Clinical Features

Roosing et al. (2014) studied a Turkish family in which 3 sibs had cone or cone-rod dystrophy. The proband presented in infancy with reduced visual acuity and mild nystagmus. At 9 years of age, she had a tritan defect of her color vision, and electroretinography (ERG) showed absent cone function but normal rod function, consistent with a diagnosis of incomplete achromatopsia (ACHM; see 216900). However, her visual acuity deteriorated over the next several years, and 2 of her younger sibs experienced rapid loss of central vision, suggesting a diagnosis of cone dystrophy (COD; see 602093) in the 2 sibs and CORD in the proband. Roosing et al. (2014) also studied a Dutch man who was diagnosed with ACHM in childhood based on the classic signs of reduced visual acuity, photophobia, nystagmus, very poor color vision, and typical ERG responses. However, in his fifth decade, visual acuity began to decrease, and in his sixth decade, degenerative changes were noted in the periphery of the inferior quadrant, including atrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium and bone-spicule pigmentations. On optical coherence tomography (OCT), changes at the inner-segment ellipsoid zone were seen, suggesting the loss of junctions between inner and outer segments. ERG at 55 years of age showed absent cone and significantly reduced rod responses; thus, the diagnosis changed from isolated cone dysfunction to progressive cone-rod disease.

Durlu et al. (2014) reported a consanguineous Turkish family in which 4 individuals had decreased central vision, extreme photophobia, and dyschromatopsia. None of the patients was blind at birth, but all experienced subsequent progressive vision loss. In all patients, a disrupted inner/outer segment line and the external limiting membrane were seen as a single blurry line at the central fovea, and the cone outer-segment tip line was absent. In the midperiphery, the rod inner/outer segment line was disrupted and blurry, and the rod outer-segment tip line (Verhoeff membrane) was absent. ERG revealed nonrecordable cone responses in all patients, whereas rod responses were nonrecordable in the oldest patient and subnormal in the other 3 patients. On electrooculography, the Arden ratio was abnormal in the youngest patient and flat in the others.


Mapping

Using genome scan data from 10 members of a consanguineous Turkish family segregating autosomal recessive CORD, Durlu et al. (2014) performed linkage analysis and obtained a lod score of 3.92 at an approximately 1.14-Mb shared region on chromosome 12q21.33, flanked by markers rs12311684 and rs934891. Haplotype analysis around the locus revealed a second region of shared homozygosity in the patients, with a maximum length of 784,517 bp and a lod score of 3.40, delineated by rs2408366 and rs2130402 and located 621,093 bp telomeric to the larger region.


Molecular Genetics

In a Turkish family in which 3 sibs had COD or CORD, Roosing et al. (2014) performed exome sequencing and identified a homozygous missense mutation in the POC1B gene (R106P; 614784.0001) that segregated with disease in the family and was not found in 189 ethnically matched controls or in the Exome Variant Server database. Exome sequencing in a Dutch man with CORD revealed compound heterozygosity for an in-frame 3-bp deletion and a splice site mutation in POC1B (614784.0002; 614784.0003); his unaffected parents were each heterozygous for 1 of the mutations, neither of which was found in 149 ethnically matched controls or in the NHLBI EVS database. Genomewide SNP homozygosity mapping of more than 400 unrelated individuals with autosomal recessive CORD, Leber congenital amaurosis (see 204000), or retinitis pigmentosa (see 268000) identified 8 probands with a large homozygous region spanning POC1B; however, Sanger sequencing of POC1B in those probands did not reveal additional pathogenic mutations. Subsequent Sanger sequencing of POC1B in a more specific cohort, including 21 patients diagnosed with ACHM, 110 with COD, and 112 with CORD, failed to reveal additional patients with POC1B mutations.

In a consanguineous Turkish family segregating autosomal recessive CORD mapping to chromosome 12q21.33, Durlu et al. (2014) sequenced 6 protein-coding candidate genes and independently identified homozygosity for the R106P missense mutation in the POC1B gene that was identified by Roosing et al. (2014) in an unrelated Turkish family. The mutation segregated with disease in the family and was not found in 113 population controls. Durlu et al. (2014) also identified a homozygous deletion at the disease locus, flanked by markers rs11105501 and rs10777224 and involving between 3,280 and 5,888 bp, that was present only in the affected family members. The sequences in the deleted region did not contain part of a gene, and there was no evidence indicative of a gene regulatory function. Durlu et al. (2014) therefore concluded that the deletion most likely did not underlie the disease.


REFERENCES

  1. Durlu, Y. K., Koroglu, C., Tolun, A. Novel recessive cone-rod dystrophy caused by POC1B mutation. JAMA Ophthal. 132: 1185-1191, 2014. [PubMed: 24945461, related citations] [Full Text]

  2. Roosing, S., Lamers, I. J. C., de Vrieze, E., van den Born, L. I., Lambertus, S., Arts, H. H., POC1B Study Group, Peters, T. A., Hoyng, C. B., Kremer, H., Hetterschijt, L., Letteboer, S. J. F., van Wijk, E., Roepman, R., den Hollander, A. I., Cremers, F. P. M. Disruption of the basal body protein POC1B results in autosomal-recessive cone-rod dystrophy. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 95: 131-142, 2014. [PubMed: 25018096, images, related citations] [Full Text]


Contributors:
Marla J. F. O'Neill - updated : 10/10/2014
Creation Date:
Marla J. F. O'Neill : 9/2/2014
carol : 12/04/2014
carol : 10/10/2014
mcolton : 10/10/2014
carol : 9/3/2014
mcolton : 9/2/2014

# 615973

CONE-ROD DYSTROPHY 20; CORD20


ORPHA: 1872;   DO: 0111026;  


Phenotype-Gene Relationships

Location Phenotype Phenotype
MIM number
Inheritance Phenotype
mapping key
Gene/Locus Gene/Locus
MIM number
12q21.33 Cone-rod dystrophy 20 615973 Autosomal recessive 3 POC1B 614784

TEXT

A number sign (#) is used with this entry because of evidence that cone-rod dystrophy-20 (CORD20) is caused by homozygous or compound heterozygous mutation in the POC1B gene (614784) on chromosome 12q21.

For a general phenotypic description and a discussion of genetic heterogeneity of cone-rod dystrophy (CORD), see 120970.


Clinical Features

Roosing et al. (2014) studied a Turkish family in which 3 sibs had cone or cone-rod dystrophy. The proband presented in infancy with reduced visual acuity and mild nystagmus. At 9 years of age, she had a tritan defect of her color vision, and electroretinography (ERG) showed absent cone function but normal rod function, consistent with a diagnosis of incomplete achromatopsia (ACHM; see 216900). However, her visual acuity deteriorated over the next several years, and 2 of her younger sibs experienced rapid loss of central vision, suggesting a diagnosis of cone dystrophy (COD; see 602093) in the 2 sibs and CORD in the proband. Roosing et al. (2014) also studied a Dutch man who was diagnosed with ACHM in childhood based on the classic signs of reduced visual acuity, photophobia, nystagmus, very poor color vision, and typical ERG responses. However, in his fifth decade, visual acuity began to decrease, and in his sixth decade, degenerative changes were noted in the periphery of the inferior quadrant, including atrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium and bone-spicule pigmentations. On optical coherence tomography (OCT), changes at the inner-segment ellipsoid zone were seen, suggesting the loss of junctions between inner and outer segments. ERG at 55 years of age showed absent cone and significantly reduced rod responses; thus, the diagnosis changed from isolated cone dysfunction to progressive cone-rod disease.

Durlu et al. (2014) reported a consanguineous Turkish family in which 4 individuals had decreased central vision, extreme photophobia, and dyschromatopsia. None of the patients was blind at birth, but all experienced subsequent progressive vision loss. In all patients, a disrupted inner/outer segment line and the external limiting membrane were seen as a single blurry line at the central fovea, and the cone outer-segment tip line was absent. In the midperiphery, the rod inner/outer segment line was disrupted and blurry, and the rod outer-segment tip line (Verhoeff membrane) was absent. ERG revealed nonrecordable cone responses in all patients, whereas rod responses were nonrecordable in the oldest patient and subnormal in the other 3 patients. On electrooculography, the Arden ratio was abnormal in the youngest patient and flat in the others.


Mapping

Using genome scan data from 10 members of a consanguineous Turkish family segregating autosomal recessive CORD, Durlu et al. (2014) performed linkage analysis and obtained a lod score of 3.92 at an approximately 1.14-Mb shared region on chromosome 12q21.33, flanked by markers rs12311684 and rs934891. Haplotype analysis around the locus revealed a second region of shared homozygosity in the patients, with a maximum length of 784,517 bp and a lod score of 3.40, delineated by rs2408366 and rs2130402 and located 621,093 bp telomeric to the larger region.


Molecular Genetics

In a Turkish family in which 3 sibs had COD or CORD, Roosing et al. (2014) performed exome sequencing and identified a homozygous missense mutation in the POC1B gene (R106P; 614784.0001) that segregated with disease in the family and was not found in 189 ethnically matched controls or in the Exome Variant Server database. Exome sequencing in a Dutch man with CORD revealed compound heterozygosity for an in-frame 3-bp deletion and a splice site mutation in POC1B (614784.0002; 614784.0003); his unaffected parents were each heterozygous for 1 of the mutations, neither of which was found in 149 ethnically matched controls or in the NHLBI EVS database. Genomewide SNP homozygosity mapping of more than 400 unrelated individuals with autosomal recessive CORD, Leber congenital amaurosis (see 204000), or retinitis pigmentosa (see 268000) identified 8 probands with a large homozygous region spanning POC1B; however, Sanger sequencing of POC1B in those probands did not reveal additional pathogenic mutations. Subsequent Sanger sequencing of POC1B in a more specific cohort, including 21 patients diagnosed with ACHM, 110 with COD, and 112 with CORD, failed to reveal additional patients with POC1B mutations.

In a consanguineous Turkish family segregating autosomal recessive CORD mapping to chromosome 12q21.33, Durlu et al. (2014) sequenced 6 protein-coding candidate genes and independently identified homozygosity for the R106P missense mutation in the POC1B gene that was identified by Roosing et al. (2014) in an unrelated Turkish family. The mutation segregated with disease in the family and was not found in 113 population controls. Durlu et al. (2014) also identified a homozygous deletion at the disease locus, flanked by markers rs11105501 and rs10777224 and involving between 3,280 and 5,888 bp, that was present only in the affected family members. The sequences in the deleted region did not contain part of a gene, and there was no evidence indicative of a gene regulatory function. Durlu et al. (2014) therefore concluded that the deletion most likely did not underlie the disease.


REFERENCES

  1. Durlu, Y. K., Koroglu, C., Tolun, A. Novel recessive cone-rod dystrophy caused by POC1B mutation. JAMA Ophthal. 132: 1185-1191, 2014. [PubMed: 24945461] [Full Text: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.1658]

  2. Roosing, S., Lamers, I. J. C., de Vrieze, E., van den Born, L. I., Lambertus, S., Arts, H. H., POC1B Study Group, Peters, T. A., Hoyng, C. B., Kremer, H., Hetterschijt, L., Letteboer, S. J. F., van Wijk, E., Roepman, R., den Hollander, A. I., Cremers, F. P. M. Disruption of the basal body protein POC1B results in autosomal-recessive cone-rod dystrophy. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 95: 131-142, 2014. [PubMed: 25018096] [Full Text: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.06.012]


Contributors:
Marla J. F. O'Neill - updated : 10/10/2014

Creation Date:
Marla J. F. O'Neill : 9/2/2014

Edit History:
carol : 12/04/2014
carol : 10/10/2014
mcolton : 10/10/2014
carol : 9/3/2014
mcolton : 9/2/2014