An investigation of the adequacy of MEDLINE searches for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the effects of mental health care
- PMID: 7991756
- DOI: 10.1017/s0033291700027896
An investigation of the adequacy of MEDLINE searches for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the effects of mental health care
Abstract
Valid reviews of the effects of mental health care depend on identifying as high a proportion as possible of relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). To investigate the sensitivity and precision both of MEDLINE and of hand-searching for RCTs in mental health, 12 journals specializing in mental health and indexed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) for MEDLINE were searched for the years 1971, 1976, 1981, 1986 and 1991. The sensitivity of the hand-search was 94% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 93-95%), but it had a precision of only 7% (CI 6-8%). The optimal MEDLINE search had a sensitivity of only 52% (CI 48-56%) and a precision of 59% (CI 55-63%). Of the reports of RCTs identified by the hand-search, 9% (CI 7-11%) were not included in MEDLINE at all. Authors had included methodological descriptions in 84% (CI 80-88%) of RCTs found by the hand-search but missed by the MEDLINE search. Systematic reviews of mental health care which are based solely on MEDLINE searches of the literature will miss a large proportion of the relevant RCTs, and are thus liable to random error and bias. A register of mental health RCTs is urgently required.
Similar articles
-
[Hand searching for controlled clinical trials in German surgical journals. A contribution to evidence-based surgery].Chirurg. 2007 Nov;78(11):1052-7. doi: 10.1007/s00104-007-1372-y. Chirurg. 2007. PMID: 17622501 German.
-
How easy are randomized controlled trials in epilepsy to find on Medline? The sensitivity and precision of two Medline searches.Epilepsia. 1996 Apr;37(4):377-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1996.tb00575.x. Epilepsia. 1996. PMID: 8603644
-
Identification of randomized controlled trials from the emergency medicine literature: comparison of hand searching versus MEDLINE searching.Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Jul;34(1):25-34. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70268-4. Ann Emerg Med. 1999. PMID: 10381991
-
Lessons for search strategies from a systematic review, in The Cochrane Library, of nutritional supplementation trials in patients after hip fracture.Am J Clin Nutr. 2001 Mar;73(3):505-10. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/73.3.505. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001. PMID: 11237924 Review.
-
Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews.BMJ. 1994 Nov 12;309(6964):1286-91. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6964.1286. BMJ. 1994. PMID: 7718048 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
EMBASE search strategies for identifying methodologically sound diagnostic studies for use by clinicians and researchers.BMC Med. 2005 Mar 29;3:7. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-3-7. BMC Med. 2005. PMID: 15796772 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic reviews: what can they do for you?J R Soc Med. 1996 May;89(5):242-4. doi: 10.1177/014107689608900502. J R Soc Med. 1996. PMID: 8778428 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Optimal search strategies for identifying mental health content in MEDLINE: an analytic survey.Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Mar 23;5:4. doi: 10.1186/1744-859X-5-4. Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2006. PMID: 16556313 Free PMC article.
-
Handsearching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;2007(2):MR000001. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000001.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007. PMID: 17443625 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Literature search strategies in dental education and research.J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2021 Jul 6;16(6):799-806. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2021.05.012. eCollection 2021 Dec. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2021. PMID: 34899122 Free PMC article. Review.