Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1995 Sep-Oct;2(5):307-15.
doi: 10.1136/jamia.1995.96073833.

The Columbia Registry of Information and Utilization Management Trials

Affiliations

The Columbia Registry of Information and Utilization Management Trials

E A Balas et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1995 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Objective: T systematically locate, register, and abstract information used in comparing effects of various information services (computerized and noncomputerized) and utilization management interventions on the process and outcome of patient care.

Design: Manual and electronic database searches located reports that met three main criteria: 1) randomized controlled trial; 2) information or utilization management intervention in the study group with no similar intervention in the control group; and 3) effect of the intervention on the process and/or outcome of patient care had been measured. Published reports were registered in the Columbia Registry.

Results: Nearly 600 reports were collected from 24 countries and 189 different publications. Frequently tested interventions included patients or physician education, telephone follow-up, patient or physician reminders, and home care services. Frequently reported effect variables included hospitalization rate, length of stay, immunization rate, and mortality rate. Standardized formal tools were developed for the separation and abstraction of practical information and methodologic details from the collected trial reports.

Conclusions: The registry provides a new source of information for meta-analyses, traditional reviews, and executive summaries of quality improvement of health services. The streamlined knowledge engineering process of quality evaluation and abstraction of critical information can generate helpful information for practitioners and researchers simultaneously.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ann Intern Med. 1993 May 1;118(9):731-7 - PubMed
    1. Am J Med. 1993 Jun;94(6):619-25 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1994 Nov 10;331(19):1303-7 - PubMed
    1. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994;:121-4 - PubMed
    1. Med Care. 1995 Jul;33(7):687-99 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms