Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 8;58(5):255-262.
doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2024.23172.

Bibliometric analysis of the Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica from 2013 to 2022

Affiliations

Bibliometric analysis of the Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica from 2013 to 2022

Necmettin Turgut et al. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. .

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to analyze the original articles published in Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica (AOTT) between 2013 and 2022 using bibliometric methods to identify their characteristics and examine the changing trends over the last 10 years.

Methods: The articles were analyzed in terms of publication year, authors, countries, affiliations, citations, study design, subspecialty of orthopedics, sample size, study outcome, presence of statistical methods, time elapsed from submission date to acceptance date, and presence of funding. Periods (2003-2012 and 2013-2022) were compared for trend analysis in the journal. Advanced bibliometric analysis was done using VOSviewer software (version 1.6.19).

Results: A total of 976 articles were included in the analysis. The journal's self-citation rate was 2.94%. Retrospective observational studies remained the most frequently published article design, as observed over 2003-2012 (n=411, 42.1%). No review articles were published in the previous period, while 35 review articles were published in this period. Publications from countries outside Türkiye exhibited a significantly higher number of case reports and reviews (P = .001), whereas articles from Türkiye had a significantly greater number of basic science and cross-sectional studies (P = .007, P=.017, respectively). Trauma (n=207), general orthopedics (n=144), and spine (n=105) were identified as the most prominent subspecialties. Spine surgery and adult reconstruction/arthroplasty publications significantly increased, while hand and microsurgery publications significantly decreased (P < .001). Article types were compared regarding citation counts, revealing that case reports and technical notes had significantly lower citation counts (P = .001). There was a significant increase observed in the number of author affiliations (n=2.57 ± 1.40) (P < .001). Management" (n=83), "fixation" (n=78), and "surgery" (n=65) were the most occurring keywords. There was a significant increase in articles with 1 or 2 authors in the latter 2017-2022 period compared to 2013-2016 (P=.001). A significant increase was observed in publications from private clinics and other clinical facilities (P < .001).

Conclusion: Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica (AOTT) has emerged as one of the leading journals in orthopedics, with a notable increase in international publications in the last decade. Being in the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-Expanded) database, increasing impact factor, and having low self-citation rates highlight its high standards and global impact. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica (AOTT) is a valuable platform for researchers worldwide to share their work and advance orthopedic knowledge.

Level of evidence: N/A.

Keywords: General orthopaedics; Joint replacement surgery; Orthopaedic trauma; Orthopaedics and traumatology; Physical medicine and rehabilitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Number of articles distribution and impact factor values by year.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Co-occurrence of keywords.

Similar articles

References

    1. Eom SH, Bamne AB, Chowdhry M, Chae IS, Kim TK. Bibliometric analysis of orthopedic literature on total knee arthroplasty in Asian countries: a 10-year analysis. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2015;27(3):149 155. (10.5792/ksrr.2015.27.3.149) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hui Z, Yi Z, Peng J. Bibliometric analysis of the orthopedic literature. Orthopedics. 2013;36(10):e1225 e1232. (10.3928/01477447-20130920-11) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vaishya R, Gupta BM, Kappi M, Vaish A. International orthopaedics journal: a bibliometric analysis during 1977-2022. Iberoam J Sci Meas Commun. 2023;3(1). (10.47909/ijsmc.465) - DOI
    1. Ho Y-S. Bibliometric analysis of the Journal of Orthopaedic Research from 1991 to 2018. Orthop Res Online J. 2019;6(2):574 584.
    1. Vishwanathan K, Kambhampati SBS, Patralekh MK, Vaish A, Vaishya R. Bibliometric analysis of the top 50 most cited publications of the Journal of Clinical orthopaedics and Trauma. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021;22:101590. (10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101590) - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding

The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.

LinkOut - more resources