The experience of women reporting damage from vaginal mesh: a reflexive thematic analysis
- PMID: 37007734
- PMCID: PMC10064426
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101918
The experience of women reporting damage from vaginal mesh: a reflexive thematic analysis
Abstract
Background: The UK's 'First do no harm' report highlighted missed opportunities to prevent harm and emphasised the need to incorporate patient voices into healthcare. Due to concerns about, and the subsequent suspension, of vaginal mesh for urinary incontinence thousands of women face the decision about mesh removal surgery. The aim of this study was to explore and understand the experience of living with complications attributed to vaginal mesh surgery so that this knowledge can contribute to improvements in care for those considering mesh, or mesh removal, surgery.
Methods: This study was embedded in the 'PURSUE' study which explored the experiences of 74 people with urogynaecological conditions in the UK (30th April 2021-17th December 2021). Of these 74 people, fifteen women reported complications that they attributed to vaginal mesh surgery. We used the six stages of reflexive thematic analysis to conceptualise these fifteen accounts.
Findings: Our conceptual model anchors eight themes around two dualities: (1) body parts versus body whole, (2) dominant discourse versus marginal discourse. Our themes indicate that trust can be established through: (1) embodied healthcare that focuses on connecting with patients' lived experience, (2) dialectic communication that recognises patient experiences and remains open to alternative perspectives.
Interpretation: This study raises some important issues for education and practice. Our findings can translate to other health settings where treatments aimed to provide care have caused harm.
Funding: NIHR Policy Research Programme (NIHR202450).
Keywords: Qualitative research; Social science; Stress urinary incontinence; Tension-free vaginal Tape; Urogynaecology.
© 2023 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
FT has received grants or contracts from 10.13039/100004319Pfizer, 10.13039/501100000272NIHR Policy Research Programme and the 10.13039/100007388CSP charitable trust. MK is Chair of International Urogynaecological Association FTECP committee. AM has received grants or contracts from the Oliver Bird Fund, 10.13039/501100000279Nuffield Foundation: OBF/43985 and the 10.13039/501100000664HTA Project: NIHR127489. The other author declares that they have no competing interests beyond their funding source.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Exploring the experiences of people with urogynaecology conditions in the UK: a reflexive thematic analysis and conceptual model.BMC Womens Health. 2023 Aug 14;23(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02592-w. BMC Womens Health. 2023. PMID: 37580761 Free PMC article.
-
Variation in availability and use of surgical care for female urinary incontinence: a mixed-methods study.Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2021 Mar. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2021 Mar. PMID: 33780208 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Surgical treatments for women with stress urinary incontinence: the ESTER systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2019 Mar;23(14):1-306. doi: 10.3310/hta23140. Health Technol Assess. 2019. PMID: 30929658 Free PMC article.
-
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009. PMID: 27819974
-
Adductor brevis myositis following transobturator tape procedure: a case report and review of the literature.Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007 Jul;18(7):817-20. doi: 10.1007/s00192-006-0220-9. Epub 2007 Feb 15. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007. PMID: 17577593 Review.
Cited by
-
Exploring the experiences of people with urogynaecology conditions in the UK: a reflexive thematic analysis and conceptual model.BMC Womens Health. 2023 Aug 14;23(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02592-w. BMC Womens Health. 2023. PMID: 37580761 Free PMC article.
-
Pain and other complications of pelvic mesh: a systematic review of qualitative studies and thematic synthesis of women's accounts.BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 3;14(6):e085879. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085879. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 38830733 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Greco C. The Poly Implant Prothèse breast prostheses scandal: embodied risk and social suffering. Soc Sci Med. 2015;147:150–157. - PubMed
-
- IMMDSR . Crown copyright; 2020. First Do No Harm – The report of the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review.https://www.immdsreview.org.uk/downloads/IMMDSReview_Web.pdf - PubMed
-
- Cohen D. How safe are metal-on-metal hip implants? BMJ Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 2012;344 - PubMed
-
- Slieker-ten Hove M.C., Pool-Goudzwaard A.L., Eijkemans M.J., Steegers-Theunissen R.P., Burger C.W., Vierhout M.E. The prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse symptoms and signs and their relation with bladder and bowel disorders in a general female population. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20(9):1037–1045. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Smith F.J., Holman C.D., Moorin R.E., Tsokos N. Lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(5):1096–1100. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous